{"id":198652,"date":"2009-04-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009"},"modified":"2014-02-28T09:54:53","modified_gmt":"2014-02-28T04:24:53","slug":"g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"G M Padmanabha Nayak vs The Commissioner For Religious &#8230; on 6 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">G M Padmanabha Nayak vs The Commissioner For Religious &#8230; on 6 April, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) &amp; V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n<pre> , \"(By  \u00ab\ufb01aghavs\u00e9gjdrg; Achag', Adv.)\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, \n\nDATED THIS THE am DAY 01%' APRIL 2r.:%iii\u00a7:   _\n\nPRESENT_m-_\n\nTHE HONELE MR. 9.9. mNA:&lt;A1eA1\u00a7,T \n\n\nTHE HGNBLE MRu.JU$*1*:&lt;f:&#039;z2rv\ufb01sgana\ufb01rr\nWRYF PETITEON N\u00a7\u00a7:4925&#039;,s2\u00a7?5:;9@%gL{\u00a2&#039;\u00a7::19\u00bb R\/Ci -- PIL)\n\nQETWEEN:\n\nC&#039;: M    \nS\/o.Ma113.1.1;1athana\u00a7;ak,,_&quot; _ V * \nAged about 6C9.j&#039;,,=\u00a2ar{&#039;\u00a7,&#039; _   _\nR] a. Sarzcshwara&#039; Te &#039; Vpi\u00e9 Square,\n\nByndoor; \u00abKundap11rj_fI5q; ,..  &quot;  \u00e9 ..--~\n\nU\u00e9t1pi}Z)is&#039;\u20ac;;,__ &quot; &quot; .. Petitioner\n\n   2 &quot;\n\n1.&quot; A &#039;~-The&#039; \u20ac&#039;3am;missi9ner fer\n Rengigigas Hindu Endowment,\n &#039;Mahadeshwa;ra Camplex\nB&#039;1:i1__g., Chamrajpet, Bangalore.\n\n ._ _?i&#039;he Deputy Commissioner,\nHindu Religous as Endowment;\nDepartment, Udupi Dist,\nUdupi.\n\n\n\n%--J\n\n3. The Asst. Ctemmiseiener,\nHindu Reiigieus 33 Endowment\nDepartment, Udupi Dist, &#039;_ \nUdupi. .. Respe:1i:ie11ts--_\n\n(By Smt\ufb02ilougfer Akbar, AGA)\n\nThis W1&#039;. is \ufb01led under Art3&#039;e1es\u00bb-:?\u00a726--&#039;_4&#039;e:\u00a3&#039;?L\u00a7ie&#039; &#039; \nCenetituticm of indie, praying te&#039;:__iss*\u00a7.1e jjdi1T\u00a7&#039;.Cti{3I1S~.Vt.g the&#039;\nrespondents te take aetien 311d&#039;: evict&quot; _tl1enf1,&quot; <\/pre>\n<p>unauthorised occupants W&#8217;hf}___ are\u00a5._ Gecupiedue ,__the  Sy.  ,<br \/>\nNo. 137\/2(A) belongs to Sri S3-33.eehwara._ &#8216;l&#8221;1&#8217;exAn&#8217;pie-,., Bai\ufb02dur &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>and make way to the devetees to ha&#8221;:.*e  smow: and<br \/>\nundisturbed darshan\ufb01i\ufb02 ef Lorti&#8217; :&#8221;\u00a7a.r1ee};wa1&#8217;a;&#8221;-AA <\/p>\n<p>This W.P coming  before<br \/>\nCourt this day, S;&#8217;~&#8217;;BHAH\ufb01&#8217;\u00bbJ}&#8217;, delhgered  &#8216;fellewingz<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;:\u00a7jV:\u00a7e;?efst.:_:Iiti&#8217;g2ition petitien is filed by the<\/p>\n<p>petitiener    taking actie\ufb02 against the<\/p>\n<p> r  A&#8217; &#8220;&#8216;0\u00a3:&lt;:_:3pants, who have occupied<\/p>\n<p> ~_.b610I&quot;1giIlg to Sri Saneshwara Temple,<\/p>\n<p>   Way 1:0 the devotees to have sxneeth<\/p>\n<p>  u:1e.ieteL1&#039;bed \u00e9arshanem ef Lore Sarzeshxvara. E&#039;: is<\/p>\n<p>&quot;*T7a&#039;_5:eIi*ed in the petitien that Sri Saneshwara tempie in<\/p>\n<p>  B\u00e9iindur, Uciupi District belongs is the M:.3m*ai<\/p>\n<p> Departmemi. The respendents have pewer of<\/p>\n<p>\\a51<\/p>\n<p>(&#039;,3<\/p>\n<p>administraticsn a3 (f:0m1:11issi011er fer Hindu R\u20ac\u00a7i\u00a7{}&#039;\u00a7iS_ \u00a3&#039;;\u00a7}d<\/p>\n<p>Ebra\u00e9awment and are reqtgixwsd to protect and  _&quot;\u00e9:i_;&lt;:&quot; <\/p>\n<p>properties belonging to the Mxizrai Vtjpparurxexz\ufb01  <\/p>\n<p>331$! both moveable and i1r1:nox?t:a&#039;c\u00bb1e .. :&#039;p14&#039;e;5efi:;  the&#039;<\/p>\n<p>temple. It is further avar\ufb01gii tl\ufb01t. \ufb01le <\/p>\n<p>:1&lt;=:aring Sy.N&lt;).137\/2A;__.mea$11\u00a7i\u00a7\ufb01g&#039;V~_\u00bb_\u00a7  gunias<br \/>\nbelongs \u00a320 the temple  &#8211;?:1*i:3Lff;V3v:-ftV;;j?%1i:&lt;\u00a7ii*\u00e9&#039;V&#039;:\u00e9.:$&#039;\u00a7V&#039;e1}cr0ac11I11e11t in<br \/>\nthe pmpertjg    has caused<br \/>\nebstmctian\u00a7~to:%&quot;4a.a3{g;;a:;;:,g\u00a7: Qf ::;\u00e9%v iGVV&lt;1V&#039;V\u00a7im;c3aneShxx2*ara. The<br \/>\n  about the $83116 and<br \/>\nreques\ufb01\u00e9d fz\ufb01r&#039; I\ufb01fiz\ufb01uthozised occupant in the<\/p>\n<p>premises ef&quot;-tempie:;_ A&#039;;3ii1r;&#039;\u00bbi-&#039;: no action has bean taken, the<\/p>\n<p> &quot; \u00ab..pati\ufb01{f3~n{:f 3355.3 pr\u00e9ferred this writ petition.<\/p>\n<p>i3&#8230;_  the leagnad 00131156} appearing for the<\/p>\n<p>V &#8211;V   learned Additienal Government Advecate<\/p>\n<p>K V&#039; &quot;  for the respondents &#8212; Authorities.<\/p>\n<p>   Leazned ccunssi ap\u00a7eari_ng for the petitiener has<\/p>\n<p>V&#039; reiteratcad &#039;aha averrnents made in the Writ petitian and<\/p>\n<p>Q<\/p>\n<p>V petit\u00a7.\u00a3\u00a71&#039;ie1*.\n<\/p>\n<p>submitted that a directien be issued to the resp0n\u00a7ie}\u00a7&#8221;:1;\u00a7\u00a7~:e<\/p>\n<p>evict. the unauthorized person and protect tl1e_&#8211;;5_r\u00e9&gt;7peijt}:{&#8216;  .<\/p>\n<p>the temyie and 30 as ta enable_ me&#8217; dee6tee\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;;V.f\u20ac:V have&#8217; &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>smooth darshanam 0f Lord Sanesliew\u00e9\u00e9fa &#8220;&#8216;as1&#8217;s&lt;\u00a7&#039;u_ ght ft-3f &quot;i;&#039;:3:<\/p>\n<p>the WI&#039;i&#039;{. pe\ufb01tion.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. 011 Ehe other 11a:1%i._;&#8217;:%\u00ab-iea-t:&#8217;r1\u00a7:%rLiL&#8221;A\u00a71nai. V{}e\u00a7z&#8217;ernn1ent<\/p>\n<p>Advocate appeari\ufb01g fer&#8230;  iffes\u00a7pGf1d&#8217;ee&#8217;i,\u00a7s &#8211; &#8216;Autht31&#8217;ities<\/p>\n<p>submitted tltag\ufb01iv _ \u00e9-3.&#8217;3;1:e:;V&#8221;i\u00a7ci&#8217;\u00a3y~&#8211;~&#8217;i\u00a7ee::1 taken on the<br \/>\nrepresenie\ufb01en.   f\u00e9e\ufb01tiegner and the t1*us1;ee:~:~= of<br \/>\nthe te\ufb01zgple &#8220;\ufb01\u00a3e&#8217;\u00ab;i {).S.No.4\/ 2008 and no<\/p>\n<p>greumi is ma\ufb01e G&#8211;&#8216;L1f&#8221;f(:::*  i&#8217;;~:\u00bbsi1Ving direetien in favour cf the<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;\\1%&#8217;e&#8221;&#8216;\u00bb..V_&#8217;A}:%iv.e \ufb01ver: careful censideration t0 the<\/p>\n<p>Co\ufb01i:e%1tiQ.;:{e&#8217; by the learned counsel appearing for<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;%:3jeTpai*tie&#8221;s and scrutinized the material on record.<\/p>\n<p>  9&#8217; &#8216;The Hlaterial en reeord szsseuld clearly Show that the<\/p>\n<p> %:.\u00a2m Saneehwara temple is situated in Sy.Ne.13&#8217;7\/&#8217;ZA in<\/p>\n<p>xi<\/p>\n<p>hold that the petiticmir is not entitled for  relief <\/p>\n<p>in tha writ petition and it is open to the petitioner to xxieifk&#8217; 5  :_. <\/p>\n<pre>out his remedy in accordance with law.    '\n\nwrit p\ufb01titicm is dis\ufb01osed off with the a.f0f6r\u00a7    7  '\u00ab\n\nIndex:  _ \n_ . _ \u00abWeb ..:~;\u00a7;\u00a7,\u00a7t:\u00a5.;\u00e9 N}:  7' \n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court G M Padmanabha Nayak vs The Commissioner For Religious &#8230; on 6 April, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) &amp; V.G.Sabhahit , &#8220;(By \u00ab\ufb01aghavs\u00e9gjdrg; Achag&#8217;, Adv.) IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DATED THIS THE am DAY 01%&#8217; APRIL 2r.:%iii\u00a7: _ PRESENT_m-_ THE HONELE MR. 9.9. mNA:&lt;A1eA1\u00a7,T THE HGNBLE MRu.JU$*1*:&lt;f:&#039;z2rv\ufb01sgana\ufb01rr WRYF PETITEON N\u00a7\u00a7:4925&#039;,s2\u00a7?5:;9@%gL{\u00a2&#039;\u00a7::19\u00bb R\/Ci &#8212; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-198652","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>G M Padmanabha Nayak vs The Commissioner For Religious ... on 6 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"G M Padmanabha Nayak vs The Commissioner For Religious ... on 6 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-28T04:24:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"G M Padmanabha Nayak vs The Commissioner For Religious &#8230; on 6 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-28T04:24:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":563,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009\",\"name\":\"G M Padmanabha Nayak vs The Commissioner For Religious ... on 6 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-28T04:24:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"G M Padmanabha Nayak vs The Commissioner For Religious &#8230; on 6 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"G M Padmanabha Nayak vs The Commissioner For Religious ... on 6 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"G M Padmanabha Nayak vs The Commissioner For Religious ... on 6 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-28T04:24:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"G M Padmanabha Nayak vs The Commissioner For Religious &#8230; on 6 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-28T04:24:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009"},"wordCount":563,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009","name":"G M Padmanabha Nayak vs The Commissioner For Religious ... on 6 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-28T04:24:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-m-padmanabha-nayak-vs-the-commissioner-for-religious-on-6-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"G M Padmanabha Nayak vs The Commissioner For Religious &#8230; on 6 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198652","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198652"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198652\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198652"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198652"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198652"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}