{"id":197542,"date":"2011-05-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011"},"modified":"2016-11-05T11:43:48","modified_gmt":"2016-11-05T06:13:48","slug":"mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr. P D Gupta vs High Court Of Delhi on 26 May, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr. P D Gupta vs High Court Of Delhi on 26 May, 2011<\/div>\n
                     Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\n                          File\u00a0No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2009\/000761\u00adSM\n                  Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19)\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0hearing                       :                                      26\u00a0May\u00a02011\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0decision                      :                                      26\u00a0May\u00a02011\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0                :    Shri\u00a0P\u00a0D\u00a0Gupta\n                                           27\/1,\u00a02nd\u00a0Floor,\u00a0Nangia\u00a0Park,\n                                           Shakti\u00a0Nagar,\u00a0Delhi\u00a0-\u00a0110\u00a0007.\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0        :    The\u00a0Central\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer,\n                                           High\u00a0Court\u00a0of\u00a0Delhi,\n                                           New\u00a0Delhi.\n\n\n\n     The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0Shri\u00a0R.B.\u00a0Bansal\u00a0&\u00a0Shri\u00a0Bipul\u00a0\nKumar,\u00a0Advocates.\n\n        On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0were\u00a0present:\u00ad<\/pre>\n
        (i)     Shri\u00a0Rajiv\u00a0Bansal,\u00a0Advocate,\n        (ii)    Shri\u00a0Manoj\u00a0Chawla,\u00a0AOJ,\n        (iii)   Shri\u00a0Vinay\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0Sr.\u00a0Judl.\u00a0Asstt.\n        (iv)    Shri\u00a0Sudhir\u00a0Sachdeva,\u00a0Sr.\u00a0Judl.\u00a0Asstt.\n        (v)     Shri\u00a0Dibyaranjan\u00a0Gouda,\u00a0Jr.\u00a0Judl.\u00a0Asstt.\n\n\n\nChief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner                 :        Shri\u00a0Satyananda\u00a0Mishra\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n
2.      Both \u00a0 the \u00a0 parties \u00a0 were \u00a0 present \u00a0 during \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing \u00a0 and \u00a0 made \u00a0 their\u00a0<\/p>\n
submissions.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2.      The \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 had \u00a0 sought \u00a0 a \u00a0 number \u00a0 of \u00a0 information \u00a0 including \u00a0 one\u00a0<\/p>\n
regarding\u00a0the\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0cases\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0orders\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0reserved\u00a0but\u00a0were\u00a0not\u00a0<\/p>\n
CIC\/WB\/A\/2009\/000761\u00adSM
\n passed\u00a0even\u00a0after\u00a0a\u00a0lapse\u00a0of\u00a0two\u00a0months\u00a0or\u00a0more.\u00a0The\u00a0CPIO\u00a0had\u00a0provided\u00a0<\/p>\n
some \u00a0 information \u00a0 or \u00a0 comments\u00a0 against \u00a0 each \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 queries. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n
Authority\u00a0had\u00a0endorsed\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO.<\/p>\n
3.      During \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 only \u00a0 item \u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n
information\u00a0he\u00a0would\u00a0now\u00a0press\u00a0for\u00a0was\u00a0regarding\u00a0the\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0cases\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0<\/p>\n
orders\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0reserved\u00a0but\u00a0not\u00a0passed\u00a0even\u00a0after\u00a0the\u00a0lapse\u00a0of\u00a0two\u00a0months\u00a0or\u00a0<\/p>\n
more.\u00a0On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0argued\u00a0that\u00a0this\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0<\/p>\n
being \u00a0 maintained \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 first \u00a0 place. \u00a0 Secondly, \u00a0 it \u00a0 was \u00a0 also \u00a0 argued \u00a0 that \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
information\u00a0regarding\u00a0such\u00a0cases\u00a0was\u00a0being\u00a0furnished\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Chief\u00a0Justice\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
the\u00a0High\u00a0Court\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0sealed\u00a0cover\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Chief\u00a0Justice\u00a0held\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n
fiduciary\u00a0capacity\u00a0and,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0such\u00a0information\u00a0could\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0disclosed\u00a0as\u00a0<\/p>\n
exempt\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a08\u00a0(1)\u00a0(e)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0(RTI)\u00a0Act.<\/p>\n
4.      After\u00a0carefully\u00a0considering\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0made\u00a0by\u00a0both\u00a0the\u00a0parties,\u00a0we\u00a0<\/p>\n
tend\u00a0to\u00a0disagree\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0contention\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents.\u00a0All\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
Appellant\u00a0wants\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0is\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0cases\u00a0reserved\u00a0for\u00a0orders\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n
which\u00a0no\u00a0order\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0passed\u00a0even\u00a0after\u00a0a\u00a0lapse\u00a0of\u00a0two\u00a0months\u00a0or\u00a0more.\u00a0<\/p>\n
This\u00a0is\u00a0plain\u00a0factual\u00a0information.\u00a0As\u00a0admitted\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0himself\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0reply,\u00a0<\/p>\n
there\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0practice\u00a0followed\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0High\u00a0Court\u00a0under\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0Court\u00a0Masters\u00a0are\u00a0<\/p>\n
supposed\u00a0to\u00a0compile\u00a0such\u00a0lists\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0furnished\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Chief\u00a0Justice\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0High\u00a0<\/p>\n
Court\u00a0every\u00a0month.\u00a0Thus,\u00a0this\u00a0information\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0available\u00a0not\u00a0only\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
Court\u00a0Masters\u00a0but\u00a0also\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Chief\u00a0Justice.\u00a0Even\u00a0if\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0admitted\u00a0<\/p>\n
that\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Chief\u00a0Justice\u00a0may\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0compiling\u00a0and\u00a0collating\u00a0such\u00a0data\u00a0<\/p>\n
received\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Court\u00a0Masters,\u00a0it\u00a0should\u00a0suffice\u00a0if\u00a0photocopies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0reports\u00a0<\/p>\n
furnished\u00a0 by\u00a0 the\u00a0 Court\u00a0 Masters\u00a0 are\u00a0 provided\u00a0 to\u00a0 the\u00a0 Appellant.\u00a0 Besides,\u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
disclosure \u00a0 of \u00a0 such \u00a0 information \u00a0 would \u00a0 serve \u00a0 a \u00a0 larger \u00a0 public \u00a0 interest \u00a0 as \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
litigating\u00a0public\u00a0would\u00a0come\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0time\u00a0being\u00a0taken\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0High\u00a0
\nCIC\/WB\/A\/2009\/000761\u00adSM
\n Court\u00a0in\u00a0finally\u00a0disposing\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0cases.\u00a0It\u00a0is\u00a0well\u00adknown\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0pendency\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
cases\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0courts\u00a0is\u00a0one\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0major\u00a0concerns\u00a0among\u00a0the\u00a0people.<\/p>\n
5.      In\u00a0the\u00a0light\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0above,\u00a0we\u00a0would\u00a0like\u00a0to\u00a0direct\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0to\u00a0locate\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
relevant\u00a0records,\u00a0such\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0reports\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Court\u00a0Masters\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
Chief \u00a0 Justice \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 High \u00a0 Court \u00a0 through \u00a0 the \u00a0 Registrar \u00a0 every \u00a0 month \u00a0 and \u00a0 to\u00a0<\/p>\n
provide\u00a0photocopies\u00a0of\u00a0those\u00a0reports\u00a0containing\u00a0the\u00a0lists\u00a0of\u00a0cases\u00a0relevant\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
RTI\u00a0request\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0within\u00a015\u00a0working\u00a0days\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0<\/p>\n
order.\u00a0Since\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0indicated\u00a0a\u00a0timeframe\u00a0for\u00a0this\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n
and\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0pointed\u00a0out\u00a0that\u00a0Honourable\u00a0Justice\u00a0\u00a0Sikri\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
High\u00a0Court\u00a0for\u00a0a\u00a0very\u00a0long\u00a0time\u00a0and\u00a0compiling\u00a0information\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0reserved\u00a0<\/p>\n
orders\u00a0passed\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0or\u00a0benches\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0a\u00a0member\u00a0judge\u00a0would\u00a0<\/p>\n
be\u00a0impossible\u00a0and\u00a0would\u00a0disproportionately\u00a0divert\u00a0the\u00a0resources\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0public\u00a0<\/p>\n
authority,\u00a0we\u00a0think\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0would\u00a0suffice\u00a0if\u00a0this\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0provided\u00a0for\u00a0a\u00a0period\u00a0<\/p>\n
of\u00a0 two \u00a0 years\u00a0 only\u00a0 preceding\u00a0 the \u00a0 date \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 application.\u00a0 However,\u00a0 if \u00a0 a\u00a0<\/p>\n
cumulative\u00a0 list\u00a0 of \u00a0 such\u00a0 pending\u00a0 reserved\u00a0 orders\u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 High\u00a0 Court\u00a0 is \u00a0 being\u00a0<\/p>\n
compiled\u00a0anywhere\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0High\u00a0Court\u00a0including\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Chief\u00a0Justice,\u00a0it\u00a0<\/p>\n
would\u00a0also\u00a0suffice\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0that\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.<\/p>\n
6.      The\u00a0case\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0off\u00a0accordingly.\n<\/p>\n
7.      Copies\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0be\u00a0given\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0parties.<\/p>\n
                                                                     (Satyananda\u00a0Mishra)
\n                                                     Chief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n
        Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy.\u00a0\u00a0Additional\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0orders\u00a0shall\u00a0be\u00a0supplied\u00a0against\u00a0
\napplication\u00a0and\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0charges\u00a0prescribed\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0Act\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0
\nCommission.\n<\/p>\n
CIC\/WB\/A\/2009\/000761\u00adSM
\n                              (Vijay\u00a0Bhalla)
\n                          Deputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
CIC\/WB\/A\/2009\/000761\u00adSM\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr. P D Gupta vs High Court Of Delhi on 26 May, 2011 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2009\/000761\u00adSM Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19) Date\u00a0of\u00a0hearing : 26\u00a0May\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0decision : 26\u00a0May\u00a02011 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0 : Shri\u00a0P\u00a0D\u00a0Gupta 27\/1,\u00a02nd\u00a0Floor,\u00a0Nangia\u00a0Park, Shakti\u00a0Nagar,\u00a0Delhi\u00a0–\u00a0110\u00a0007. Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0 : The\u00a0Central\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer, High\u00a0Court\u00a0of\u00a0Delhi, New\u00a0Delhi. The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0Shri\u00a0R.B.\u00a0Bansal\u00a0&\u00a0Shri\u00a0Bipul\u00a0 Kumar,\u00a0Advocates. On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0were\u00a0present:\u00ad (i) Shri\u00a0Rajiv\u00a0Bansal,\u00a0Advocate, (ii) Shri\u00a0Manoj\u00a0Chawla,\u00a0AOJ, (iii) Shri\u00a0Vinay\u00a0Sharma,\u00a0Sr.\u00a0Judl.\u00a0Asstt. (iv) Shri\u00a0Sudhir\u00a0Sachdeva,\u00a0Sr.\u00a0Judl.\u00a0Asstt. (v) Shri\u00a0Dibyaranjan\u00a0Gouda,\u00a0Jr.\u00a0Judl.\u00a0Asstt. Chief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner : Shri\u00a0Satyananda\u00a0Mishra 2. Both \u00a0 the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-197542","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr. P D Gupta vs High Court Of Delhi on 26 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. P D Gupta vs High Court Of Delhi on 26 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-05T06:13:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. P D Gupta vs High Court Of Delhi on 26 May, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-05T06:13:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011\"},\"wordCount\":703,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr. P D Gupta vs High Court Of Delhi on 26 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-05T06:13:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. P D Gupta vs High Court Of Delhi on 26 May, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. P D Gupta vs High Court Of Delhi on 26 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. P D Gupta vs High Court Of Delhi on 26 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-05-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-05T06:13:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. P D Gupta vs High Court Of Delhi on 26 May, 2011","datePublished":"2011-05-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-05T06:13:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011"},"wordCount":703,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011","name":"Mr. P D Gupta vs High Court Of Delhi on 26 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-05T06:13:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-d-gupta-vs-high-court-of-delhi-on-26-may-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. P D Gupta vs High Court Of Delhi on 26 May, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197542","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197542"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197542\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197542"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197542"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197542"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}