{"id":199372,"date":"2009-08-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009"},"modified":"2018-02-06T14:46:56","modified_gmt":"2018-02-06T09:16:56","slug":"aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Aswathaiah vs The Management Of M\/S Kamala Dials on 10 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Aswathaiah vs The Management Of M\/S Kamala Dials on 10 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n
IN THE }\u00a7(}I~i COURT ()1? KAELN .A'1'AKA. AT BANGALORE\nDated this the 19\"' day of August, 2909\n\nBefore\n\nI'HEHON'BLEMRJUS1YC'E HULLrI:;4p1 G    j\" *\n\nBetween:\nIn WP 188613605:\n\nMazzagetnent of M53 Kamla Dials 82. Devices Ltd\n\nDials Unit 11 296 5 297, 5* Main Raad   \n\n4\"' Phasa, Peemya Industrial Area'  V\n\nBangalore 560 058   _ _  . - % .\n\nBy' its Executive Director  A   :     9' V Petitions?\n\n(By Sri B C. vxab\ufb01\u00e9k\u00e9ig f\u00e9ixsfyw)   \"\nAnd:     K A M 'A\nSri Aswathaiaii' C50 Prd\u00e9iza\ufb01n\ufb01a Egiigrg\ufb01rises\n\nRfa 2\"' Main Roaii Huyga\ufb01mlaggar\nSmzkmgkane, V'isw&m;_cdam Pas:\n\n V'  'iloggd? Eiangalar\u00e9'  Respandeni\n\n\"'-::B;,~V?s'r;--x~f .{\u00a7d~v_.}\n\nIn 'i?1>\"v%204'923*3;:j41V:\u00e91: V'\n\n 4  Sri Asv;a:h;i2ah, 33y:s\n~ Q  359 'v'ecrab\u00e91_z:v.draiah\n' ,. mg L)  258;; 14* Cress\n\n'B95  Haysala Nagar\n\n-- .T\".-S\ufb01akadakaite, Bangaiore Prstiiiuner\n\n \" my Sr: v s Nag Adv.)\n\n\/'\n\n'gr\n\nWrit Petitions I886} \/ 2:205 aw .2w92 ,?.2\u00a7\u00a3iii5 2'e5})  \n\n\n\n{V-J\n\nAnd:\n\nManagement ofMfs Kamia Biais & Devices Ltd\nEials Unit H 296 ,2 297, 5*' Main Road\n\n4*\" Phase, Peenya Industrial Area\n\nBangaiore 560 058\n\nBy its Executive Director I?.;\u00e9:%paI;\u00a7i\u00e9;\u00bb\u00a7f  [*1  _  .\n\n(By Sri B C Prahhakar, Adv.)   _\n\nThese Wri! Petiticms are \ufb02ied imdresr   <\u00a7i' .t he \npraying to quash the award dated 1.6.'20{)5 in  '?5f'20t32;," \u00a5V;s\u00a7zVj_\u00a3v1:e L;a'ha'::z*_ " ;\n\nCourt, Bangaiorc.\n\nThese Writ Pctit\u00e9ons c\u00e9itning onfor   the Court\nmade the foilowingt   I  <  \n\n   \n\nPej;ifi0\ufb01S':\u00a7x*:\u20acV5hy  iia.=n;Vits epz:'x'ati0n:\u00e9\u00a7'_'v  c;lose_d. \" \"\n\nAecnrdinglyg it is prayed for setting aside vibe r_:rdu:i'* df'..r\u00e9izi\u00a7iaf\u00e9r.r{e.z:: \n\npayment of back wages.\n\nIn the Workmafs peti\ufb01:.>h\u00a7A~-it is--'_Vs.ta\u00a7r:4:1\"ti'z.z;1Efhbcharges iaveied are nest\n\npmved agairmt the workman.  }p3u:3r',}:\u00a3.5;{s\u00bb~:f1,a3.'\u00bb*i: award\ufb01d full back\n\nwages and that the L\u00e9'\u00a3\u00bb%;3;fCo\u00a3i\ufb01  '3?-.'\u00a5T'\ufb01iI\"\u00a3.i1 errors on the face of\nthe record.\n\nIn   of advanceti and the grounds taken, the\n\npoint that arisesffgr can\u00a7i\u00a73efa\ufb01{2 r:~-- Whether the award passed by the Labour\n\n\" *  V ~ ..... .. *\n\n\" . . 'Thev  is a public iimite\u00e9 company engaged in the\n\npfvwateh Dials. There are: certified sfand\u00e9ng mdem and abcut\n\nV' i g:\u00a3%en$yneig?1t persons are Werking. Accar\u00e9ing to the warkrnan, he was\n\n--   a saiary of Rs.\u20ac\u00a5,3Q}0f-- pm. at the relevant paint of time. There were\n\n VV '\u00e9\u00e9:i?erai aharges ievele\u00e9 against the\/ werkmanx As per the eharge sheet datad\n\nT?\"\n\n\n\n22.6.1993<\/pre>\n
, {here is willful misconz\u00e9uct and <\/p>\n
Work plaae during Working hours, behaving rudely wi\ufb01u   …<\/p>\n
and disorderly bchaviolsr for which, workmagi  fepii\u00e9gi subsg\u00e9q\u00e9s\ufb01tly  <\/p>\n
next month. Thcrea\ufb01er, warning ietter has   <\/p>\n
days. Several Setters were issued tixne {o v:2zne._\u00a7m_d”2’a.i.1999;”<\/p>\n
Warning letter was issued  ‘i)f__disc’i;A}11ir:;a.. i\ufb01gille factory
\npremises. Ano\ufb01uer charge sh\u00e9ei\u00e9tihs Ai:’1’su;a;JV:&:r;’4Vregardixa:g disorderly
\nbehaviour, use of ms}: Ignguf-age’  Apart from that,
\nthere is also the__  and a memo is issued
\non   to the Personae} Magxagcr,
\nmeme is Essugd. __this regard, warning ietter is issued on\n<\/p>\n
38.i2.20{1G.    to discharge work given by the<\/p>\n
Superv\ufb01ssii”? _ ma\ufb01a V-.is \u00a7ss1uea on. 2′?.6.2GCr1, Explanation is given by the<\/p>\n
  5we:1\u00a7:\ufb01a\ufb01   ie\ufb01\u00e9s issued by the managesment are also produce\u00e9.<\/p>\n
 ;~–*;1i?;:i_iaei”T’a:;1\u00a7:ia’;tge” \ufb01gzzifist \u20ac113 waricman is, unauthorised absence for fourteen<\/p>\n
  \u00e9uperviser questioned about \ufb02ue same, the workman has<\/p>\n
 –  izzsisted f’e3.:f__A\u00a7>ost ‘faster smctien and abused the crf\ufb01ciai. It is aise stated an<\/p>\n
   the warkxnan had \u00a7e\ufb01 the work place and was fa-nn\u00e9 leiterixzg *3: the<\/p>\n
  fagjzoasg. On issue 1, 3 \ufb01nziirzg is given that then: was megal dismiseai fmm<\/p>\n
 servi’es. The inqizjry canductad is 3150 held is be not fair and pmper. On the<\/p>\n
\u00a7\u00a7\/J’<\/p>\n
issue whether the dismissal is justified, Labeur Coast has ordered for<\/p>\n
rc:\u00a3z1statement with 6{}’?\/\u00bb: back wage 3,<\/p>\n
What has been noticed in the awaxd ‘:s$ Labour Courftteas   ~<\/p>\n
consideration the reply given by the workman gmd it apps\u00e9f\u00e9  ‘_’\\_w:dr}~.*r.rvia:1 as u’<\/p>\n
ifhe is innecent, has given his explanation. Irlewgtvex; ctitniseijtfepf\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9ag\ufb01itg’<\/p>\n
the managememt has taken me: through ‘the~tjari(>us’ ~at1t1exu1*t;SVV\u00a3\u00e9gar\u00a3ijng_7izsi1\u00a7g _ V F<\/p>\n
efwords –~ abusive and obscene language, the o\ufb01”ic.i:at_1′  which
\nis at pages 27 and 28 of the writ tiI;t\u00e9.:.b\u00a7\u00bb=-.ti1\u00a7:}z:an3gement. When the
\nSupervisor asked the V:%'{)ri\u00a7!n31}_,\u00a3!.8V:.’t{>.VWt?V!t_%’ ihc ‘  \ufb01ppfy for leave in<\/p>\n
advancr; \ufb02te: ‘tht: Supertti\u00e9\u00e9r tn task. Sirniiariy, when the<\/p>\n
Warkman  Vinstxuct\u00bb:{ittct_t:Vg(\u00bbt\u00a7  work place by the Supervisor, he has<\/p>\n
replied that he \u00a35 tires at gt;  everywhere and who is he to as}: him.<\/p>\n
  E1′._)’\u00a7’\\I’\u00a3’:’tt\u00a7.I:’ in-the reply gi\ufb02vezr-it is as if the workman is innocent ef the charges<\/p>\n
 ‘agai:s$t’  has also am to justify his conduct,<\/p>\n
 ursazltharised absence, Labour Court has notad that the<\/p>\n
    came to wurk only on 17.7.2001 fer the first time and has 3139<\/p>\n
  management witness \u00e9id not latnnw whether the workman was<\/p>\n
“35t\u00a7sH\u00a3:13t an i?.?.20{)} of nut. Labour Ctmrt has gene ta the extent ef<\/p>\n
\u00ab. dishelievirsg the vcrsion at the management witness an\u00e9 tried in jttstify the<\/p>\n
1′<\/p>\n
W,<\/p>\n
conduct cf the Workman only on \ufb01re score that the management Wlf\u00a31\u20ac{‘$3’_’lii).il\u00a7d<\/p>\n
not say properly wheilxer cm 15* and E5″ the workman had ati\u00e9xid\u00e9d _<\/p>\n
net. But, it is clear from 4,7.2G01 to 14.7.2891, the-v. <\/p>\n
absent and also d\u00e9d not apply ieave. 1.ate:\u00a3,A_ <\/p>\n
sanctinn of eamed leave and this aspect  nofi:-gen’ sariezmlgrltaiceiz niztel of  ,<\/p>\n
Thvligh it is stated that there is  W}l\u00e9’i}%f2’\u00a3fA5l1;lE\u00a7l’l.!.i4\u00a7t3;lllllT:ll0r\u00a7Se(i
\nabsance ft)!’ any ether purpogg \u00a7::!:.lll’\u00a7{\u00a35.1″jllSliiV’i;1\u00e9l\u00a7_i  Rrriher, ihe
\nLabour Cam has also not stated lls ‘ltl;~A :~.;3lif5_?  witness has $0 be<\/p>\n
disbelieved regardipg  of?A__abt;lsl\u00e9\u00a7a?&  siating that it is 331
\nconcocted.   em record, Labeur Court has
\npassed  fgfef\u00e9nce lt\u00e9llhe sgeei\ufb01c allegation made by<\/p>\n
the :nanagefnent\u00ab .agajn$t’\u00a3h\u00a7:~vii3rkiixa;1,.–~<\/p>\n
Regartli\ufb01g lusinglla:bus.i.3r\u00e9V?\u00a7:”:g13age, the opinion fanned by the Labour<\/p>\n
 ‘Ci}lil”fV\u00bb’\u00a7?\u00a7*;,.  t\u00a71c’l;31as:1eV_p_f_i3:ci&ent to tbs place where other peeple are<\/p>\n
Al” w0::f\u00a7<ing ih\ufb01 'disIa%i'ce__ is only 15 feet as such, mixers maid not have heard.<\/p>\n
  'ili\u00e9'l..Labour Com! appears to be perverse because when<\/p>\n
. abus\u00e9w\u00e9\u00e9 langllltg\u00e9llis usad, one can easily hear them though the incidanf camrtot<\/p>\n
H u    A=:ve;:3;1 if f\u00e9iilas taken glace in a separate room. Speci\ufb01cally the managemerxt<\/p>\n
 -_\u00a7v’i\u00a7;lzl1\u00e9ssl1as staiad that the workxnan Wsrlwd far nearly fear yesars and he has<\/p>\n
 ” naifmishehaxxed earlier til} \u00a3999. Stating that ewiier them is no such report<\/p>\n
against the workman regarding rnisbehaviour, only to harass ga<\/p>\n
allegations is made, Labour Couri is of the View that only \u00a3111:   V’<\/p>\n
submission of the Charter sf Demands, there; is anfair  Cf ‘A a<\/p>\n
course the explanation oifered by the man\ufb01gcm.-\u00a7nt*  :il2is”‘r;e”gaArli<\/p>\n
Wm-kman is not at all an o\ufb01ice bearer 0l’_tl2’s:.,\u00a7Jnio1\u00a7’a2nd in the us\u00a3iai’v<;1x:’se his r . L’<\/p>\n
misbehaxe\ufb01onr is brought to thc_ no\ufb01ce of u\u00a3};c_ rngnageincnivvanrl  has
\n. c?\u00a7e!l’4\u20ac-\u00ab*3? “”4? .A  –. ,.  A H .\n<\/p>\n
bean held and there ls rzotlsgg as; such to \u00a5f_:Ci}Ifi1:iEa~.}VUfkm&n 1101′ he was
\nan ac\ufb01ve participani inlthe uniernv-a\u00ab:;t_if&’iti\u00a3:sAas ly\u00e9arer. Thmugh out
\nthe Labour Cuurthals  onV:’clisi5cllevi:\u00a7Vg._\ufb02ie’ uvt-‘s’sion of the xzxanagernent
\nwitness. It app\u00e9ays th\u00e9sfg iS’v”531’fi’\u00e9i.\u00e9_Ht_ frialerifgl V\u00e9vidence on record painting
\n(put the miicond\ufb01\u00e9t   regarding unauthorised absence, use of
\nabusive language and :;lisljge21\u00a71i:\u00e9:}iir\u00ab.9\u00e9iti1 the superiors. Even tl1eug,h it is<\/p>\n
stated  ihc   has m\u00e9sbehaved with the Supervisor<\/p>\n
 l’Vs.i\u00a5;h\u00a31:i:t_.’\u00a7:;ps;g:L\u00a7Afi<;;"sll3: sta\u00a7ihg"'\u00a3i1\u00e9 name of the Superviser, Labour Court has<\/p>\n
 ..:\u00e9f saying ihat there is my charge leveled for which the<\/p>\n
woz\ufb01tlii\u00e9l  lfliiid guilty. This appears to be strange.
\n   sanctriiming of leave fer the unauthorised periud and<\/p>\n
x V' lgseriniti-iglg 'Elle werkrrzma 1:0 do duty, Labour Caurt has opined mat after the<\/p>\n
-.llf.ar\u00a51p:i<'\u00a7'j;'\u00e9i::: gives explanation for his unautzhnrised absence ,. if they as<\/p>\n
" satisfied, he wmzid be allowed to do work. it has uizserwd that $16 wnrkmaxx<\/p>\n
11%'<\/p>\n
If}<\/p>\n
using abusive and obscene language against the oi\ufb01c\u00e9al superiegf and<\/p>\n
unauthorised ahsemsze.\n<\/p>\n
In the circumstances, while setting aside the order of  <\/p>\n
and payment of 6\u00a3)% back wages, in modi\ufb01cation of the  of th\u00a7’i,$;b\u00e9hr _\u00ab  ‘v<\/p>\n
Court, it is ordered that management shall  as <\/p>\n
in lieu cf reinstatement and also back wages v\u00a7.%E1i<.:'\u00a7i.V_arna)unbt'V iuwax{i':\u00a2 fu1V1  '-<\/p>\n
and \ufb01nal settiement, since the Werktnan    ‘V<\/p>\n
pins towards 3.17 B Wages from 12;; dm,.at’\ufb011i;:g \u00a75i”=.:1_:e w\u00a7i{penm:;n till date.<\/p>\n
Acc:f\u00a7rding:Alj;’;’Tv:g;::ti\u00a7i{;zx’  the Igxanagement is allowad in part.<\/p>\n
Petition of {E6 ‘v\u00a7?o1’kma’n.Vi::;1’  2 *”\n<\/p>\n
         Sd\/–\n<\/p>\n
HEDGE<\/p>\n
H%:;z_;R;:_%,2 23\u00a7’k;g.%2ev\u00a3\u00a7\u00a2V<\/p>\n
Hea\u00a7{i”;f:1fther. It is erdareck, 816 mzmagcment shall pay another<\/p>\n
   tswayds full and final settlcmcni, in addition in what has men<\/p>\n
   the ardcr data\u00e9 1{}.\u20ac}8;2(}{}\u00a7.\n<\/p>\n
sa\/~
\nESDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Aswathaiah vs The Management Of M\/S Kamala Dials on 10 August, 2009 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh IN THE }\u00a7(}I~i COURT ()1? KAELN .A’1’AKA. AT BANGALORE Dated this the 19″‘ day of August, 2909 Before I’HEHON’BLEMRJUS1YC’E HULLrI:;4p1 G j” * Between: In WP 188613605: Mazzagetnent of M53 Kamla Dials 82. Devices Ltd Dials Unit […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-199372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAswathaiah vs The Management Of M\/S Kamala Dials on 10 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Aswathaiah vs The Management Of M\/S Kamala Dials on 10 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-06T09:16:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Aswathaiah vs The Management Of M\\\/S Kamala Dials on 10 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-06T09:16:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1209,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Aswathaiah vs The Management Of M\\\/S Kamala Dials on 10 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-06T09:16:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Aswathaiah vs The Management Of M\\\/S Kamala Dials on 10 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Aswathaiah vs The Management Of M\/S Kamala Dials on 10 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Aswathaiah vs The Management Of M\/S Kamala Dials on 10 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-06T09:16:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Aswathaiah vs The Management Of M\/S Kamala Dials on 10 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-06T09:16:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009"},"wordCount":1209,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009","name":"Aswathaiah vs The Management Of M\/S Kamala Dials on 10 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-06T09:16:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/aswathaiah-vs-the-management-of-ms-kamala-dials-on-10-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Aswathaiah vs The Management Of M\/S Kamala Dials on 10 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=199372"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199372\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=199372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=199372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=199372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}