{"id":19661,"date":"2008-09-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008"},"modified":"2017-07-23T16:32:26","modified_gmt":"2017-07-23T11:02:26","slug":"v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"V.V.Venugopal vs Tholoporu Ashraf on 15 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">V.V.Venugopal vs Tholoporu Ashraf on 15 September, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRL.A.No. 1696 of 2003()\n\n\n1. V.V.VENUGOPAL, SECRETARY,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THOLOPORU ASHRAF, S\/O.MUHAMMED,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.WILSON URMESE\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.SAMSUDIN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.K.MOHANAN\n\n Dated :15\/09\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                           V.K. MOHANAN, J.\n                -------------------------------------------------\n                     Crl. Appeal No 1696 of 2003\n                -------------------------------------------------\n                Dated this the 15th September 2008\n\n                               JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>      This appeal is preferred by the complainant in S.T. Case No<\/p>\n<p>4275 of 1997 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate I,<\/p>\n<p>Perinthalmanna challenging the order of acquittal passed by the<\/p>\n<p>court below as per judgment dated 22.02.2003.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. P.W.1, Secretary of Perintalmanna Rural Housing Co-<\/p>\n<p>operative Society Limitted, is the complainant.                 Accused was a<\/p>\n<p>member of the Society and he availed of a loan of Rs 35,000\/- for<\/p>\n<p>constructing a house, but failed to repay the loan amount and the<\/p>\n<p>complaint filed ARC 940\/96-97 which was decreed in favour of the<\/p>\n<p>complainant. Ext P1 is a copy of the award as per which the liability<\/p>\n<p>of the accused is fixed as Rs 39,235.80. It is the further case of the<\/p>\n<p>complainant that in order to discharge that debt accused issued Ext<\/p>\n<p>P2 cheque for a sum of Rs 39,235.80 drawn on the Pattikad Service<\/p>\n<p>Co-oiperative Bank Limited and when it was presented for<\/p>\n<p>encashment before the Malappuram District Co-operative Bank the<\/p>\n<p>same was returned by the drawee Bank with the endorsement &#8220;funds<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CrlA.No 1696\/03                    2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>insufficient&#8221;. On receiving Ext P3 memo P.W.1 sent a lawyer notice<\/p>\n<p>calling upon the accused to pay the amount to which there was no<\/p>\n<p>response from the accused.      Thereafter formal complaint was filed<\/p>\n<p>on the basis of which cognizance was taken by the court below.<\/p>\n<p>When the accused appeared before the court below particulars of<\/p>\n<p>the charge were read over and explained to him to which he pleaded<\/p>\n<p>not guilty. Consequently trial was proceeded. P.W.1 was examined<\/p>\n<p>on the side of the complainant and Exts P1 to P5 were marked as<\/p>\n<p>documentary evidence. Specific stand taken by the accused at the<\/p>\n<p>time of trial is that at the time of paying the third instalment of the<\/p>\n<p>loan amount, the complaint Board demanded a cheque and for giving<\/p>\n<p>a cheque the accused opened a new account at the Pattikad Service<\/p>\n<p>Co-operative Bank and on that day itself the cheque was given. It is<\/p>\n<p>also the case of the accused that his property was already attached<\/p>\n<p>by the complainant Society. To prove the case of the accused he<\/p>\n<p>himself was examined as D.W.1. After elaborate consideration of the<\/p>\n<p>materials and evidence the court below came to the conclusion that<\/p>\n<p>the accused had discharged his liability and that no offence under<\/p>\n<p>Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act would lie against the<\/p>\n<p>accused. The court below thus found the accused not guilty and he<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CrlA.No 1696\/03                     3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>was acquitted. The above order of acquittal is challenged in this<\/p>\n<p>appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3. I have heard the counsel for the appellant and perused the<\/p>\n<p>evidence and materials available on record. The transaction alleged<\/p>\n<p>by the complainant has been admitted. It is the further case of the<\/p>\n<p>defence that the cheque in question was issued at the time of<\/p>\n<p>realisation of the third instalment of ;the loan and for that purpose he<\/p>\n<p>had opened an account with Pattikad Service Co-operative Bank and<\/p>\n<p>on that day itself the cheque in question was given. The court below<\/p>\n<p>after appreciating the entire evidence found that the house and the<\/p>\n<p>property of the accused was sold in auction           after obtaining an<\/p>\n<p>award from the ARC and the complainant Society took the property<\/p>\n<p>in auction. It was also found by the court below that the complainant<\/p>\n<p>has no case that after taking the property in auction there is anything<\/p>\n<p>balance towards the housing loan availed of by the accused.         The<\/p>\n<p>court below also found that from the evidence it could be seen that<\/p>\n<p>by selling the property of the accused the entire amount due to the<\/p>\n<p>Board had been recovered. The evidence of D.W.1 and Exts D1 and<\/p>\n<p>D2 would prove that the accused opened an account for giving Ext<\/p>\n<p>P2 cheque to the Housing Board. The evidence of P.W.1 would<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CrlA.No 1696\/03                      4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>clearly show that the accused discharged his liability. The only point<\/p>\n<p>urged by the complainant before the court below is that even after<\/p>\n<p>the execution of the order of the civil court the accused is liable for<\/p>\n<p>offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.<\/p>\n<p>Rejecting the above contention the court below found that liability of<\/p>\n<p>the appellant is over by selling his property. Learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>appellant submitted that the above finding of the court below is not<\/p>\n<p>supported by any evidence. But the learned counsel failed to point<\/p>\n<p>out any evidence adduced by the complainant against the above<\/p>\n<p>finding of the court below. After all this is an appeal against an order<\/p>\n<p>of acquittal. It is a case where, as already found by the court below,<\/p>\n<p>the liability has already been discharged by the accused, that too at<\/p>\n<p>the instance of the complainant by selling the property in auction. It<\/p>\n<p>has also come out in evidence that it is not in controversy that Ext P2<\/p>\n<p>cheque was issued by the accused even before the entire loan<\/p>\n<p>amount was released, but particularly at the time of releasing the<\/p>\n<p>third instalment.      It is for that purpose only he had opened an<\/p>\n<p>account and on which date itself cheque was given to the<\/p>\n<p>complainant. The above facts cast a doubt regarding the<\/p>\n<p>genuineness of the prosecution case as such. However the court<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">CrlA.No 1696\/03                     5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>below after elaborately considering the materials on record came to<\/p>\n<p>the conclusion that    the accused had discharged his liability and<\/p>\n<p>therefore no offence under Section 138 of the N.I Act would lie. No<\/p>\n<p>ground is made out to interfere with the order of acquittal passed by<\/p>\n<p>the court below. Therefore the appeal is devoid of any merit and the<\/p>\n<p>same deserves to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>     In the result, the appeal is dismissed as devoid of any merit.<\/p>\n<p>                                              Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                         V.K. MOHANAN<br \/>\n                                              Judge<br \/>\n15\/09\/2008<br \/>\nen<\/p>\n<p>                 [true copy]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court V.V.Venugopal vs Tholoporu Ashraf on 15 September, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRL.A.No. 1696 of 2003() 1. V.V.VENUGOPAL, SECRETARY, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THOLOPORU ASHRAF, S\/O.MUHAMMED, &#8230; Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE For Petitioner :SRI.WILSON URMESE For Respondent :SRI.P.SAMSUDIN The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice V.K.MOHANAN Dated [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19661","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>V.V.Venugopal vs Tholoporu Ashraf on 15 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"V.V.Venugopal vs Tholoporu Ashraf on 15 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-23T11:02:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"V.V.Venugopal vs Tholoporu Ashraf on 15 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-23T11:02:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":974,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008\",\"name\":\"V.V.Venugopal vs Tholoporu Ashraf on 15 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-23T11:02:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"V.V.Venugopal vs Tholoporu Ashraf on 15 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"V.V.Venugopal vs Tholoporu Ashraf on 15 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"V.V.Venugopal vs Tholoporu Ashraf on 15 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-23T11:02:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"V.V.Venugopal vs Tholoporu Ashraf on 15 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-23T11:02:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008"},"wordCount":974,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008","name":"V.V.Venugopal vs Tholoporu Ashraf on 15 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-23T11:02:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-v-venugopal-vs-tholoporu-ashraf-on-15-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"V.V.Venugopal vs Tholoporu Ashraf on 15 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19661"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19661\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}