{"id":20021,"date":"2011-02-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011"},"modified":"2017-04-11T02:19:35","modified_gmt":"2017-04-10T20:49:35","slug":"blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011","title":{"rendered":"Blue Blak Granites vs P.P.Thankachan on 2 February, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Blue Blak Granites vs P.P.Thankachan on 2 February, 2011<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 34217 of 2008(W)\n\n\n1. BLUE BLAK GRANITES, AYATHUPADY,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. P.C.SALUS, PARTNER, BLUE BLACK\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. P.P.THANKACHAN, PARAPPURAM HOUSE,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. KOOVAPPADY GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KOOVAPPADY\n\n3. THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.G.ARUN\n\n                For Respondent  :SMT.JAYASREE MANOJ\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN\n\n Dated :02\/02\/2011\n\n O R D E R\n                      S. SIRI JAGAN, J.\n               -----------------------------------\n                 W.P.(C) No.34217 OF 2008\n             ---------------------------------------\n          Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2011\n\n                         JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
     The petitioners are partners of a firm by name ‘Blue Black<\/p>\n
Granites’.  They had obtained a consent from the Pollution<\/p>\n
Control Board originally for establishing a secondary Metal<\/p>\n
Crusher Unit using 40 h.p. machinery with 20 h.p. for secondary<\/p>\n
Crusher Unit and 20 h.p. for Ancillary Unit. Ext.P2 is the consent<\/p>\n
issued by the Pollution Control Board for the same.            In<\/p>\n
accordance with the said consent, the second respondent –<\/p>\n
Panchayat issued Ext.P1 licence for running a Metal Crusher Unit<\/p>\n
using 40 h.p. electric motor. Later on, the petitioners realised<\/p>\n
that they cannot profitably run the Unit without a primary<\/p>\n
Crusher Unit also.     Therefore, they applied to the Pollution<\/p>\n
Control Board for consent to establish an additional primary<\/p>\n
Crusher Unit as well. By Ext.P3, the Pollution Control Board gave<\/p>\n
consent for a Primary Crusher Unit of 45 h.p.            The first<\/p>\n
respondent herein objected to the petitioners establishing the<\/p>\n
W.P.(C)No.34217\/08                    2<\/span><\/p>\n
Primary Crusher Unit. He approached this Court by filing W.P.<\/p>\n
(C)No.7672\/2008.       In that, this Court, by Ext.P4 judgment,<\/p>\n
directed the Panchayat to consider the matter, after hearing<\/p>\n
both sides. Thereafter, the Panchayat considered the matter<\/p>\n
and ultimately passed Ext.P6 order, whereby licence was<\/p>\n
directed to be granted to the petitioner to install an electric<\/p>\n
motor of an additional 45 h.p. for a Metal Crusher Unit. The<\/p>\n
first respondent challenged the same before the Tribunal for<\/p>\n
Local Self Government Institutions. The Tribunal, after hearing<\/p>\n
the parties, passed Ext.P8 order quashing Ext.P6 order holding<\/p>\n
that going by the written statement of the Panchayat, what<\/p>\n
was applied for was an up-gradation of the present 40 h.p.<\/p>\n
machinery to 45 h.p. machinery whereas what was sanctioned<\/p>\n
is an additional 45 h.p. In that view, the Tribunal quashed the<\/p>\n
order with liberty to the first petitioner to file fresh application.<\/p>\n
The petitioners have filed this writ petition challenging Ext.P8<\/p>\n
order, seeking the following reliefs:\n<\/p>\n
          ” i) to call for the records leading to Ext.P8 and
\n          quash the same by the issuance of a writ of certiorari
\n          or any other writ, direction or order;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
           ii)   to declare that the petitioners are entitled to
\n          establish and operate a Primary Crusher Unit of 45
\n          HP after obtaining clearance from the statutory
\n          authorities”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      2.    As is evident from the narration of the facts, the<\/p>\n
W.P.(C)No.34217\/08                3<\/span><\/p>\n
petitioners are challenging Ext.P8 order on the ground that the<\/p>\n
Tribunal committed a mistake in holding that, what the<\/p>\n
petitioners sought, was the up-gradation of the existing 40<\/p>\n
h.p. machinery to 45 h.p. machinery whereas, as is evident<\/p>\n
from the documents produced, what the petitioners applied for<\/p>\n
was, for installation of a new Primary Crusher Unit of 45 h.p. in<\/p>\n
addition to the Secondary Crusher Unit and Ancillary Unit of<\/p>\n
total 40 h.p.\n<\/p>\n
      3.    The first respondent stoutly opposes the claim of<\/p>\n
the petitioner.     According to them, the Tribunal rightly<\/p>\n
interfered with the order of the Panchayat.\n<\/p>\n
       4.   I have considered the rival contentions in detail.<\/p>\n
From Ext.P1 licence originally granted by the Panchayat to the<\/p>\n
petitioners, it is clear that the licence was to run a Metal<\/p>\n
Crusher Unit with 40 h.p. electric motor. In Ext.P2 consent<\/p>\n
issued by the Pollution Control Board, column No.15 reads<\/p>\n
thus:\n<\/p>\n
          \"15. Machinery Details   Primary  -    Nil\n                                  Secondary - 20 HP\"\n\n<\/pre>\n
That shows that at that time, there was no Primary Crusher<\/p>\n
Unit and there was only one Secondary Crusher Unit of 20 h.p.<\/p>\n
In Ext.P3 consent, corresponding column No.15 reads thus:<\/p>\n
W.P.(C)No.34217\/08                     4<\/span><\/p>\n
            “15. Machinery Details Primary Crusher 45 HP”<\/p>\n
Therefore the consent is clearly for Primary Crusher Unit of<\/p>\n
45 h.p. Nobody has a case that at the time of issuing Exts.P1<\/p>\n
and P2 there was a Primary Crusher Unit and Exts.P1 and P2<\/p>\n
clearly related to only a Secondary Crusher Unit. Therefore,<\/p>\n
Ext.P3 is clearly for an additional Primary Crusher Unit of 45<\/p>\n
h.p. Ext.P6 order also specifically reads thus:<\/p>\n
       “ORDER NO.A3-549\/07 DATED 17.07.08<\/p>\n
       Sri\/Smt…………….P.P.Cheriyan…………………….
\n       as per the application read first above has requested for
\n       permission to establish a work place is Sy.No.429\/4
\n       of …….Koovappady Village, ward ……V……….. of
\n       Koovappady Grama Panchayat and to install an electric
\n       motor of      additional 45 HP (existing 40 H.P.)……
\n       H.P………for metal     Crusher      Unit    Blue     black
\n       granites…………….\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
              Grama Panchayat after having examined the
\n       application in the detail has resolved to grand permission
\n       under section 233 of Kerala Panchayat Raj act 1994
\n              Therefore,       sanction     is      accorded       to
\n       Sri\/Smt.P.P.Cheriyan …………………..establish a work
\n       place in Sy.No.429\/4 …………….of Koovappady Village
\n       and to install additional 45 H.P. to existing 40 H.P.
\n       Electric motor for a metal crusher unit (Blue black
\n       granites)”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
From the same, it is evidently clear that what has been<\/p>\n
granted is permission to install an electric motor of additional<\/p>\n
45 h.p. in addition to the existing 40 h.p.           The Tribunal has in<\/p>\n
paragraphs 8 and 9 of Ext.P8 order held thus:\n<\/p>\n
          “8.The application for permit under Section 233 of the
\n          Kerala Panchayat Raj Act is to be submitted as per<\/p>\n
W.P.(C)No.34217\/08                      5<\/span><\/p>\n
          Rule 12 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act (Issue of
\n          Licence to Dangerous and Offensive Trades and
\n          Factories) Rules 1996 giving the details as specified in
\n          the said rule with proper plan of the factory, workshop
\n          or workplace.       The application submitted by 2nd
\n          Respondent is found on page 74 of the file produced
\n          by the 1st Respondent.       Particulars as to power of
\n          machinery of plant proposed to be installed is shown
\n          in column No.10 as 40 HP + 45 HP in the said
\n          application   dated    12.9.2007.      Along   with   the
\n          application the 2nd Respondent has produced consent
\n          to establish obtained from Kerala State Pollution
\n          Control Board on 16.6.2007 as valid up to 15.6.2009.
\n          But in the said consent the machinery details specified
\n          is only of 45 HP and not 40 + 45 HP. No proper plans
\n          are seen submitted along with the application dated
\n          12.9.2007 showing the location of the machinery in
\n          existence at present as well as the location of the
\n          additional machinery proposed to be installed.         As
\n          already pointed out the application submitted by 2nd
\n          Respondent is not consistent with the consent to
\n          establish obtained by him as to the power of the
\n          machinery concerned.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
          9. Though the impugned decision is one enabling the
\n          2nd Respondent to install additional 45 HP machinery
\n          as against the consent to establish obtained by him
\n          for installation of total 45 HP machineries only, it is
\n          stated in the written statement filed by the 1st
\n          Respondent that the impugned resolution only granted
\n          a permit for machinery installation with a view to
\n          expand the existing unit of 2nd Respondent’s metal
\n          crusher unit from 40 HP to 45 HP.           Thus as per
\n          paragraph 3 of the written statement filed by the 1st
\n          Respondent the permit was granted for increasing the
\n          Horse Power of the machineries by 5 HP only, ie from
\n          40 to 45.    If it was so it could be found as consistent
\n          with the consent to establish granted by the Pollution
\n          Control Board on 16.6.2007. As already pointed out
\n          the application submitted by 2nd Respondent was for
\n          installation of 40 HP + 45 HP motors and the
\n          impugned decision also is as enabling installation of
\n          additional 45 HP machineries. Thus considering the
\n          impugned decision and the written statement of 1st
\n          Respondent, the 1st Respondent has no consistent
\n          case as to the nature of the permit granted by the
\n          impugned decision”.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
From the same, it is evident that the Tribunal was under the<\/p>\n
W.P.(C)No.34217\/08                6<\/span><\/p>\n
mistaken impression that what the petitioners applied for was<\/p>\n
the up-gradation of existing Crusher Unit from 40 h.p. to 45<\/p>\n
h.p.    This mistake also arose because of a mistake in the<\/p>\n
written statement filed by the Panchayat, which is extracted in<\/p>\n
paragraph 3 of the order. As such, clearly Ext.P8 order has<\/p>\n
been passed on the basis of the mistaken understanding of the<\/p>\n
facts involved and therefore, Ext.P8 order is quashed.       The<\/p>\n
Tribunal is directed to reconsider the matter in the light of the<\/p>\n
observations made above as expeditiously as possible, at any<\/p>\n
rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of<\/p>\n
this judgment.\n<\/p>\n
      The writ petition is disposed of as above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                  S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE<\/p>\n
acd<\/p>\n
W.P.(C)No.34217\/08    7<\/span><\/p>\n
W.P.(C)No.34217\/08    8<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Blue Blak Granites vs P.P.Thankachan on 2 February, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 34217 of 2008(W) 1. BLUE BLAK GRANITES, AYATHUPADY, … Petitioner 2. P.C.SALUS, PARTNER, BLUE BLACK Vs 1. P.P.THANKACHAN, PARAPPURAM HOUSE, … Respondent 2. KOOVAPPADY GRAMA PANCHAYAT, KOOVAPPADY 3. THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20021","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBlue Blak Granites vs P.P.Thankachan on 2 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Blue Blak Granites vs P.P.Thankachan on 2 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-10T20:49:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Blue Blak Granites vs P.P.Thankachan on 2 February, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-10T20:49:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1366,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011\",\"name\":\"Blue Blak Granites vs P.P.Thankachan on 2 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-10T20:49:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Blue Blak Granites vs P.P.Thankachan on 2 February, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Blue Blak Granites vs P.P.Thankachan on 2 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Blue Blak Granites vs P.P.Thankachan on 2 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-10T20:49:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Blue Blak Granites vs P.P.Thankachan on 2 February, 2011","datePublished":"2011-02-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-10T20:49:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011"},"wordCount":1366,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011","name":"Blue Blak Granites vs P.P.Thankachan on 2 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-10T20:49:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/blue-blak-granites-vs-p-p-thankachan-on-2-february-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blue Blak Granites vs P.P.Thankachan on 2 February, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20021","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20021"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20021\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20021"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20021"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20021"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}