{"id":197659,"date":"2008-03-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008"},"modified":"2017-05-09T10:25:48","modified_gmt":"2017-05-09T04:55:48","slug":"sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Babul Mojumder vs Dr N Rangaraj on 10 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Babul Mojumder vs Dr N Rangaraj on 10 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE man COURTOF KARNATAKA AT  \n\nomen 'nus me 10\"' nAy.oE4MAit\u00e9H;.:;1fva\u00e9B,'_' N'  N\n\nBEFORZE4\n\nnu: I-lDN'BLE IIIR.  N' N\n\n \n\nsax BABUL MOJUMDER V' \"\n\n5\/0 DHIRENoRAin~'11-sin.\nHUHINDI IYIC JUlJ\\JI\"IlZlII HIIU HIUHNU 'IJl\"'i5$-.-\".n-3.', 'Q.\n\n.1' \".\ni'!a\u00a3'--QU|.i~~ b ~-\n\nPASSED IN me No. 895\/2005 on\" me 91:5 or tH\u00abs%1p1oAoo'e.. 7 1\n\ncxvn. JUDGE (siz.oN). MEMBER,  Nauemimg,\n\nPARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM-BETITIQN FOR.'C(C!f~'i.PI\u00a7iiiSATi0i8i':s.\n\nAND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT oi{coMPENsA*n,oN. \n\nThis appeal coi'i1i_i1g on f\u00a2N?,ti\u00a7:aoi.,,Ahearing  day, the\nCourt delivered the foiiowin;;.:,.\u00a5\"     \" -.\n\n \n\nThe   'fiiedvfciaim petition, cia:--inc\ncom:oensation.Vfto3m th'e~\u00ab'.if_es_pont1ents on the account of the\ninjuriee.__sustain_eei,'Ab\u00a7('\"him'in the motor vehicies accident,\n\nwhichppha\u00e9o\" o:cc'ur.*red\u00b0-on:24.4.2005. In the claim petition,\n\n  had ciaimeti' ttttt i5Kvs.10,0D,OO0\/- as the compensation\n\n Vgsaye.IV_i!'eh to The cieim pe\n\n-Jon having been contested\n\n AA tri'biivn.a'i by a common judgment and separate awards, has\n\n \"enforced compensation of Rs.2,05,200\/- in favour of the\n\n appellant. Disstatisfieci with the amount awarded, claiming\n\na enhancement of compensation to Rs.5,o0,000\/-, I.e., for\n\n'V-\n\/--\n\n\n\nawarding of difference amount of Rs.2,94,$G3\u00ab.i?.\"'fi[e-jhie\u00e9' \n\nfiled this appeal.   \n\nII _.._I I..-\n\n2. HQ r the iearn\"..as-iveca-at-9 anneennn \n\nthe sides and perused the impiianedvhaward.  the\n\ntribunal.\n\nof   the \ufb01\ufb01iiiiii\ufb01t\n\n3. it is coirtended'onI'bei:e'if_ '\n\ntribunal  in:  preoerijfnioticing the injuries\n\nsustaivned_i'n.e_the.; on 24.4.2005, the .\n\namount of xeir:sen:tiitu'rei\"'incurred towards treatment, i.e.,\nboth romleaicaz treatuiiehtiana on other heads, the loss of\n\n during,-._.Vt..e lgriod of treatment, as well as the\n\n. freductlon--.i:'n--..eernini tenacity, on account of the nernzenent\n\n ~. l'h3uri'e\u00e9\"'_*eustai'ned in the accident, ioss of amnities en'\n\nother-Theadis.\n\n4. Refutino the said 'ont\ufb01\ufb01tions, learned cennsel\n\n appearing for the 2\"' respondent -- insurance cfompany<\/pre>\n
contended that, the tribunal has taken into consideration,
\nevidence of the claimant as\\weli as the doctors and after<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
7<\/span><\/p>\n
noticing the injuries sustained,’ the amount  <\/p>\n
treatment and related aspects, considerlnd”‘VthEe’;Vthat i” it<\/p>\n
the appellant has failed to establish  he.’iMais avid-riiier;<\/p>\n
and was earning Rs.6,000\/\u00a5V.p’;nji. andias th’e’Aeyvi\u00abdeM::e <\/p>\n
P\\.\ufb02.!.3 was without any bas_ls;jA’~the..__trlhun\u00a7l_ hes rightly
\nawarded Rs.2,G5,2d$};V;.–. _ however
\nconceded that there :is”rl-elf: ai’~a_’ifdg” towards ioss ‘f
\namenities\u00a7.an’cI4’__e’nhancenjient  ithatifepard, is only called
\nfor. In  contended that the<\/p>\n
award…Apa.ssedi’h\u00a7:-tiheet’rii\u00a7:una’i,-‘should be upheld.<\/p>\n
 ,5. ia\u00a2:onVsId.erin’g’  rival contentions and the<\/p>\n
  Alnipuganeqajuugnient’and award, the point that arises for<\/p>\n
  “‘c;in’sid’e.fation:v’is, “whether the tribunal has passed -a just<\/p>\n
‘end r_esoinei\u00a7le award, If not, is the appellant entitled to be<\/p>\n
. It is not now in dispute that, the accident has<\/p>\n
6<\/span>
\ni ‘ “taken place the epp_!lant was the victim and has suffered<\/p>\n
I’<\/p>\n
the ifuries, such as, muitipie small abrasions ever up<\/p>\n
‘I<\/p>\n
I3.\n<\/p>\n
face and fracture of shaft of the ie\ufb01: femur at rniddie 3- .<\/p>\n
4<\/span><\/p>\n
‘X<\/p>\n
The treatment obtained by the appellant frorngthe 4_<\/p>\n
has been established from theta-erai ” ‘ ; <\/p>\n
evidence. Tribunal has accepteej”‘the’~-factv <\/p>\n
appellant has produced lnedi.cal bills ‘fort.11li\u00e9;82,w9’\ufb011.48′.VL’<\/p>\n
The material_:’factor_-“‘to’.’  is, whether the
\nappellant. eves  as at  deposed by PW.3
\nand was   Evidence of PW..3 does
\nnot “Even though he has stated that it
\nis a company”  employed, he had falm to<\/p>\n
 c. att\u00e9ndancevrepister and salary \ufb01a””””ii”‘|t r”l*ter.<\/p>\n
.’ jpI.f_ the~’..ap’pei_iant was employed as a driver and was<\/p>\n
 . recelvlnp.__R\u00e9{;’6;000\/- p.m., while examining PW.3, records<\/p>\n
as shovv ‘the employment and the payment of salary, could<\/p>\n
 at ha_ve\u00b0”been produced. Though it was claimed that the<\/p>\n
1″‘.la’ppellant was a driver, even his driving licence has not<\/p>\n
same cannot be found fault with. in view of the inability of<\/p>\n
the apoeiiant to produce the proof  <\/p>\n
employment and the saiory ear__n.ed._bY _i1’in1.=i7j1:onsI_dei*ing” . <\/p>\n
the medical evidence that thereis;f10%\u00ab’disobitit\u00a7rIi”oon”’tho ‘<\/p>\n
whole body on account of”tho_occidont, winged; income’<\/p>\n
of the appellant at Rs.3,00OZ\u00a5’jA-end_,_\u00bbapoiy’ing._the\u00e9 muitipiier<\/p>\n
‘-are. re’e.rnVi.og”eccount of permanent<\/p>\n
Since there?’-.i\u00a7  eutd\u00e9nce on record, in my
\nview,”the’-~tribu_nVoVi”   considering his monthly
\nincorj1e._atxVVii5.3_rti{i01’\u00a5_’fend computing the loss of future<\/p>\n
earning.  J<\/p>\n
  vviiiowevergthe tribunal has not awarded just and<\/p>\n
V V”VV’r_eo.sovn\u00a7bie::Compensation with regard to the loss during<\/p>\n
i” the treotnient period and future medical expenses.<\/p>\n
 ..l..I-…I .Il._l. .,_ . _ . . _ g . g -..-_.; mung.
\n, I1 urlsnuu mat, Lullveyalluu an<\/p>\n
El.\n<\/p>\n
\ufb01r<\/p>\n
 Considering the evidence on record, in my view, it wouid<\/p>\n
be Just and reasonable to award under the said heads as<\/p>\n
follows: y<\/p>\n
loss of income for the period oft’: rnonthsV.5′-L .:’Tfrii:unjal””hasi,<\/p>\n
awarded loss of salary for draonths. ‘Hence, tha appellant
\nis ‘entitled to be awarded  sun’iofA’Rs.6.0oO\/-,
\nbeina the difference for the   The tribunal has<\/p>\n
not award;sd”\u00b0j,;;ariv amouat ‘\u00b0towards:V.T4attendant charges.<\/p>\n
contendedsv ,o.that”7’3.4ti’sa:'”amount awarded towards medical<\/p>\n
expeinsues is insl’tt$lse’of”attendantcharges, extra nourished<\/p>\n
‘ diet. coniirafanoe a”nd”‘loss of amenities, In my view, the<\/p>\n
  A sarliefis u.nacoepta’ble. The tribunal has accepted the bills<\/p>\n
V    since the appellant could not produce<\/p>\n
ialld  hills, an amount of R.s,9t,l,.Llt.ll)!- was<\/p>\n
…….~.~…j;….i ..| 1.1.- ….:.._J |….-4 .. – .. at .. –
\niIW\ufb02E,(:.I’.;”‘.'(.l~|1iI(.Il:l lung 53″} “U3″. IIII: ‘ IIUU In 5”’ U<\/p>\n
I an nan. AA<\/p>\n
 V._ori,By towards medical bills and not on other heads.<\/p>\n
 Considering the fact that the appellant was under<\/p>\n
treatment for about 6 months, it is reasonable to award
\ntowards attendant charges at the rate of Rs.10D\/- per day
\nL<\/p>\n
-v
\npl<\/p>\n
(day and night’) for a period of 5 months _and’4iien’ceji’tne.\u00bb<\/p>\n
appellant is entitled to be awardedet Rs;1’S1}(iOCi)e’_’tinti\u00a7.–~ 5 <\/p>\n
the said head. During the treatrneiitperl’od,”~tiie:a\u00a7tipeiiant<\/p>\n
has incurred expenses totiierds eittrai nou:fisi?eied–.ediet and”<\/p>\n
hence he has to he awair1de:d:_1its.1(i>,’0tt():\/if thereunder.<\/p>\n
reasonahi\ufb02.   under the head
\nconveyancethe(gee?of’i1vii’mseifVVa:nd attendant.
\n it is  that on account of the injuries<\/p>\n
susteined”~ein”theaccldent, there is shortening of the limb<\/p>\n
    result-~~in’Ioss of amenities, which deprives the<\/p>\n
i  future happy life. The loss of amenities will<\/p>\n
it  way of the appellant enjoying his future life.<\/p>\n
Hence; it is r…esen-ebie to award under the h.e-t_1  of
\n” ,a’rrf1enities’ Rs.2G,Gih3;’-. The triiounai has awarded<\/p>\n
 Rs.12,000\/- towards future medical treatment. The<\/p>\n
evidence of the doctor shows that implants have to be<\/p>\n
removed and the appellant has to urkderoo surgery. The<\/p>\n
L-\n<\/p>\n
. I’ ‘<\/p>\n
amount awarded by the tribunal at 4_<\/p>\n
lower side and hence an amount iaixavirardadu ‘ ; <\/p>\n
under the said head.\n<\/p>\n
9. By awarding addltio’nal’sum of there
\nwould be a reasonable cgonrnpansautlon in Vlayour of the<\/p>\n
appellant.\n<\/p>\n
In itha i.raauit,”t:ha:_i’a.ppaaif.’V_io’allowed in part and the
\nlmpugned””‘~.:vaihi23rd_  In additional to<\/p>\n
compensation’ofi:y:RS\u00a72~,!\u00a7\u00a7,200\/- awarded by the tribunal,<\/p>\n
.-. 2.-……..  1……\n<\/p>\n
:\u00a7lI Baily Ii”Io,I<\/p>\n
a jjpatltlony ‘l:i:Il*~1.t_ne date of deposit by the 2″‘ respondent<\/p>\n
 – +’i.nsura:n_on oohipany, which has been fixed with the liability<\/p>\n
 thalt\ufb01ibunai. The 2″‘ respondent Insurance Company,<\/p>\n
.   ” ah.alldeposit the awarded amount in the tribunal, under an<\/p>\n
‘intimation to the appellant within a period of 3 months<\/p>\n
” Fr-nrn hsrlnu M
\nu u uuuu 1 .\n<\/p>\n
\\
\nX<\/p>\n
-‘<\/p>\n
<3
\n3<\/span>
\nB
\n1-\n<\/p>\n
lab<\/p>\n
1.0<\/p>\n
Gf\ufb01oe is directed to draw the modifs\u00e9d “\u00a7w$rd,f’V–.-nn\u00abV’<\/p>\n
terms hereof. .\n<\/p>\n
KS1!-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Babul Mojumder vs Dr N Rangaraj on 10 March, 2008 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE man COURTOF KARNATAKA AT omen ‘nus me 10″‘ nAy.oE4MAit\u00e9H;.:;1fva\u00e9B,’_’ N’ N BEFORZE4 nu: I-lDN’BLE IIIR. N’ N sax BABUL MOJUMDER V’ ” 5\/0 DHIRENoRAin~’11-sin. HUHINDI IYIC JUlJ\\JI”IlZlII HIIU HIUHNU ‘IJl”‘i5$-.-“.n-3.’, ‘Q. .1′ “. i’!a\u00a3’–QU|.i~~ b ~- […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-197659","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Babul Mojumder vs Dr N Rangaraj on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Babul Mojumder vs Dr N Rangaraj on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-09T04:55:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Babul Mojumder vs Dr N Rangaraj on 10 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-09T04:55:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1024,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Babul Mojumder vs Dr N Rangaraj on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-09T04:55:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Babul Mojumder vs Dr N Rangaraj on 10 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Babul Mojumder vs Dr N Rangaraj on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Babul Mojumder vs Dr N Rangaraj on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-09T04:55:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Babul Mojumder vs Dr N Rangaraj on 10 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-09T04:55:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008"},"wordCount":1024,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008","name":"Sri Babul Mojumder vs Dr N Rangaraj on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-09T04:55:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-babul-mojumder-vs-dr-n-rangaraj-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Babul Mojumder vs Dr N Rangaraj on 10 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197659","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197659"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197659\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197659"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197659"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197659"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}