{"id":196427,"date":"2009-10-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009"},"modified":"2016-05-04T07:54:55","modified_gmt":"2016-05-04T02:24:55","slug":"the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs N Venu on 15 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs N Venu on 15 October, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER\n\nBEFORE _ ' ' L.  A'\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. 4. _ \u00bb<\/pre>\n<p>M.F.A. No.2872\/_2og.7 &#8216;<br \/>\nM.F.A,.566\/2007,\u00bb&#8217;M.F.A.56&#8217;7\/2007&#8217;AND<br \/>\nM.F.A.2S&#8217;73\/2oo7_    <\/p>\n<p>IN M.F.A. 2872 \/ 2007:\n<\/p>\n<p>BETWEEN: &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>THE NEW: If~lDIA\u00a7_&#8217;ASSUR1\\,NCE. _CO.&#8221;:LTD.,<br \/>\nDIV1S1c.3NA;I.\u00bbI&#8217; OFFICE_ No.1 1.. &#8221; &#8221; <\/p>\n<p>4TH EI;OGR;v.T&#8217;:OWI\u00ab;R_ I3.LO.r}&#8221;:K,_&#8217;  *<\/p>\n<p>UNKTY B~iUILDING._AN_NExE,  c. ROAD,<br \/>\nIvREPI.I3T&#8221;vIIfI*S DIVISIONAL MANAGER.<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; I    &#8221; .. &#8216; &#8230;APPELLANT<\/p>\n<p>(By Sri.  RAIJIJ,A;4Ii)Vuf)CATE)<\/p>\n<p>*   N_.&#8217;vE1$III ._S\/O. SR1 NARAYANASWAMY,<\/p>\n<p> * A(3~.ED ABGUT 10 YEARS, SINCE MINOR<br \/>\n&#8216;-  REPVQBY FATHER\/NATURAL GUARDIAN:<br \/>\n NARAf&amp;&#8217;ANASWA1\u00bbIY @ NARAYANA,<br \/>\n&#8216; R&#8217;\/AT NUDUGURKI, KASABA HOBLI,<br \/>\nBIDALURU POST, DEVANAHALLI TALUK,<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  BANGALORE RURAL DIST.\n<\/p>\n<p>AND<br \/>\nI. 35\/8. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD,<br \/>\nREP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER,<br \/>\nDO-2, TOWER BLOCK, UNITY BUILDING  2<br \/>\nJ. C. ROAD, BANGALORE.  &#8221; &#8216; u &#8221; :.- <\/p>\n<p>2. SR1 MANJUNATH,<br \/>\nS\/O. NARAYANAPPA D. HOSUR~,&#8211;.<br \/>\nCHICKKABALLAPUR TQ., &#8216;  &#8216;<br \/>\nKOLAR DIST.\n<\/p>\n<p>(By Sri. P. B. RAJU ADVOCATE-\u00a7&#8217;OR R1,&#8217;; &#8216; &#8212;<br \/>\nNOTICE TO R-2 IS SERVED)  &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>THIS IS AN APPEALjEII..ED\u00ab..,U\/&#8217;S., 173(1) OF MV ACT<br \/>\nAGAINST THE JUDGMENT&#8217;AND AwARD._DATED 23\/8\/O6<br \/>\nPASSED IN MVC NO.567?O&#8217;\/.O4&#8211;.ON T&#8221;I.I.E&#8221;Ir{:I&#8217;I.;E OF 14TH ADDL.<br \/>\nJUDGE, MEMBER,  COURT&#8221; OF SMALL CAUSES,<br \/>\nMET*ROPOI.ITA:-N AREA, R BANGALORE&#8221;&#8216; (SCCH~ 10), PARTLY<br \/>\nALLOWING ,T&#8221;II,E&#8221;&#8221;{:I.AI1S2I.., PETITION FOR COMPENSATION<br \/>\nAND SEEKING ;E;\u00a7IIIANC_EM&#8217;ENTV_OE COMPENSATION.<\/p>\n<p>IN M,&#8217;Igf.A.&#8217;567&#8217;\/2WI)ci7:   &#8221;  %<br \/>\nBETwEEN.,% &#8211; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>~  SRI MUNINAR&#8230;.A,YANAPPA,<br \/>\n_ S\/fO MADALAPPA,<br \/>\n   AGED. ABOUT 46 YEARS,<br \/>\n  R.\/&#8217;AT. AVATHI VILLAGE DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD,<br \/>\n&#8221; ~ DEV&#8217;PgNI&#8217;kHALLI TQ.,<br \/>\nBANGALORE RURAL DIST.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; . &#8230;APPELLANT<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217; &#8221; A. &#8221; IBy,Sri, K. R. MURALIKRISHNA, ADVOCATE)<\/p>\n<p>. . \u00bb <\/p>\n<p>AND<\/p>\n<p>I. M\/S. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO L&#8217;I&#8217;D..<br \/>\nREP. BY DIVISIONAL MANAGER,  \u00bb<br \/>\nDO-2 TOWER BLOCK UNITY BUILDING<br \/>\nANNEXE J. C. ROAD. BANGALORE.  <\/p>\n<p>2. SR1 MANJUNATH,  4&#8242; ._<br \/>\nS\/O. NARAYANAPPA D. HOSIURQ&#8221; ~<br \/>\nCHICKKABALLAPUR TQ., &#8216;<br \/>\nKOLAR DIST.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Sri. P. B. RAJU, ADVOCATE EOR:RI;<br \/>\nNOTICE TO R-2 IS SERyED}.I&#8221; &#8211; I <\/p>\n<p>THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED :.I._\/&#8217;S._&#8217;;.I. 73(1) OF MV ACT<br \/>\nAGAINST THE grUDGIvIENTj&#8221;.AND=,AwARD&#8221; DATED 23\/8\/06<br \/>\nPASSED IN JVIVCV .&#8217;NO.%36&#8217;Z1%O4&#8217;~O&#8217;N:fTH_E\u00a7 FILE OF THE 14TH<br \/>\nADDL. JU.D&#8217;G4E:*:j, V_MEM;BER. -.EvIACT.. COURT OF SMALL<br \/>\nCAUSES, IvIE:TROPOLITAN AREAQBANGALORE (SCCI-I-10],<br \/>\nPARTLY.._   PETITION FOR<br \/>\nCOMI\u00e9ENSATION&#8217;V &#8216;1 AND&#8221;&#8217;~\u00ab.__SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF<br \/>\nCOMPENSAIIIONQ  _  <\/p>\n<p>M.F.A.2sVx7&#8217;3g 20%  &#8216; <\/p>\n<p> g     &#8230;.. .. V<\/p>\n<p> I If &#8221;  THEINEi}V~&#8211;INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD..<\/p>\n<p>._ ADIVIISIONIAL OFFICE NO. 1 1, 4TH FLOOR,<br \/>\n.  TOWER BLOCK. UNITY BUILDING ANNEXE,<br \/>\n J.,_C&#8217;. ROAD. BANGALORE 27.<br \/>\nREPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER.<br \/>\n &#8221; &#8230;APPELLANT<\/p>\n<p> &#8211;,(&#8216;1-3y  P. B. RAJU ADVOCATE]<\/p>\n<p>V   RE$P_(51\\IDEN&#8217;ISV<\/p>\n<p>|&#8211;u0<\/p>\n<p>MUNINARAYANAPPA,<\/p>\n<p>AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS.\n<\/p>\n<p>S\/O. MADALAPPA,   \u00a7<br \/>\nR\/AT AVATHI DR. RAJKUMAR..RQAD,j<br \/>\nDEVANAHALLI TALUK,  &#8216; &#8216;<br \/>\nBANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.  ~ &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>S\/O. SR1 NARAYANAPI&gt;A;&#8221;-~..<br \/>\nR\/ATD. IIOSUR,<br \/>\nCI-IIKKBALLAPUR &#8211;  I<br \/>\nKOLAR DISTRICT.-._  2 <\/p>\n<p>2. SR1 MANJUNATH, <\/p>\n<p>  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>(Sn. K. R. &#8220;ADi;7OCATI:&#8217;IrOR R1;<br \/>\nNOTICE TO&#8221;R:2VISv-S,ERVI?.D&#8217;:~&#8211;.___  <\/p>\n<p>TI-IISLISII&#8217;.AN*;API&gt;EAL&#8217; E1I;.&#8217;ED&#8217;\u00b0U\/S 173(1) OF MV ACT<br \/>\nAGAINST AND AWARD DATED 23\/8\/06<br \/>\nPASSED _IN  3.LiNO&#8217;;5S:7&lt;I&quot;)04 ON THE FILE OF 14TH<br \/>\nADDL..JUDGE,&quot; .Iv;jEM:3ER; MACT, COURT OF&#039; SMALL<br \/>\nCAUSES; ME&#039;I ROPQ_LITAN AREA, BANGALORE (SCCH-10),<\/p>\n<p>_  &#039;-A COMPENSATION OF RS.94,0O0\/- WITH<br \/>\n   RATE OF 6% RA. FROM THE DATE OF<\/p>\n<p>PE&#039;1&#039; ITION  DEPOSIT.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR EINAL HEARING<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217; &#8216;THIS&#8211;..DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:<\/p>\n<p>5. The learned counsel for claimants would justify the<\/p>\n<p>impugned award.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. The claimant in MFA.566\/2007 is a&#8221;:\ufb01r_l:nq1~.:b&#8217;\u00a2\u00a7;  <\/p>\n<p>the claim petition is filed by hisffather.p_ ll\/luninvairayianlappa, b<\/p>\n<p>Who is also a claimant in  <\/p>\n<p>established from evidence &#8211;.V\u00a7r&#8217;1..yprecoI&#8217;d, &#8216;  llclavimant <\/p>\n<p>MFA567\/07&#8242; along  hispytwo. children lnahrelytib\/lst. Venu<br \/>\n(claimant in MFA566\/it were travelling<br \/>\nin a maxi cab_.l&#8217;As     Urnesha died<br \/>\nand the   namely Mst. Venu and<\/p>\n<p>the claiman&#8217;t*Vti.n suffered injuries.<\/p>\n<p>7&#8217;, &#8220;In the as many as 15 persons were<\/p>\n<p>injured and the&#8217;driver  cab and the said Mst. Umesha<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;l V&#8217;  , &#8216;died&#8217; irithe .acciclent}&#8221; lln the circumstances, if the police have<\/p>\n<p>  the claimants in the aforesaid appeals as<\/p>\n<p>c1i1arge\u00a2.sheje&#8217;\u20acyvitnesses, that cannot be a ground to contend<\/p>\n<p> that &#8220;they were not travelling in the vehicle involved in the<\/p>\n<p> vacclident. It also looks improbable that the claimant in<\/p>\n<p>4% (,4 _o <\/p>\n<p>(iii) Two lacerated injuries over left<br \/>\ntemporal region each measuring 2<br \/>\ncm, muscle deep;\n<\/p>\n<p>[iv] Lacerated wound over bridge   r A&#8217;<br \/>\nnose 5 X 0.5 cm, tenderness otter<br \/>\nlower 1\/3 of right leg; &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>(V) Comminuted frac&#8217;:j,.&#8217;uref_ggoI_&#8221;jV &#8220;&#8216;}.o\\&#8217;3v&#8217;er\u00ab..: 4&#8217;<br \/>\n1\/3 of right tibia; V &#8221; &#8221; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>10. The Tribunal hasiawardcdt  of &#8221; V L&#8217;<br \/>\nRs.53,000\/&#8211; under following   g l<br \/>\n(1) Pain    if   _ Rs.35,0OO\/W,<br \/>\n[11] Medic-91.e$}lf3\u00a71Sel\u00a7&#8217;,f:,_   Rs.4,000\/-<\/p>\n<pre>(iii)    --V\n.-     Rs.4,000\/-\n\n(iif)\"   : Rs. l0,000\/ -\n<\/pre>\n<p>11&#8243;; u &#8220;The  treated claimant was not<\/p>\n<p>examined before the  The claimant was a young<\/p>\n<p>Dy-&#8216;.e._g;ge,d. Tgyearsvvlllatlv the time of accident. Therefore,<\/p>\n<p> u.consider_Vi;1Vg= thiegnature of injuries and residual effects of<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;*.fi&#8217;ribunal tinder the head loss of amenities is enhanced to<\/p>\n<p>injuries, Vthewcompensation of Rs.i0,000\/&#8211; awarded by the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">11<\/span><\/p>\n<p>[i] Pain and agony : Rs.50,000_\/-<\/p>\n<p>(ii) Medical expenses : A&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>(iii) Conveyance &amp;  =  &#8216;l  :\n<\/p>\n<p>nourishment :\n<\/p>\n<p>[iv] Loss of income during  &#8216; _j \u00bb A *  &#8221;   A&#8217;<br \/>\ntreatment :  i H lVRS.:9~00Ql)&#8217;\u00ab7_<br \/>\n(V) Loss of amenities;   . _ <\/p>\n<p>[Vi] Future medical__ef{penses :   .R&#8221;s.V5ii00O\/-<\/p>\n<p>15. The learned   would submit<br \/>\nthat claimant iis\u00e9  the disability<br \/>\nwould come&#8217; vl&#8217;::oc:ct1pation. Therefore. the<br \/>\nTribunal&#8217;  :5&#8242; *f1r:a.vejl.l compensation under the<br \/>\nhead loss   and loss of future earnings.<\/p>\n<p>From the evidence  Ramalingaiah, it is clear that<\/p>\n<p> , A c1airnant_had fracture-___left humerus proximal third.<\/p>\n<p>  it through records, I \ufb01nd that the injuries<\/p>\n<p>siiffered  would not interfere with his occupation.<\/p>\n<p> .  &#8216; The claimant has failed to establish functional disability.<\/p>\n<p>1 i<br \/>\n: f<br \/>\nr\\~s A  **\u00bb\u00bb\u00bb\u00abl?&#8217;\\\u00ab &#8216;W&#8217; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">12<\/span><\/p>\n<p>After going through the impugned award, I am of the<\/p>\n<p>considered opinion that compensation awarded<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal under the head loss of amenities is  .<\/p>\n<p>side; so also under the head future medicaZi:&#8217;_e2EperLses. &#8220;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, compensation of Rs.2C):;_QOO\/a~..:&#8217;aWai~d&#8217;ed <\/p>\n<p>Tribunal under the head loss of arrtenviticsp is3eniiance_d to <\/p>\n<p>Rs.30,000\/- and compensationdvi\u00e9idoiv:Rs:5,(iiO0k &#8216;awarded by<br \/>\nthe Tribunal towards  is enhanced to<br \/>\nRs.15,000\/&#8211;. Thus,  is entitled to<br \/>\ntotal compensatioifitioi   V&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>15. &#8216;r;e.suit,&#8217;  the foilowingw<\/p>\n<p> .::&#8217;o.:i2 D an<br \/>\n &#8216;(icy div:i+*A&#8217;;ij5\u00e9&#8217;6,4_o&#8217;*r\u00ab. &#8220;and MFA.567\/O7<\/p>\n<p>i are accepted in part;\n<\/p>\n<p>it  (ii) impugned award is modified;<\/p>\n<p> Compensation of Rs.53,000\/&#8211;<br \/>\n  dd-awarded by the Tribunal in<br \/>\n &#8216;::MVC.5670\/O4 is enhanced to<br \/>\nRs.58,000\/&#8211; with interest at the<\/p>\n<p>rate of 6% pa. from the date of<\/p>\n<p>petition till the date of realisat\ufb01m<br \/>\n; E<br \/>\n,-I j<br \/>\n\/ . A ,5<\/p>\n<p>{viii}<\/p>\n<p>{VJ<\/p>\n<p>[Vi]<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">13<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of Rs.94,000\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>Compensation<\/p>\n<p>awarded by the<\/p>\n<p>MVC5671\/O4 is enhanced  &#8216;L Z<br \/>\nRs.1,14.000\/&#8211; with interest V &#8216;V<br \/>\nrate of 6% p.a. froi\ufb01nthetd&#8211;ate.;&#8217;of:&#8221; a<\/p>\n<p>petition till the date-of      A<\/p>\n<p>MFA.28&#8217;72\/O7  MF}\\.28T8e\/O7u&#8217;V&#8221;1.:4&#8217;V  S<\/p>\n<p>are dismissed;\n<\/p>\n<p>The payin_e&#8217;11t w . Eind  tinfvestment<\/p>\n<p>shall be&#8221;in&#8217;\u00bb\ufb02f1e v1*a.t:1&#8217;r&gt;__ as&#8217;.eVt&gt;1{red in<\/p>\n<p>(Vvia<\/p>\n<p>ti&#8217;-The a:t;011:Ai1\u00ab%&#8221;iI1:::,tde}3osit shall be<\/p>\n<p>. \u00a31fsi:&#8217;;\ufb01\u00e9:er;\u00e9;1&#8217;M.A.c.T. and<br \/>\n S:,c.&#8217;c<\/p>\n<p>_.H~,:f&#8221;1&#8243;Q {[1 t. _j3a1jga10re.<\/p>\n<p>Patties&#8217; are ei-irezeted to bear their<\/p>\n<p>  C9_Sts.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sci\/-~<br \/>\nRIDGE<\/p>\n<p>in  V<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs N Venu on 15 October, 2009 Author: N.Ananda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER BEFORE _ &#8216; &#8216; L. A&#8217; THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE N. 4. _ \u00bb M.F.A. No.2872\/_2og.7 &#8216; M.F.A,.566\/2007,\u00bb&#8217;M.F.A.56&#8217;7\/2007&#8217;AND M.F.A.2S&#8217;73\/2oo7_ IN M.F.A. 2872 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-196427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs N Venu on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs N Venu on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-04T02:24:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs N Venu on 15 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-04T02:24:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1239,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009\",\"name\":\"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs N Venu on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-04T02:24:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs N Venu on 15 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs N Venu on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs N Venu on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-04T02:24:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs N Venu on 15 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-04T02:24:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009"},"wordCount":1239,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009","name":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs N Venu on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-04T02:24:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-new-india-assurance-co-ltd-vs-n-venu-on-15-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs N Venu on 15 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196427"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196427\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}