{"id":197605,"date":"2011-04-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-04-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011"},"modified":"2015-05-24T22:08:29","modified_gmt":"2015-05-24T16:38:29","slug":"mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr Cl Soni For The vs The Learned Advocate Mr.Kakkad … on 25 April, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
Mr Cl Soni For The vs The Learned Advocate Mr.Kakkad … on 25 April, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: R.M.Doshit,&Nbsp;<\/div>\n
@))\n\n\n      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n\n\n\n      SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2098 of 2003\n\n\n\n      --------------------------------------------------------------\n      VYAS HARISHANKER ANANJI DEKIVADIA,       SINCE  DIED\n        THROUGH HIS WIDOW RAMAGAURI HARISHANKER VYAS\n Versus\n      NATHALAL VELJIBHAI VYAS AND ORS.\n      --------------------------------------------------------------\n      Appearance:\n\n\n           MR CL SONI for the Petitioner\n           MR RC KAKKAD for Respondent No. 1\n           MR ANSHIN H DESAI for Respondents Nos. 2-3\n\n\n      --------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n               CORAM : MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT\n\n\n               Date of Order: 03\/05\/2003\n\n\n ORAL ORDER<\/pre>\n
      The petitioner challenges the judgment and order
\n      dated 20th February, 2003 passed by the learned Joint
\n      Civil Judge (S.D.), Junagadh below Application Ex.114 in
\n      Special Civil Suit No.10\/2000.\n<\/p>\n
      The petitioner before this Court is the plaintiff
\n      in the said suit.\n<\/p>\n
      The plaintiff has instituted the said suit for
\n      declaration of title with respect to the disputed land
\n      and for permanent injunction.   Pending the said suit,
\n      after the completion of the evidence of the plaintiff,
\n      the plaintiff examined the concerned Talati-cum-Mantri.
\n      In view of the evidence of the said witness, the
\n      petitioner moved Application Ex.114 for production of
\n      documents, namely,   the   revenue records.     The said
\n      application was contested by the respondents – defendants
\n      and has been rejected under the impugned order dated 20th
\n      February, 2003. Hence, the present petition.\n<\/p>\n
      Mr.Soni has submitted that the documents in
\n      question are the public documents and the certified copy
\n      of such documents can be received in evidence without the
\n proof thereof. The petitioner had no knowledge about the
\nexistence   of   the    said    documents    until    the
\nTalati-cum-Mantri was examined and he gave his evidence.
\nBesides, the documents can be produced at any stage of
\nthe trial.   The learned Judge has erred in rejecting the
\nsaid application on the ground of delay and latches.
\nMr.Soni has relied upon Order 7 Rule 14 CPC and Order 11
\nRule 14 CPC. He has also relied upon the judgment of the
\nHon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of MADAMANCHI RAMAPPA
\nAND ANOTHER V\/S. MUTHALURU BOJJAPPA [A.I.R.    1963 S.C.
\n1633].\n<\/p>\n
The learned advocate Mr.Kakkad has contested the
\npetition.   He has supported the impugned order and has
\nsubmitted that the petitioner having examined himself and
\nhis evidence having been closed, the petitioner can not
\nnow be permitted to produce further documents.        The
\npetitioner has missed the opportunity to produce the said
\ndocuments at the relevant time. If he is now permitted
\nto produce the documents as prayed for, he will have to
\nbe recalled for further examination-in-chief and the
\nrespondent shall have no opportunity to cross-examine the
\npetitioner.   He has relied upon Order 13 Rule 1 CPC and
\nthe judgments in the matters of M\/S.NARANDAS ANANDJI V\/S.
\nPATEL HARILAL VELJI [1997(3) Current Civil Cases 229
\n(GUJ.)] and of SHRI TARLOCHAN SINGH AND ANR. V\/S. SHRI
\nJASPAL SINGH AND ANR. [1974 Rent Control Reporter 342].\n<\/p>\n
Mr.Anshin Desai has also contested the petition
\nand has relied upon Order 13 Rule 1 CPC.          He has
\nsubmitted that once the issues are settled no further
\ndocuments can be produced on the records of the matter.
\nHe has also relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble
\nSupreme   Court   in   the   matter of MOHD.YUNUS V\/S.
\nMOHD.MUSTAQIM AND OTHERS [A.I.R. 1984 S.C. 38] and has
\nsubmitted that this Court, in exercise of supervisory
\npower under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,
\nshall not interfere with the impugned order. He has also
\nrelied upon the judgments in the matters of G.S.R.T.C.
\nV\/S. SARFUDDIN K.SAIYED [2002(2) G.L.H.     359] and of
\nESSEN DEINKI V\/S. RAJIV KUMAR [(2002) 8 S.C.C. 400].\n<\/p>\n
In the matter of Madamanchi Ramappa and Anr.
\n(supra), Mr.Soni has relied upon paragraph 9 of the
\njudgment and particularly the observation that “…The
\ndocument in question being a certified copy of a public
\ndocument need not have been proved by calling a witness.”\n<\/p>\n
In the matter of M\/s.Narandas Anandji (supra),
\nthis Court was considering a matter where the lower Court
\nhaving allowed the production of documents refused the
\n permission to issue witness summons. The Court held that
\n“…Once a document is permitted to be produced at a
\nlater stage, the parties are relegated to the position as
\nif the document is produced at the initial stage as
\nrequired under law. If this is so, the parties cannot be
\ndeprived of their valuable rights of proving         such
\ndocument by oral evidence. In this case, as the evidence
\nof plaintiff is already over consequently, the document
\ncan be proved only by recalling the witness and leading
\nadditional evidence. Of course, this right is subject to
\none restriction that party recalling the witness cannot
\nbe permitted to introduce new case with a view to fill up
\nlacuna. On witness being recalled the evidence to be led
\nhas to be restricted to the relevancy and proof of such
\ndocument produced at later stage.\n<\/p>\n
The ultimate aim of courts of law is to do
\nsubstantial justice to the parties and procedural rules
\nshould not come in way. Procedure is always meant for
\ndiscipline and systematic proceeding.”\n<\/p>\n
In my view this judgment shall not lend support
\nto the respondents.     On the contrary, this judgment
\nenvisages production of document at a later stage and of
\nrecalling the witness for leading additional evidence
\nwith respect to the relevancy and proof of such document.
\nWhat is paramount is, to do justice to the parties and
\nnot the procedure.\n<\/p>\n
In the matter of Shri Tarlochan Singh and Anr.
\n(supra), the Hon’ble Delhi High Court upheld the order of
\nthe trial Court in not allowing the production of rent
\nreceipts at a later stage of proceedings.   Nevertheless,
\nthe Court did observe that “…It is true that there is
\nno absolute bar for a party to produce documents not
\nrelied upon earlier and the court has power to permit the
\nparties to produce the documents even at a later stage,
\nif the court is satisfied that they could not be filed
\nearlier.”\n<\/p>\n
The above referred judgments in the matters of
\nMohd.Yunus v\/s. Mohd.Mustaqim and Ors.; of G.S.R.T.C.
\nv\/s. Sarfuddin K.Saiyed; and of Essen Deinki v\/s. Rajiv
\nKumar all deal with the jurisdiction of the High Court
\nunder Article 227 of the Constitution of India.    It is
\nwell settled that the supervisory jurisdiction of the
\nHigh Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India
\ndoes not vest unlimited authority or prerogative in High
\nCourt to correct all errors.       The said power can be
\nexercised only if the Courts commit wrong which amount to
\ngrave dereliction of duty resulting into miscarriage of
\n justice.\n<\/p>\n
The present is the case where the impugned order
\nof the Court below is, in my view, erroneous and has
\nresulted into miscarriage of justice. The learned Judge
\nhas held that once the plaintiff had given the evidence
\nand his cross-examination was over, no further documents
\ncan be permitted to be produced. If such documents are
\nproduced, the same cannot be exhibited and thus cannot be
\nreceived in evidence.     If the documents cannot      be
\nreceived in evidence, there is no point in allowing the
\nsame to be produced. It appears that the learned Judge
\nhas overlooked that if the documents in question are
\npublic documents, as claimed by the petitioner plaintiff,
\nthe same can be received in evidence without the proof
\nthereof. Or in case where the relevancy and the proof of
\nthe documents in question are required to be established,
\nthe concerned witness can be recalled for this limited
\npurpose. Hence, if the interest of justice so requires,
\nthe documents can be permitted to be produced at a later
\nstage also.\n<\/p>\n
In    above view of the matter, the impugned
\njudgment and order passed by the learned Joint Civil
\nJudge    (S.D.), Junagadh below Application Ex.114 in
\nSpecial Civil Suit No.10\/2000 is quashed and set aside.
\nThe Application Ex.114 is allowed.       The petitioner –
\nplaintiff is permitted to produce the documents in
\nquestion.\n<\/p>\n
The learned trial Judge shall decide whether the
\nsaid documents are public documents as claimed by the
\npetitioner – plaintiff    and can be received in evidence
\nwithout the proof thereof or whether the relevancy and
\nthe proof of the documents are required to be established
\nor not. If so, the trial Court shall permit the recall of
\nthe concerned witness for this limited purpose.\n<\/p>\n
The petition is allowed in the above terms. The
\nparties shall bear their own costs.\n<\/p>\n
( Ms. R.M. Doshit, J. )<\/p>\n
\/sakkaf\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court Mr Cl Soni For The vs The Learned Advocate Mr.Kakkad … on 25 April, 2011 Author: R.M.Doshit,&Nbsp; @)) IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2098 of 2003 ————————————————————– VYAS HARISHANKER ANANJI DEKIVADIA, SINCE DIED THROUGH HIS WIDOW RAMAGAURI HARISHANKER VYAS Versus NATHALAL VELJIBHAI VYAS AND ORS. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-197605","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMr Cl Soni For The vs The Learned Advocate Mr.Kakkad ... on 25 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr Cl Soni For The vs The Learned Advocate Mr.Kakkad ... on 25 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-04-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-24T16:38:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr Cl Soni For The vs The Learned Advocate Mr.Kakkad … on 25 April, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-24T16:38:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1352,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr Cl Soni For The vs The Learned Advocate Mr.Kakkad ... on 25 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-24T16:38:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr Cl Soni For The vs The Learned Advocate Mr.Kakkad … on 25 April, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr Cl Soni For The vs The Learned Advocate Mr.Kakkad ... on 25 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr Cl Soni For The vs The Learned Advocate Mr.Kakkad ... on 25 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-04-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-24T16:38:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr Cl Soni For The vs The Learned Advocate Mr.Kakkad … on 25 April, 2011","datePublished":"2011-04-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-24T16:38:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011"},"wordCount":1352,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011","name":"Mr Cl Soni For The vs The Learned Advocate Mr.Kakkad ... on 25 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-04-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-24T16:38:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-cl-soni-for-the-vs-the-learned-advocate-mr-kakkad-on-25-april-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr Cl Soni For The vs The Learned Advocate Mr.Kakkad … on 25 April, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197605","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197605"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197605\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197605"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197605"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197605"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}