{"id":197009,"date":"1998-05-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1998-04-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998"},"modified":"2016-03-01T14:27:56","modified_gmt":"2016-03-01T08:57:56","slug":"rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998","title":{"rendered":"Rameshwar Dayal vs Rent Controller Tribunal Delhi &amp; &#8230; on 1 May, 1998"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Delhi High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Rameshwar Dayal vs Rent Controller Tribunal Delhi &amp; &#8230; on 1 May, 1998<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: M Sarin<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: M Sarin<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p>Manmohan Sarin, J.<\/p>\n<p>1.  Petitioner  has filed this petition aggrieved by the order  dated  7th  April, 1998, passed by the Rent Control Tribunal. The Rent Control Tribunal  by the said order dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner  against  the  order dated 1.10.1993, by which the application of the respondent  DCM  Shriram  Consolidated Ltd., under Order XXII Rule 10 of the Code  of  Civil  Procedure,  was allowed by the learned Additional Rent Controller.  By  the  said order the learned Additional Rent Controller permitted respondent  DCM  Shriram  Consolidated Ltd. to be substituted in place of M\/s.DCM ltd.,  who  were the original petitioner in the eviction petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.   The respondent DCM Ltd. had filed the eviction petition under Clause I  of  proviso to Section 14(1) and Section 22 of the Delhi Rent Control  Act,  alleging  that  the  petitioner,  by  virtue  of  being  in  employment  of  M\/s.Swatantra Bharat Mills was allotted quarter No.B-219, Swatantra  Bharat  Mills Colony, New Delhi. Petitioner had retired from service and ceased  to  be in employment, yet he continued to occupy the said quarter.  M\/s.Swatantra Bharat Mills was one of the units of M\/s.DCM Ltd.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.   During  the pendency of the eviction petition a scheme of  arrangement  between  DCM Ltd. and DCM Shriram Industries Ltd., DCM  Engineering  Industries  Ltd. and Rath Foods Ltd. and their shareholders was formulated.  The  scheme  was approved by the Delhi High Court vide orders  dated  16.4.1990.  M\/s.Swatantra Bharat Mills, was a unit of DCM Ltd. The name of DCM Ltd. was  subsequently  changed to M\/s.DCM Industries Ltd. M\/s. DCM Industries  ltd.,  was  incorporated on 16.2.1989, changed its name, following  the  procedure  laid down under Section 21 of the Companies Act, to DCM Shriram Consolidated  Ltd. It is at this stage that M\/s.DCM Shriram Consolidated applied  for  substitution  in the eviction petition which was filed by M\/s.DCM  Limited,  having  the ownership and control of Swantanter Bharat Mills with whom  the  petitioner was employed.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.        The  main  contention of the petitioner is that  respondent  No.2  under  the Scheme of Arrangement approved, does not become  owner-landlord.  The land in question on which the quarters were built was freehold land and  was  required to be transferred as per the provisions of the  Transfer  of  Property  Act. Learned counsel further submits that there has been  no  attornment  in favour of respondent No.2. It is claimed that respondent  No.2  would  not come within the definition of &#8216;landlord&#8217; and there would  be  no  relationship of landlord-tenant and the said respondent does not become the  landlord qua the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.   The  learned Additional Rent Controller, after considering the  Scheme  of  Arrangement,  reached  the conclusion that in terms of  the  Scheme  of  Arrangement,  with  effect from 1.4.1990 all legal  and  other  proceedings  filed  by  M\/s.DCM Ltd. under any statute, pending on the  effective  date,  i.e. 1.4.1990 and relating to the DCM Industries Ltd. were to be  continued  and enforced by M\/s. DCM Industries Ltd. It is not in dispute that eviction  petition relates to a quarter belonging to M\/s.Swatantra Bharat Mills  Unit  and DCM Industries Ltd. The petition was liable to be continued by  M\/s.DCM  Industries Ltd. whose name has been subsequently changed to M\/s.DCM Shriram  Consolidated Ltd.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.   Learned  counsel for the petitioner had relied on the proviso  in  the  Scheme  whereunder  leases and licences,  containing  restrictions  against  transfers,  were  to  be transferred with the approval  of  the  respective  landlords  and other leases and licences were also to be  transferred  with  such  permission  as may be required at law. The  learned  Additional  Rent  Controller  after  considering  the provisions of the  Scheme  reached  the  conclusion  that provisions of Transfer of Property Act would not apply  to  the Scheme of Arrangement under which the assets and properties of a company  are transfered to another company in terms of  the  arrangement\/scheme.  The further submission of the petitioner is that the Scheme of  Arrangement  was  akin to a family arrangement and if it affected the immoveable  rights  in  the property, the same was required to be registered. The said  submission  is also devoid of merit in as much as the said arrangement cannot  be  equated  to a family arrangement. Besides, the Scheme of  Arrangement  provides  that  any  pending proceedings by or against the  company  would  be  carried out by the transferee company.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.   On  a  perusal  of the orders passed by the  learned  Additional  Rent  Controller  and the Rent Control Tribunal, I find no infirmity or error  of  jurisdiction. There is no ground for me to interfere in exercise of  jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition has no  merit and is dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court Rameshwar Dayal vs Rent Controller Tribunal Delhi &amp; &#8230; on 1 May, 1998 Author: M Sarin Bench: M Sarin ORDER Manmohan Sarin, J. 1. Petitioner has filed this petition aggrieved by the order dated 7th April, 1998, passed by the Rent Control Tribunal. The Rent Control Tribunal by the said order dismissed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-197009","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Rameshwar Dayal vs Rent Controller Tribunal Delhi &amp; ... on 1 May, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rameshwar Dayal vs Rent Controller Tribunal Delhi &amp; ... on 1 May, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1998-04-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-01T08:57:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rameshwar Dayal vs Rent Controller Tribunal Delhi &amp; &#8230; on 1 May, 1998\",\"datePublished\":\"1998-04-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-01T08:57:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998\"},\"wordCount\":802,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998\",\"name\":\"Rameshwar Dayal vs Rent Controller Tribunal Delhi &amp; ... on 1 May, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1998-04-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-01T08:57:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rameshwar Dayal vs Rent Controller Tribunal Delhi &amp; &#8230; on 1 May, 1998\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rameshwar Dayal vs Rent Controller Tribunal Delhi &amp; ... on 1 May, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rameshwar Dayal vs Rent Controller Tribunal Delhi &amp; ... on 1 May, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1998-04-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-01T08:57:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rameshwar Dayal vs Rent Controller Tribunal Delhi &amp; &#8230; on 1 May, 1998","datePublished":"1998-04-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-01T08:57:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998"},"wordCount":802,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998","name":"Rameshwar Dayal vs Rent Controller Tribunal Delhi &amp; ... on 1 May, 1998 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1998-04-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-01T08:57:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rameshwar-dayal-vs-rent-controller-tribunal-delhi-on-1-may-1998#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rameshwar Dayal vs Rent Controller Tribunal Delhi &amp; &#8230; on 1 May, 1998"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197009","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197009"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197009\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197009"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197009"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197009"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}