{"id":198746,"date":"2008-03-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008"},"modified":"2018-09-30T19:48:22","modified_gmt":"2018-09-30T14:18:22","slug":"ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Ramachandra Reddy S\/O Narasimha … vs State By Bagepalli Police on 10 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Ramachandra Reddy S\/O Narasimha … vs State By Bagepalli Police on 10 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: R.B.Naik<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BANGPJQORE<\/p>\n
BETWEEN<\/p>\n
L Ra_m_ac11a_I.1d_aR-L1d.y,
\nS\/o Narasimha R\ufb01ddy,  _ VA  .4 V
\nAged about 45 y’eai”S.p * _ 3. L
\nR\/at Maxganakuntgy   A
\nBagepa1liTa1uk.   A<\/p>\n
2. Srinivas (z:,’)._Ni1agi1nib__aiSe<\u00e9ne:i_',
\nS\/'0 Aamayma Ready';  ' A<\/p>\n
Age W-about 3Qye'a1fs., '<\/p>\n
R] at _Da1ava.y_iepa11i;'\u00ab .  _<\/p>\n
CI"L\u00a7_19&1la*.11"1u1'.VP;4I9.\ufb02dE'tl, " _<\/p>\n
Andra 'Pradeslrnf _ \u00ab-\n<\/p>\n
3. 4;Narr::ndi’a’R\u00e9d’dy,
\n.f_ ‘S \/;_~.:)_ Kuntasilb-ha ‘Raddy,<\/p>\n
. A ‘._,.1 ~
\n. H n.ge,\u00ab.,. ab \ufb01t 22 years,<\/p>\n
 ? “Ri’aa,t’K.isa:cg,:a;g.amaka1apa11i,
\n._   G6r\u00a7Lat1a.;1vi’anda1,
\n‘  VHi11I:.11.’I_i_3_.tJi’ Taluk,
\n4′ ” Aladrapradesh.\n<\/p>\n
(At jar\ufb01sent R,’ at Golur ‘u’i.”.a g-,<\/p>\n
 ” * Ba\u00e9epalli Taluk) : Petitioner<\/p>\n
.    –!(;~’3y:Sr1, (LN. Raju, Advocate for
\n    M\/s Sshankarappa and Babu Associates}.<\/p>\n
\n\n\/QL\n\n\n\n- v    a perio\n\nAND:\n\nState by Bagepalli Police,\n\nRep by S.P.P.,\n\n<\/pre>\n
High C-eurt. Bul.di11g..,   v_   _
\nBangalore.\n<\/p>\n
(By Sri. Honnappa , HCGP)<\/p>\n
n 0 u c 0 _  1 ” I . .\n<\/p>\n
This C1’Lm1ne=.l e’..’1s10n.._. et’. or! filed. 1.1.. *-<\/p>\n
us ;.  ,.-,V, — I  .\n<\/p>\n
397 8:. 401 Cr.P.C praying to”e_ 91; aside” he Ju Vggnent an<\/p>\n
\u00a31-\n<\/p>\n
scntencc of’ the 170,, Fast (Track Cour-tm\ufb01, Koiar in ‘<\/p>\n
Crl.A.Nos.16_l2003 as”f’18;!2QO3″‘=.dated 15.07.2005 and
\nJudgment and sentence of -the _C.LJ._’\u00bbV.(‘*r. Dn) 65 JMFC.,
\nQ<\/p>\n
Bagepaili,  (LC.No,2–83f’19@9_dated e=3=200<\/p>\n
This __   02iij\u00e9*f0r hea1*ing, this day the
\n,:t:n_1,.1’t, m;11_1__:t1:5c’ftJ!1oVir~if1j.g’:’  ” <\/p>\n
\\II’.\u00bbIJI:lI’-\n<\/p>\n
 petitiibarhrers’-~ have been convicted for an
\no\ufb01enee  ri\ufb01der Section 392 IPC and are
\nof two years and six months<\/p>\n
R”.-I.forv’six.1″inon\ufb021s, by an order of e011vi**”‘T1 “‘”1Ci sentence<\/p>\n
 . paseed by the Civil Judge, (Jr.Dn) dated am March 2003 in<\/p>\n
“‘._ C.C’LA.No.283\/ 1999. The said order of conviction and<\/p>\n
” Sl:1’itE11C6 is confirmed in Crl.A.Nos. 16 and 18 of 2003 by<\/p>\n
9. AL vac:\/I:4′,z___<\/p>\n
K v-‘<\/p>\n
an order dated 15-7-2005 passed by the FastT’_I’r <\/p>\n
Kolar and as such the petitioners have come<\/p>\n
0<\/span><\/p>\n
1343.0. . his<\/p>\n
u.r u.-..p.p.-.1<\/p>\n
111.<\/p>\n
‘cu…\n<\/p>\n
2.It is the case of the prosec\ufb01fidh  eh  <\/p>\n
a. 9. out 8 9 “1. P.’…2 Pr–=**1n_ <\/p>\n
and P.W.6.Murthy were goiiig ‘Jeep I’\u00a7’i;\u00a3i;~4fjJ\/Ivi.:T:44 to
\nMaraganakunte v\ufb02lage snack packets to
\narrack shops’   persons came in a<\/p>\n
jeep  and prevented<\/p>\n
+1…. .;V.’.’.’-“.Vi ‘-,.;’.._..,..\u00ab’:.3-.’.”‘ 4′..Q;.,.;.L;- .-…………..V..:I .. . …. ,. 43-… _: .
\num yseuu _[J~EJi\u00a7bU1.H’,i u  p1 L. Bung J.Ll.l.|-1,1 ‘IA ,_=m;u IUI l.U.i_<\/p>\n
pullecivthe\ufb01l  he jeep; beat them with hands<\/p>\n
am1..,forei\ufb02b11v_  toekA”‘a\u00a7f\u00a31y the jeep in which they were<\/p>\n
 V.  –  .a_1oh\ufb01  3580 packets of arrack.<\/p>\n
‘ dg\u00e9ddr to establish the guilt of the accused the<\/p>\n
preseeettien has examined P.W.1 to P.W.1O and got<\/p>\n
~ marked Exs.P.1 to P.8.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4. P.W.1 Mohaboob Sab is an eye wimeee’–.to the
\nincident in question. He in his evidence
\nthe ease of t. A  % ‘<\/p>\n
hostiie.\n<\/p>\n
5. P.W.2.I\\Tmmm’ is 1;.\n<\/p>\n
case, he has lodged’.   that the
\npetitioners have   punishable under
\nSection 392.  in   named the first
\naccused 5ers’::’orie”:V’*Vo.f’  and has made other
\n“”” H .  ‘our-“‘e’. In me course of
\ninveefige1\ufb01on,~oecused also came to be
\n  ‘A32  <\/p>\n
 .,  \ufb01g\u00bbI’,Wv.3.Ramacha11drappa is the panch witness to<\/p>\n
H “Ex~.P.”S.’V”\u00ab.V.”i?.W\u00a7?\u00a5.Seshagi1irao is a panch witness for spot<\/p>\n
 Ex.P.3 and also seizure mahazar Ex.P.4.<\/p>\n
7. P.W.5 ChB1’1d1’\u00a3-1 who has been referred to above<\/p>\n
*:was the driver of the Jeep which was forcibly taken away<\/p>\n
by the accused persons herein. pwas a
\nworker in the arrack shop. He was also in  ;,-5: in\n<\/p>\n
111.. _.vit1e11_e __a_w sated Lhat he too wag
\nW’ 1 P.w.5 auu I-‘.w.o au.1d :11. ‘*
\nstopped the said jeep,  V
\nand forcibly took away   ie; the panch<\/p>\n
witness to the seizure i:1ah\u00a5azar.t’Ex_;P;6\u00a2_<\/p>\n
   ‘.:’.:3ub’-‘Ir;speeV\u00a7to’r of Police who
\nregistered’  -the petitioners-accused
\nsnrmnaiaht He:-rd.f$onstable and P.W.1O Venkata<\/p>\n
Reedy isthanother eenetable who speak about the recovery<\/p>\n
 V’  _  ‘L.Ieep.H  “”” ” A’<\/p>\n
~ ix~;r..,r-s-..==r<\/p>\n
Vfpetitionersiaccused ‘nerei\ufb02 Who Elffi rivai arr’ ‘-1: ti<\/p>\n
‘  counsel for the petitioner submitted
\n  P.W.5 and P.W.6 are all interested Witnesses,<\/p>\n
in se.,.u..r-.g the eonvi ti. 1′: of the<\/p>\n
mania’; u–v 4. – ..w wr –\n<\/p>\n
 Though P.W.5 in his evidence has etated that he knew all<\/p>\n
FALQLL\/u2LL’r I\/L.__.\n<\/p>\n
the three petitioners prior to thedate of co1111I1issioI1.pof the<\/p>\n
offence, there is no mention of the names: foi”__”__ai3′,”the<\/p>\n
cti  all  1, it  <\/p>\n
names of petitioners ‘2 and  are jj.n.;t’:’.f ‘ 1:; i__t’he*..<\/p>\n
complaint as well as in the  i’Snhseq11ei’-\ufb01g
\nof furtherestaternent of   3 are
\nimplicated as aceusedinereonei  euhmitted that
\nthough we A-in  A 2 V V
\nstolen   _po1i\u00a7;epp_ Station, a
\n  of witne\ufb01e P.W.7, but
\nthe  petitioner was not arrested ‘at<\/p>\n
all and  V;-ninite  a. he tinie the mahazar was<\/p>\n
djsawn” in the “po1i_ee,stai;io\ufb02, pe’–‘_”on”r was “i_(‘:t preeer at<\/p>\n
‘ Lothep  drawing up of mahazar and that A-1<\/p>\n
.  Venirendered before the Court and had obtained<\/p>\n
 bai1,.  ‘Seizure of Jeep on the basis of the voluntary<\/p>\n
,1 1.: an 9 nnnimd nn gnw. Hg<\/p>\n
5-, CHI-I-I lat \\d\\I\\lnn\\JI-an\u00bb I-\u00abarr  u<\/p>\n
‘ no mention about the arrest of the petitioner No.1\/A-1<\/p>\n
i ?L\u00e9.mu.cL’wL.\n<\/p>\n
and nothing is stated to have been recovered gffom his
\npossession and at his instance, Thoughicit <\/p>\n
the dealers, they in fact didnot  licenee_:fe_
\narrack in the area where ejlegeti  had taken
\nplace. He also submiftediiidependent witnesses<\/p>\n
‘W’-” hwn exee11ned\u00bbb:,r.’she-1g=:oeee1=1iez1 t.<\/p>\n
guilt of the   \u00ab _ Z:\n<\/p>\n
,.'<:.~,.= .'"–,.;;g.. =,." 1- +
\n; '._"'c\u00a7;' "11 11 '3 Jae material en re-we rd, I<\/p>\n
find    line agent has deposed in<\/p>\n
his. evidenee_:Vt11a\u00a5:  he was coming in the Jeep KA 40<\/p>\n
 V.  –  aiter  arrack packets in Maraganakunte<\/p>\n
came in _8.110\ufb021CI' Jeep<\/p>\n
E
\nD
\nC:\n<\/p>\n
e
\n.1<\/p>\n
 .c jeepufrom proceeding further. He has further -deposed that<\/p>\n
ii  inmates of the jeep in which he was travelling were<\/p>\n
Vipulled down and forcibly the jeep WaS_t&|1\u00a3\u00a7l’_1 beatixlg<\/p>\n
\/Q.:@–Q–LJLQ,J..$c’-\u00bbI_,<\/p>\n
P,W,5  .\n<\/p>\n
P.W.2, P.W.5 and PW. 6. In the evidence it is brought on<\/p>\n
record that the driver of the Jeep as well V.<\/p>\n
persons ‘..e.e c.21.rr_\\,Ii__g cash which they had  ‘ <\/p>\n
selling the arrtcx p”ci{“ts t.m'” t.’1e1;tin1.e’t:ie”j-e}:– <\/p>\n
by the accused persons, noiiesof the’*accus\u00a2Ci;9;ti\u20ac\ufb01I:ifa’v.o <\/p>\n
steal, rob and snatch the cashivieziiotiht   their
\npossession. P.W.2    haestated that
\nthe driver jeep P.W.-.’i r, said persons,
\nP.W.5 being__tiie”   has stated none
\nassau1ted__him,:::’ *    only identi\ufb01ed IVLO. 1<\/p>\n
jeep bealirig ‘N__o.O5 M\/6264. The said jeep<\/p>\n
 an’ythii1g*iI1\u00ab evidence and he does not kT1_’w mjrtliing<\/p>\n
mint  has deposed that he knew A-1 and<\/p>\n
the doesihotiilaiow A-2 and A-3. He has further stated that<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
jfhe; does no. . .-w anythin about the case. Both the<\/p>\n
–_’I’-I<\/p>\n
‘  Witnesses have been tr”-*t”d “S hostile ..y the p:os…c1_1Li_h,<\/p>\n
It is on the basis of the evidence 0″ F’.W”.5 and I-“.W.8, ‘Le<\/p>\n
Courts below have held that incident in qaesticn has
\noccurred in Maraganakunte: – village.’ -‘  {two<\/p>\n
nrifnncuans gnu 1n1rne”r!a \ufb01g    “(L nun <\/p>\n
by the investigating. officer  T’
\nindependent witness. P.W,\u00bb4
\nscene of occurrence  the case
\nof the prosecution.  dated 29-6-1999
\ndrawn for the -s”-‘iez’   _  ‘  T 1%.’o.m.\n<\/p>\n
6264 in      by the HC and
\n13.0 of  *  has also not been<\/p>\n
estahiiishedV.VVsinjeep”  witnesses have clearly<\/p>\n
Q
\n‘ .theVjeep. :i.ie;, ___P.W.7 also admits_- that none of the accused<\/p>\n
‘\ufb011*sons'{iz’erevp1*esent at the time; of the S\u00a7iZ11_1.’-jQ_:Of the jeep.<\/p>\n
 In amen it is found that petitioner No. had__vo1unwr\ufb02y<\/p>\n
sV1″I”‘Is’-‘!’t’\u00a3II’|l’1.\ufb02!’Vea anti Ohfni\ufb01n\ufb02 HQ b1’!<\/p>\n
‘ V I..l.I-‘;Z’.\\.tl.I.\\..I.\\Jl<\/p>\n
.._.ed. to he made<\/p>\n
it is<\/p>\n
C-IA M LI KJCLI-I ‘W M Lila<\/p>\n
‘out that he was apprehended when he- W_as:_\ufb02  the<\/p>\n
‘ stolen jeep which was taken to the Police Station in the<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
presence of the accused persons and the same was”–seized<\/p>\n
by the investigating officer. It is only  ._of<\/p>\n
‘P.’t’I!_2′ Pjxr I’: and 13111.5 \\_x_jr ‘<\/p>\n
VV If-LI \u00a2’4I.l.l.\\.aI. -It<\/p>\n
..ic–\n<\/p>\n
.;;4. 1<\/p>\n
_’__ -“-1<\/p>\n
.es a a111_  of  <\/p>\n
manner in which the incident ihad…ta;E<ei1 "  we 4<\/p>\n
reading of the complaint .:~eqea1s"' that aeeusied,
\nknown to the comp1a1'nanHt'V\u00abare not  in the<\/p>\n
complaint. No attemp\ufb01isgrnade.i'.b;:_'thet accusedpersons to<\/p>\n
witnesses,' in  has also admitted that there<\/p>\n
was no._.assaiut.:;py the accused. The record
\nreveais that "business rivalry between the first
\npeti..cner.._4 .;*….\u00a2'\u00bbe.., iiand\ufb01ene By_a__reddy to whom the – jeep<\/p>\n
mug No. <\/p>\n
'  apjmars the quarrel erupted on the date of' the<\/p>\n
"incident.V–het.ween the two groups and as such a case came<\/p>\n
to iiheviii\ufb01led against the petitioners accused herein. In the<\/p>\n
" _instent e"se, the recovery of ii:-L49! jeep -.o-.,- the Qossession<\/p>\n
by the prosecution that the jeep belonging to Byrareddy<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
was forcibly took by these petitioners. N9_it_1dependent<\/p>\n
witnesses have supported the case of ..to<\/p>\n
‘VII f’\\ ‘I’\\ 1751<\/p>\n
the jeep after beating P.w.z, r_.vg:.5 : yd’ _  ‘,
\nthe said witnesses have a1s’o.__1_1oI;
\nshow that they were    packets for
\ndistribution in the   :’tt1e:’inoiderit “occurred on<\/p>\n
th” date of ‘ti\ufb01e ‘”””*”*-*'”*.f- VA”1\u00b0””.’.’V<\/p>\n
‘5
\nt:\n<\/p>\n
In-\n<\/p>\n
‘. is
\ni
\nE
\n2<\/span>
\n.2<\/p>\n
failed to  -tihei  it  accu$.?\u00a7l’.. beyond
\nreasonabie’~VdoIii1t.VV_i  appears to be out come
\nof  busitiess-..v~*–betWeen the first _ petitioner and<\/p>\n
Bv s1″e-:,1P.ey t_.e_riv-\ufb02:\u00b0’_die11’ibutors of arrack. As the<\/p>\n
“.1.-.1}.-.1-. ‘I-us;\n<\/p>\n
‘ 1 to _’g*uu_-“‘t of mesa<\/p>\n
prdsecutio\ufb02 iiis\u00e9\ufb01. iaii<\/p>\n
‘ Lpmcusedifieyond all reasonable doubt, they are entitled for<\/p>\n
H the revision petition requires to be allowed.<\/p>\n
‘ V   following:\n<\/p>\n
{TDTTFi’_
\n\\…r\u00a3\\_:_g*._g4\\<\/p>\n
The revision petition is aiiovved and the o -u r o
\nconviction and sentence passed by the trial Court as<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
af\ufb01rmed by the first ap.pe1late Court is set asid’e\u00ab.bT The<\/p>\n
accused are acquitted of the _c_ha1’gcs _.<\/p>\n
t….,_—. .11: 1331. bends furnished by the  <\/p>\n
l
\nH:\n<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
\nn
\nI
\n3:\n<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
\n5<\/span><\/p>\n
-lid ”v *;..e 2<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Ramachandra Reddy S\/O Narasimha … vs State By Bagepalli Police on 10 March, 2008 Author: R.B.Naik IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BANGPJQORE BETWEEN L Ra_m_ac11a_I.1d_aR-L1d.y, S\/o Narasimha R\ufb01ddy, _ VA .4 V Aged about 45 y’eai”S.p * _ 3. L R\/at Maxganakuntgy A Bagepa1liTa1uk. A 2. Srinivas (z:,’)._Ni1agi1nib__aiSe<\u00e9ne:i_', S\/'0 Aamayma Ready'; […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-198746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRamachandra Reddy S\/O Narasimha ... vs State By Bagepalli Police on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramachandra Reddy S\/O Narasimha ... vs State By Bagepalli Police on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-30T14:18:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramachandra Reddy S\\\/O Narasimha … vs State By Bagepalli Police on 10 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-30T14:18:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1820,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Ramachandra Reddy S\\\/O Narasimha ... vs State By Bagepalli Police on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-30T14:18:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramachandra Reddy S\\\/O Narasimha … vs State By Bagepalli Police on 10 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramachandra Reddy S\/O Narasimha ... vs State By Bagepalli Police on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramachandra Reddy S\/O Narasimha ... vs State By Bagepalli Police on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-30T14:18:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramachandra Reddy S\/O Narasimha … vs State By Bagepalli Police on 10 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-30T14:18:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008"},"wordCount":1820,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008","name":"Ramachandra Reddy S\/O Narasimha ... vs State By Bagepalli Police on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-30T14:18:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramachandra-reddy-so-narasimha-vs-state-by-bagepalli-police-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramachandra Reddy S\/O Narasimha … vs State By Bagepalli Police on 10 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198746"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198746\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}