{"id":200772,"date":"2009-12-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009"},"modified":"2015-06-23T19:12:39","modified_gmt":"2015-06-23T13:42:39","slug":"chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"Chikkalakkaiah vs Puttarama on 4 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Chikkalakkaiah vs Puttarama on 4 December, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
  Rio Ks\u00e9mbinakoppalu,\n\n   \n\n  Rib K\ufb01mbinakoppalu,\n\nIN THE HIGH comm' ore' KARKATAKA AT nmaamm\nDATED 1':-as THE 41% 11.9.? or !)ECEMBER_.  ~ \nBEFORE H    %    \nTI-IE HOWELE MKJUETICE   \nR..B.A. xo.1m7%5   A. A  \nsmwsan: V\u00bb  \n\nChikkalakkaiah,\n\nS\/0 Sambaiah,\n\nAged about '35 years,\nR,\/o Kombinakoppalu,\nDcvalapura Hobirgf  .  _  - \nuevalapura       \n\n ' ._      .\n\nMandya.       .. APPELLANT\n\n(By 3:113;  A.-'sixggy\n\nAND:\nS4\/gar}  '\ni\ufb01ged Eabcazt S8 \n\n'  E;}e1raZ:a;.pz~1mA\u00a7E*Isr31:3}i,\n {)e'siai%ai'\u00a7;z;r;:ff'::vst,\n\"  Taiuk,\n\ufb01zantiga Q53-i;I'$cf;.\n\n.. \" Sip Euadanfah,\n'waged ahaiai: 86 yaears,\n\nF \ufb02revaiapura Eisebli,\n\" Bevaiapura ?st.,,\nNagamangaia Taluk,\nMa-rxdya II}ist':ri*ira       \nDetral:}.pu1u\u00e9t_\u00bbPos'i:,\u00bb ' *  *\nNagam\u00e9r:\u00a7a1s;;TaIuk,%%L % ' \nPsg'ia11ciy:3..i1)istzil;t ..--1S'z_1' 432. 66 nmspoxpmnrs\n\n(By   far R-- 1\nSri \ufb01.V.Rama11, Adv. far  3 (a) to ((1))\n\n is filed umier Scc\ufb01on 100 CFC against the\n\n   Decme dated 30.10.1200? passed in\n\nR;A.:szcs.159;'%2i1{35 on than \ufb01le of the Civil Judge (Sr.D1::.) 3:,\n\n_  _ JMI?5{3.,  a11awi11g the appeal \ufb01kzd against the\nVJ1i1\u20acI7g2}1$1f3.i: and Decree dated 32.10.2096 passerzi in\n \u00a5]0\u00a2s'.r\u00a7'\u00a2.135\/2301 01:}, the \ufb01le at the Civil Ju\u00e9gc (J1:{311.) 55\n\nThis appeal coming on for admisgion this day, the Court\n\nA. deiivered the foI}owing:~\u00bb\n\n \n\n\n\n6\nand hence the impugned jzicigment\/decree calls for\ni\ufb01terference an\u00e9 the matter may have tr} be re1egat\u00a72:i,:.:bag::k to\n\nthe Appellate Court far GOi1Si.d6\u00a7'a'{iGI1 of  \n\naccardance with iaw.\n\n6. Smt\ufb01umangaia Swamy   14.\n\nadvocates for the respondents, o:; tfia.e other.  iiia\u00e9s<\/pre>\n
submissions in Supp\ufb02fi of  t}1r;.\u00e9”V\u00bbf1I1di1’14gs_ “arid . \u00a3;0nc1usioI1s<\/p>\n
recorded by the learne\ufb01 andv\u00e9ciitezzded that<\/p>\n
in View of the material}.  5;i.?\u00a7’?\u00bb1\u00a7\u00a7I:-..bie on record,
\nespecially thc;.v’:,*3\u00a7g;f\u00a73ast};a  judgment; under
\nappealgs  – ‘<\/p>\n
‘2’, In i?iL’.w”  “E3131 cententions, the substantial<\/p>\n
 ‘~  _ qu\u00e9:_\u00e9’$iQ_x; cf iaw that-requires considera\ufb01on is:<\/p>\n
  _  Ffrst Appeilate Court has decided the<\/p>\n
. ‘-   –A3:’1’f\u00a7\u20ac\u20ac1\u00a7i?1 a\ufb01rdarbm with law?”<\/p>\n
8’ ‘  Apex Cau\ufb01: in the case of Saatash Hazari Vs.<\/p>\n
A ” ‘Mi’7:’x._shotta.m Tiwari {Dead} by Lu. mmrted in Am 2001<\/p>\n
  965, the facts cf the case were that, the<\/p>\n
‘p}ai11t;i\ufb01’\/appeilant fieci 9. suit for deciaratien of title and<\/p>\n
recovery of yassession and issuance of permanent<\/p>\n
\\\/<\/p>\n
7<\/span>
\npreventive injunction res\ufb01aimng the defendant \ufb01om<\/p>\n
i;1terfeI*ing with the possessian 0f the plaintiff over th: e”\u00bb$11it<\/p>\n
property. Defendant contested the suit. On <\/p>\n
of oral and d<}CU_'i\ufb01er1ta1'y evidence adduced  .,  <\/p>\n
the suit was decreed. Defeiidant   <\/p>\n
was allowed. and thereby the suii-  was cijirkeciif\u00e9tix {{1}}.<\/p>\n
ciismissed. A second appea1–\u00e91isz\ufb01;issed in
\niimine and the matter  ._b\\\u00e9iE?~.1fe th\u00a7\u00a7"AV;i}ex Court,
\nwherein it was held as fc~11m=?$_;    LT AA 9<\/p>\n
'The first \u00e9dg\ufb01\u00e9-'elir\ufb01e  = .1.3.'_'_\u00a3,.V:Ar:1 very cryptic<\/p>\n
 ' on question of
\n,g5\u00a33ssessi\u00a3\u00a7?i'.{L12}\ufb01t'  as alleged by the
\nplaira_t:_\u20acf'f,   question of adverse
\n_posse\u00a7Sic;:?1Va$; pzedaed by the defendant. me
\n 'aaggf\u00e9figtte  jurisdiction is reverse or affirm
\n%    jimfiings cf the ma: Court. First appeaz is a
\n   of the parties and un\u00e9ess restricted<\/p>\n
'A  the wfwie case is therein apart for<\/p>\n
_ "  mm on questiens offact and Eaw, The
\n * s '_ of the appellate Com': must, therefare,
\n*  f\u00e9e\ufb02mr its wnsdmm appfication of mind, and
\nrecord \ufb01ndings supported by rerasarw, em all the
\nissues arising aiong with the contentiarzs pat forth,<\/p>\n
and pressed by the: parties for decision of the
\nappeliate Court. The task of ma\ufb01zppeliate Court<\/p>\n
\/1<\/p>\n
\u00bb<\/p>\n
8<\/span><\/p>\n
affirming the firzding3 of the trial Court is an easier
\none. The appellate Court agreeing with the view of
\nthe trial Court need not restate the ejfect of thg<\/p>\n
eviderm or reiterate the reasons given by <\/p>\n
court; expression of general agreeme:_:*;ti””  5 _;. <\/p>\n
reasons given by the Court, decisisn gf  i<\/p>\n
under app-eai, would ordiitar’i{y
\nGirtjanandini Devi :2. Bijendriz. Nctmin c*hou.};m:;+g;,.\u00a2#’it~<\/p>\n
AIR 1967 SC 1124). we.4;uou1az__howe:.re\u00a7;Iifge
\nsound :2 note of cczutionfv.\n<\/p>\n
agreement with  “zf\u00a2c>:3rci’\u00a3?:d–.. in} the
\njudgment under   device or
\ncams-u\ufb02age__adopted,:’by   Court for
\nshirking ;ti”;\u00a33 k1utgi,{_   ..  writing a<\/p>\n
jt;\u00a7dg{n\u00a73}iti’iX;3iV_  the appeliate Caurt must
\nrefnair: CG\ufb02.$\u20ac3\u00a74\u00a7fL\u00a3,’\u00a7 twa principles. Firstiy, the<\/p>\n
\ufb01ndirxzgsi eff i s.E;\u00abt>\u00e9ed on con\ufb02ieting evidence<\/p>\n
.. \u00ab\ufb01frzlfrived at vvthgvtriczl Court must weigh with the<\/p>\n
in   moreso when the findings are<\/p>\n
V ‘  it  pram! evidence rec\ufb01rded by the same
\nJudge who authors the judgment. This<\/p>\n
  daes not mean that when an appeal ties<\/p>\n
 AA  onjiszcts, the appeiiate Court is not competent ta
\nV’ V.  ‘”‘g**ez:e:’se a finding of fact arrived at by the trial<\/p>\n
Judge. As a matter cf law if the appraisal of the
\netzidencse by the triai Cami su\ufb01em frsm a material
\nirregularity 91* is based an inadmissibie evidence<\/p>\n
02* an cenjectures and surmises; the afiipeilzzte<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
,,\u00ab\/7.\n<\/p>\n
Cam’: is emitted to interfere with the \ufb01n,d\u20acng offact
\n(See Madhusudcm Das V. Smt.Narc2yan;i Bat”, <\/p>\n
1933 so 114;. The rule is -W and it is
\nmore than {,2 rule of practice ~ that  .
\nconflict cf oral evidence of the  <\/p>\n
matter in issue and the d63(..’i\u00a7iOfi};li1’3g\u20ac;S _i;;;ir_,rn:  <\/p>\n
credibi\ufb01ty of witnesses, thei2’ui\u00a7fes:S t?2g?’e_.is VT<\/p>\n
special feature about .i}aa_.e:zi\u00a7ic32\u00a7tie3 Qf <\/p>\n
witness which has  the triai Jm~:ge*s; notice
\nor there is a sz\u00a7;zj’igient&..i9ai{i\ufb01;::Q\u00e9””9f inzgifoiaa\ufb01fiity to
\ndispzaoe his opirii’e::\u00e9;:zs”-3;:xtgredibility lies,
\nthe appeilcgte  nbt.  with the
\n   offact (See
\n ‘V   U. Jwalesfuvazi
\n  .\u00a7v{\u00a2;\u00a7fAi:ain=. Si:1gh,_’ AIR 1951 Sc :20).
\n\ufb01cc\u00e9\ufb01dly;  a finding of fact the
\nap\ufb01\u00e9\u00a3I\u00a7:\u00e9.te  come izzto dose quarters with<\/p>\n
V,   rea\u00e9bning a\ufb01signed by the trial Court and therz\u00e9<\/p>\n
13:3 own reasens for arriving at a different<\/p>\n
  ,\u00a3zn\u00a71ik:;’gr..  ‘ :r’nis would satisy the Court hearing :2
\n fu+z\u00a7\u00e9gr.’Tappeaz that the first appeiiate Court had
\n ciigcfc\u00e9irged the duty expected sf it. We need anly<\/p>\n
.re~rhind the first appeilate Courts of the additionai<\/p>\n
_ H obligatian mst on them by the scheme of the
\npresent Section 100 substituted in the Code. The<\/p>\n
first appellate Court wntirmes, as before, to be :1
\n\ufb01rzai Court of facts; pure findings of fact remain
\nimmune: frezam chailenge be-fare the High Cam’: fr:<\/p>\n
R<\/p>\n
\/7?\n<\/p>\n
II
\nevidence :10: applicatie\ufb01 of law by the learned Appellate
\nJudge. In the circumstances, aubstantrial questien cf law is
\nanswered in the a\ufb01irmative and it is held that the impugned
\njudgment su\ufb02ers from non~app1ica\ufb01e-11 cf mind the<\/p>\n
facts. and the law, by the learned Appellate  \u00abl   _~_. A’ <\/p>\n
In the result, the second hapfg\u00e9al  Tll\u00e9’ . <\/p>\n
\ufb01rldgment \u00a5.}I1d\u20acI’ Challenge is s\u00e9it a$’id%:.  <\/p>\n
remittad back to the Appeiidte..  Vde’ci\u00a7d{2i._’fJ1\u00a2V  ”<\/p>\n
afresh, both on facts and in   the ratio
\nlaid clown by the A];)V(ft}{.zTi.:Q1\u00a7lIft  iiscision referred to<\/p>\n
supra\ufb02 Al_},}>9t1_: the 13ar’c:ies are left epen for
\nconside\ufb01a\ufb01i\u00e9n  Court. Since the appeal is<\/p>\n
of thc-vyear’4.V2{)V(u}6,”‘ ef the Case Flow Management<\/p>\n
. l  by tli\ufb02i\u00e9lll\u00e9lotirt, in order to enable the Appellate<\/p>\n
   the hearing 0f the appeal, the parties are<\/p>\n
difecteclv’ ‘tz)_v’alppea3″ before the First Appeiiaiae Ctmrt 011<\/p>\n
10 and recgive further or\u00e9ers \ufb01gm the Iorwar<\/p>\n
A   C1<:a111"t,. It is made clear that, any observatians<\/p>\n
   .,p:\u00a7.ade in this judgment, being only limited for the purpose sf<\/p>\n
V' alecision an the szibstantial question of law under<\/p>\n
conaidara\ufb01an, shall not be treated as an expression sf<\/p>\n
Ex<\/p>\n
1;:\n<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
opinion on the merits of the matter, which is new 1f\u00e9qui;red<\/p>\n
to be decided by the Appeilatse Ccmrt.<\/p>\n
   3%UD’ E*     <\/p>\n
FKS<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Chikkalakkaiah vs Puttarama on 4 December, 2009 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda Rio Ks\u00e9mbinakoppalu, Rib K\ufb01mbinakoppalu, IN THE HIGH comm’ ore’ KARKATAKA AT nmaamm DATED 1′:-as THE 41% 11.9.? or !)ECEMBER_. ~ BEFORE H % TI-IE HOWELE MKJUETICE R..B.A. xo.1m7%5 A. A smwsan: V\u00bb Chikkalakkaiah, S\/0 Sambaiah, Aged about ’35 years, R,\/o Kombinakoppalu, Dcvalapura […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200772","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nChikkalakkaiah vs Puttarama on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chikkalakkaiah vs Puttarama on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-23T13:42:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chikkalakkaiah vs Puttarama on 4 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-23T13:42:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1054,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009\",\"name\":\"Chikkalakkaiah vs Puttarama on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-23T13:42:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chikkalakkaiah vs Puttarama on 4 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chikkalakkaiah vs Puttarama on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chikkalakkaiah vs Puttarama on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-23T13:42:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chikkalakkaiah vs Puttarama on 4 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-23T13:42:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009"},"wordCount":1054,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009","name":"Chikkalakkaiah vs Puttarama on 4 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-23T13:42:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chikkalakkaiah-vs-puttarama-on-4-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chikkalakkaiah vs Puttarama on 4 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200772","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200772"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200772\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200772"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200772"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200772"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}