{"id":200528,"date":"2010-04-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010"},"modified":"2017-04-16T16:59:43","modified_gmt":"2017-04-16T11:29:43","slug":"mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Maj Gen Vinay Kumar Singh vs Department Of Personnel And &#8230; on 26 April, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Maj Gen Vinay Kumar Singh vs Department Of Personnel And &#8230; on 26 April, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                    CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                Appeal No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2009\/000101 dated 17.2.2009\n                  Right to Information Act 2005 - Section 19\n\n\nAppellant       -       Maj. Gen. (retd.) V. K. Singh\nRespondent          -   Department of Personnel &amp; Training\n                           Decision announced: 26.4.2010\n\n\nFacts<\/pre>\n<p>:\n<\/p>\n<p>         By an application of 1.5.08 Maj. Gen. V. K.Singh of Gurgaon (Haryana)<br \/>\napplied to the CPIO, DOPT seeking the following information:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         &#8220;1.   Please provide the list of officers of the rank of Jt. Secy., Spl.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>               Secy. and Secy. as on 1.1.2001, indicating their names,<br \/>\n               cadre, seniority and date of appointment.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>         2.    Please provide the list of officers of the rank of Jt. Secy., Spl.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>               Secy. and Secy. as on 1.1.2002, indicating their names,<br \/>\n               cadre, seniority and date of appointment.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>         3.    Please provide the list of officers of the rank of Jt. Secy., Spl.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>               Secy. and Secy. as on 1.1.2003, indicating their names,<br \/>\n               cadre, seniority and date of appointment.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>         4.    Please provide the list of officers of the rank of Jt. Secy., Spl.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>               Secy. and Secy. as on 1.1.2004, indicating their names,<br \/>\n               cadre, seniority and date of appointment.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>         5.    Please provide the list of officers of the rank of Jt. Secy., Spl.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>               Secy. and Secy. as on 1.1.2005, indicating their names,<br \/>\n               cadre, seniority and date of appointment.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>         6.    Please provide the list of officers of the rank of Jt. Secy., Spl.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>               Secy. and Secy. as on 1.1.2006, indicating their names,<br \/>\n               cadre, seniority and date of appointment.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>         7.    Please provide the list of officers of the rank of Jt. Secy., Spl.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>               Secy. and Secy. as on 1.1.2007, indicating their names,<br \/>\n               cadre, seniority and date of appointment.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>         8.    Please provide the list of officers of the rank of Jt. Secy., Spl.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>               Secy. and Secy. as on 1.1.2008, indicating their names,<br \/>\n               cadre, seniority and date of appointment.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>         9.    Please provide a certified list of officers of the rank of Jt.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>               Secy., Spl. Secy. and Secy. as on 1.5.2008, available on the<br \/>\n               website of the Department of Personnel &amp; Training indicating<br \/>\n               their names, cadre, seniority and date of appointment. &#8220;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                            1<\/span><\/p>\n<p>        To this, the General received a response from CPIO Shri S. K. Mohanty,<br \/>\nSection Officer, informing him as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;It is stated that list of officers of the rank of Joint Secretary,<br \/>\n       Additional Secretary, Special Secretary and Secretary on each date<br \/>\n       is not maintained in this Department. However, the present of<br \/>\n       officers is available on the official website of this Department i.e.<br \/>\n       https:\/\/persmin.nic.in. &#8220;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       Aggrieved, Gen. Singh moved an appeal before Shri A. K. Singhal,<br \/>\nDirector, DoPT pleading as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;The reply is incomplete and amounts to denial of information. It is<br \/>\n       difficult to believe that the department does not have the list of<br \/>\n       officers for the preceding seven years. If such lists are maintained,<br \/>\n       they must be on a particular date. If the list as on the 1 st day of the<br \/>\n       year is not available, the list on any other day of the year can be<br \/>\n       provided.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       Upon this, he received an order of 18.6.08 allowing the appeal in part, as<br \/>\nfollows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;While I do believe that the CPIO may not be in possession of such<br \/>\n       lists as on 1st Jan of each, but it may be possible to guide the<br \/>\n       applicant and provide the information to the extent available.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       Therefore, the interests of justice would be served by directing the<br \/>\n       CPIO to accord a personal hearing to applicant and provide<br \/>\n       information to the extent available by suitably advising him.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       The CPIO is directed to complete the entire process within a period<br \/>\n       of four weeks.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       In compliance, CPIO Shri Ravinder Kumar, US by letter of July 1, 2008<br \/>\ninvited Maj. Gen. Singh to meet CPIO and consequently in a letter of 18.7.08<br \/>\ninformed the General that the information sought by him, as available with the<br \/>\nNIC Cell of the Department, has been compiled in 277 pages and the General<br \/>\nwas, therefore, requested to pay Rs. 554\/- and obtain the information. Upon this,<br \/>\nGen. Singh protested in a letter of Appellate Authority, Shri A. K. Singhal on<br \/>\n28.7.08 that since the information sought had not been provided in time, he<br \/>\nshould be allowed free access in accordance with sub sec. (6) of Sec. 7, which<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                          2<\/span><br \/>\n was also agreed to by CPIO Shri Ravinder Kumar in his letter of 6.8.08, with<br \/>\nwhich he enclosed the information. Upon receipt of this, Gen. Singh in his letter<br \/>\nof 13.8.08 responded as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;Instead of 277 pages, I have received only 183 pages. Details are<br \/>\n       as under:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<pre>        Date                 Secretaries             Addl.         Joint\n                                                     Secretaries   Secretaries\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">              1.1.2001                  8                  14          157<\/span>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">              1.1.2002                  9                  15          165<\/span>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">              1.1.2003                 15                  15          182<\/span>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">              1.1.2004                 23                  28          189<\/span>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">              1.1.2005                 20                  45          205<\/span>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">              1.1.2006                 22                  54          211<\/span>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">              1.1.2007                 40                  66          218<\/span>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">              1.1.2008                 66                  64          239<\/span>\n\n<\/pre>\n<blockquote><p>       It appears that some pages are missing, especially pertaining to the<br \/>\n       years 2001 to 2006. In addition, I have the following observations-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>a)            The list does not tally with the list available on your website.<br \/>\nFor example, the list of secretaries does not show the names of Secretary<br \/>\nto the President, Principal Secretary to the PM, Secretary (Coord. &amp; PG),<br \/>\nCabinet Secretary, Secretary (RAW) etc.\n<\/p>\n<p>b)            Appointments outside Delhi appear to have been omitted.\n<\/p>\n<p>c)            The lists are not certified, as requested in my application<br \/>\ndated 1.5.2008.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>       Consequently, Section Officer Shri S. K. Mohanty in his letter of 27.8.08<br \/>\nresponded as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;Some papers could not have been enclosed with the above<br \/>\n       referred letter, inadvertently.   The papers are being forwarded<br \/>\n       herewith. Hopefully, this would solve the further queries raised by<br \/>\n       you in your letter dated 13.8.2008.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       Maj. Gen. V. K. Singh has then moved a second appeal on 11.9.08<br \/>\npleading, &#8220;the information is incomplete and incorrect.&#8221; He has gone on to point<br \/>\nout perceived contradictions in the information provided and has specifically<br \/>\nmentioned that several officers of the RAW had not been included in the list.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>        The appeal was heard on 26.4.2010. The following are present:<br \/>\n       Appellant<br \/>\n             Maj. Gen. V. K. Singh<br \/>\n       Respondents<br \/>\n             Shri Jai Prakash, US<br \/>\n             Shri S. K. Mohanty, S.O.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Shri Jai Prakash, US submitted that he had in his capacity as then CPIO<br \/>\nresponded to the appeal dated 11.9.08 of appellant Gen. V. K. Singh, as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;you had sought information relating to the list of officers of the rank<br \/>\n       of Joint Secretary, Addl. Secretary, Spl. Secy. And Secy. Indicating<br \/>\n       their names, cadres, seniority and date of appointment as on 1st of<br \/>\n       January of each year from 2001 to 2008. The information is neither<br \/>\n       readily available nor maintained in the format desired by you. In<br \/>\n       this regard, it may be noted that the various lists of senior officers<br \/>\n       available on the website of this Department are up dated from time<br \/>\n       to time as a result of additions or deletions. However, in order to<br \/>\n       meet your requirement to the extent possible, the National<br \/>\n       Informatics Centre (NIC) of this Department was requested to<br \/>\n       retrieve the date to the extent possible from the software in use for<br \/>\n       updating the lists appearing under the Tab &#8216;Citizen corner&#8217; on the<br \/>\n       website of the Department of Personnel &amp; Training. So far as your<br \/>\n       objection No. 11 in your appeal dated 11.9.2008 is concerned, the<br \/>\n       RTI Act does not apply to the Research &amp; Analysis Wing (RAW) of<br \/>\n       the Cabinet Secretariat as per Sec. 24 of the RTI Act (Second<br \/>\n       Schedule).&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       Appellant Maj. Gen. V. K. Singh also agreed that he had received this<br \/>\ninformation but pointed out that there were wide gaps even in the current<br \/>\ninformation provided since only some of the officers of RAW have been<br \/>\nmentioned. If on the other hand DOPT stands by its comments in the letter of<br \/>\n26.12.08 regarding exemption granted to RAW u\/s 24(1), none of the officers of<br \/>\nRAW should have been mentioned on the website or indeed in the information<br \/>\nprovided to him. However, he also pointed out particularly in the case of RAW,<br \/>\nthat even the information available on the website and that provided to him was<br \/>\ncontradictory.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                          4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>         Shri Jai Prakash, US submitted that upon receipt of the orders of the<br \/>\nAppellate Authority, CPIO had taken recourse to obtaining information through<br \/>\nNIC. Since this was not regularly maintained, it was subject to error, and supplied<br \/>\nas held. However, the present list is consistently upgraded and although the list<br \/>\nmay change from time to time, it is likely to be up to date.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                DECISION NOTICE<\/p>\n<p>        Having heard the arguments and examined the records, we find as<br \/>\nfollows:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.      Under sec. 4(1)(a), all records that are appropriate to be computerized are<br \/>\nexpected to be computerized in DOPT and this will include the list of officers in<br \/>\nany given year serving in the DOPT so as to bring it in line with the spirit of sec.<br \/>\n4(1)(b)(ix). The DOPT is the administrative authority for the implementation of<br \/>\nthe RTI Act and it is essential that this Organization develop as a role model in<br \/>\nimplementation of the law. Hence u\/s 19(8)(a) Shri Shantanu Counsel, Secretary,<br \/>\nDOPT will take such steps to commission the NIC to prepare an up to date<br \/>\nstatement of a directory of its officers from time to time for any date, specified by<br \/>\nhim from year to year, for the years stretching into the time of records held as per<br \/>\npolicy of the department on destruction of records, which information will be<br \/>\nuploaded on the DoPT website for purposes of reference.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2. The complete list of all RAW officers selected by the ACC on the<br \/>\n        recommendations of DOPT will be provided. As pointed out by US Shri<br \/>\n        Jai Prakash during the hearing in certain cases the ACC may also receive<br \/>\n        communication from the Organization itself for appointment of officers.<br \/>\n        The communication received from RAW being outside the pale of the RTI<br \/>\n        Act, the information provided will not cover such cases.\n<\/p>\n<p>     3. In providing the names of the officers working in RAW, DOPT will take into<br \/>\n        account that CBI in its biannual Conference of 26\/27-8-2009 has in fact<br \/>\n        published, together with its agenda a comprehensive list of RAW officers,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                          5<\/span><br \/>\n        the names of which, therefore, are now decidedly in the public domain.<br \/>\n       The appeal is thus allowed. There will be no costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Announced in the hearing. Notice of this decision be given free of cost to<br \/>\nthe parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Wajahat Habibullah)<br \/>\nChief Information Commissioner<br \/>\n26.4.2010<\/p>\n<p>Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against<br \/>\napplication and payment of the charges, prescribed under the Act, to the CPIO<br \/>\nof this Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar)<br \/>\nJoint Registrar<br \/>\n26.4.2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        6<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Maj Gen Vinay Kumar Singh vs Department Of Personnel And &#8230; on 26 April, 2010 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2009\/000101 dated 17.2.2009 Right to Information Act 2005 &#8211; Section 19 Appellant &#8211; Maj. Gen. (retd.) V. K. Singh Respondent &#8211; Department of Personnel &amp; Training Decision announced: 26.4.2010 Facts : By [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200528","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Maj Gen Vinay Kumar Singh vs Department Of Personnel And ... on 26 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Maj Gen Vinay Kumar Singh vs Department Of Personnel And ... on 26 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-04-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-16T11:29:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Maj Gen Vinay Kumar Singh vs Department Of Personnel And &#8230; on 26 April, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-16T11:29:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1636,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.Maj Gen Vinay Kumar Singh vs Department Of Personnel And ... on 26 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-16T11:29:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Maj Gen Vinay Kumar Singh vs Department Of Personnel And &#8230; on 26 April, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Maj Gen Vinay Kumar Singh vs Department Of Personnel And ... on 26 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Maj Gen Vinay Kumar Singh vs Department Of Personnel And ... on 26 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-04-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-16T11:29:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Maj Gen Vinay Kumar Singh vs Department Of Personnel And &#8230; on 26 April, 2010","datePublished":"2010-04-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-16T11:29:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010"},"wordCount":1636,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010","name":"Mr.Maj Gen Vinay Kumar Singh vs Department Of Personnel And ... on 26 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-04-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-16T11:29:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-maj-gen-vinay-kumar-singh-vs-department-of-personnel-and-on-26-april-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Maj Gen Vinay Kumar Singh vs Department Of Personnel And &#8230; on 26 April, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200528","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200528"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200528\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200528"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200528"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200528"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}