{"id":200013,"date":"2008-09-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008"},"modified":"2014-06-16T03:10:23","modified_gmt":"2014-06-15T21:40:23","slug":"lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Lakshmamma vs Channaiah on 8 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Lakshmamma vs Channaiah on 8 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: L.Narayana Swamy<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/pre>\n
-1-<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
IN Tim HIGH comm: “;.g;V’:1z1′}’2c’JV;;g_\u00bb:,,-_a;_VC   ‘ % V’<\/p>\n
BETWEEN:  V .\n<\/p>\n
3;  – .\n<\/p>\n
W\/0 Gov3:1mAwA_ .\n<\/p>\n
AGE}? :;3oU’r,\u00e9’9″–3f:jaAIesf-.._ _
\nR0 ::;3′,=;,:*I }3_L0_\u00a3’\u00a742″  <\/p>\n
\n\n  \n\n ---  zz\u00e9xr\ufb01' \n _     _ _'  APPELLANT\n<\/pre>\n
 * (B? ‘sg;.%4..R..,A-ggvanmm, ADV.)<\/p>\n
‘ 1, __ ‘c3_m~zm3:AH._. \u00bb 1
\n‘”?’s\/c~.y_1~Io*:’ msrcam TO 3:’:-m APPELLANT\n<\/p>\n
 –.__'<:-,'{'a 'J. measmsmm
\n'  fi–*1'.,G :"L4.-,; 7-:33 (moss,
\n6*.i:jz_a.F;~s.Am, mm I,
\n ,_*J.<:: HAGAR,
\n..  B.A1~\u00a5GAI.0RE–86\n<\/p>\n
– .– ” . RESPONBENT
\n(BY $RI.GAN\u00a33AIAH, ADV. 3<\/p>\n
REA FILES U\/$.96 GE’ CFC AGAINST THE<\/p>\n
01:96:-mar Am: DEGREE z>*r.3.3.o5 PASSED rm<\/p>\n
0.S.NO.4475\/93 G19′ TEE FILE OF THE VII 3aI.’}\ufb01L.
\nCI’3I’Y CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-19} ,
\nDI3MISSI1*?G THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT XNCKIRCTION.<\/p>\n
4<\/span><\/p>\n
-2-<\/span><\/p>\n
THIS REA CGMING ex FGR HEAR:NG”\u00e9H\u00a3s BAX,
\nTHE coca? MAEE yam FGLLOWING: \u00bb ‘W”\u00bb:\u00bb’r.*<\/p>\n
The apwllant is <\/p>\n
No.44′?5\/1998 on the’ -;\u00a7:;.:Le”..;5::
\nCity Civil Judge, aan\u00e9aicze.
\n2, For  s;-\u00e9dcaeti\u00bb  cs-1_\u00a7’-;*C:\u00abnvenience, tha<\/p>\n
parties are} rafe.x:\u00a3’ed  as  their ranking<\/p>\n
befa;:r1*::~. j\ufb01ihe E3fi,3l ‘a\u00e9:u:t:*t”;~w <\/p>\n
   filed the suit for<\/p>\n
per’s::aiia:itv 3f.’:’1~:31i:.’;\u00a2’c3;”an against the defendants as<\/p>\n
 ja:ex:\u00e9”\u00abv…:.,.;2’terfering with his peaceful<\/p>\n
V .= ‘};>r:As’34\u00e9:;i\u00ab*.Es”:;:\u00a795:”:. af the suit schedule prupazrty.<\/p>\n
U4; ‘ i’:_’z.?i~ae plaintiff purchased the suit<\/p>\n
$$h\u00e9;%u\ufb01e prczpexrty from<\/p>\n
 hzanjundappa and M Muninrafgu on 14-8-1980.<\/p>\n
 The plaintiffs name is also: antcarw in the<\/p>\n
Katha. Extract and that the tax is being paid<\/p>\n
regularly .\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
– 3 ..\n<\/p>\n
5. The dafendant though served, remained
\nabsent and hence he was placed axpart.e2V_}”-.._”T~..’<\/p>\n
6. Tim plaintiff examined  <\/p>\n
and she has producea 12 ccume\ufb01tg 15 supper; *<\/p>\n
of her case.\n<\/p>\n
‘3’ W The cjourt _V$f\ufb01\u00e9r’V:\u00a7Oifi\u00a7,i
\nmaterial an regard
\nhad pxodxzced   the sale dean:<\/p>\n
and as sum’-av it was  ta accept the<\/p>\n
cai\ufb01e  VvA3plaj3:;r:\u00a7;iff. Accordingly the court<\/p>\n
be1:$w__ suit. Henge the present<\/p>\n
asvm\ufb01i  ”\n<\/p>\n
. Jfhe  ccmnsel fer the plaintiff-<\/p>\n
 that in View cf Grder 41<\/p>\n
“Rule?  CFC this court has the pave: to remit<\/p>\n
 .A _ths:~:=~~ir:atter to the court: belaw. He further<\/p>\n
 *$bmitted that at the xelavant point cf tim,<\/p>\n
the plaintiff was next in a pasitian to produce<\/p>\n
the csriginal. sale deed. hence the suit was<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
aismiased. In View af the provisi\u00e9nsgr\ufb01fexzed<\/p>\n
to abcve, the appeal is ta be a3i\u00a2w\u00e9\u00a7:an@ &h\u00e9 <\/p>\n
matter is to be remitte\ufb01 }Ea&\u00ae” fax  \u00a3r\u00e9sh=_i<\/p>\n
adjudicatian.\n<\/p>\n
9. on behalf   learned
\nccun$el submiE\u00a7f~t\ufb01#%I $h% V99ur\u00a3  below has
\nrightly d$Smi$$g\u00a7   by the
\nplaintiff \ufb01g: \ufb01Qnf\u00a7%\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7iun of oxiginal sale
\ndeed.\u00a7_\\ \u00e9%;$fd\u00a3\ufb01\u00a7 \ufb01b’E\ufb01\u00a3m the encumrance
\nce%\u00a3\u00a3fi\u00e9$;af4is\u00e9 \u00a7\u00a2u;\ufb01 \ufb01at be produced by the
\npl%in\ufb01iff i$ \u00a7\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7 5f the fact that the suit<\/p>\n
sahadi\u00e9apr\u00a2pe&t\u00a7 has alraady been said and<\/p>\n
\ufb02” _ the ‘a\ufb01txiag now stand in the name af the<\/p>\n
“gp\ufb01r$has\u00e9\u00a7Q”Hene he submits that theme is ma<\/p>\n
 9ai\ufb01t.\ufb01\ufb01Aremandiag the matter.<\/p>\n
“rib. aeard the learned csunsel for the<\/p>\n
‘2 *parties.\n<\/p>\n
11. The plaintiff’s suit was for<\/p>\n
pexmanent injunctian. In order ta prove his<\/p>\n
4<\/span><\/p>\n
$5..\n<\/p>\n
possession, the plaintiff must havax\ufb01y\ufb01duced<\/p>\n
the original documents. The ccnt\u00a2\u00a7\u00a3i\u00e9\ufb01 \u00a2f_\u00a3he<\/p>\n
plaintiff was that orig\ufb01nag d&\u00e9d”%\u00a7$ givea ts”;<\/p>\n
the GMC far mutating k\u00a7atg} VThe*\u00a7\u00a2\ufb01#\ufb01g\ufb01e10wK””<\/p>\n
was cf the cpini\u00e9\u00a7=_\ufb01h$t’\ufb01i\u00a3V \u00a7h\u00a7~mm\ufb01igin#l
\ndocuments were with \u00a7\u00a3% CM? \ufb01\u00a7E\u00a7#h\u00a7$?revented
\nhim: from: prad\u00e9{ngi \u00a7\ufb01@ \ufb01\u00a7\u00a5ti\ufb01ied. cies at
\nleast. In t\ufb01at \ufb01\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01 \u00a7\ufb01\ufb01\u00a7$% %%E\u00a3er, the trial
\ncmurt:h\u00a7%K\u00e9i\u00a7mi\u00a7g%\ufb01it\ufb01\u00e9 %\ufb01;\u00a3j<\/p>\n
{12. A$ ;%fe\u00a3#\u00a3\u00a7 tc by learned counsel for
\ntheA’:p;;~.;;.nt:._\u00a3aEl’;–  Order 41 Rule 239., :;\u00a3 the<\/p>\n
court fram whose degree an appeal is preferred<\/p>\n
 ‘_’h\u00a7\u00e97d\u00a3$\u00a7gsedW\u00a9f the case atherwis\u00e9 than on &<\/p>\n
n\u00e9ptaiimi\ufb01\u00e9ry paint, this court has the power ta<\/p>\n
‘remand_t\ufb01e matter.\n<\/p>\n
.13* In the interest of justice, I pass the<\/p>\n
 *f$l1awing ordr;\n<\/p>\n
The appeal is allowed. The impugne\u00e9 order<\/p>\n
is set asi\u00e9e. Matter if remanded tn the smart<\/p>\n
-6-<\/span><\/p>\n
beicw with a direction ta “the:<\/p>\n
matter afresh, within three ” <\/p>\n
date at’ reaeipt at’ a crgpy L  Q<\/p>\n
parties are at libgairtgy  p.rad’t.:;\u00a2e_:\n<\/p>\n
docfurrants which    for the
\neffective   N The wart.\n<\/p>\n
belaw is  r1e’l:. _V_ ?t’-‘,.-_.;.V   by the
\n V”\u00a2.:a;:ij’:\u00e9.1::t in the ccxurse<\/p>\n
of thiff\u00e9 <:\u00a7{#'?'%t"; '  '<\/p>\n
Sd\/–%
\nIudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Lakshmamma vs Channaiah on 8 September, 2008 Author: L.Narayana Swamy -1- IN Tim HIGH comm: “;.g;V’:1z1′}’2c’JV;;g_\u00bb:,,-_a;_VC ‘ % V’ BETWEEN: V . 3; – . W\/0 Gov3:1mAwA_ . AGE}? :;3oU’r,\u00e9’9″–3f:jaAIesf-.._ _ R0 ::;3′,=;,:*I }3_L0_\u00a3’\u00a742″ — zz\u00e9xr\ufb01’ _ _ _’ APPELLANT * (B? ‘sg;.%4..R..,A-ggvanmm, ADV.) ‘ 1, __ ‘c3_m~zm3:AH._. \u00bb 1 ‘”?’s\/c~.y_1~Io*:’ msrcam […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200013","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nLakshmamma vs Channaiah on 8 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Lakshmamma vs Channaiah on 8 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-06-15T21:40:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Lakshmamma vs Channaiah on 8 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-15T21:40:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":766,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Lakshmamma vs Channaiah on 8 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-06-15T21:40:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Lakshmamma vs Channaiah on 8 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lakshmamma vs Channaiah on 8 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Lakshmamma vs Channaiah on 8 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-06-15T21:40:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Lakshmamma vs Channaiah on 8 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-15T21:40:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008"},"wordCount":766,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008","name":"Lakshmamma vs Channaiah on 8 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-06-15T21:40:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/lakshmamma-vs-channaiah-on-8-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Lakshmamma vs Channaiah on 8 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200013","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200013"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200013\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200013"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200013"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200013"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}