{"id":198655,"date":"2009-02-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009"},"modified":"2018-12-22T05:06:17","modified_gmt":"2018-12-21T23:36:17","slug":"mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar vs Dghs, New Delhi on 27 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar vs Dghs, New Delhi on 27 February, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>             Central Information Commission\n                                                                 CIC\/AD\/A\/X\/09\/00132\n\n                                                                Dated February 27, 2009\n\nName of the Applicant                      :     Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar\n\nName of the Public Authority               :     DGHS, New Delhi\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>1.    The Applicant filed a RTI application dt.12.4.08 with the CPIO, DGHS, New<br \/>\n      Delhi. He requested for the following information:\n<\/p>\n<p>      i)     Administrative reasons by which it was assumed that the holder of<br \/>\n      second post of Physiotherapist under CGHS, Delhi was similar placed person<br \/>\n      as claimed in the letter F.No.C-13014\/04\/2002-CGHS-I dt.16.8.07\n<\/p>\n<p>      ii)    How is it administratively feasible that the lower scale of 8000-13500<br \/>\n      was accorded on 12.6.03 as mentioned in file No.A.32022\/1\/2000-CGHS-I in<br \/>\n      Para 5(b) (112\/N) at a later date and a higher scale of pay of 10000-15200<br \/>\n      was    granted   on   an   earlier       date   i.e.   19.7.02   vide   letter   F.No.C-<br \/>\n      13014\/04\/2002-CGHS-I dt.16.8.07\n<\/p>\n<p>      iii)   Since the posts of Physiotherapist under CGHS, Delhi are Group &#8216;A&#8217;<br \/>\n      posts, what will be the status i.e. Gazetted or non-gazetted in the light of<br \/>\n      ruling of M\/o Finance to grant the ACP with effect from the date of joining<br \/>\n      Govt. in a particular case, where the applicant was holding a non gazetted<br \/>\n      post at Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi\n<\/p>\n<p>      iv)    Why the clarification 4 to 6 was relaxed as notified by DoPT vide their<br \/>\n      OM F.No.35034\/1\/97-Estt(D) (Vol.IV) dt.10.2.2000 to suit the particular case\n<\/p>\n<p>      v)     How and why part clarification No.14 of OM F.No.35034\/1\/97-Estt(D)<br \/>\n      (Vol.IV) dt.10.2.2000 was made applicable to suit a particular case, whereas<br \/>\n      it deals with clarification on some other point of observation\n<\/p>\n<p>      vi)    Is it a fact that the entry grade of Physiotherapist post under CGHS,<br \/>\n      Delhi are in higher pay scale over the entry grade of post of Physiotherapist<br \/>\n      under Safdarjung\/Dr.RML\/Kalawati Children Hospitals, if so what are the entry<br \/>\n      grade pay scales at these places as per                   existing   recruitment   rules<br \/>\n      respectively.\n<\/p>\n<p>      The CPIO replied on15.5.08 stating that information asked by the applicant<br \/>\n      from time to time has already been supplied.              Now he has raised various<br \/>\n       queries about the action taken in the matter and added that RTI Act does not<br \/>\n      confer a right upon the applicant to interrogate the respondents for the<br \/>\n      actions taken in the matter. The applicant filed an appeal dt.27.5.08 with the<br \/>\n      Appellate Authority. In his appeal he stated that his letters dt.26.5.07 and<br \/>\n      6.6.07 seeking certain information under RTI Act were redirected by DoPT to<br \/>\n      M\/o Health &amp; Family Welfare vide letter dt.25.6.07.             The Director,<br \/>\n      Administration, vide letter dt.16.8.07, provided him some information. But,<br \/>\n      according to the applicant, that letter did not give the required information<br \/>\n      w.r.t 1st ACP, pay scale attached to it and date of implementation of 1st ACP.<br \/>\n      Further, the letter failed to provide information on under which clause of ACP<br \/>\n      scheme, this was provided. As per the letter dt.16.8.07 and after completing<br \/>\n      the necessary formalities, the applicant was given 5 pages of notings vide<br \/>\n      letter dt.27.11.07.   He submitted another letter dt.22.1.08 which was not<br \/>\n      accepted and he was asked to apply a fresh application under the RTI Act,<br \/>\n      2005 vide letter dt.25.2.08.     Accordingly, he filed another RTI application<br \/>\n      dt.12.4.08 which was not accepted. Vide letter dt.15.5.08, the applicant<br \/>\n      reiterated his request for information w.r.t his RTI application dt.12.4.08.<br \/>\n      The Appellate Authority replied on 20.10.08. Not satisfied with the reply, the<br \/>\n      applicant filed an appeal dt.26.12.08 before CIC.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.    The Bench of Mrs. Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner, scheduled the<br \/>\n      hearing for February 27, 2009.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.    The Public Authority was not present at the hearing.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.    The Applicant was present during the hearing.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision\n<\/p>\n<p>5.    The CPIO is directed to provide all the available information to the Appellant<br \/>\n      within 15 days of the receipt of this Order.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.    The appeal is disposed off.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                  (Annapurna Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                          Information Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated true copy:\n<\/p>\n<p>(K.G.Nair)<br \/>\nDesignated Officer<br \/>\n Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.    Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar<br \/>\n      G-16, Hauz Khas Enclave<br \/>\n      New Delhi 110 016<\/p>\n<p>2.    The CPIO<br \/>\n      Directorate General of Health Services<br \/>\n      Nirman Bhavan<br \/>\n      New Delhi<\/p>\n<p>3.    The Appellate Authority<br \/>\n      Directorate General of Health Services<br \/>\n      Nirman Bhavan<br \/>\n      New Delhi<\/p>\n<p>4.    Officer in charge, NIC<\/p>\n<p>5.    Press E Group, CIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar vs Dghs, New Delhi on 27 February, 2009 Central Information Commission CIC\/AD\/A\/X\/09\/00132 Dated February 27, 2009 Name of the Applicant : Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar Name of the Public Authority : DGHS, New Delhi Background 1. The Applicant filed a RTI application dt.12.4.08 with the CPIO, DGHS, New Delhi. He requested for the following [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-198655","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar vs Dghs, New Delhi on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar vs Dghs, New Delhi on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-21T23:36:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar vs Dghs, New Delhi on 27 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-21T23:36:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":659,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar vs Dghs, New Delhi on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-21T23:36:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar vs Dghs, New Delhi on 27 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar vs Dghs, New Delhi on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar vs Dghs, New Delhi on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-21T23:36:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar vs Dghs, New Delhi on 27 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-21T23:36:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009"},"wordCount":659,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009","name":"Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar vs Dghs, New Delhi on 27 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-21T23:36:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-bhatnagar-vs-dghs-new-delhi-on-27-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.A.K.Bhatnagar vs Dghs, New Delhi on 27 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198655","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198655"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198655\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198655"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198655"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198655"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}