{"id":198702,"date":"2009-05-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009"},"modified":"2015-11-17T05:38:03","modified_gmt":"2015-11-17T00:08:03","slug":"ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S. V.K. Enterprises vs M\/S. Shiva Steels on 20 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S. V.K. Enterprises vs M\/S. Shiva Steels on 20 May, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: V.B.Gupta<\/div>\n
*            HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI\n\n        RFA No.147\/2009 & CM No.5923\/2009\n\n%            Judgment reserved on:13th May, 2009\n\n             Judgment delivered on:20th May, 2009\n\n      M\/s. V.K. Enterprises\n      Through its Proprietor\n      Shri Pyare Lal\n      B-4, Jitar Nagar\n      Delhi-110051                             .... Appellant\n\n                   Through: Mr. Harjinder Singh, Adv.\n\n                                    Versus.\n\n      M\/s. Shiva Steels\n      Through its Proprietor\n      Mr. Jogesh Bansal\n      Y-255, Loha Mandi, Narayana\n      New Delhi-110028                        ..... Respondent\n\n                   Through : Nemo.\n\n\nCoram:\nHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA\n\n1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may\nbe allowed to see the judgment?                            Yes\n\n2. To be referred to Reporter or not?                      Yes\n\n3. Whether the judgment should be reported\nin the Digest?                                             Yes\n\n\n\n\nRFA No.147\/2009 & CM No.5923\/2009                   Page 1 of 9\n V.B. GUPTA, J.\n<\/pre>\n
      Appellant has filed this appeal challenging the<\/p>\n
judgment dated 30th September, 2008 passed by<\/p>\n
Additional District Judge, Delhi, vide which appellant\u201fs<\/p>\n
leave to defend application, was dismissed and suit of<\/p>\n
respondent, was decreed for Rs.6,68,513\/- together<\/p>\n
with costs and interest pendete lite and future @ 6%<\/p>\n
per annum.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2.    Facts in brief are that respondent who is the sole<\/p>\n
proprietor       of    his    firm,   was     having    business<\/p>\n
transactions with the appellant.            Appellant had been<\/p>\n
purchasing iron sheets on credit basis from the<\/p>\n
respondent. A sum of Rs.4,42,724\/- became due and<\/p>\n
appellant settled the accounts and acknowledged the<\/p>\n
liability of this amount.             Respondent approached<\/p>\n
appellant several times and asked him to pay the<\/p>\n
amount.        Appellant issued a cheque for sum of<\/p>\n
Rs.3,50,000\/- dated 11th October, 2006, towards part<\/p>\n
payment, which was signed by Sh. Pyare Lal, the sole<\/p>\n
proprietor of the appellant\u201fs firm. On presentation the<\/p>\n
RFA No.147\/2009 & CM No.5923\/2009                      Page 2 of 9<\/span>
\n same was dishonoured. A legal notice was sent. Since<\/p>\n
appellant failed to pay this amount, respondent filed<\/p>\n
the present suit under Order 37 Rules 1 & 2 of the<\/p>\n
Code of Civil Procedure (\u201efor short as \u201eCode\u201f).<\/p>\n
3.    Appellant filed an application under Order 37<\/p>\n
Rule 3 of the Code, seeking permission to leave to<\/p>\n
defend.       In the application, appellant stated that<\/p>\n
cheque for Rs.3.5 lacs was issued       towards security<\/p>\n
only and the same was issued by appellant on 11th<\/p>\n
October, 2000, but respondent forged the date of the<\/p>\n
cheque from 11th October, 2000 to 11th October, 2006,<\/p>\n
i.e. after six years and that too after altering the date<\/p>\n
of the cheque.         Rest of the cheque was blank and<\/p>\n
appellant had put the date and signatures on the face<\/p>\n
of the cheque for security purpose.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4.    It had been admitted by the appellant that he had<\/p>\n
been purchasing iron sheets from respondent.              Last<\/p>\n
payment was made to the respondent for Rs.25,000\/-<\/p>\n
vide cheque, dated 27th September, 2004.                   The<\/p>\n
RFA No.147\/2009 & CM No.5923\/2009                 Page 3 of 9<\/span>
\n appellant owed only Rs.1,18,230\/- on 27th September,<\/p>\n
2004 and the issues raised are genuine and triable.<\/p>\n
5.    It has been contended by learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
appellant, that cheque in question was forged, since<\/p>\n
the date of the cheque has been changed and amount<\/p>\n
mentioned in the cheque was towards security only<\/p>\n
and not towards any other payment.                  The case of<\/p>\n
respondent is also time barred.             Learned counsel for<\/p>\n
the appellant in support of his contention cited a<\/p>\n
decision of Madras High Court, T.Kalavathy v.<\/p>\n
Veera Exports, 2001(2)JCC(HC)37.\n<\/p>\n
6.    As per averments made in the application for<\/p>\n
leave to defend, appellant had business dealings with<\/p>\n
the    respondent       and     appellant    owed    a     sum         of<\/p>\n
Rs.1,18,230\/- on 27th September, 2004.                   The main<\/p>\n
defence of the appellant is that the cheque in question<\/p>\n
was issued towards security only and respondent has<\/p>\n
forged the date of the cheque from 11th October, 2000<\/p>\n
to 11th October, 2006. Rest of the cheque was blank<\/p>\n
RFA No.147\/2009 & CM No.5923\/2009                        Page 4 of 9<\/span>
\n and appellant had put date and signed on the face of<\/p>\n
the cheque for security purpose.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
7.    In reply to the legal notice, appellant had stated<\/p>\n
that the cheque was issued as security and only date<\/p>\n
was mentioned on it and other portion of the cheque<\/p>\n
was blank.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
8.    Appellant is taking contradictory stand, as on the<\/p>\n
one hand, in application for leave to contest, he states<\/p>\n
that date of the cheque was forged and rest of the<\/p>\n
cheque was blank, while in the same breath he states<\/p>\n
that he had put the date and signatures on the face of<\/p>\n
the cheque for the security purpose.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
9.    On the other hand, in reply to the legal notice,<\/p>\n
appellant\u201fs case is that, only date was mentioned on<\/p>\n
the cheque and other portion of cheque was blank.<\/p>\n
10. Appellant has nowhere stated either in his leave<\/p>\n
application or in reply to the legal notice, that name of<\/p>\n
payee of cheque was also forged, nor he has stated<\/p>\n
that this cheque does not bear his signatures or his<\/p>\n
RFA No.147\/2009 & CM No.5923\/2009             Page 5 of 9<\/span>
\n signatures has been forged.               Only plea taken by the<\/p>\n
appellant is that, the date mentioned on the cheque<\/p>\n
has been altered and forged.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
11. Appellant         himself       has     placed   on      record,<\/p>\n
photocopy of the cheque at Page 15 of the paper book.<\/p>\n
There is no alteration, overwriting or cutting on the<\/p>\n
date of the cheque, which has been mentioned as “11th<\/p>\n
October, 2006”.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
12. Now coming to the plea taken up by the appellant<\/p>\n
that a sum of Rs.3.5 lacs was given towards security.<\/p>\n
If Rs.3.5 lacs was given towards security as earlier as<\/p>\n
on 11th October, 2000, then it is not clear as to why till<\/p>\n
date, the appellant has not asked for refund of this<\/p>\n
security amount. Interestingly, in leave application, it<\/p>\n
is no where mentioned as in what connection, this<\/p>\n
security amount was given. Was there any agreement<\/p>\n
to deposit security amount?\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
13. As per appellant\u201fs own case, he owed a sum of<\/p>\n
Rs.1,18,230\/- on 27th September, 2004.                     There is<\/p>\n
RFA No.147\/2009 & CM No.5923\/2009                         Page 6 of 9<\/span>
\n nothing on record to show that appellant till date has<\/p>\n
paid even this amount to the respondent.<\/p>\n
14. Another feature in this case is that, in Para 6 of<\/p>\n
application for leave to defend, appellant had taken the<\/p>\n
stand, that he always put Roman \u201eX\u201f for the month of<\/p>\n
October. Para 6 of application reads as under;<\/p>\n
             “That the defendant always put
\n             roman \u201eX\u201f for the October month and
\n             he specifically mentioned the date
\n             11\/X\/2000     and     the    plaintiff
\n             altered\/forged    the   date    from
\n             11\/X\/2000 to 11\/10\/2006.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
15. As per the photocopy of the cheque, the date on<\/p>\n
the   cheque       mentioned        is   “11\/10\/2006”    and     not<\/p>\n
“11\/X\/2000”.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
16. The trial court also rejected this defence taken by<\/p>\n
the appellant observing;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
            “Other than mere repudiation of the
\n         liability on the grounds of the cheque
\n         being misused by fabricating the date, no
\n         triable issue has been raised.       The
\n         defendants contention that the date on
\n         the cheque has been altered from 2000 to
\n         2006 by manipulating the \u201e0\u201f & \u201e6\u201f does<\/p>\n
RFA No.147\/2009 & CM No.5923\/2009                       Page 7 of 9<\/span>
\n          not seem to be correct as the circle of \u201e6\u201f
\n         is smaller than the zeros in the figure of
\n         “2000”. The defence of a blank cheque
\n         given by them also does not entitle them
\n         to escape their liability. The plaintiff has
\n         also relied upon the defendants own
\n         ledger     extract,      confirming      the
\n         transactions and reflecting the balance of
\n         Rs.4,42,724\/- due to the plaintiff.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
17. So, from the entire material available on record, I<\/p>\n
come to the conclusion that the defence raised by the<\/p>\n
appellant in its leave application are sham, most bogus<\/p>\n
and frivolous one. The only intention of the appellant<\/p>\n
is not to make the payment due, to the respondent.<\/p>\n
The case law cited is not at all applicable to the facts of<\/p>\n
the present case.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
18. Under these circumstances, I do not find any<\/p>\n
infirmity or ambiguity in the judgment of the trial<\/p>\n
court. The appeal filed by the appellant is most bogus<\/p>\n
and frivolous one and the same is hereby dismissed<\/p>\n
with costs of Rs.20,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n
RFA No.147\/2009 & CM No.5923\/2009               Page 8 of 9<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
 19. Costs be deposited with the trial court within one<\/p>\n
month from today, failing which the trial court shall<\/p>\n
recover the same, in accordance with law.<\/p>\n
20. Copy of this judgment be sent to trial court.<\/p>\n
21. Trial court record be sent back.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                       V.B.GUPTA, J<\/p>\n
May 20, 2009
\nrb<\/p>\n
RFA No.147\/2009 & CM No.5923\/2009            Page 9 of 9<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court M\/S. V.K. Enterprises vs M\/S. Shiva Steels on 20 May, 2009 Author: V.B.Gupta * HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI RFA No.147\/2009 & CM No.5923\/2009 % Judgment reserved on:13th May, 2009 Judgment delivered on:20th May, 2009 M\/s. V.K. Enterprises Through its Proprietor Shri Pyare Lal B-4, Jitar Nagar Delhi-110051 …. Appellant […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-198702","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S. V.K. Enterprises vs M\/S. Shiva Steels on 20 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S. V.K. Enterprises vs M\/S. Shiva Steels on 20 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-17T00:08:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S. V.K. Enterprises vs M\\\/S. Shiva Steels on 20 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-17T00:08:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1241,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S. V.K. Enterprises vs M\\\/S. Shiva Steels on 20 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-17T00:08:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S. V.K. Enterprises vs M\\\/S. Shiva Steels on 20 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S. V.K. Enterprises vs M\/S. Shiva Steels on 20 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S. V.K. Enterprises vs M\/S. Shiva Steels on 20 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-17T00:08:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S. V.K. Enterprises vs M\/S. Shiva Steels on 20 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-17T00:08:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009"},"wordCount":1241,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009","name":"M\/S. V.K. Enterprises vs M\/S. Shiva Steels on 20 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-17T00:08:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-v-k-enterprises-vs-ms-shiva-steels-on-20-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S. V.K. Enterprises vs M\/S. Shiva Steels on 20 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198702","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198702"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198702\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198702"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198702"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198702"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}