{"id":19870,"date":"2009-11-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-11T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009"},"modified":"2016-01-20T09:18:17","modified_gmt":"2016-01-20T03:48:17","slug":"ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Sri Vinayaka Constructions vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 12 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Sri Vinayaka Constructions vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 12 November, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & Shantanagoudar<\/div>\n
HVTKEIHGH(XNHIFOFIQHEMKUHQLKTBANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 12\"' DAY OF NOVEMBER 2009\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. P.D. DINAKARAN. CHIEF   A \n\nAND\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE MOIIAISI _ \n\nWRIT PETITION N0.33V2_54-3'3--2_77'3\/2099'. A \"\nWRIT PETITION NO.33352-33422 \/20O\u20ac3_(t}\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3--1\\I\ufb013{I--\u00a7}\n\n1 M\/S SR1 VINAYAKA CONSTRU'C'l'*IO_N._S\" A  \nR\/BY ITS PROP}?.IE'IOR\"G~.S:;'SHIY'A SWANIY\nS\/0 G.K.SHIVARUDRA.-ISH .AGED\"A_BQUfT 38 YEAR\nocc. c0NRA.C'H\u00a7R,_ R\/A NO. I5\/;3~1, 'I'1\"'1\\\/IAIN\n\nROAD} MA_1\\I'\u00a3fI\"ilAHALLI;v.'vTiJAYA1\\iAGAR,\nBANGALORE saoaao. _   '\n\n2 M\/S SUNRISE CQNSTRU_.C'l'IONS\nR\/BY, ITS PRQPRIETOR \n G.,.s\u00a7.:V1NAY KUMAR s\/:0 G.K.SHIVARUDRAIAH\n'  . AGEDQABOUT 26  OCC. CONRACTOR,\n . R\/A NO, I5'\/3,~1, 11 MAIN ROAD\n  'Iy'[AI'~I.EI*x'AHALLI',. VIJAYANAGAR,\n' .BA1\\:GAI..'oRE,'5'60040\n\n.   3 K_vINAyiKU.MAR S\/O KALAiAH\n\nAGED:ABO'UT 29 YEARS.\n OCC: CONRACTOR\n-~  R,\/_A NO. 37\/4\/40, 11 MA1N, GOVINDARAJ\n NAGAR, VIJAYANAGAR,\n ._BAl'xI GALORE\n\n\n\nIQ\n\nN.C.SURESH S\/O CHANNAVEERAIAH\nAGED ABOUT 30 YRS, OCC. CONRACTOR,\n\nR\/A NO. 58, 5TH MAN ROAD, HVR LAYOUT\nMAGAD1 MAIN ROAD,\n\nBANGALORE 560079\n\nGBASAVARAJU S\/O GANGAVERANNA'~ E  -: Q' \u00ab\nAGED AEOUT 42 YEARS,   ..  \n\nOCC. CONRACTOR V\n\nR\/A NO. 23, 4TH A CROSS  \n\nMARUTHINAGAR, TUMKUR '\n\nM\/S ARASAMBA CONSTRUcTIO'Nj\"  _\n\nR\/BY ITS PROPRIETORIE'I.G.'PURUS~HO'I'HAM\n\nS\/O GANGANNA AGE; 30;_YRS;.,.O!3C,' CONRACTOR\nR\/A NO. 341, 5TH MAIN.R_OAD,,  '   ' ~ \n\nTANGANATHAPLARA,   \nBANGALORE_?56g}-5179.,     \" \n\nM\/S GIRI CQNS?I'RUC\"I10~N' E_  ' 1\n\nR \/ BY ITS. PROPR'H\u00a73TO'R G_.JA1mAx;A1AH\n\nS\/O G1R1APPA_._AGE; 33 \u00a5RS._,OCC. CONRACTOR\nR\/A NO. 2235 {Ewe-._}_ ':3TH--A.C\"ROSS, 5TH MAIN,\n\n11 STAGE, KHB cOLjON':z,__ EASAVESWAGIANAGAR\n\nBANGALORE\n\nS.x,I;fjNERASTRUOTURE\n\n' . R';\"\u00abBY1TS PARTNERS 'VIJAYKUMAR K. S \/O\n .  AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS AND\n  'N.DC;SGREs'HD.AGED MAJOR, BOTH\n' .Oc_c. CONTRACTOR, NO. 3A, IST CROSS,\n\nII ,MAIN_  M.P.M.LAYOUT MALATHAHALLI\nBANGALORE 560056\n\n-- S,H_IVAS\u00a3iAKTH1 CONSTRUCTEON\n R\/BY ITS PROPRIETOR N.S.ADARSHA.\n _S'\/O' SHEVASHANKAR AGED AEOUT 30 YEARS,\n\nR\/A NO. 423, 12TH MAIN M.C.LAYOUT,\n\n \" ~-'VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE 560040\n\n\n\n10\n\nll\n\n12\n\n13\n\nB.N.JANARDHA.N S\/O B. NANJUNDAPPA\nAGED ABOUT 48 YEARS.\n\nR\/A NO. 5\/B, 9TH MAIN, 4TH BLOCK,\nRAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE\n\nL.1v1AHEsH S\/O LINGAPPA D 0\nAGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,  \u00ab 0_ \nR\/A NO. 23, BYATARAYANAPURA'-._  . \nMYSORE ROAD, 2\nBANGALORE\n\nANUGRAHA CONSTRUCTIONS  'V\nPROPRIETOR SHANMRHA K.,s;\"' --  \nS\/O SIDOAVEERAIAH---.__'j;~ ;   \"\nAGED ABOUT45YEARS.,; '  i  .\nR\/A NO. 3, 15\/3--1,11MA1R-ROAD, \" ;----\nWJAYANAGARA,'   _ \nBANGALORE_'56O040.  \" \nM.MANJU1*I_A'F1fI;.'_ _  '_  \nNO. 70.3.4-,----.7_TI-I *..~,14,.._11 'CROSS;-..,...._ \nM.P.1\\\u00ab:E.LAYO'UT, KENG13MTE_ --\nBANGALORE 56\u20ac)0.56.   '\n\nv - p   \" PETITIONERS\n\n. _ u33}\"sr_:: R RAG\u00a7;ND'RA NAIDU, ADVOCATE)\n\n   KARNATAKA BY ITS DIRECTOR\n~DE3I?T. 'O1?-.MiN'Es es: GEOLOGY,\n\nKA__NIJA_ BH\u00a3C\\7AN, RACE COURSE ROAD.\nBANGALORE 560001\n\n  DEPUTY DIRECTOR\n DEPT. OF MINES & GEOLOGY,\n_   FLOOR, V.T.TOWER\n\n\" BANGALORE 500001\n\n\n\n3 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY\nPUBLIC WORKS DEPT. VIKAS SOUDHA.\nBANGALORE 580001\n\n4 EXECUTE ENGINEER\nPANCHAYATH RAJ ENGINEERING DIVISION   \n(URBAN & RURAL) ANANDA RAO CIRCLE. r \"  \" ~ \nBANGALORE    \n\n5 THE COMMISSIONER A     =\nBRUHAT BANGALORE MAIIANAGAR BALIKE  '  \nBANGALORE    \n\n6 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER   \nMINOR IRRIGATION DEVISION, , ,  \nJAYANAGAR 4TH BLOcK,_A_BA'NGALORE\"\u00bb.,. \" .\n\n7 FINANCE MEMBER ;'  _  - \nBANGALORED Ej:\\rELO PMPZNT Aufmomw\nBANGALORE\"  \" 1. \"   \u00bb\n\n8 EXECUTIVE \"F;NQIIJEER ' \u00ab. _ _\nPUBLIC w'ORKsIf3EPAR\"EM'EN\"\u00a3,\nK.1=2.cIRcLE% ' _   \nBANGALORE _ '_ '\n\n RESPONDENTS\n\nA   BEI\"E3,Varaj Kareddy, Pr}. GA. for R-1 to 3]\n\nTHEsE__ \\2vRIT_ .PE:'tj:\ufb01oNs ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF\n\nTHE' coNs\"1\"ITUIj1o'N OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE CIRCULAR DTD\ni1v4..12:q7 ISSUED' BY THE R1 AND LETTER DTD 24.8.09 ISSUED BY THE R2\n*i._'''vI_DELfANNE'>th.e..yl'pri'yate sources. It is\nfurther contended;_\"tha;;t:r1.the;ipetitione~rs\" d'oes...V.not own any quarry\n\nand that they:._  'pay' any royalty to the\n\nrespondents. Ho=.rii\u00bbeve'r3;4VVltherrespondwents are deducting royalty\n\nfrom the bills of the pe'tifVtiVo\"ne:rfs'\u00bbwithout authority of law. Hence,\n\nthese writ .tpetition.s p.rayiAngV'\ufb01ot to deduct the royalty from the\n\nof\"'vth'etpetiitionersin\"respect of the materials procured by\n\ntheml'from_:;:irivat6eV\"_j:;ources for execution of the civil contract\n\nl'\"'*works.A \n\nIn sir\ufb01iiar matters, this Court in G..V. KUMAR AND\n\nO'iFi{ERS'A\".~'v. STATE 0? KARNATAKA me OTHERS in Writ\n\n 'i'-'etiytiursins No. 31264-31266 of 1994 disposed of on 31\" October,\n\n .\n<\/pre>\n
\u00a7”\u00a5x1___.a””\\’<\/p>\n
1994 has Eaici down the principles reiat\u00e9ng to the payment of<\/p>\n
royalty by the contractors. The same are extracted herejuinfcE’e:r’:\u00ab<\/p>\n
(a) Where providing the material (subjected:  V’
\nroyalty) is the responsibility. ‘_  it
\ncontractor and the DVepartin_eiit_b’ a, ”
\nthe contractor with
\nfor extraction of the “‘co_nstructiont”\u00a7
\nmaterial, the contra’ctori” to
\npay    jmaterial
\n(min or”   from such<\/p>\n
yareag-}  the contract<\/p>\n
   or a lump sum
\n._Vcon’tract.  deduction of royalty
\n Charges su”ch”cases will be legal. For this
\n  i.  “rjon~execution of mining lease is
\nnvotvre-.’evant, as the liability to pay royalty
\n“arises on account of the contractor
\n extracting material from a Government<\/p>\n
land, for use in the work.\n<\/p>\n
(:53)<\/p>\n
Where under the con tra ct the<\/p>\n
responsibility to supply the materialf’:f.f”–\u00ab.V”‘*
\n(minor minerals) is that of  ‘V’.
\nDepartment\/emplo yer and . .r the .  ”  it<\/p>\n
is required to provide only   <\/p>\n
service for execution ofany woil<._involvin;g"" <\/p>\n
use of such material,VAi.–anfd~. the unit-rate.:\u00a7
\ndoes not include? the _ _  it terial,
\nthere is  'liat\u00a7ility'    to
\npay   position<\/p>\n
even' 't'l'2(3… convtracto…r_H_is required to<\/p>\n
'transport'~'thei ma.te'riai ' from outside the<\/p>\n
worl<_<site,V"so'V'.foi7g:'_"_as the unit rate is only<\/p>\n
 for labour-..or service and does not include<\/p>\n
R5)'–.i'<\/p>\n
 cost of material.\n<\/p>\n
M\/huere”[;;V’the contractor uses material<\/p>\n
 .p-urchased in open marked, that is<\/p>\n
”  material purchased from private sources<\/p>\n
it like quarry lease holders or private quarry<\/p>\n
3 ,=
\n3; “=*’\u20ac.A\u00bb”‘\ufb02
\nat\/’<\/p>\n
(0′)<\/p>\n
(8)<\/span><\/p>\n
owners, there is no liability on the<\/p>\n
contractor to pay any royalty charges.<\/p>\n
In cases covered by paras (b) and (c) –fi :_. \u00e9 <\/p>\n
Department cannot recover or deduc’t’*\u00bba.ijy \u00bb  ‘<\/p>\n
royalty from the bills of the=.A:con-trafctoar a~no’- 4′ V<\/p>\n
if so deducted, the .\u00bbDepartrrie_n’t <\/p>\n
bound to refund any anuiount.Vso <\/p>\n
or collected to tii.e”fcontrac;tor;  _<\/p>\n
Subject to ‘ the a:bo”ye,f; collection ofV’Vroyalty
\nby the  ‘refund ‘ thereof by
\nthe governed by the<\/p>\n
terms of contl’a’ct.V””’— ‘<\/p>\n
  (f).jf<. Alotlzing stated~\u00ab'above shall be construed<\/p>\n
  Tasha direction for refund in regard to any<\/p>\n
""tAparticul\u00a2\u00a7r contract. The Department or<\/p>\n
it authority concerned shall decide in each<\/p>\n
it \u00abcase, whether royalty is to be deducted or<\/p>\n
if any royalty is already deducted, whether<\/p>\n
it should be refunded, keeping in view the<\/p>\n
\/.,<\/p>\n
=\/V<\/p>\n
 \/,
\ns <\/p>\n
 Ilxdexz 'res\/No.\n<\/p>\n
above principfes and terms of the<\/p>\n
con tract. ”\n<\/p>\n
3. The said decision has been upheld. <\/p>\n
Bench of this Court in the case of OFFICE oI=’.TtHtoAE;v.oi\u00a7\u00a7Ec*ro’Rheh<\/p>\n
or DEPARTMENT or MINES A%Nn..e4e’eEoLoG;Y’–t.’y:{]_n2\u00a7’.<\/p>\n
MOHAMMED HAJEE in Writ Appeal4__.No. ‘8.3_’o~ of 2oo’6VV.#dj:%s:po\u00a7;\u00e9do of<\/p>\n
on 25*’ September, 2006.\n<\/p>\n
4. Following the juud’g’o1en’t__vof:i;hi’\u00a7\u00bb:.Co\u00a7Jrtkrendered in Writ
\nAppeal i\\Eo.83O of V2,”‘UVG’\ufb01’ d\u00e9isbose\ufb01i gfffen 25\u00abf5VV”September, 2006
\nthese writ petit\ufb01orie .aFe:.a–!so:d\u00a7_\u00a7h-ose.d  Vblto\ufb02order as to costs.<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
Chiei Justice<\/p>\n
   ‘t -Sd\/…\n<\/p>\n
o     ~4 JUDGE<\/p>\n
 V.7e’b.AAI*I0sti–‘Yes\/No<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Sri Vinayaka Constructions vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 12 November, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & Shantanagoudar HVTKEIHGH(XNHIFOFIQHEMKUHQLKTBANGALORE DATED THIS THE 12″‘ DAY OF NOVEMBER 2009 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. P.D. DINAKARAN. CHIEF A AND THE HON’BLE MRJUSTICE MOIIAISI _ WRIT PETITION N0.33V2_54-3’3–2_77’3\/2099’. A ” WRIT PETITION NO.33352-33422 \/20O\u20ac3_(t}\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3–1\\I\ufb013{I–\u00a7} […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19870","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Sri Vinayaka Constructions vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 12 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Sri Vinayaka Constructions vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 12 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-11T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-20T03:48:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Sri Vinayaka Constructions vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 12 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-20T03:48:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":563,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Sri Vinayaka Constructions vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 12 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-11T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-20T03:48:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Sri Vinayaka Constructions vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 12 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Sri Vinayaka Constructions vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 12 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Sri Vinayaka Constructions vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 12 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-11T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-20T03:48:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Sri Vinayaka Constructions vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 12 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-20T03:48:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009"},"wordCount":563,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009","name":"M\/S Sri Vinayaka Constructions vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 12 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-11T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-20T03:48:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-sri-vinayaka-constructions-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-12-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Sri Vinayaka Constructions vs The State Of Karnataka By Its … on 12 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19870","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19870"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19870\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}