{"id":198713,"date":"2009-09-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009"},"modified":"2014-10-04T14:27:55","modified_gmt":"2014-10-04T08:57:55","slug":"smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt S Radha vs State By Vyalikaval Police on 9 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt S Radha vs State By Vyalikaval Police on 9 September, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 9*\" DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2OQST_7._\nBEFORE J I I\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAwAD__  A I I\n\nCRL.R. NO. 975 OF 2:058.  \" * V'\nBETWEEN:   \"\n\n1. SMT S RADHA  \nW\/O.L.S.RAO, AGED 63 YEARS\n2. SRI L S RAO, S\/OI.LAKS|---IML}.NR'A_O_{;ATE,\nAGED 73 YEARS,BO\"Tlji\"ARvE7  T \nR\/AT.NO.44A4,8TH C.ROSS,\u00a5.  7 =\nMAHALAKSHMT. LAYOUT; B.AN.fGALO RE--O7.\n_ , _      PETITIONERS\n(BY SR1 DTT,R;SBNDARE~SH~,I_ ADV;\n\n1. STATE BY V\\:\":v\\:(A:LIi<.4v_:'V.A'E__'POLICE\n\nBAHGALORE;\u00a7--_=\n\n2. 4;'A.SURESH_ANNE' COTTAGE,\n"  :\\_I,O.2.B, 11N'D-MATH, PALACE GUTTAHALLI,\nBANGALORE -- 560 003.\n 'A    RESPONDENTS\n\n.  .(B"{\u00b0S.T{I\u00bbAI.R\u00bb.A'JA SUBRAMANYA BHAT, HCGP FOR R1 AND\n\nSR;"S.v:S'OBrA'AMANYA, ADV. FOR R2)\n\nik*\n\n CRL. ZP FILED U\/S482 CR.P,C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR\n\nI \"'TH'E':PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY\n\nBE PLEASED TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE\n\nI\"\"\"PETITIONER (ACCUSED NO.1) IN C.C.NO.493\/2003\n\nPENDING ON THE FILE OF THE JMFC., DAVANAGERE., ETC.,\n\n\n\n\n\nTHIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS\nDAY THIS COURT MADE THE FOLLOWII\\EG:-\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
The petitioners, who are arrairgned as avcctised  Cr, I<\/p>\n
No. 66\/ 2005, facing charge for  pTLi’ni:s:–iiapi’|OOe’:OIJ’njd:er<\/p>\n
Section 420 IPC, have assa~i.T;\u00e9d,_%the” prosVeVc:;t’i’:o’n”‘wagjainst’~00<\/p>\n
them.\n<\/p>\n
2. The matter is..I:i’stedI__Va-fiei:\u00ab..goti..\u00a7e fsto respondents,<\/p>\n
in response   the ir_espo:_nd_ent”f\\io.2 — compiaint has
\nfiied adetaileicis’Coitiht-er”–an~d Eea’rne’d Government Pleader Sri
\nRaja S{ibrRaman3Via:.,”‘r3ha.tV_LO’i’r.e:presents the first respondent —<\/p>\n
State ._<\/p>\n
   \ufb01\ufb01reard the {earned counsei for petitioner and<\/p>\n
“ie_a-r.ned'”i3’o$}_erOnrhent Pleader Sri Raja Subramanya Bhat.<\/p>\n
 The contextuai facts are:\n<\/p>\n
 By a report dated 26-03-2005 the respondent No.2<\/p>\n
 “”aileged that the petitioners herein had transacted with him<\/p>\n
gU3i\/<\/p>\n
’33<\/p>\n
to self the immovable property bearing No. 2916\/E, IV Main,<\/p>\n
Vijayanagar 2″” Stage, Bangalore-56O 040 for<\/p>\n
consideration. The agreement resulted in <\/p>\n
and a sum of Rs.-47,500\/~ was paid by her 2.\n<\/p>\n
as saie consideration. Despite I-.re.Cei’vying.'”–tihe’–r___sale<\/p>\n
consideration they did notstr-a__nsfeVrs.Vthe   <\/p>\n
manner known to law and  th\u00e9’ey_e:nt.:Vf;He made
\nrepeated demand,   Hioviiever, the
\npetitioners a conspired…toissuv-pAp.,ress’.h.’the’~”V”subsisting saie
\nagreement  in::”fa\u00a7’;oiuVr  No.2 and soid<\/p>\n
the property-rtwo’:-aV:’\u00a7i’Vose’_r’eia:tive_’b’y nj.arne Suneeia Prituri.<\/p>\n
 itSubsedrueriit,.:”‘t.o:”_.saEe transaction when the<\/p>\n
respondent\u00b0’i’io.’2 VaVp_pro_aCh’ed the petitioners they refused to<\/p>\n
.—.,.,_parvi5s,j’3iivith: the l”}’;1V'(‘j’I’!\u20ac~’~,~-‘~’VaI’1d openly displayed their hostiiity.<\/p>\n
 :,’bo:na’fide that they wouid not return the money<\/p>\n
he _i_o%dged”V’ai._report. The jurisdictionai potice registered a<\/p>\n
”._case inC’3r. No. 66\/2005 for the offence punishabie under<\/p>\n
“:i:’\u00a73e:citi’on 420 r\/w 34 {PC After compietion of enquiry they<\/p>\n
  fii\u00e9ed charge sheet. The petitioners have sought to quash the<\/p>\n
 same.\n<\/p>\n
air”\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6. In support of the grounds urged the learned<\/p>\n
counsel Sri D.R. Sundaresh would contend that privrriarfacie<\/p>\n
no case is made out for the offence punis_h”a”ol.e’~..ui\u20acd_\u00e9r.<\/p>\n
Section 420 r\/w 34 IPC or any other offence-..’irefersllpto.<\/p>\n
list between the parties including;ini:ti.ativoi’i_of.”pros’e.cuVtlOri<\/p>\n
against the petitioners by sthe res’p.oridentsV\u00bb”i’3xio.2lfor ti~.e’,<\/p>\n
offence punishable under Sectiolriw\u00ab.138x of”tiie_u:N;:1.  in CC.<\/p>\n
No. 15100\/2005. He–also”_V_refiers”~~.t’o,i.”exchange of notice<\/p>\n
between the parties, reg-ar.dingV-.dispu.’te’ is only of civil<\/p>\n
nature andghost”.attract:_4Va.ny”‘p’enal provision. The
\njurisdict’io”na!.ygpoiic\u00e9:’nothiave registered a complaint
\nand everillif ‘the’y:’j”h.ad..V_:regis.tered a case they should not<\/p>\n
proceed allgaiinstgtheiij; “..-brie submits that they approached<\/p>\n
  at theV”e’a\u00bbr!~i\u00abe-st point of time and submits that now<\/p>\n
 is complete. Hence, they seek for<\/p>\n
a’ppropri_ate”i_re:lief.\n<\/p>\n
7}”? The learned Government Pleader vary fairly<\/p>\n
\u00b0:.u’b:*hits that Complainant was received, registered,<\/p>\n
“investigated and has culminated in filing of the charge<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
sheet. It is based on the statement of the respondent No.2,<\/p>\n
who has furnished all details.\n<\/p>\n
8. The question is whether in a SitUe3’t:i”O\ufb02.:lVl’l~tl.E”‘rtl;r’\u00a7S\u00ab<\/p>\n
the action initiated against the petitioneprs if<\/p>\n
received by the jurisdictional police  <\/p>\n
sheet is mis–use of process of<\/p>\n
9. My attentio.n”:\u00ab–is   of the
\nApex Court in the case…of:._I:!\\JEiliiitM’C;iiiliiiSij!{\u00a7OSWAMI & ANR
\nvs STATE  8{_”ci:i\u00a7:\u00e9;’v–P.eported in 2oo7 AIR
\nSCW   ftielllnoticed that the report
\nsubmitted__   is a report under Section
\n154    jurisdictional police could not<\/p>\n
hav4e”ca.lled.V i;ipon’1the Complainant to establish the case.<\/p>\n
The ju.’ri.sd_iTc”ti.onal police officer has to register the report.<\/p>\n
 Tfilerefore,,,\u00bbV_thegrievance of the petitioners that report could<\/p>\n
not’~~have been registered by the poiice officer is against the<\/p>\n
 ~pr.o_visi’ons of Section 154 Cr.P.C. However, once report is<\/p>\n
Krece\ufb01ived it is only the Investigating Officer who has to<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
(1<\/p>\n
inquire about the truth of the allegations and file final report<\/p>\n
as required under Section 173 Cr.i3>.C.\n<\/p>\n
10. The report as lodged by the compiaiinty <\/p>\n
two circumstances viz., (1) transac:tioh”betvi{een hirri and’:th”e<\/p>\n
petitioners and (2) payment of  *<\/p>\n
to him the transaction was doctiyrriented ahd.xh\u00a2_: yii’aVs”Ve’n’titled’V’<\/p>\n
to seek enforcement o.f__the There”~is*’VEno other
\nallegations made in the  had in
\nany way indul<;;:_ed:in-  'induce him or force
\nhim to part alleges is that
\nthere  Therefore, there is a<\/p>\n
distinction ii-etweeni'V'the'iib_r'e.ach of contract and criminal act.<\/p>\n
;1'i._ No '-d.o'u'i:i't, it may be that the petitioners have<\/p>\n
 A'r'ecel.iVyedE""rfrio:ri'e_y and failed to return the amount. But the<\/p>\n
Aa*'ii.eg'atyiAo"n\u00a7;-Ain  complaint do not make out prima facie<\/p>\n
 _ case'~for,.__'the.A\u00ab:"oifence punishable under Section 419 IPC to<\/p>\n
Viirnrite action under Section 420 IPC. The ailegations in the<\/p>\n
i._coorn'p\u00a3–aint itself are too baid, vague and do not raise any<\/p>\n
oiiiv<\/p>\n
direct allegations on the petitioners of having indulged in<\/p>\n
any act, which would constitute an offence of cheating.<\/p>\n
12. Hence, I am satisfied that considering thefinjature<\/p>\n
of allegations in the complaint itself and the m_.a:’te’r:–ia’ip~…ifeli:ejd\u00ab _<\/p>\n
by the complaint to indict the petitioners _ti’.-ere:~.is’n:o\u00ab.case\u00bb. <\/p>\n
justifying to proceed against theZgaccpusevdu7fOh’ri..’t’he”ioiffgence<\/p>\n
punishable under Section s’42.0  V  <\/p>\n
complaint’s right to recover the\u00e9arnotiignt fr’o’m:f_the p\ufb01etitioners
\nand any other right in re.l_aiion\u00e9._to;_trla”n\u00bbsa.ction are saved.\n<\/p>\n
13. Accordivrlglyi,” Vileftitiovri  if isllowed. The<\/p>\n
impugned ordeA’f5isVVciVuashed’;”‘-Proceedings against petitioners
\nare dropped. i.LibertVy5is to respondent No.2 to
\nrecovi;r’any an1o\u00bbu,r_it’ in accordance with law.<\/p>\n
sd\/4-=<\/p>\n
VKA  judge<\/p>\n
7.__i-:b<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt S Radha vs State By Vyalikaval Police on 9 September, 2009 Author: Jawad Rahim IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9*” DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2OQST_7._ BEFORE J I I THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAwAD__ A I I CRL.R. NO. 975 OF 2:058. ” * V’ BETWEEN: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-198713","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt S Radha vs State By Vyalikaval Police on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt S Radha vs State By Vyalikaval Police on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-10-04T08:57:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt S Radha vs State By Vyalikaval Police on 9 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-04T08:57:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1020,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt S Radha vs State By Vyalikaval Police on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-04T08:57:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt S Radha vs State By Vyalikaval Police on 9 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt S Radha vs State By Vyalikaval Police on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt S Radha vs State By Vyalikaval Police on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-10-04T08:57:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt S Radha vs State By Vyalikaval Police on 9 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-04T08:57:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009"},"wordCount":1020,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009","name":"Smt S Radha vs State By Vyalikaval Police on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-04T08:57:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-s-radha-vs-state-by-vyalikaval-police-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt S Radha vs State By Vyalikaval Police on 9 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198713","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198713"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198713\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198713"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198713"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198713"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}