{"id":200697,"date":"2011-11-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-11-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011"},"modified":"2019-03-20T06:43:40","modified_gmt":"2019-03-20T01:13:40","slug":"mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.A K Venkatachalapathy vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 November, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.A K Venkatachalapathy vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 November, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                       Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\n                             File\u00a0No.CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/001177\n                  Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19)\n\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0hearing                       :                               3\u00a0November\u00a02011\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0decision                      :                               3\u00a0November\u00a02011\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant                 :   Shri\u00a0A\u00a0K\u00a0Venkatachalapathy\n                                          Advocate,\u00a0185\/13,\u00a0Seethammal\u00a0Colony,\n                                          Gobichettipalayam,\u00a0Erode,\u00a0District,\n                                          Tamilnadu\u00a0-\u00a0638\u00a0452.\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0        :   CPIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Commission,\n                                          Satarkta\u00a0Bhawan,\u00a0Block\u00a0A,\n                                          GPO\u00a0Complex,\u00a0INA,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0-\u00a0110\u00a0023.\n\n\n\n        The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0represented\u00a0by\u00a0Shri\u00a0Rajkumar.\n\n        On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0were\u00a0present:\u00ad<\/pre>\n<pre>        (i)      Shri\u00a0Surendra\u00a0Mohan,\u00a0Director,\n        (ii)     Shri\u00a0Dal\u00a0Chand\n\n\n\nChief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner                 :      Shri\u00a0Satyananda\u00a0Mishra\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>2.      We \u00a0 heard \u00a0 this \u00a0 case \u00a0 through \u00a0 video \u00a0 conferencing. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 was\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>present\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Gobichettipalayam\u00a0studio\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0NIC\u00a0through\u00a0his\u00a0representative.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The \u00a0 Respondents \u00a0 were \u00a0 present \u00a0 in \u00a0 our \u00a0 chamber. \u00a0 We \u00a0 heard \u00a0 both \u00a0 their\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>submissions.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.      The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0action\u00a0taken\u00a0on\u00a0a\u00a0complaint\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/001177<br \/>\n he\u00a0had\u00a0sent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CVC\u00a0against\u00a0the\u00a0NHAI\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0construction\u00a0of\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>particular\u00a0road.\u00a0The\u00a0CPIO\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CVC\u00a0informed\u00a0him\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0complaint\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>sent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0NHAI\u00a0and,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0transferred\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>them.\u00a0Thereafter,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0preferred\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Authority\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0transferred\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0NHAI.<\/p>\n<p>4.      During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0insisted\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0a\u00a0right\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>about\u00a0the\u00a0investigations\u00a0made\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0CVC\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0complaint\u00a0preferred\u00a0by\u00a0him.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>On\u00a0the\u00a0 other\u00a0hand,\u00a0 the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0 submitted\u00a0 that\u00a0the\u00a0 CVC\u00a0had\u00a0 not\u00a0 found\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>anything\u00a0of\u00a0vigilance\u00a0angle\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0complaint\u00a0and,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0conducted\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>any\u00a0investigation\u00a0on\u00a0its\u00a0own\u00a0into\u00a0this\u00a0complaint\u00a0and\u00a0had\u00a0instead\u00a0transferred\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>entire \u00a0 matter \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 NHAI \u00a0 for \u00a0 further \u00a0 necessary \u00a0 action. \u00a0 If \u00a0 indeed, \u00a0 no\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>investigation\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0conducted\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0CVC,\u00a0obviously,\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>expected\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0any\u00a0further\u00a0details.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>5.      It\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0NHAI\u00a0which\u00a0should\u00a0provide\u00a0whatever\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0available\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>respect\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0particular\u00a0complaint\u00a0forwarded\u00a0to\u00a0them\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0CVC.\u00a0Therefore,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>we\u00a0direct\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CVC\u00a0to\u00a0forward\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0NHAI\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0further\u00a0direction\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>NHAI\u00a0should\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0desired\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0directly\u00a0within\u00a015\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>working\u00a0days\u00a0of\u00a0receiving\u00a0this\u00a0order.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>6.      Needless \u00a0 to \u00a0 say, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 would \u00a0 be \u00a0 free \u00a0 to \u00a0 approach \u00a0 the \u00a0 first\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0NHAI\u00a0and,\u00a0later,\u00a0the\u00a0CIC\u00a0if\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>information\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0NHAI.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>7.      The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/001177\n<\/p>\n<p> 8.      Copies\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0be\u00a0given\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0parties.<\/p>\n<p>                                                              (Satyananda\u00a0Mishra)<br \/>\n                                                Chief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>        Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy.\u00a0\u00a0Additional\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0orders\u00a0shall\u00a0be\u00a0supplied\u00a0against\u00a0<br \/>\napplication\u00a0and\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0charges\u00a0prescribed\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0Act\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0<br \/>\nCommission.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                        (Vijay\u00a0Bhalla)<br \/>\n                                                                     Deputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/001177\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.A K Venkatachalapathy vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 November, 2011 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No.CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/001177 Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19) Date\u00a0of\u00a0hearing : 3\u00a0November\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0decision : 3\u00a0November\u00a02011 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant : Shri\u00a0A\u00a0K\u00a0Venkatachalapathy Advocate,\u00a0185\/13,\u00a0Seethammal\u00a0Colony, Gobichettipalayam,\u00a0Erode,\u00a0District, Tamilnadu\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0638\u00a0452. Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0 : CPIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Commission, Satarkta\u00a0Bhawan,\u00a0Block\u00a0A, GPO\u00a0Complex,\u00a0INA,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0110\u00a0023. The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0represented\u00a0by\u00a0Shri\u00a0Rajkumar. On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0were\u00a0present:\u00ad (i) Shri\u00a0Surendra\u00a0Mohan,\u00a0Director, (ii) Shri\u00a0Dal\u00a0Chand Chief\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner : Shri\u00a0Satyananda\u00a0Mishra 2. We \u00a0 heard \u00a0 this \u00a0 case \u00a0 through \u00a0 video [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200697","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.A K Venkatachalapathy vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.A K Venkatachalapathy vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-20T01:13:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.A K Venkatachalapathy vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 November, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-20T01:13:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011\"},\"wordCount\":399,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.A K Venkatachalapathy vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-20T01:13:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.A K Venkatachalapathy vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 November, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.A K Venkatachalapathy vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.A K Venkatachalapathy vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-20T01:13:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.A K Venkatachalapathy vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 November, 2011","datePublished":"2011-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-20T01:13:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011"},"wordCount":399,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011","name":"Mr.A K Venkatachalapathy vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-20T01:13:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-venkatachalapathy-vs-central-vigilance-commission-on-3-november-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.A K Venkatachalapathy vs Central Vigilance Commission on 3 November, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200697","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200697"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200697\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200697"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200697"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200697"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}