{"id":2002,"date":"2011-07-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011"},"modified":"2016-04-11T23:44:50","modified_gmt":"2016-04-11T18:14:50","slug":"mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Samir Vijay Zaveri vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Samir Vijay Zaveri vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 July, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                    at\n                                                 New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/000048\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a011,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a011,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Samir\u00a0Vijay\u00a0Zaveri\n           H.No.127,\u00a0Mumbadevi\u00a0Road\n           Daya\u00a0Mandir\u00a0Building\n           3rd\u00a0Floor\n           Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0003\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Mumbai\n\n           Respondents\n\n           The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n           Western\u00a0Railway\n           Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n           Mumbai\u00a0Central\n           Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0008\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Gopalakrishnan,\u00a0Sr.DOM\n                                    \u00ad\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Mumbai\n\n\n\n\n                   Information\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                         at\n                                                 New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                                   File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/000048\n\n\n                                                      ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.     The\u00a0Applicants\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.21.6.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Western\u00a0railway,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       following\u00a0information:\n<\/p>\n<p>       i)         names \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 stations \u00a0 where \u00a0 minimum\u00a0 two\u00a0 folding\u00a0 stretchers\u00a0 are\u00a0 available\u00a0 at \u00a0 Western \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Railway\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0division<\/p>\n<p>       ii)        names\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0stations\u00a0where\u00a0collapsible\u00a0stretcher\u00a0is\u00a0available\u00a0at\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway\u00a0Mumbai \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       division<\/p>\n<p>       iii)       To\u00a0permit\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0or\u00a0his\u00a0representative\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0at\u00a0stations.<\/p>\n<p>       The\u00a0Sr.DOM\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a03.9.10\u00a0as\u00a0follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>       i)         All\u00a0suburban\u00a0railway\u00a0stations\u00a0are\u00a0having\u00a0a\u00a0provision\u00a0of\u00a0minimum\u00a0two\u00a0stretchers,\u00a0but\u00a0they\u00a0are \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       not\u00a0of\u00a0folding\u00a0type.\n<\/p>\n<p>       ii)        Collapsible\u00a0stretchers\u00a0are\u00a0not\u00a0provided\u00a0at\u00a0any\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0suburban\u00a0stations.<\/p>\n<p>       iii)       Applicant\u00a0or\u00a0his\u00a0representative\u00a0is\u00a0permitted\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0stations\u00a0after\u00a0duly \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                  intimating\u00a0the\u00a0office.\n<\/p>\n<p>       The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0dt.21.10.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0while\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0had\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       collapsible\u00a0stretchers\u00a0are\u00a0not\u00a0provided\u00a0at\u00a0any\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0suburban\u00a0stations,\u00a0however\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0an\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       RTI\u00a0application\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0Shri\u00a0J.D.Sakpal,\u00a0the\u00a0Sr.DOM\u00a0vide\u00a0his\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.16.7.10\u00a0had\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       stretcher\u00a0provided\u00a0was\u00a0collapsible.\u00a0 \u00a0He\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0PIO\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       contradictory\u00a0with\u00a0each\u00a0other.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>2.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0complained\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0two\u00a0contradictory\u00a0replies\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0one\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       PIO\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0Shri\u00a0Sakpal\u00a0and\u00a0by\u00a0 \u00a0another\u00a0 \u00a0PIO,\u00a0with\u00a0reference\u00a0to\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0about\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       availability\u00a0of\u00a0collapsible\u00a0stretchers\u00a0at\u00a0Railway\u00a0stations.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0earlier\u00a0case(Sakpal)\u00a0,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       wrong\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0deliberately\u00a0to\u00a0mislead\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0when\u00a0he\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0<br \/>\n          a\u00a0collapsible\u00a0stretcher\u00a0was\u00a0used\u00a0to\u00a0remove\u00a0the\u00a0patient\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0accident\u00a0site.\u00a0\u00a0His\u00a0contention\u00a0was\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         the\u00a0answer\u00a0given\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0instant\u00a0case\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0are\u00a0no\u00a0collapsible\u00a0stretchers\u00a0in\u00a0Western\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Railway,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0Division\u00a0is\u00a0correct.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0explained\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0in\u00a0Shri\u00a0Sakpal&#8217;s\u00a0case\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         furnished\u00a0on\u00a016.7.10\u00a0was\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0a\u00a0PIO\u00a0\u00a0who\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0able\u00a0to\u00a0comprehend\u00a0what\u00a0a\u00a0collapsible\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         stretcher\u00a0is.\u00a0 \u00a0He\u00a0pointed\u00a0out\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0himself\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0completely\u00a0sure\u00a0of\u00a0what\u00a0 \u00a0a\u00a0collapsible\u00a0stretcher\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         looks\u00a0like.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0pointed\u00a0out\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.21.10.10,\u00a0a\u00a0\u00a0reply\u00a0was\u00a0again\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         furnished\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0on\u00a027.10.10\u00a0wherein\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0had\u00a0admitted\u00a0that\u00a0 \u00a0an\u00a0inadvertent\u00a0mistake\u00a0was\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         made \u00a0 by \u00a0 him \u00a0 \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 information \u00a0 provided \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 case \u00a0 of \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 Sakpal, \u00a0 regarding \u00a0 availability \u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         collapsible\u00a0stretchers,\u00a0\u00a0while\u00a0stating\u00a0\u00a0categorically\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0collapsible\u00a0stretcher\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         the\u00a0injured\u00a0traveler\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0what\u00a0was\u00a0used\u00a0was\u00a0an\u00a0aluminum\u00a0stretcher\u00a0that\u00a0was\u00a0non\u00adfoldable.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0having\u00a0noted\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0sought\u00a0no\u00a0further\u00a0information\u00a0with\u00a0respect\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         to\u00a0the\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0RTI\u00a0application,\u00a0however\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0Sr.DOM\u00adBCT\u00a0to\u00a0explain\u00a0once\u00a0again\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0against\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         item\u00a0No.\u00a010\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0reply\u00a0dt.16.7.10\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.3.7.10\u00a0of\u00a0Shri\u00a0J.D.Sakpal,\u00a0he\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         had\u00a0informed\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0stretcher\u00a0provided\u00a0was\u00a0collapsible.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0explanation\u00a0should\u00a0reach\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a011.8.11\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0\u00a0No\u00a0further\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0authorized\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         disclosure.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.       The\u00a0complaint\u00a0to\u00a0continue.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                             \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                                     Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0Ramesh\u00a0Chand<br \/>\n         S\/o\u00a0Late\u00a0Shri\u00a0Laxmanlal<br \/>\n         H.No.1486\/30<br \/>\n         Prakash\u00a0Road<br \/>\n         Nagra<br \/>\n         Ajmer\u00a0305\u00a0001\n<\/p>\n<p> 2.   The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n     Western\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n     O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Chief\u00a0Personnel\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n     Personnel\u00a0Department<br \/>\n     Old\u00a0Building<br \/>\n     Churchgate<br \/>\n     Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0020<\/p>\n<p>3.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n     Western\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n     O\/o\u00a0Addl.\u00a0General\u00a0Manager<br \/>\n     Churchgate<br \/>\n     Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0020<\/p>\n<p>4.   Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Samir Vijay Zaveri vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 July, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/000048 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a011,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a011,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Samir\u00a0Vijay\u00a0Zaveri H.No.127,\u00a0Mumbadevi\u00a0Road Daya\u00a0Mandir\u00a0Building 3rd\u00a0Floor Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0003 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Mumbai Respondents The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer Western\u00a0Railway Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office Mumbai\u00a0Central Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0008 Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Gopalakrishnan,\u00a0Sr.DOM \u00ad\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Mumbai Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/C\/2011\/000048 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicants\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.21.6.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Western\u00a0railway,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0 following\u00a0information: i) names \u00a0 of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2002","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Samir Vijay Zaveri vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Samir Vijay Zaveri vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-11T18:14:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Samir Vijay Zaveri vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-11T18:14:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":587,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Samir Vijay Zaveri vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-11T18:14:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Samir Vijay Zaveri vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Samir Vijay Zaveri vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Samir Vijay Zaveri vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-11T18:14:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Samir Vijay Zaveri vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-11T18:14:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011"},"wordCount":587,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011","name":"Mr.Samir Vijay Zaveri vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-11T18:14:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-samir-vijay-zaveri-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-11-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Samir Vijay Zaveri vs Ministry Of Railways on 11 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2002","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2002"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2002\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2002"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2002"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2002"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}