{"id":200590,"date":"2011-10-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-10-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011"},"modified":"2017-01-29T03:07:18","modified_gmt":"2017-01-28T21:37:18","slug":"smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011","title":{"rendered":"Smt. Leelavati vs Divisional Manager, Oriantal … on 22 October, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission<\/div>\n
Smt. Leelavati vs Divisional Manager, Oriantal … on 22 October, 2011<\/div>\n
              CHHATTISGARH STATE\n     CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION\n                 PANDRI, RAIPUR\n                                                             (A\/11\/2337)\n                                                    Appeal No.56\/2011\n                                                  Instituted on 03.02.11\nSmt. Leelawati, W\/o Late Shri Samaylal,\nR\/o: Vill. Bhaiyathan Road, Surajpur,\nDist. SURGUJA (C.G.)                                       ... Appellant.\n             Vs.\n1. Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.,\nDivisional Office, Opp. High Court, Nr. Bus Stand,\nBILASPUR (C.G.)\n2. Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.,\nBanaras Chowk, Ambikapur,\nDist. SURGUJA (C.G.)                                    ... Respondents.\nPRESENT: -\nHON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI S.C. VYAS, PRESIDENT\nHON'BLE SHRI V.K. PATIL, MEMBER\nCOUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES: -\nShri S.K. Sharma, for appellant.\nShri Anil Gaikwad, for respondents.\n\n                               ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
                           Dated: 22 \/10\/2011
\n          PER: – HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI S. C. VYAS, PRESIDENT<\/p>\n
       This appeal has been preferred against order dated 11.01.2011 of<\/p>\n
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja-Ambikapur<\/p>\n
(hereinafter called “District Forum” for short) in an unregistered<\/p>\n
execution case of 2007 for execution of award dated 21.03.07 of the<\/p>\n
District Forum, passed in complaint case No.147\/04.<\/p>\n
2.     The contention of the appellant herein is that an award of<\/p>\n
Rs.5,00,000\/- was passed along with interest in favour of the appellant<\/p>\n
herein against the insurance company. The insurance company, on
\n                                     \/\/ 2 \/\/<\/p>\n
05.05.07, deposited Rs.25,000\/- before the District Forum for filing<\/p>\n
appeal before this Commission. Prayer of the appellant \/ complainant<\/p>\n
before District Forum as well as before us, is that this amount be first<\/p>\n
adjusted against the amount of interest and not against the principal<\/p>\n
amount of award.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3.     We have heard arguments of both parties on this question and<\/p>\n
perused the impugned order.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4.     The District Forum vide the impugned order has recorded<\/p>\n
finding that if the deposited amount Rs.25,000\/- is deducted from the<\/p>\n
principal   amount,    then   the     principal   amount   remains     only<\/p>\n
Rs.4,75,000\/- and then interest on that amount, if it is calculated for<\/p>\n
three months and twenty eight days @ 9% p.a., then it comes to<\/p>\n
Rs.14,012.50p. If that amount of interest, rest of the principal amount<\/p>\n
and the amount of cost is taken into consideration then the amount<\/p>\n
which has been deposited in the case by the insurance company, so far,<\/p>\n
is the payment, in full satisfaction of the order of District Forum.<\/p>\n
5.     The contention of the appellant \/ complainant is that the<\/p>\n
amount of Rs.25,000\/- was required to be adjusted in the amount of<\/p>\n
interest and interest was required to be calculated on the whole<\/p>\n
awarded amount of Rs.5,00,000\/- and the District Forum has
\n                                  \/\/ 3 \/\/<\/p>\n
committed a mistake in making calculation on the basis that the<\/p>\n
deposited amount would be adjusted first against the principal<\/p>\n
amount and then interest would be calculated on rest of the principal<\/p>\n
amount. We do not find any substance in the arguments advanced by<\/p>\n
counsel for the appellant. The amount which was deposited by the<\/p>\n
insurance company can either be adjusted against the interest or<\/p>\n
against the principal amount, as the case may be and as the District<\/p>\n
Forum has chosen to adjust the deposited amount against the principal<\/p>\n
amount first and then to calculate amount of interest on the rest of the<\/p>\n
principal amount for three months and twenty eight days, then such<\/p>\n
calculation of interest cannot be said erroneous and such amount has<\/p>\n
already been paid by the insurance company.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6.    The second contention of learned counsel for the appellant is<\/p>\n
that the insurance has deducted Rs.14,691\/- as TDS and has paid the<\/p>\n
remaining amount only. He submitted no TDS was required to be<\/p>\n
deducted by the insurance company on the amount of award, because<\/p>\n
that amount was required to be paid as per orders of the District<\/p>\n
Forum and it was an amount of decree of a Court, so the insurance<\/p>\n
company was not required to deduct any amount from the decretal<\/p>\n
amount.\n<\/p>\n
                                 \/\/ 4 \/\/<\/p>\n
7.    In this regard, counsel for the insurance company has drawn<\/p>\n
our attention towards a Press Release, No.402\/92\/2006-MC(04 of<\/p>\n
2010), dated 20.01.2010 of Government of India, Ministry of Finance,<\/p>\n
Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes and it has been<\/p>\n
submitted that as per this Press Release, the insurance company was<\/p>\n
required to deduct tax at source @ 20% or the higher of the prescribed<\/p>\n
rate, where Permanent Account Number (PAN) of the deductee was<\/p>\n
not mentioned. Provisions of section 194A of the Income Tax Act, 1961<\/p>\n
has also been referred by counsel for the respondent to show that the<\/p>\n
amount was required to be deducted against tax deduction at source,<\/p>\n
on the amount of interest.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
8.    Section 194A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 provides as under : –<\/p>\n
      “194A (1) Any person, not being an individual or a
\n            Hindu undivided family, who is responsible for
\n            paying to a resident any income by way of interest
\n            other than income [by way of interest on
\n            securities], shall, at the time of credit of such
\n            income to the account of the payee or at the time
\n            of payment thereof in cash or by issue of a cheque
\n            or draft or by any other mode, whichever is
\n            earlier, deduct income-tax thereon at the rates in
\n            force:”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
      Then certain provisions for such deduction have been<\/p>\n
mentioned under which no such deduction would be made. Provision<\/p>\n
(ix) says that no such deduction would be made from the amount of<\/p>\n
interest on the amount of compensation awarded by M.A.C.T. when
\n                                     \/\/ 5 \/\/<\/p>\n
such amount of interest is less than Rs.50,000\/-.        But when we<\/p>\n
minutely go through this provision, then we find that in this provision<\/p>\n
of Law nothing is said in respect of amount payable under an order of<\/p>\n
a Court, so when some amount is required to be paid under an order<\/p>\n
of a Court, then it is no more applicable and in the present matter,<\/p>\n
payer was not required to deduct any amount as income tax, because<\/p>\n
in such case the liability of payment of tax will be shifted upon the<\/p>\n
person, who receives payment of the amount which is required to be<\/p>\n
deposited in a Court of Law from where it is to be paid to the<\/p>\n
concerning person. Therefore, such amount in the hand of the payee,<\/p>\n
cannot be said to be an income of interest and payable to someone else<\/p>\n
by the payee, from which compulsory deduction of tax was necessary.<\/p>\n
Thus, we find that the respondent insurance company has committed<\/p>\n
mistake in deducting amount of TDS and then paying remaining<\/p>\n
amount.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
9.      Therefore, on this limited ground, the appeal succeeds and is<\/p>\n
allowed. The respondents are directed to pay the amount which has<\/p>\n
been deducted by way of TDS to the complainant \/ appellant along<\/p>\n
with a certificate that no Tax has been deducted at source and it will be<\/p>\n
liability of the complainant \/ appellant to pay any tax, if payable<\/p>\n
under the provisions of Law. With this observation, the appeal is<\/p>\n
disposed of. No order as to cost.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
     (Justice S.C.Vyas)                               (V.K. Patil)\n         President                                     Member\n           \/10\/2011                                       \/10\/2011\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Smt. Leelavati vs Divisional Manager, Oriantal … on 22 October, 2011 CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PANDRI, RAIPUR (A\/11\/2337) Appeal No.56\/2011 Instituted on 03.02.11 Smt. Leelawati, W\/o Late Shri Samaylal, R\/o: Vill. Bhaiyathan Road, Surajpur, Dist. SURGUJA (C.G.) … Appellant. Vs. 1. Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Divisional […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200590","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt. Leelavati vs Divisional Manager, Oriantal ... on 22 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt. Leelavati vs Divisional Manager, Oriantal ... on 22 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-28T21:37:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt. Leelavati vs Divisional Manager, Oriantal … on 22 October, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-28T21:37:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1030,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011\",\"name\":\"Smt. Leelavati vs Divisional Manager, Oriantal ... on 22 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-28T21:37:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt. Leelavati vs Divisional Manager, Oriantal … on 22 October, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt. Leelavati vs Divisional Manager, Oriantal ... on 22 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt. Leelavati vs Divisional Manager, Oriantal ... on 22 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-28T21:37:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt. Leelavati vs Divisional Manager, Oriantal … on 22 October, 2011","datePublished":"2011-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-28T21:37:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011"},"wordCount":1030,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011","name":"Smt. Leelavati vs Divisional Manager, Oriantal ... on 22 October, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-28T21:37:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-leelavati-vs-divisional-manager-oriantal-on-22-october-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt. Leelavati vs Divisional Manager, Oriantal … on 22 October, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200590","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200590"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200590\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200590"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200590"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200590"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}