{"id":198587,"date":"2009-11-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009"},"modified":"2018-09-07T01:02:20","modified_gmt":"2018-09-06T19:32:20","slug":"sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sadhu Ram vs Juglal And Others on 10 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sadhu Ram vs Juglal And Others on 10 November, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>COCP No.2005 of 2009(O&amp;M)                                1\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH\n\n                                      COCP No.2005 of 2009(O&amp;M)\n                                      Date of decision: 10.11.2009\n\n\nSadhu Ram                                   ......Petitioner(s)\n\n                               Versus\n\nJuglal and others                           ......Respondent(s)\n\nCORAM:-     HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG\n\n                         * * *\n\nPresent:    Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.\n\nRakesh Kumar Garg, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>CM No.26354-CII of 2009<\/p>\n<p>            Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions.<\/p>\n<p>COCP No.2005 of 2009<\/p>\n<p>            As per the averments made in this petition, petitioner along<\/p>\n<p>with one Gopi Ram filed civil suit No.1126 of 1988 for permanent injunction<\/p>\n<p>restraining defendants No.1 to 3 therein from alienating the suit land to<\/p>\n<p>defendant No.4-Juglal (respondent No.1 in the contempt petition) or any<\/p>\n<p>other person comprised in Khewat No.185 min Khatauni No.320\/259 rect.<\/p>\n<p>No.107, Killa No.13\/2 (0-5) and Khewat No.189 min, Khatauni No.334\/277<\/p>\n<p>rect No.29 killa Nos.14\/1(0-19) 15\/1(6-18) and Khewat No.4(8-0) Khewat<\/p>\n<p>No.214 min\/201, Khatauni No.383\/381, rect. No.54 Killa No.4\/3 (1-0),<\/p>\n<p>Khewat No.154\/141 Khatauni No.268\/213, Rect. No.107 Killa No.13\/1 (0-<\/p>\n<p>18), Khewat No.89 min, Khatauni No.184\/142, rect. No.111, Killa No.3 (8-<\/p>\n<p>0), Khewat No.111 min\/100\/1 and Khatauni No.214\/164\/1. Rect. No.3 Killa<\/p>\n<p>Nos.12\/1 (2-16) 12\/2 (5-4), 11\/1\/1(4-11), situated in village Badhaur, Tehsil<\/p>\n<p>Panipat, Distt.Karnal. The claim of the plaintiffs in the suit, as set-up was<\/p>\n<p>that they are co-sharers and co-owners of the land in dispute measuring<\/p>\n<p>38K-11M.     Previously their fore-fathers were real owners of the suit<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> COCP No.2005 of 2009(O&amp;M)                                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>property, but now the plaintiffs have become co-owners by way of<\/p>\n<p>survivorship. It was further alleged that the fore-fathers of the plaintiffs<\/p>\n<p>gave the agricultural land to one phulla, father-in-law of defendant No.1 in<\/p>\n<p>Dholi. Accordingly, the plaintiffs were real owners, whereas defendants<\/p>\n<p>No.1 and 2 were simple dholidars upon the land in question. Zile Singh<\/p>\n<p>defendant No.3 Husband of Kalawati had expired leaving behind three<\/p>\n<p>minor children, so they had also been impleaded as defendants.<\/p>\n<p>                It was also alleged that defendants No.1 to 3 were bent upon<\/p>\n<p>to sell some portion of the land in dispute to defendant No.4. The plaintiffs<\/p>\n<p>learnt that defendants No.1 and 2 had entered into an agreement to sell<\/p>\n<p>the land in dispute to defendant No.4, so, they approached the Biradari<\/p>\n<p>Panchayat on 16.7.1984 and requested them not to alienate the land in<\/p>\n<p>dispute.\n<\/p>\n<p>                It was further alleged that during the pendency of the suit,<\/p>\n<p>defendant No.1 had illegally executed a lease-deed dated 29.5.1985 in<\/p>\n<p>favour of Sarupa and Nihala defendants No.5 &amp; 6. Defendants No.1 and 2<\/p>\n<p>had also illegally executed a sale-deed vide dated 27.11.1984 in favour of<\/p>\n<p>defendants No.8 to 15, which was void and abinitio and liable to be set<\/p>\n<p>aside. All these facts and circumstances necessitated the institution of the<\/p>\n<p>present suit.\n<\/p>\n<p>                Thus, the aforesaid suit was filed by Gopi Ram and the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner on the ground that defendants No.1 to 3 who are the legal heirs<\/p>\n<p>of Surja, who was the son of Phula to whom some portion of the land in<\/p>\n<p>question was given by the forefathers of the plaintiffs as Dholi land, were<\/p>\n<p>in possession of the land as Dholidars and not as owners. The aforesaid<\/p>\n<p>suit was decreed vide judgment and decree dated 25.11.1993 declaring the<\/p>\n<p>aforesaid sale deed as well as lease deed mentioned above as null and<\/p>\n<p>void and defendants No.1 to 3 were restrained         for ever from selling,<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> COCP No.2005 of 2009(O&amp;M)                                3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>mortgaging, alienating the land of Dholidars mentioned above. The appeal<\/p>\n<p>preferred by defendants i.e. (respondents No.2 to 7            in the contempt<\/p>\n<p>petition) was dismissed by the Additional District Judge, Panipat vide his<\/p>\n<p>judgment and decree dated 19.8.1999.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Aggrieved    from   the   aforesaid   judgment      and    decree,<\/p>\n<p>respondents No.2 to 9 (defendants No.8 to 15 in the civil suit) filed Regular<\/p>\n<p>Second Appeal No.154 of 2000 in which vide order dated 22.12.2008, this<\/p>\n<p>Court ordered maintenance of status quo with regard to possession during<\/p>\n<p>the pendency of the appeal. The aforesaid appeal is still pending before<\/p>\n<p>this Court. The aforesaid order was passed on the application filed by the<\/p>\n<p>defendant-appellants against the plaintiff-respondent (now petitioner).<\/p>\n<p>             The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.11 at the<\/p>\n<p>instance of respondents No.1 to 9 with the active connivance of<\/p>\n<p>respondents No.10 and 12 to 14 are allowing respondents No.1 to 9 to<\/p>\n<p>install a submersible tubewell in Khasra No.29\/14\/1, 15\/1 and thus, in this<\/p>\n<p>manner, respondents No.1 to 9 are willfully violating the status quo order<\/p>\n<p>passed by this Court on 22.12.2008 by interfering forcibly in the possession<\/p>\n<p>of the land in question and also by installing submersible tubewell in the<\/p>\n<p>aforesaid land.\n<\/p>\n<p>             I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>             It is not in dispute that defendants No.1 to 3 were in<\/p>\n<p>possession of the suit land as Dholidars and the respondents in the<\/p>\n<p>contempt petition are subsequent transferees from them and order dated<\/p>\n<p>22.12.2008 was passed by this Court on the application filed by these<\/p>\n<p>defendants    against    the   plaintiff-respondents   from    taking   forcible<\/p>\n<p>possession of the land in dispute, whereas the present contempt petition<\/p>\n<p>has been filed by one of the plaintiffs in the suit. Moreover, the order dated<\/p>\n<p>22.12.2008 has been passed by this Court as an interim measure under<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> COCP No.2005 of 2009(O&amp;M)                               4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC and if there is any violation, the petitioner has<\/p>\n<p>an effective remedy by moving an appropriate application under Order 39<\/p>\n<p>Rule 2A CPC or any other application in RSA No.154 of 2000.<\/p>\n<p>            In view of the aforesaid, I am not inclined to take cognizance of<\/p>\n<p>this contempt petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>November 10, 2009                          (RAKESH KUMAR GARG)\nps                                                 JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Sadhu Ram vs Juglal And Others on 10 November, 2009 COCP No.2005 of 2009(O&amp;M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2005 of 2009(O&amp;M) Date of decision: 10.11.2009 Sadhu Ram &#8230;&#8230;Petitioner(s) Versus Juglal and others &#8230;&#8230;Respondent(s) CORAM:- HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG * * * Present: Mr. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-198587","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sadhu Ram vs Juglal And Others on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sadhu Ram vs Juglal And Others on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-06T19:32:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sadhu Ram vs Juglal And Others on 10 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-06T19:32:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":847,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Sadhu Ram vs Juglal And Others on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-06T19:32:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sadhu Ram vs Juglal And Others on 10 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sadhu Ram vs Juglal And Others on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sadhu Ram vs Juglal And Others on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-06T19:32:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sadhu Ram vs Juglal And Others on 10 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-06T19:32:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009"},"wordCount":847,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009","name":"Sadhu Ram vs Juglal And Others on 10 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-06T19:32:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sadhu-ram-vs-juglal-and-others-on-10-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sadhu Ram vs Juglal And Others on 10 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198587","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198587"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198587\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198587"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198587"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198587"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}