{"id":198564,"date":"2009-02-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009"},"modified":"2017-05-26T10:49:41","modified_gmt":"2017-05-26T05:19:41","slug":"sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri M Nagaraju S\/O Muniyappa vs Government Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri M Nagaraju S\/O Muniyappa vs Government Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
    *  <\/p>\n
\u00bb ” ‘  Anekal Taiuk,
\n  Bangalore: District.<\/p>\n
IN THE HEGH COURT 0:: KARNATAKA,  _<\/p>\n
DATED THIS THE 6%’ may 05* FEBRU;aRj\ufb01f:; i,iO<;=9 _: "  <\/p>\n
BEFQRE;\n<\/p>\n
THE HC}N’BLE MR. JY\u00a7_3Sf\u00a7’1CE’~AJIT av\ufb01\u00e9imtiax<\/p>\n
WRIT ?E’I’I’I’1{)N No 18E_: \u00a76:_(>\u00a7’ 20% .{L AmI{;iHB)
\nWRIT PE’I’ITION”N{}._ 1.w;.r:;a  2008 {LA-KHB}<\/p>\n
BE)’I’WEEN’:\n<\/p>\n
WP 1859\u20ac\u00a74 Oi?”’12\u00a5i3C3:6   <\/p>\n
1 Sri ‘MA.A. :a;ag3;ea;1;%?.%%\u00ab%%
\n‘=.szo1_;:v1uni3;4a;sp;1’~   * %
\nAged abeut’ -5*?\n<\/p>\n
R,’ at Hinnakkiw v’i.1fg::ge,<\/p>\n
V. Jigalii Ijiobli’,
\n Anszkal ‘I”3-.E.ui<, _
\n' Bangggiare Di\u00e9irict.\n<\/p>\n
‘-  Wfu–“Sri  isa-‘IV. Nagamju<\/p>\n
 $Lge\u00a7i4i’.about 45 years,
\nZR’\/.at Hinnakki viilage,
\nJ.i.gf’ani Hcbii,<\/p>\n
..Petit:ioners cernmon
\nin both W.Ps.\n<\/p>\n
( By Sri H. Anantha Krishna Murthy 8:. Associates)<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
171 and 1’72 \/ 3 (part of Sy. No. 172) of Hi.nnakki’-xg\ufb01iage,
\nJigani Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Distr\u00a7gt.- ,  —  <\/p>\n
‘\u00a7’hese petitions <:omj,:1g can for h\u20aca'\\7:.i__:'1g 'jt}iis% c1–a{y,v' <\/p>\n
the court made; 1:116 fo\ufb02ewing:\n<\/p>\n
0 m3:\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7E…E<\/p>\n
Both these \u00abp\u20ac:!Li\ufb01QIT1S:4″\u00abC1iSp0S\u00e9(i Gf by this<\/p>\n
6015111101} order.\n<\/p>\n
2. The s;u:;;;:\u00a2:\u00bb::1:   13595\/05 is sy.
\nN0. 93\/   guritas of Hirmakki
\n matter of WP. No.
\n1  1’72 nzeasurirrzg 29 gumjas<\/p>\n
am} ~v’2{7 gdI:taS’r\u00e9s15ec{\ufb01iveiy of tha 881116: village.<\/p>\n
‘ V.  –   3-.111  tfi\u00e9”i\u00e9{7i’it patitions the lands wefe canvertszd<\/p>\n
 V jrzto v..i101″‘z-agiculttlrai purpose, convarsion order was<\/p>\n
  conversion charges z-me aiso paici. A1} these<\/p>\n
 x1anc.\u00a7s.. Were sought :0 13\u00a2 acquired pmsuaxzt to the<\/p>\n
A’   Ixotiiicaticm dated 1.4. 12805 Vida Annexure-C<\/p>\n
.  the”  ef ie\ufb01fe\ufb02t, the very purpose for which the<\/p>\n
   to be acquired is being done by the<\/p>\n
   ‘.’.hC\u00a7I’\u20ac1}i*i(i\u20acI’ wouid not arise; He further submits that an
\n‘  of 481 acres 11 guntas was noti\ufb01ed under<\/p>\n
  -eeetio\ufb01 4(1) of the Act and \ufb01nal declaration is in respect<\/p>\n
With reference to this proposition he would
\nmzmg reported in 1995 (7) K.L.J, 846 anizffiialeeei
\n1992 SC 1812?’. Indeed he \u00a7”\u00a7?(5{11(3\u00ab   ‘ 2
\nacqtiisiiion has commencegi j=
\nLand Acquisition Act and  t\u00a3:1e*-
\nAct. would comtemgjiiege  are
\nrequired to be issued  .AA(;x;;\/;};:\u00a7.;;11issioner. \u00a311
\nthe    to him, the
\nnotj\ufb01catioig:  .?3ei:3;1:t1’i,<,ssio11er, Karnataka
\n  to him, wouid m1I\u00a7iJ'.'y
\nthe no\u00e9ii\ufb01ea\ufb01ezx Indeed the other contention<\/p>\n
raised   me: Since the lands are converted for<\/p>\n
p\u20ac3t\u00a7\u00a3iiOI\u00a7f31'S' dnemseives, the question of pmeeedmg<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
\/'<\/p>\n
of or\ufb02y 26} acres. He submits {hat a Iittie less than W<\/p>\n
 =!'.0" be in Vjii\u00e9ice befare the noti\ufb01cation is issued<\/p>\n
  of the Act. Reiterating his objections,<\/p>\n
 : \u00a73OV\u20acI'I1'\u00a31"i\u20ac1'1t authorizilig the Commissioner of
\n . ''~IE$'I;z\u00bb.1.,-*\u00b0n\u00abai:a1<a Housing Board to issue noti\ufb01cation. undsr<\/p>\n
-ssction 4(1) of the Act. In 50 far as deletion is<\/p>\n
O\\<\/p>\n
50% of the Land has been deleted from the acquisitisn
\nproceedings. Thus, according to him, thtz
\nacquisition proceedings are liable to be qz1as1’iVs;:’1’\u00a7A   “” <\/p>\n
3. Mr. Ba-savaraj sa:grad.\u00ab,*s’1e;in3\u00a7as_,;ou}ise1 \u00e9spea\ufb01ng
\nfer the Board in    of objections
\nsubmits that  “17”\u20acrC%1V:V}t’\u20ac 1’eITed to section
\n20 of the   Act is only with
\nrefers;L*i\u00a7:\u20ac\u00a7VTV ts:  the scheme and the
\nGovt. spfgsxsiial \u00abwhich is not the case here.<\/p>\n
He furt.hez; ‘s\u00a7;1bI:iits”-tlist it is not necessary for the<\/p>\n
siibmits that a noti\ufb01cation is issued by the<\/p>\n
concerned, he submits that vast: track of land was<\/p>\n
notified. I-is submits that the lands which stood W<\/p>\n
X’<\/p>\n
.  \u00a73<\u00a5:i1Si1*:g"%'sghezn\u00e9;fi1e same can be irxitiated only after<\/p>\n
  V"iS:'.:~sanctioned by the Government and the<\/p>\n
  saxxctioxi\u00e9ci by the GOV\u20acI'I1IZI"}_(iI"1t. mdeed the said
\n  'deci\u00e9\u00e9ion was based on a. ruling of the Apex Court in the<\/p>\n
 -\u00bbv.\u00a3-$136 of State of Tamil Nadu vs. A. Mohammad<\/p>\n
execution of a housing scheme, which woul\ufb01
\ngives a meaning that the land i$-:ret*.32Ji1je\u00a7::i.V4c’\u00a7{j’4
\nas Contamplated iifid\ufb01i’ the_
\nHowever it does not give  ‘\u00e9bf’ 1e111e
\nis required to be  pi\u00e9i\u00e9\u00e9 it.” ‘i’$”‘s\u00e9i:1t to the
\nGovernment. A said provision
\ndo not \ufb01ve   the scheme is
\na must   are notified. It is no<\/p>\n
doubt:r\u00a7;e     case of 1.995 (7) K.L.J.<\/p>\n
346 (%Me\ufb01\u00a3ckra;\u00a7g\u00a2iah&:j”as~; State of Karnataka and<\/p>\n
othe:’s) ha s” @.i\u00a7s-hibited from executing the scheme not<\/p>\n
Yousqf, reported in AJ.R. 1992 SC p. 1928. It is aiso<\/p>\n
brought tar my notice that the decision of the Apex Courii\ufb01<\/p>\n
_\/’<\/p>\n
 V.   act  maliy require that the fmal scheme
\n‘  –VtgA;;, :v’\u00a7A;J~A1\u00a7’f:;)ared and appmved by the Government.
\n was laid by the learned counsel
\n far the: petitianer in para 33 of the judgment<\/p>\n
A ‘” ‘  certain obgervations are made by the Apex ‘
\n {30j1;1rt 1:0 the e\ufb01ecxt that where the 131101 is sought to be<\/p>\n
acquired far the purpose of execution of a Housing \ufb02<\/p>\n
in the Case of Mohammeci Yousef has
\nthe Apex Court in A.I.R. 1995  ‘p; .4237 (:;’.~’;\u00a3;it:; \u00a3\u00a7:*?1%a::.=.11 j  <\/p>\n
Natiu vs. L. Krishnan and Qtheri\u00e9},    . .\n<\/p>\n
6. ‘i’he Apex Court in ‘ih_e”-33.56 cf ST_{3.t\u20ac \u00a7)f.9N&Ci ‘L! ‘<\/p>\n
(AER 1996 SC 497) flas  a pre-\n<\/p>\n
requisite before a   und<~:r section 4
\nof the Act. I:1_3.i'e\u00a7;d whai'  before the
\nCourt wgas  Vcrf;  Nadu Housing
\n i;'#-Tifirfe Apex Court was of the<\/p>\n
View "~,tha'1; ~  acquisition proceedings were<\/p>\n
comme\ufb01cad .uIicierA._t11t::;3'geI1era1 enacnnem, section 4 of<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
I.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
–  Avsexieizie umgezst i\u00a7e”\u00ab\u00e9put in piece and apemval of the<\/p>\n
  a must befere the iancls are noti\ufb01ed fer<\/p>\n
 ..1ee1{zeci:’int0 is section 24 ef the Act. Section 24 of the
\nA’ Act: speaks about sanctiorzing of the housing scheme<\/p>\n
“ianci its execution. To my mind, What is eemempiateci is<\/p>\n
2:\n<\/p>\n
Scheme, the noti\ufb01cation under section 4 efV~’e*1eV’w\u00a7g,_\ufb01*;; :__Aaf:t<\/p>\n
Wonk} expressly state that the”  be >1′
\nacquired is requireci for
\nis also to be noticed thatVLi’\u00a3\u00a7.\u00a7er
\nAuthorities Act, 19:32. eeaxmg with the
\nscope of the scheme   there must. be
\na scheme iezelgiee 6-.:: I1::i:: government is a
\nmust    for acquisition. But
\nhoweeef   .f’e1’t:11 coming in the<\/p>\n
p1’esemVV Aet.’ .V1m”ieed*~ ‘re’fereI:ee which is made to the<\/p>\n
pre*.:-is1i.o;1?.\u00a7’ efithe Aet, \u00a7$2*hich would not indicate that the<\/p>\n
aequi_$i’Eio.i}. Another provision which is required to be<\/p>\n
not approval of the scheme but the execution thereof. \/W<\/p>\n
j<\/p>\n
V neei:ca::iQ;1g..\n<\/p>\n
V’ ” ,c:Zt}m{ereio11 as well as certain other lands have been left
\n e\u00a71\u00bbt, it is to be noticed that the total extent of land<\/p>\n
2 Etotifieci is 329.39 acres and under the \ufb01nal noti\ufb01cation<\/p>\n
8. This takes us to the next contention ef
\ncouneei for the petitioner regarding _  _
\nauthority to issue noti\ufb01cation.
\nmade available wherein _\u00a7;I},_ exereise  A’
\nconferred under clause :3′) of  (Sf  the
\nGevertunent has  1′ Ceeie\u00e9issioner,
\nKaznataka Hozi\ufb01ixig  functions of
\nthe ‘\u00e9ec\ufb01on 4 of the Act.\n<\/p>\n
Having ?; ‘  ae\ufb01\ufb01ee\ufb01on issued by the<\/p>\n
Goveri3_13:1e:1tV __ titre Commissioner of the<\/p>\n
Housing Board {:3 ‘e..\u00a2i:..’eLe,_\u00e9{ Deputy Commissioner, I am<\/p>\n
of “view tiiat_V_ tV1ie eempetent authority has issued the<\/p>\n
9.  112:’. S13.’ far as East: two contenfions Ifegarding<\/p>\n
“?54.22 acres was acquireei. It is no doubt true that\/W<\/p>\n
X’<\/p>\n
 \u00ab–.c0r:\u00a7z\u00e9rsion’v%. has  piace before issuance of the<\/p>\n
 _pf\u20ac:1i’:11i\u00a7i1z3;y \u00e9vizoti\ufb01icatiozw. In so far as remaming iarids<\/p>\n
 “~<._"V'-?\u00a7.SS"\u00a31\u00a3ijI'iC\ufb01\u00a7A 301' the greliminary noti\ufb01cation. The Board in
\n   " t}1a,_\u00a7t;at\u20acII1eI1\u00a5: of abjection has stated that indeed an
\n  .\u00e9 \ufb01ffbrt was made by {he authority '\u00a30 ciezlete the lands by<\/p>\n
 conducting spot i1"1Sp\u20acCti{)1"1 on 30.6.2006. 811%: however %<\/p>\n
about 6 acres of land was ieft out of the
\nthat by itseif, it Cazmet be said \ufb0111ai~–th\u00a22%\u00a7   A
\nthe acquisition. The peVtitio:;i:=;;'$ –A.'_V_i:"io
\ncontend that all the lands \u00e9:\u00a31"x~\u00e9j\u00e9i:9I1Vc\u00a7\u00a7i9'1e\u00a71.; krery
\npurposc for which th\u00a2:–'}gnd   'b\u00e9 piixt to use
\nfer the same purpesye    it is 13.0
\ndoubt true   conversion has
\nbeen  conversion. is still
\n   measures  acres
\n12 gu1ifi3ia'S.'_ is  the acquisitien on the<\/p>\n
ground that-~  hay-';= 1\u00a7t:ef3; c:01';1rer:ed. But however such<\/p>\n
ar\u20ac..\u00a7Vonce;ri::\u00a7\u00a7dT, the conversion has taken piazza a\ufb02tar the<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
it could not be given effect to, i:t::as1}:1uc:h as,_.:f1'e_<\/p>\n
Wsuid came in the middki: of the project.  <\/p>\n
IE}. Since all the conmn\ufb01G\u00a5{S'.ur\u00e9e\u00e9
\nceunsei for the petitia\ufb01efs   th\u20ac%\u00e9\u00a7%i\u00e9w? f.hat the
\nacquisition proceedingg\ufb02%:2ii};1\u00e9}.?;i\u00a7;i\u00a7Ve <\/p>\n
11.  V\ufb01gerit in thase petitions.\n<\/p>\n
  _  V  V V<\/p>\n
   ”  ” ‘  <\/p>\n
5 Mr.  ieaxned A.G.A. is permitted to<\/p>\n
 fiievniiteziio \u00e9fappearance within four weeks.<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\u00bb
\nIudqe<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri M Nagaraju S\/O Muniyappa vs Government Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2009 Author: Ajit J Gunjal * \u00bb ” ‘ Anekal Taiuk, Bangalore: District. IN THE HEGH COURT 0:: KARNATAKA, _ DATED THIS THE 6%’ may 05* FEBRU;aRj\ufb01f:; i,iO<;=9 _: " BEFQRE; THE HC}N’BLE MR. JY\u00a7_3Sf\u00a7’1CE’~AJIT av\ufb01\u00e9imtiax WRIT ?E’I’I’I’1{)N No 18E_: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-198564","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri M Nagaraju S\/O Muniyappa vs Government Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri M Nagaraju S\/O Muniyappa vs Government Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-26T05:19:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri M Nagaraju S\\\/O Muniyappa vs Government Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-26T05:19:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1482,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri M Nagaraju S\\\/O Muniyappa vs Government Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-26T05:19:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri M Nagaraju S\\\/O Muniyappa vs Government Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri M Nagaraju S\/O Muniyappa vs Government Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri M Nagaraju S\/O Muniyappa vs Government Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-26T05:19:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri M Nagaraju S\/O Muniyappa vs Government Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-26T05:19:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009"},"wordCount":1482,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009","name":"Sri M Nagaraju S\/O Muniyappa vs Government Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-26T05:19:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-nagaraju-so-muniyappa-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-6-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri M Nagaraju S\/O Muniyappa vs Government Of Karnataka on 6 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198564","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198564"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198564\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198564"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198564"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198564"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}