{"id":197024,"date":"2009-07-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009"},"modified":"2019-03-12T12:33:46","modified_gmt":"2019-03-12T07:03:46","slug":"shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shri Prabhat Kumar vs Central Administrative Tribunal &#8230; on 6 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri Prabhat Kumar vs Central Administrative Tribunal &#8230; on 6 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>                        CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                          Appeal No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2008\/00058 dated 28.1.2008\n                            Right to Information Act 2005 - Section 19\n\n\nAppellant       -          Shri Prabhat Kumar\nRespondent          -      Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)\n\n\nFacts<\/pre>\n<p>:\n<\/p>\n<p>By an application of 19.4.07 Shri Prabhat Kumar of Kankar Bagh, Patna applied<br \/>\nto the Director, (Administrative Tribunal), Department of Personnel &amp; Training,<br \/>\nseeking the following information:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         &#8220;I may kindly be informed as to what is rationale behind keeping the<br \/>\n         older cases in sine die and giving priority to fresh cases and<br \/>\n         whether the same is not a gross injustice&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>     To this Shri Prabhat Kumar received a reply dated 23.5.07 from Shri Sanjay<br \/>\nSharma, Dy. Registrar, CAT to which organization, DOPT appears to have<br \/>\ntransferred this matter through a letter of 27.4.07, as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         &#8220;certain cases were decided at the admission stage either at the<br \/>\n         time of first hearing or in course of hearing under the heading<br \/>\n         Admission (On Notice) and a few cases have been heard and<br \/>\n         disposed of owing to the circumstances of the case they were taken<br \/>\n         up on priority basis.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>     Specifying that the question asked by him was whether the delaying of<br \/>\nolder cases sine die was &#8220;not a gross injustice&#8221;, Shri Prabhat Kumar moved an<br \/>\nappeal before the Registrar CAT alleging that the information requested has not<br \/>\nbeen given. Upon this, Shri R. Pande, Registrar, CAT in his order of 12\/16-7-07<br \/>\nhas ordered as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         &#8220;the cases admitted for hearing are being taken in chronological<br \/>\n         order and in certain cases the matters are disposed of either at the<br \/>\n         time of first hearing or in course of hearing of cases under the<br \/>\n         hearing &#8220;Admission (On Notice)&#8221;, which seems to be justified.<br \/>\n         Owing to the circumstances of the case, a very few cases are being<br \/>\n         taken up on priority basis, which have been heard and disposed of.<br \/>\n         However, the Benches have been requested to dispose of old case<br \/>\n         expeditiously.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                              1<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      Shri Prabhat Kumar has then moved his second appeal before us with the<br \/>\nfollowing prayer:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;The cases may be dealt with in terms of Sec. 19 &amp; 20 of the RTI<br \/>\n       Act, 2005.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>     He specifically pleaded that the information sought by him merits suo moto<br \/>\ndisclosure as per sec. 4(1)(d) of the RTI Act 2005.\n<\/p>\n<p>       The appeal was heard by videoconference on 6.7.2009. The following are<br \/>\npresent:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       Appellant at NIC Studio, Patna<br \/>\n             Shri Prabhat Kumar<br \/>\n             Shri R. K. Rai<\/p>\n<p>       Respondents at CIC Studio, New Delhi.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            Shri N. Ramamurthy, Registrar<br \/>\n            Shri Anil Srivastava, Jt. Registrar<br \/>\n            Shri Sanjay Sharma, Dy. Registrar.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>     Shri Ramamurthy, Registrar submitted that appellant had wanted his case<br \/>\nto be heard early and had moved applications of 4.4.07 and 18.4.07 before CAT<br \/>\nwith that objective. Both these applications were rejected. Such rejection is at<br \/>\nthe sole discretion of the Court. It was also submitted by Shri Sanjay Sharma,<br \/>\nDy. Registrar that as per Rule 47 of the CAT Rules of Practice, 1993, that it is<br \/>\nopen to appellant to get such information as he seeks regarding the disposal of<br \/>\nhis case. He also challenged the allegation that the cases had been adjourned<br \/>\nsine die but submitted that the remedy against the decision of CAT lay only in<br \/>\nWrit Petition before the High Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Shri R. K. Rai, assisting appellant Shri Prabhat Kumar on the other hand<br \/>\nsubmitted that as per information received by him chronology of receipt had been<br \/>\nviolated and disparity in disposal has resulted from deliberate discrimination. He<br \/>\nstated categorically that he has information that cases up to 2004 were being<br \/>\nadjourned whereas subsequent cases are being decided upon.             Upon this<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        2<\/span><br \/>\n Registrar Shri Ramamurthy placed before us copies of Decisions of CAT dated<br \/>\n11.5.07 on the application No. OA No. 287 of 2004 filed by Shri Prabhat Kumar,<br \/>\nappellant in this case and in CIC\/AT\/A\/2006\/00586 of Sept. 18, 2007 Shri<br \/>\nRakesh Kumar Gupta vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal before the CIC. In<br \/>\nthe latter case, he has quoted from our decision w.r.t. sec. 4(1)(d) as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;Sec. 4(1)(d) does not apply to a judicial proceedings conducted by<br \/>\n       a Court or a Tribunal as it refers only to administrative and quasi-<br \/>\n       judicial decisions of public authorities.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>     In the decision of Shri Prabhat Kumar&#8217;s case, Shri A. Surender Registrar-in-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Charge has noted as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;the applicant filed an MA 379 of 2006 for fixing an early date of<br \/>\n       hearing on 13.7.06 and on 14.8.06. The Court after hearing the<br \/>\n       learned counsel for both the parties and having been opposed by<br \/>\n       the learned counsel for the other side, the Court held as under :\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>              &#8220;Many cases are pending which are much older than this<br \/>\n              case. In the circumstances, unless there is some extremely<br \/>\n              urgent ground, hearing should not be preponed.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>              In that view of the matter, the prayer of the applicant is<br \/>\n              rejected and the MA is dismissed, accordingly.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       Thereafter, the applicant once again filed an MA on 4.4.07 for fixing<br \/>\n       an early date of hearing which was numbered as MA 154\/2007.<br \/>\n       The matter came up before the Court on 18.4.2007 and the Court<br \/>\n       upon hearing learned counsel for the applicant held as under:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             &#8220;This is an application for early hearing of OA No. 287 of<br \/>\n             2004.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             2.     Obviously, a large number of older cases are pending<br \/>\n                     hearing awaiting their turn. In that view of the matter,<br \/>\n                     it is not proper to list the cases of 2004 ahead of the<br \/>\n                     older cases.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             3.     Accordingly, the M.A. is dismissed.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>     Appellant Shri Prabhat Kumar however argued that the information<br \/>\nsought is on administrative matters, not on judicial proceedings<\/p>\n<p>                            DECISION NOTICE<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         3<\/span><br \/>\n       This clearly is a case wherein appellant Shri Prabhat Kumar is of the view<br \/>\nthat injustice has been done to him by not deciding his case before others, which<br \/>\naccording to him were filed subsequently. CAT has decided upon this question,<br \/>\nwhich is the appropriate authority for this purpose. The Central Information<br \/>\nCommission can only help appellant Shri Prabhat Kumar to obtain information<br \/>\nthat he does not have, which may be held by CAT. In this case appellant has<br \/>\nstated clearly before us that he has information that would indicate an injustice<br \/>\nhaving been done to him. In that case, the purpose of the RTI Act 2005 stands<br \/>\nserved. If on his obtaining such information Shri Prabhat Kumar nurses a<br \/>\ngrievance, which he evidently does, the appropriate authority to seek redress in<br \/>\nthis case is not this Commission. At any rate, on the issue that Shri Prabhat<br \/>\nKumar is agitating, CAT has already ruled and remedy, therefore, lies in<br \/>\npreferring a Writ Petition before the High Court.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>      It is not possible for information to be created in order to service an RTI<br \/>\napplication. In the present case, what appellant Shri Prabhat Kumar is seeking in<br \/>\nreference to Sec. 4(1)(d) is that such information since it affects him, should be<br \/>\ncreated and published. The &#8220;right to information&#8221;, however, extends to only such<br \/>\ninformation as is held or under the control of the concerned public authority. In<br \/>\nthis case Registrar Shri Ramamurthy has offered to place all records concerning<br \/>\nhis case before appellant Shri Prabhat Kumar, should he wish to examine these.<br \/>\nThere is clearly nothing further that can be done under the RTI Act in response to<br \/>\nShri Prabhat Kumar&#8217;s application. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Announced in the hearing. Notice of this decision be given free of cost to<br \/>\nthe parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Wajahat Habibullah)<br \/>\nChief Information Commissioner<br \/>\n6.7.2009<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         4<\/span><br \/>\n Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against<br \/>\napplication and payment of the charges, prescribed under the Act, to the CPIO<br \/>\nof this Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Pankaj Shreyaskar)<br \/>\nJoint Registrar<br \/>\n6.7.2009<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                      5<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Shri Prabhat Kumar vs Central Administrative Tribunal &#8230; on 6 July, 2009 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2008\/00058 dated 28.1.2008 Right to Information Act 2005 &#8211; Section 19 Appellant &#8211; Shri Prabhat Kumar Respondent &#8211; Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) Facts : By an application of 19.4.07 Shri Prabhat Kumar of Kankar Bagh, Patna [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-197024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri Prabhat Kumar vs Central Administrative Tribunal ... on 6 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Prabhat Kumar vs Central Administrative Tribunal ... on 6 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-12T07:03:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Prabhat Kumar vs Central Administrative Tribunal &#8230; on 6 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-12T07:03:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1214,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Shri Prabhat Kumar vs Central Administrative Tribunal ... on 6 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-12T07:03:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Prabhat Kumar vs Central Administrative Tribunal &#8230; on 6 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Prabhat Kumar vs Central Administrative Tribunal ... on 6 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Prabhat Kumar vs Central Administrative Tribunal ... on 6 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-12T07:03:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Prabhat Kumar vs Central Administrative Tribunal &#8230; on 6 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-12T07:03:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009"},"wordCount":1214,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009","name":"Shri Prabhat Kumar vs Central Administrative Tribunal ... on 6 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-12T07:03:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-prabhat-kumar-vs-central-administrative-tribunal-on-6-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Prabhat Kumar vs Central Administrative Tribunal &#8230; on 6 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197024"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197024\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}