{"id":198179,"date":"2008-06-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008"},"modified":"2017-08-28T04:55:01","modified_gmt":"2017-08-27T23:25:01","slug":"ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Allfab vs The Bombay Burmah Trading … on 12 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Allfab vs The Bombay Burmah Trading … on 12 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Arali Nagaraj<\/div>\n
IN TIE HIGH COURT' OF KARKATAKA AT BAKGALQRE\n\nDATED mm THE 12th my or arms %\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE Hownm mz.JUs*rIcE    _    \ncmz. REVISIOR PETITION W_,m.'gs&;[g% %ws\"   . *  T\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nM\/S.ALLFAB.\nI'~IO.202, 4m CROSS, V \n4TH MAIN ROAD,  '\n\n4TH STAGE 1NDUs'rR1A;_.. 1*oi*J1$     :1    \n\nRAJAJINAGAR,\n\nBANGAL0P\\E\u00bbv44j,\"5V'.'       \nmam ITS \n\n(BY SR1 A.v.Am;Rm1\u00a5}L\u00ab1\u00a7i;%%k%%ADV.)\n\n%THE BA\u00a75is.\u00a3B%}\u00a3Y SURMAQTRADING\n\nc0RPoRA'FIOH \"I..f_I'B.,\nNo.9, '*'.KfALL\u00ab6b_\u00a33E \n\nMUMBAI-4~\u20ac)O  1,\n\n  j%'(A%A%;t~H%AVING I'TS\"I3RANCI~i OFFICE\n,  AT\u00bbNO;25\/ 1\/ 2, 13'? CROSS,\n   13?-MAIHROAD,\n sUDiiAMNAGAR.\n 'BANQi~ALORE--56O 027,\n\nRERBY ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY\n\n \"HOLDER & REGIONAL MANAGER\n\nc---r~\"\"\"'\\..--\n\n. .PE'1'I'TION ER\n\n\n\nL..K.i;UNI3AR .. RESP{)\u00a3\u20aci\u00a7ENT\n\nTHIS CRP IS FILED U\/SL115 01:' THE \nTHE ORDER D'1'.3t). 1.03 PASSED IN O.S.NO. 16 15752000 ON \nTHE FILE OF THE 26TH ADDL.c1TY (3i'y'iL JUif'2'GE;5 (e<:1~1+:2s1);x   \n\nMAYO HALL UNIT, BANGALORE.  t i A   \n\nmis PETITION comma ON EFO\n\nDAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWIEG: V   \n     \n\nThough this matter is  I "asdmission, with\nconsent of the  \u00a301' iii-eijieizwitioner, it is taken\nup for final  fiiiis  heard and impugned\norderis   i' \n\n2. The  fgeiieiix, being the first defendant in\n\nO;S:No. A"'f<:Ife_..vthe learned 26$ Addi.Ci'ty Civil\n\nJALidgeV:V(C(:H;.2i)','\u00ab\u00e9angalore, has cha\ufb02enged the correctness of\n\nthe or<ief'~ida..Vte'r.ij'j3{)ii.2OO8 passed in the said suit rejecting\n\n . Vpregver .. fez'  of time for taldng steps against the\n\n5 's?\u00a3tIiess.' i " K\n\n  3; 'I'h0ugh this case was called four times at 11.15\n\n 1.15 p.m., 12.45 pm. and at 4.15 pm. the learned\n\nC'~5\\'\\.--\\__\n\n V_A.ADMi$A$IONV ei?m:'s\u00ab..\n\n\n\ncounsel for the respondent p1aint1'\ufb01' remained absent. Since<\/pre>\n
this revision is against the order on an ixlterieetztoryi<\/p>\n
application and further proceedings in the said <\/p>\n
stayed by this Caurt by order dated   <\/p>\n
arguments of the ieamed counsel   peijtiezief’ <\/p>\n
arguments of the learned eousisel fee ‘the  ~ ”<\/p>\n
taken as heard.\n<\/p>\n
4. On perusal ef  written in
\nthe order sheet: itselfby   J udge, and<\/p>\n
also the enderssemeriti;,inad:e’~.byt ti:e…ei’\ufb01ee thereen it could be<\/p>\n
seen that t’i”1_e’f1:1*s’t  is the petitioner herein was<\/p>\n
to secure the pireseiice (if the’ witliees to be examined for him<\/p>\n
;a\u00a7;1d._AfeI{iii&t.e,:p:1I1x)se ‘ “”i’d witxiess summons was sent’. through<\/p>\n
    was netumed. The endorsement of the<\/p>\n
 ‘\u00bb….\u00bbe\ufb01iee’ ‘  the”: \u00a7s:*:;c1er sheet reads: “RPAD cover returned<\/p>\n
_. fv\u00a7J}.jVl\u00a7\u20aclV’\u20acd \u00e9-ieihe addressm”. This endorsement does not Show<\/p>\n
  I10 whether the addressee refused the said cover or<\/p>\n
  _w\u00e9\u00a7.s not found at his address. Despite this being so, the<\/p>\n
  “piiayer of the learned counsel for the defendant No.1 made<\/p>\n
C—\\\u00a3\\~\\\/~<\/p>\n
before the learned Addl.City Civil Judge for grant of time for<\/p>\n
taking further steps in securing the said wimess  be<\/p>\n
rejected. I am of the opinion that the learned City\u00e9<\/p>\n
was not justi\ufb01ed in rejectillg the prayer ef  ,V 9\u00bb <\/p>\n
for the first defendant–pet;iti0ner.  = f A 1;\n<\/p>\n
 h    ht 1  <\/p>\n
The present revision ‘peu’\ufb01oet’t:   tjnpugned
\norder is set aside. The 1earee;1Judge (CCH.-2 1)
\nshall afford Ieasormbte ” tirst defendant
\ntherein    the witness to be
\nexamined fer’   with the suit. Under the
\neixeumstarzeeeth the_I”e  cede: as to costs. A copy of this<\/p>\n
girder   seat  court forthwith.\n<\/p>\n
sd\/i
\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Allfab vs The Bombay Burmah Trading … on 12 June, 2008 Author: Arali Nagaraj IN TIE HIGH COURT’ OF KARKATAKA AT BAKGALQRE DATED mm THE 12th my or arms % BEFORE THE Hownm mz.JUs*rIcE _ cmz. REVISIOR PETITION W_,m.’gs&;[g% %ws” . * T BETWEEN: M\/S.ALLFAB. I’~IO.202, 4m CROSS, V 4TH MAIN […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-198179","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Allfab vs The Bombay Burmah Trading ... on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Allfab vs The Bombay Burmah Trading ... on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-27T23:25:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Allfab vs The Bombay Burmah Trading … on 12 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-27T23:25:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":298,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Allfab vs The Bombay Burmah Trading ... on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-27T23:25:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Allfab vs The Bombay Burmah Trading … on 12 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Allfab vs The Bombay Burmah Trading ... on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Allfab vs The Bombay Burmah Trading ... on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-27T23:25:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Allfab vs The Bombay Burmah Trading … on 12 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-27T23:25:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008"},"wordCount":298,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008","name":"M\/S Allfab vs The Bombay Burmah Trading ... on 12 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-27T23:25:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-allfab-vs-the-bombay-burmah-trading-on-12-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Allfab vs The Bombay Burmah Trading … on 12 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198179","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198179"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198179\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198179"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198179"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198179"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}