{"id":197271,"date":"2009-07-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-11-28T10:56:05","modified_gmt":"2016-11-28T05:26:05","slug":"smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt.Manjula Reddy vs The Managing Director on 23 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt.Manjula Reddy vs The Managing Director on 23 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n
IN 'l'l~IE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT\nBAN(\u00a7A.L(.)RE\n\nDATED THIS THE 23\") DAY OF JULY 2609?\n\nBEFORE\n\n \n\nTHE H()N'BL}\u00a3 MR.JUSTiCE rmLuvA1>:%;i;\u00a7RAIs1mu%% ,  \n\nWRIT 1>I\u00bb;'m';0N N0441538 %()F_ggIoxs:_\u00a73 x  'k  T \n\nBE\"I'WEEN:\n\nSmt.Man}'ttia Raddy,\n\nAged about 51 years,  a\n\nWfo late G.S::inivas, _ --.  ; ~ AA \nAssistant, Establishment See{:ti(;i1 ,\"V   '\nK.S.R.T.C., %        \u00e9\nTumkurI)ivisam:'&J:v%%4%'%  g   \"\n\nTumkur.    %     \"PETITIONE-R\n\n(By MES'.S13.Mi1\u00a7:.1\u00a7;i\u00a7iAha;j;i1a\u00a7\u00a7;'\u00e9'iJAssoc\u00e9atcs_ Am. )\n\n  Ma\ufb01ging Director,\n\"   \n\n-- A ' '--(3enita'i:'L:Of5\u00e9cs,\nShahthinagar,\n\n x  Bang\u00e9l0re~560027.\n\n\"  We Divisional Contraiier,\n\nK.S.R.T.C.,\n\nTumkur I}ivisi<:)n,\nTumkur. ..RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
38″‘<\/p>\n
(By Sri.L.Govindra\u00a7, Adv-)<\/p>\n
This Writ Petitima is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of
\nthe Constitution cf India praying to quash \ufb01ne impugned order
\ncxf reversion dt.30.5.09 passed by the R2, vidc Ann-{;iii’to this
\nWP, under the facts and circurnstanccs of the case. f  ..  _<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition earning can for pmlimizw\u00e9ry, <\/p>\n
‘B’ Group this day, the Ceurt made thg \u00bbf0lI0wi:;g:. _: \u00bb  ‘<\/p>\n
0RDER;.\n<\/p>\n
The petitioner in this  has”3$sai1czii.:ri1\u00e9._o:<\u20aci$r~30f'{he L'<\/p>\n
2"': respondent–au\ufb021:3rit.y at An\ufb01fi:i}{!!f6~\u00bb.._'L7 i\u20acii!'}<.i._SQbigh'{ for to<\/p>\n
issuc\ufb01wnit sf '?=;$"quash' the same and also to issue any<\/p>\n
other araprrupri\ufb01te. '\ufb01r-.;iiriiictio:1K<\/p>\n
  A_1Icgi1iig-3%:-ai petitioner-wnrkman was unauthorisedly<\/p>\n
 of six months cnmmencing am 8.5.93 is<\/p>\n
 I .93'  {inquiry was instittmeci against her and the enquiry<\/p>\n
 AA repe\u00a7rt,_.iwa\u00a3 submitted to the effect that she is nut guiity cf<\/p>\n
ii 'rriiimi-i\ufb01\u00e9anduct. However, it appears; her absence continued til}<\/p>\n
24.3.94. If} the meanwhile the disciplinaxy ant};-ority having<\/p>\n
W.\n<\/p>\n
examined the matter, being not satis\ufb01ed w\u00e9ih the enquiry repeo\ufb02z,
\nardere\u00e9 f\u00e9wr frmh enquiry an\u00e9 during the pnenciemy (sf the: \ufb01ts}:<\/p>\n
enquiry, the workman was pmn2otcd’cim’ing 2004 \ufb01gnf<\/p>\n
of iunim Assistant to Assistant. in the nieaszwhif\u00e9 ff;-:”cfi\u00e9’:r:._Tt’1t\u00bbv<\/p>\n
initiate frtssh enquiry a notice qamc\u00e9 to by  * L4 <\/p>\n
Management to the: wcrkman can  gf\ufb01uiid <\/p>\n
report was set aside. The ” b\ufb02fbtg  has’<\/p>\n
challenged the said gouge. Tc;”pa\u00a7t;’aii”-sgzd zggshe nxigauon this
\nCourt by imposing a  the matitar in
\nW.P.I>Io;33:9\u20ac3}(}f;\u00a7ii:;:A: .vTh+.\u00a7\u00a7*aa:Lft\u00e9r,—-\u00ab:an.\u00bb’i:he ground that during the
\npend\ufb01cy  (‘3f  been promoted to the post if<\/p>\n
Assistanfiirhtn Vthg:  p.\u00a7:\u00a7si~~– Junior Assistant a decision was<\/p>\n
 V’  _  V-the rV\u00e9VS;x1’iTident~aa\ufb02a0Iity to revert her back to her<\/p>\n
V is\ufb01ating that the ‘candidate shall not he ccmsidercd<\/p>\n
fig prsan\ufb01i\ufb01gi\ufb01l during the pendency (“If the discipiinary enquiry.<\/p>\n
 AA Hcnx\ufb01q. this pctitiozm by the workman on various grounds.<\/p>\n
3. Heard.\n<\/p>\n
X5?”\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4. A1: the outset, the learned Counsel appearing t3t)i*”–the<\/p>\n
Workman has submitted that even as per R&gulatic:z:’**1i-itVliifliiizgii’ <\/p>\n
KSRTC Servants (Ccmduct &; Discipline) Raga.la$iiiii_isV     i <\/p>\n
Ciirprzaratinn only permits for lijrtherlanqgxiryi’ afadinlcit- ii}? .i<\/p>\n
enquiry much less, the dlS{3l]Z1lli’l}ii’\u00a7;’..aUlll’l0flt:VVl2a;.\u00a7:il}ii}’\u00a7}Q}\u00a7f\u00e9’%iF {ii <\/p>\n
set aside the enquiry \ufb01nding a:igi..oifda_r’tQ   enquiry
\nwhich is noncst in the eye;   ‘pm’ the guidelines
\nproducad al\u00a3)i:’1g’:i\u00a2:VV\u00a7*’it}}  lfozi  i \ufb01lling up the
\npromatienaf  if ha: for prmnation.\n<\/p>\n
–~ Cmmscl appearing for the<\/p>\n
Man\u00a71gve1j;1eriliih:ii$’s1ibiaiiittiiElithat Regulation 24 of the KSRTC<\/p>\n
  D) liiigiiilations of 1.971 pmvides far to order far<\/p>\n
   since the file ofthe petiticmer was misplacad<\/p>\n
heri'”‘c3.s\u00e9A wai\u00e9 considered fer pmmotinn during 2004, Hmvcver,<\/p>\n
 ..  to the nrder of the ‘c:li$cip\u00a7inary aatlmrity relying upon<\/p>\n
iii’Rui:igii;i:1ation 24, 3 fresh enquiry being ordered which is pending,<\/p>\n
as such, an actimi was taken by the Managamani: to revert the<\/p>\n
workman from the post (if Assistant to luniar Assistant, as<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
case of the petitioner for pmmetion. In the ci3’cumstancg\u00e9sTany<\/p>\n
natice that is issued by \ufb01ie Management ti; revert <\/p>\n
post of Assistant to the post sf Junioar  \ufb01at ., <\/p>\n
permissible.\n<\/p>\n
10. Acmrrdingly, _pctiticsn___iL:’\u00a7\u00a7:’s:t}_}a>v\u00a7red.’an\u00a7Vfhc\ufb01impugned .<\/p>\n
order passed by the 2″”   ‘L’ is quashed.\n<\/p>\n
    Sdli
\n   .   \u00abwage<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt.Manjula Reddy vs The Managing Director on 23 July, 2009 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh IN ‘l’l~IE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN(\u00a7A.L(.)RE DATED THIS THE 23″) DAY OF JULY 2609? BEFORE THE H()N’BL}\u00a3 MR.JUSTiCE rmLuvA1>:%;i;\u00a7RAIs1mu%% , WRIT 1>I\u00bb;’m’;0N N0441538 %()F_ggIoxs:_\u00a73 x ‘k T BE”I’WEEN: Smt.Man}’ttia Raddy, Aged about 51 years, a Wfo late […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-197271","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt.Manjula Reddy vs The Managing Director on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt.Manjula Reddy vs The Managing Director on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-28T05:26:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt.Manjula Reddy vs The Managing Director on 23 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-28T05:26:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":616,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt.Manjula Reddy vs The Managing Director on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-28T05:26:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt.Manjula Reddy vs The Managing Director on 23 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt.Manjula Reddy vs The Managing Director on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt.Manjula Reddy vs The Managing Director on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-28T05:26:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt.Manjula Reddy vs The Managing Director on 23 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-28T05:26:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009"},"wordCount":616,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009","name":"Smt.Manjula Reddy vs The Managing Director on 23 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-28T05:26:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-manjula-reddy-vs-the-managing-director-on-23-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt.Manjula Reddy vs The Managing Director on 23 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197271","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197271"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197271\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}