{"id":199635,"date":"2008-11-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008"},"modified":"2017-05-02T20:17:33","modified_gmt":"2017-05-02T14:47:33","slug":"state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"State Of Haryana vs Satyawan @ Kala And Others on 25 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
State Of Haryana vs Satyawan @ Kala And Others on 25 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Crl.Misc.No.451-MA of 2008                                      1\n\n           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                          CHANDIGARH.\n\n                           Crl.Misc.No.451-MA of 2008\n                           Date of decision:25.11.2008\nState of Haryana                                   ... Appellant\n                      Versus\nSatyawan @ Kala and others                         ... Respondents\n\nCORAM:       Hon'ble Mr.Justice Uma Nath Singh.\n             Hon'ble Mrs.Justice Daya Chaudhary.\n\nPresent:     Ms.Ritu Punj, DAG, Haryana.\n             ...\n\nUMA NATH SINGH, J. (ORAL)\n<\/pre>\n
             This Criminal Misc. (application for leave to appeal) and the<\/p>\n
accompanying appeal arise out of a judgment dated 26.4.2008 passed by<\/p>\n
learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jind, in Sessions Case No.47 of<\/p>\n
20.2.2008, recording acquittal of all accused-respondents in an FIR<\/p>\n
registered under Sections 148\/302\/323\/120-B\/149 IPC.<\/p>\n
             It appears that the FIR of this case being No.198 was registered<\/p>\n
on 8.8.2006, on the statement of complainant Satbir Singh who reported to<\/p>\n
SI\/SHO Babu Ram, PS Julana, that his nephew Vinod, aged about 23-24<\/p>\n
years, was running a chemist shop in Aggarsain Market, Julana, and<\/p>\n
whenever he would visit Julana he used to sit on that shop. One Sukhbir @<\/p>\n
Bittu, Jat, a friend of Vinod, also used to visit that shop with other persons<\/p>\n
like Kala son of Zile Singh, Kala son of Randhir and Shamsher son of Dhup<\/p>\n
Singh.     Thus, they were known to him (complainant) as they used to<\/p>\n
frequently visit that shop. On 7.8.2006 at about 6 O’clock, when<\/p>\n
complainant Satbir Singh was sitting along with his nephew Vinod on that<\/p>\n
shop, the said Sukhbir @ Bittu, a friend of Vinod, came there and told that<\/p>\n
he had a fight with Kala son of Zile Singh in the inebriated condition on the<\/p>\n
day before yesterday, as Kala had abused him. Hence, he (Sukhbir) had
\n Crl.Misc.No.451-MA of 2008                                    2<\/span><\/p>\n
given him beatings with belt. Being aggrieved, Kala accompanied by<\/p>\n
another Kala son of Randhir and Shamsher son of Delu had also given him<\/p>\n
slaps and fist blows when he was going to Julana for his personal work at<\/p>\n
the boundary of their village. Sukhbir had come to Julana on being<\/p>\n
separated from them, however, those boys were still after him.        Since<\/p>\n
Sukhbir was to return to his village, he was apprehending that those boys<\/p>\n
would again assault him. Accordingly, he requested Vinod for help to be<\/p>\n
carried in later’s Jeep to his village. Hence, Vinod and the complainant in<\/p>\n
order to transport Sukhbir safely to his village started in a jeep for going<\/p>\n
towards Dorard Fatak from the side of Railway Station. When they had<\/p>\n
reached near the Railway Station at about 7.00-7.15 PM, at a distance of<\/p>\n
about one acre from Dorard Fatak, Julana, Kala son of Zile Singh with<\/p>\n
another Kala and Shamsher, who were carrying wooden dandas in their<\/p>\n
hands, arrived there. Shamsher gave a lalkara saying that Sukhbir had<\/p>\n
arrived with his friend and he be taught a lesson for beating Kala the day<\/p>\n
before yesterday. As a result of lalkara, Kala son of Randhir caused a danda<\/p>\n
blow on the right shoulder of Sukhbir, which was followed by Kala son of<\/p>\n
Zile Singh, who also gave a danda blow on Vinod, which hit him on his<\/p>\n
head. Vinod fell down and on hue and cry raised by the complainant to save<\/p>\n
injured Vinod and Sukhbir, one Virender son of Gaje Singh came from the<\/p>\n
direction of Akta Colony. When Virender and the complainant tried to<\/p>\n
separate them, then Shamsher inflicted a danda blow also on Virender,<\/p>\n
which had hit him on his hand and he too fell down. Thereafter, Kala son of<\/p>\n
Randhir caused a danda blow on Vinod, while he was lying on the ground.<\/p>\n
Thereafter, all the accused persons ran away from the spot with their<\/p>\n
respective dandas.   Virender and Vinod were sent to Medical College,
\n Crl.Misc.No.451-MA of 2008                                    3<\/span><\/p>\n
Rohtak, along with Sukhbir, after arranging a private vehicle. Complainant<\/p>\n
Satbir Singh went to village Rajgarh to give this information and to collect<\/p>\n
money for medical treatment. When he reached the PGIMS, Rohtak, then he<\/p>\n
came to know that his nephew Vinod had already succumbed to the injuries.<\/p>\n
According to him, all the accused persons had caused injuries to the<\/p>\n
deceased without any provocation. Injured Virender was discharged after<\/p>\n
giving medical aid and a case under Sections 302\/323\/120-B read with<\/p>\n
Section 34 IPC was registered against the accused persons and taken for<\/p>\n
investigation. During the course of investigation, accused Satyawan,<\/p>\n
Narender, Shamsher, Vinod, Kaptan and Joginder         were arrested. After<\/p>\n
completion of investigation, a challan was laid against these accused<\/p>\n
persons and thereafter, a supplementary challan was submitted against<\/p>\n
accused Jitender, Vikas, Sanjay, Satish and Devender in the Court on<\/p>\n
30.3.2007. On the scrutiny of challan and other materials placed by police<\/p>\n
on record, prima facie, a case under Sections 148, 120-B, 302 and 323 read<\/p>\n
with Section 34 IPC was found to be made out against all the accused<\/p>\n
persons, hence, they were charge-sheeted       accordingly, to which they<\/p>\n
pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. In support, the prosecution examined<\/p>\n
13 witnesses namely (i) Dr.Rohit Kapoor (PW1); (ii) Satbir Singh (PW2),<\/p>\n
EHC Baljit Singh No.39 (PW3); Ram Mehar (PW4); ASI Brij Lal No.275<\/p>\n
(PW5); ASI Hawa Singh (PW6); EHC Ramesh Kumar No.820 (PW7); Dr.<\/p>\n
Ravi Kant, Lady Medical Officer (PW8); ASI Raj Singh (PW9); Kuldeep<\/p>\n
Gupta, Draftsman (PW10); Rajbir Singh (PW11); Babu Ram (PW12), and<\/p>\n
ASI Vijay Singh (PW13).\n<\/p>\n
            During their statements under Section 313 Cr.P.C., accused
\npersons denied all the incriminating materials put across and pleaded that
\nthey were falsely implicated in the case. However, they led no evidence in
\n Crl.Misc.No.451-MA of 2008                                    4<\/span><\/p>\n
their defence.\n<\/p>\n
            It appears that the trial Court after carefully scrutiny of the<\/p>\n
prosecution evidence could not find any cogent evidence to record the<\/p>\n
conviction of accused persons. On behalf of accused, a defence plea of<\/p>\n
inordinate delay in lodging the FIR was also taken which was not found to<\/p>\n
be properly explained. The prosecution withheld         the production of<\/p>\n
important witnesses like the injured ones, who were the only eye witnesses<\/p>\n
of the occurrence. Testimony of complainant Satbir Singh (PW2) was also<\/p>\n
not found to be reliable and he was doubted to be a procured and interested<\/p>\n
witness. Moreover, the medical evidence also did not lend the requisite<\/p>\n
support to the ocular version. In view of the aforesaid, according to the<\/p>\n
defence submission, the credibility of the prosecution case itself became<\/p>\n
doubtful. Thus, the trial Court accepted the defence version to be the<\/p>\n
probable and acceptable one in comparison with the prosecution case.<\/p>\n
            We have heard learned State counsel.\n<\/p>\n
            Learned State counsel submitted that this is a case of eye<\/p>\n
witnesses accounts, which is duly supported by the medical evidence. The<\/p>\n
trial Court has committed serious errors in law in discarding such evidence<\/p>\n
while recording the acquittal of accused persons.\n<\/p>\n
            On a careful scrutiny of the aforesaid submissions and the<\/p>\n
impugned judgment, we are of the considered view that the impugned<\/p>\n
judgment does not require any interference. Injured witnesses Sukhbir and<\/p>\n
Vinod were not even produced in the witness box. The incident took place<\/p>\n
on 7.8.2006 at 7.00 pm, whereas the FIR was lodged with delay on 8.8.2006<\/p>\n
at 6.15 am and the special report was sent at 10.00 am on that day. Thus, a<\/p>\n
delay of 15 hours in sending the report to learned Illaqa Magistrate is also
\n Crl.Misc.No.451-MA of 2008                                      5<\/span><\/p>\n
creating doubt about the credibility of the prosecution case. Further, the<\/p>\n
prosecution has not given any satisfactory explanation for this inordinate<\/p>\n
delay. Police Station Julana was situated just at a short distance and even<\/p>\n
the place of learned Illaqa Magistrate was situated only at a distance of 20<\/p>\n
kms. During that period, it appears that complainant Satbir Singh (PW2)<\/p>\n
was introduced and the real genesis of the incident was suppressed. This<\/p>\n
also appears that deceased Vinod was not carried to Civil Hospital, Julana,<\/p>\n
immediately, and police was also not informed in time about the occurrence.<\/p>\n
Moreover, the medical report mentioned the incident to be a road side<\/p>\n
accident as was informed by the person attending to deceased Vinod. This<\/p>\n
version appears to be true for the reason that the two injured persons had<\/p>\n
had taken Vinod to hospital were not produced in the witness box.<\/p>\n
Moreover, even complainant Satbir Singh was not found to be injured and<\/p>\n
the trial Court, thus, rightly concluded that in case he had intervened in the<\/p>\n
matter, he would have certainly sustained some injuries. Even there was no<\/p>\n
blood stain on his cloths either. Thus, his statement that he had participated<\/p>\n
in physically carrying the deceased also does not appear to be true.<\/p>\n
            In view of all the aforesaid infirmities in the prosecution case,<\/p>\n
coupled with the judgments of Hon’ble the Apex Court holding that if two<\/p>\n
views are possible, the one taken by the trial Court in favour of the accused<\/p>\n
for recording his acquittal should be accepted as the reasonable and possible<\/p>\n
view, we do not find any merits in this application for leave to appeal. Some<\/p>\n
of the judgments on the point of interference with the orders of acquittal are<\/p>\n
reported in (i) 2002(3) RCR (Crl.) 861 (Harijana Thirupala and others<\/p>\n
versus Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad); (ii) 2004(2) RCR<\/p>\n
(Crl.) 940 (Shingara Singh versus State of Haryana and another), and (iii)
\n Crl.Misc.No.451-MA of 2008                                   6<\/span><\/p>\n
AIR 2005 SC 2439 (State of UP versus Gambhir Singh and others).<\/p>\n
             Hence, this application for leave to appeal and the<\/p>\n
accompanying appeal, both, are dismissed as being devoid of merits.<\/p>\n
\n\n\n                                                 ( UMA NATH SINGH )\n                                                       JUDGE\n\n\n\n25.11.2008                                     ( DAYA CHAUDHARY )\n      pk                                               JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court State Of Haryana vs Satyawan @ Kala And Others on 25 November, 2008 Crl.Misc.No.451-MA of 2008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.Misc.No.451-MA of 2008 Date of decision:25.11.2008 State of Haryana … Appellant Versus Satyawan @ Kala and others … Respondents CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Uma Nath Singh. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-199635","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState Of Haryana vs Satyawan @ Kala And Others on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Haryana vs Satyawan @ Kala And Others on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-02T14:47:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Haryana vs Satyawan @ Kala And Others on 25 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-02T14:47:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1509,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008\",\"name\":\"State Of Haryana vs Satyawan @ Kala And Others on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-02T14:47:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Haryana vs Satyawan @ Kala And Others on 25 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Haryana vs Satyawan @ Kala And Others on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Haryana vs Satyawan @ Kala And Others on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-02T14:47:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Haryana vs Satyawan @ Kala And Others on 25 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-02T14:47:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008"},"wordCount":1509,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008","name":"State Of Haryana vs Satyawan @ Kala And Others on 25 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-02T14:47:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-satyawan-kala-and-others-on-25-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Haryana vs Satyawan @ Kala And Others on 25 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199635","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=199635"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199635\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=199635"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=199635"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=199635"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}