{"id":196197,"date":"2009-11-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009"},"modified":"2018-09-18T05:59:07","modified_gmt":"2018-09-18T00:29:07","slug":"mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal vs Hardayal Municipal Public … on 27 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal vs Hardayal Municipal Public … on 27 November, 2009<\/div>\n
                    CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                        Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                      Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                             Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                             Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002117\/5247penalty\n                                                           Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002117\nSHOWCAUSE HEARING:\n\nAppellant                            :       Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal\n                                             1775, Kucha Lattushah,\n                                             Dariba, Chandni Chowk,\n                                             Delhi - 110006.\n\nRespondent                           :       Mr. Madhukar Rao\n                                             Public Information Officer &\n                                             Librarian\n                                             Hardayal Municipal Public Library\n                                             Gandhi Ground, Chandni Chowk,\n                                             Delhi - 110006.\n\nRTI application filed on             :       27\/05\/2009\nPIO replied                          :       17\/06\/2009\nFirst appeal filed on                :       10\/08\/2009\nFirst Appellate Authority order      :       20\/08\/2009\nSecond Appeal received on            :       29\/08\/2009\n\nBACKGROUND<\/pre>\n
:\n<\/p>\n
Information Sought:\n<\/p>\n
   i)     Whether it was fact that the Secretary of said library had made some appointments in
\n          the Library which were later cancelled by successive administration of the Library.\n<\/p>\n
   ii)    If yes, whether some of those appointment still working for the library or in any of its
\n          branch but without getting any pay.\n<\/p>\n
   iii)   If yes then number of such employees.\n<\/p>\n
   iv)    Details of rules under which library was getting work from such appointees without
\n          giving them any pay.\n<\/p>\n
   v)     Whether any law allow any employer to gets its work done by its appointees without
\n          paying salary to the employee.\n<\/p>\n
   vi)    Present status of those employee of the said library who are working without being
\n          paid.\n<\/p>\n
   vii)   Time frame by which employment of such appointees will be confirmed.\n<\/p>\n
   viii) Time frame by which the library will pay the salary to those appointees, belonging to
\n          the period when Mr. Ashok Jain was working as Secretary, for the work which was
\n          already done.\n<\/p>\n
   ix)    Whether the Library was not intending to pay salary for such appointees for the
\n          period they had already worked\/or may be working in future.\n<\/p>\n
   x)     Whether the Secretary of the Library was authorized to make or cancel such
\n          appointments without following rules and normal law.\n<\/p>\n
   xi)    Whether appointments made by the then Secretary Mr. Ashok Jain unlawful or
\n          illegal.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                  Page no. 1 of 4\n<\/p>\n
    xii)    Details if any, of action taken by the Library against its then Secretary Mr. Ashok
\n           Jain.\n<\/p>\n
   xiii)   Any other related information.\n<\/p>\n
   xiv)    File noting on movement of this RTI petition as well.\n<\/p>\n
Reply of PIO:\n<\/p>\n
The PIO replied that the matter related to the information asked by the Appellant, had been
\ntransferred to an Impartial Inquiry Tribunal and the disclosure of the same information at that
\nstage would not be possible.\n<\/p>\n
First Appeal:\n<\/p>\n
Unsatisfactory information received from the PIO.\n<\/p>\n
Order of the FAA:\n<\/p>\n
The FAA in its order gave the reply following replies:\n<\/p>\n
   1. Appointments were made in the Library and later on these became subject matter of one
\n       man Impartial Inquiry Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n
   2. The conclusion of the aforementioned tribunal are self evident copy of the report of the
\n       tribunal can be had on usual charges under RTI Act 2005, payable through banker
\n       cheque\/demand draft in the name of Hony. Secretary, Hardayal Municipal Library, Delhi\n<\/p>\n
       – 110006.\n<\/p>\n
   3. Reply is contained in the Report.\n<\/p>\n
   4. & 5. are matter of law.\n<\/p>\n
   6. Situation is still fluid and no comments would be appropriate.\n<\/p>\n
   7. 8, & 9. as given in reply of query no. 6.\n<\/p>\n
   10. It is common knowledge that responsibility in taking decision cannot be ordinarily of an
\n       individual but such decisions are committee decisions.\n<\/p>\n
   11. & 12. The report of the Tribunal was self evident.\n<\/p>\n
   5. 13.      Copies of notings of the relevant RTI File could be furnished on usual payment
\n       under RTI Act2005, payable through Bankers Cheque or Demand Draft in the name of
\n       Hony. Secretary, Hardayal Municipal Library, Delhi – 110006.\n<\/p>\n
Ground of the Second Appeal:\n<\/p>\n
Unsatisfactory reply received from the PIO and FAA.\n<\/p>\n
Relevant Facts that emerged during Hearing on 28 October 2009:
\n“The following were present:\n<\/p>\n
Appellant : Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal;\n<\/p>\n
Respondent : Mr. Satish Kumar Rathee on behalf of PIO Mr. Madhukar Rao;
\nThe PIO has neither given any reasonable reply nor any reasons under the Law for refusing to
\ngive the information. The mere setting up of enquiry tribunal cannot be a ground for denial of
\ninformation since there is no provision in law exempting such information. Refusal to give
\ninformation can only be on the basis of exemption under Section 8(1).”\n<\/p>\n
Commissions’ Decision:\n<\/p>\n
“The Appeal is allowed.\n<\/p>\n
The PIO is directed to give the complete information point wise to the Appellant before 10
\nNovember 2009. He will also give a copy of the report of the tribunal and file notings sought in
\nthe original RTI application to the Appellant.”\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                 Page no. 2 of 4
\n Facts leading to Showcause:\n<\/p>\n
The issue before the Commission was of not supplying the complete, required information by the
\nPIO within 30 days as required by the law. From the facts before the Commission it appeared
\nthat the PIO Mr. Madhukar Rao was guilty of not furnishing information within the time
\nspecified under sub-section (1)of Section 7 by not replying within 30 days, as per the
\nrequirement of the RTI Act. Hence a showcause notice was issued to him, and he was directed
\ngive his reasons to the Commission to show cause why penalty should not be levied on him on
\n27 November 2009 at 11.30am alongwith his written submissions showing cause why penalty
\nshould not be imposed on him as mandated under Section 20 (1).\n<\/p>\n
Relevant Facts emerging during Showcause Hearing on 27 November 2009:
\nThe following were present:\n<\/p>\n
Appellant : Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal;\n<\/p>\n
Respondent : Mr. Madhukar Rao, PIO & Librarian;\n<\/p>\n
       The PIO states that he does not know the law and therefore rejected the RTI application
\non 17\/06\/2009 without any basis in the law. The Appellant states that the information has been
\nreceived by him after the order of the Commission. The Appellant states he is satisfied with the
\ninformation.\n<\/p>\n
        The PIO is asked to given reasons for not supplying the information earlier and refusing
\nto provide the information without any basis in law. In his written submission the PIO has at
\npoint-11 stated that, “the keeping in view of the gravity of the issues, it was not found
\nappropriate as it would impede the process of investigation, which was under investigation by
\nthe inquiry tribunal as aforesaid. Moreover, at that point of time, the PIO was not in a position to
\nfurnish the information sought by the applicant. Therefore, the PIO exercised his power under
\nclause (h) of Section 8 of RTI Act and had given a reply dated 17.06.2009 stating therein that the
\ninformation sought is under investigation by the impartial inquiry tribunal…” The PIO was
\nasked to justify how he has suddenly woken up to the possibility of an exemption being quoted
\non 26\/11\/2009. Initially the PIO had offered no reasons for denying the information. The PIO
\nwas asked to justify even at this late date how realizing the information would impede the
\nprocess of investigating. He states that the Appellant could have leaked the information to others.
\nThe PIO was again asked how even if the entire country knew about this information, how this
\nwould impede the process of investigation. The PIO is not able to give any justification for this
\nposition and it is evident that he had initially denied this information and had not thought any
\nreasons under the RTI Act by which the denial could be justified. It is unfortunate that the FAA
\nMr. Yashpal Arya has given a vey poor order without any application of mind and without
\nordering the information to be given.\n<\/p>\n
       In view of the above the PIO has offered no reasonable cause for refusing the
\ninformation. The Commission finds this as a fit case of levying penalty under Section 20(1) of
\nthe RTI Act. Since the RTI application was made on 27\/05\/2009 information should have been
\nprovide before 27\/06\/2009. Instead the information has been provided on 04\/11\/2009. Since the
\ndelay in providing the information has been over 100 days the Commission levies a maximum
\npenalty of Rs.25000\/- under the RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n
Decision:\n<\/p>\n
       As per the provisions of Section 20 (1), the Commission finds this a fit case for levying
\npenalty on Mr. Madhukar Rao, PIO & Librarian. Since the delay in providing the correct
\ninformation has been over 100 days, the Commission is passing an order penalizing Mr.
\nMadhukar Rao for Rs. 25000\/ which is the maximum penalty under the Act.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                    Page no. 3 of 4
\n        The President, of the Hardayal Municipal Public Library to recover the amount of
\nRs.25000\/- from the salary of Mr. Madhukar Rao and remit the same by a demand draft or a
\nBanker’s Cheque in the name of the Pay & Accounts Officer, CAT, payable at New Delhi and
\nsend the same to Shri Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar, Joint Registrar and Deputy Secretary of the
\nCentral Information Commission, 2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan, New Delhi – 110066. The
\namount may be deducted at the rate of Rs.5000\/ per month every month from the salary of Mr.
\nMadhukar Rao and remitted by the 10th of every month starting from January 2009. The total
\namount of Rs.25000 \/- will be remitted by 10th of May, 2010.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                      Shailesh Gandhi
\n                                                                            Information Commissioner
\n                                                                                   27 November 2009<\/p>\n
CC:\n<\/p>\n
  1-        Dr. Kanwar Sain\n            President\n            Mayor of Delhi,\n            MCD\n            Town Hall, chandni Chowk, Delhi - 110006\n\n   2-       Shri Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar,\n            Joint Registrar and Deputy Secretary\n            Central Information Commission,\n            2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan,\n            New Delhi - 110066\n\n\n<\/pre>\n
(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)<\/p>\n
                                                                                        Page no. 4 of 4\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal vs Hardayal Municipal Public … on 27 November, 2009 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi – 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002117\/5247penalty Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002117 SHOWCAUSE HEARING: Appellant : Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal 1775, Kucha Lattushah, Dariba, Chandni Chowk, Delhi – […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-196197","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal vs Hardayal Municipal Public ... on 27 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal vs Hardayal Municipal Public ... on 27 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-18T00:29:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal vs Hardayal Municipal Public … on 27 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-18T00:29:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1397,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal vs Hardayal Municipal Public ... on 27 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-18T00:29:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal vs Hardayal Municipal Public … on 27 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal vs Hardayal Municipal Public ... on 27 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal vs Hardayal Municipal Public ... on 27 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-18T00:29:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal vs Hardayal Municipal Public … on 27 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-18T00:29:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009"},"wordCount":1397,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009","name":"Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal vs Hardayal Municipal Public ... on 27 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-18T00:29:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-subhash-chandra-agrawal-vs-hardayal-municipal-public-on-27-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. Subhash Chandra Agrawal vs Hardayal Municipal Public … on 27 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196197","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196197"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196197\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196197"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196197"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196197"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}