{"id":200869,"date":"2009-06-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009"},"modified":"2015-11-01T23:18:09","modified_gmt":"2015-11-01T17:48:09","slug":"worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Worldwide Shipping Inc vs New Mangalore Prot Trust on 18 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Worldwide Shipping Inc vs New Mangalore Prot Trust on 18 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: V.Gopalagowda<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
IE’? ‘THE Hi\ufb01r\ufb01 CGEIRT 3? K%I’ZA.’I’AKA AT  <\/p>\n
DATED THIS Tim 13% DAY 01%’ JI3i\u00a2E \u00a7’j2\u00a3t{}i\u00a7 ~ _ _: ”  <\/p>\n
BEFGRE<\/p>\n
THE I~:ozsr*3LE 3m..ms’1fIcE V, ”\n<\/p>\n
WRIT PETITION’ No–.. $’i=3-,1’7’\/V2\u00ae’\u00a7’\u00a3\u20ac\u00a7MV;}E\u00a7\ufb01Si’
\nBETWEEE: V’  ‘ V
\n1, Wc;1″ldv\u00a3i{i\u00a3: Shippii1Vg I:*1\u00a7:’;’,’E’\u00bb  . .\n<\/p>\n
E33133. Houssxi, Pa:.aI:1hFur”\n<\/p>\n
Sew Ma\ufb01gaiiii\ufb01 5f3;75 {}\u00bb:’i{};’~   u
\nRap. bi.-‘ =25’r::=f:;c.’is*vE?e;’r1.*a\u00a7.r:d_:>  v .<\/p>\n
Iv<\/p>\n
Se\ufb01idi’ i%3:i&:g:utiva.  V :\n<\/p>\n
 iii} S.AShV:1pui’3.’ i::i::1f12ati\u20ac;11al Ltd,
\nEiine %f}*W\ufb01e:*:?s3_Fr{>\u20ac:\u20ac:fs’S~mi’s and
\nE.15Q3GI”‘t6I’S 0f’i:\u00a7::;1ta:ii::\u20ac:”\n<\/p>\n
P1\/im,  ‘Wing, “}4i?;;nai Court
\n_E’~”‘*’.;os: \u00a73(\u00a7,%:._\u00a7’5{};  167:3 ‘
\n.. \u00ab.;\u00a7\\3’ai”~ima:: \u00a7>*z:::;1i;_1_:___A .\n<\/p>\n
 \u00e9 – ;vii;:”.;:;1i’:x;a,i 400 \u00a332 1,
\n_ ” ~ , \u00a7\u00a7’s;_p;.\u00a53}.:,_ \u20ac}e:1\u20acrai
\nV  M\u00e93\u00a71’23.Tg<::i* .Xf:\u00a736Va&(:sa::1. . I 6 .Pe'i:iti0I;zer3
\n  ' _  { Sri Jagzaram 55 Jayaraxn, Adj
\nA.N'I}:"\n<\/p>\n
”   Managa\u00e9ere Port Twist<\/p>\n
”  Vi3″a;T1a:11bu1′
\n;Ev1angai<::re :*"3'?E": (31%).,\n<\/p>\n
-V\ufb01ep. E3}; thfi Chaimmm theraaf. ..HResp0:1den’i:<\/p>\n
{By Szifs\u00e9aimzzrhaza RN. Adv, far
\nSri Asimk Eiainaha\ufb01ig Acivy)<\/p>\n
@<\/p>\n
\u00a3:\u00a5}”};_V iiemanci in terms cf Nmice at Az1:1e:x’11res “(E53<\/p>\n
E3’1.:rf\u00a3’;e1” the _p\u20ac2t:i%.i<3:1\u20acr has $0i,1gI':t ta d\ufb01ciare   <\/p>\n
Cause I'1{}iZiC2E3 anzi the canseqzaarxt' \ufb01e-1:'1'f'a3';zi 11;:-_ad_r~:  iltc' 'f1OE.iC\u20ac<\/p>\n
dated 16. 1.:2\u00a3}{}'? are alike i\ufb01tzgal, \u00bbit'ggxii:-c\u00a7fii$1:iii.;\ufb01;}na'1 <\/p>\n
AI1I}\u20acX11I'\u20ac': "F" am} appesed \u00a30 ":I?:i%:V.%\u00bbp1*oVi\u00a3~iO11\u00bb$ :9f 'tI*i\u00e9' Act to<\/p>\n
resi;rai:'1 the respoxxdem v\u00a7}jo111   f11z*ti:'e\u00a7\\, gctiara in
\npurs11a;i1ce theraoi.' and dire:;: tii\ufb01r%a$p\u00a3;\u00a7id\u00a7:r1t'_'.f;<3 rrifund to the<\/p>\n
petiiiiafisrs the S\ufb01ilii' ._\u00bb:3?:'. Rs}! :2:,'?'.Q\u00a7 \u00a398  i_Q\u00a7\u20acti'1\u20acz' 23;-'i%:12. interest<\/p>\n
GE' Rs. 14,\u20ac}9,8\u20ac}'\u00a39\u00a7.i)\u20ac,\u00a7}.{i:i$~::::\u20ac:1*\ufb01~\u00a7';:{\u00a33d," iii":?s:m\u20acx:1re \u00ab~ K} calczuiateai<\/p>\n
at the 1\/*a\u00a7:;:s gg3:.;12d$\u00a7<\/p>\n
2. vi; is ‘:\u00a7::\u00a7e’::  aft \u20ac156: \ufb01I’Sf \u00a7)\u20ac”?1\u00a3\u00a7}”,\u00a7Gf}\u20acI’ {hat E3: rec\u00bb:3iv\u20ac{‘i<\/p>\n
:.f%::\u00e9\u00e92’i;\u00ab3i::\\_…g;\u00a7i’;\u00a7:3:;2m\u00e9i3;;\u00a7iS :>\u00a7”E’35’\u00a7%:1\u20ac::>z’1\u00a7t\u00a7 in \u00a7”;u\u00a7;i{ E;\u00a3:m*\u20ac:\u20ac:2 Essiag,\/’ EEEQE<\/p>\n
aI1’i;i_ :’:i’\u00a3:2;fr “asifiigth zhi\u00e9 w}’;a’:’fag& (312623 vs;-‘era E.-:3 33$<\/p>\n
 “” }\u20acViEi\u00a7 A:-:;} $315: ~ \u00a5f\u00e92,\u20ac 0%’ 533% gm? f\u00a3f}\u20acf\u00a7.”‘\u00a7{‘f iiiililfi 3.5 $’pe<:\u00a7f2\u20ac\u00a2d in<\/p>\n
"  -Ti\u00a7'\u00a3.'\u20ac\ufb01:'zi'2 AA 5:\u20ac ";}z  the \u00a7z::?;i\u00a7'i\u00bb::af3\u00a7az': daisd 132. 198%. The \ufb01rstr.<\/p>\n
 \u00a7,\u00a7{'f7\u00a7j,A2;'i4'i{f\u00a7\u00a7"3\u00a7?\u00a3; zimijs paiii iiht\u00e9gs {$1.165 an bei\u00e9aif of $125: Em<\/p>\n
VT \u00a7e::i:.i.<\u00a7}:'2@3', '\u00a7'E2\u20ac \u00a7.'\u20aciS\u00a7\u00a3}I"\u00a3\u20ac"\u00a7f':\u00a73E mz1.\u00e9s:- a aiszzzaxi\u00e9 fa}? \u00a7}3}=-"z:;e:':\u00a3; {sf<\/p>\n
}'<':"'$.V3'2\u00a7?2,?}82.?i"3 83 S3"}\u20ac).\u00a7'\u00a7; Eevy ::;fwi1a;\u00b0i'ag\u20ac E171 \u00a7"\u20acga:'*:;i :0 {.316<\/p>\n
\\w\/<\/p>\n
said s\u00a71i_pI:1ez:ts am} issued a 1"mi:1\u00a7<:e 0f demami. Aft;:::f_ somzz\u00e9<\/p>\n
.32;3″73\/93. in the \u00a711ferreg*:’::1:11:,’;’Af}1\u00a5e’\u00abfirst;  masts 7<\/p>\n
direct\u00e9id ‘\u20ac23 pay at the rate 0:?’ Rs. 134?’: :S’ujbj6:c’\u00a3. \u00a7::?A’ad;\u00a71i$\u20acii1%\u00e9:i1:L<\/p>\n
after <:0m:ius%\u20ac31"1 sf pmceedings.'  an o:*Ci::\u00a7"   200$
\nvicie A33nexL1r\u20ac~A, this . ._;1\u00a7\u00e9::a,sed '\u00a36 \ufb01uash the
\ni'I}ema;1(\u00a3 \u00a7'~\u00a7'c;tices \u00ab:ia.1:.<3d   and 1'?."?. 1993<\/p>\n
on the ground  t,h%:y :1:%\u00a7v\u20ac"~ \u00a7iG'Zat.;\u00a25i' the principles sf<\/p>\n
naitxrai jigstige a:i:';:"z.Ew'\u00e9r\u00a2"a?iE:\u00a7aiiv\u00e9 0? the provisions of S\u20acC.56<\/p>\n
of th\ufb01 Mi'? ,e'~'\u00bb<fEf;,% 3 '$635'  :10: ggreceded by an e:";qi_z\u00a7:'y<\/p>\n
aft\u00e9zr a;f\u00a7fc\u00a7f{%Aing ai'1'~:)\u00a7p\u00a321'\u00a7:':3:1it33 to the ps\u00e9:\u00e9\u00a7\u00a3;i0r2\u20ac:'s,. 'i'ha (Emir:<\/p>\n
A':',es\u00e9:*e*.e;:i  {ha 3['\u20acS\u00a7}i'3\u00a7'.1d\u20acI}t to Beds {ha fi3.&\u00a7Z'i*$I', if they<\/p>\n
SQ "'<5;.e"':;\u00a7m:\u00a7;  1";e-a"s.%ii":\u00a7 332 cazitsntioyzs Qf thszi pa1'%:i\u20ac:S are kapt<\/p>\n
 3 spam.\n<\/p>\n
” V. n if:;4..\u00e9’Fhe1*ea\u00a7”f.\u20ac:’, the E113: pt\u00e9titiezzer again rese\u00e9szai 3 shavan<\/p>\n
 __1<::T\u00e9mAsgt'~:\u00bb r\ufb01aticae {iatad 2, E 1.2i:){}{} f:'*1:d$nt rapaaiing<\/p>\n
 ‘4 2.31%: same <i&::aa1":;<'\u00a7_ fzzr Rs. E13,' 2,982.'?:'% "\u00e9iawartis iihs: di\ufb01'e:*&r1<:\u00e9:<\/p>\n
in wharfage eharges. The petiti01'1e:* once again :'ep1i@(E"*:.\u00a2 {ha<\/p>\n
Shaw-<:aust":. matice Stating that there was no ap.;:}_\u00a7c\u00e9iii%:i~:1""s;f<\/p>\n
rnind an the part; 93" the re$\u00a730I1ci\u00a2:<1t; ii} the qz1\u00e9;;<\u00a7:f,ie\u00a7_;~~.T:jf"A1e1:\u00a7y  <\/p>\n
and the dezrxixand 1'1-c::t;i\u20ac\u20ac was witizagilt b;8:;41_1\u00a7?}L(}}f"i"~'i;}!* .\u00a73f  1f5;?.V'\u00a7'5\u00ab";V "F'c<\/p>\n
make the e.{:t;i0:{1 65251} more E3ian;<~:woi't}1\u00a7;–,._ iI1Sf;{3\u00a7iTi(i'A. sf' 0ff\u00a7'\u00a7:'<i_n[g<\/p>\n
iegai \u00a7ust.iii’ <}f<\/p>\n
v4_i:}:rar1si\u00a7;;e:'1%.' atitit \u00e9;.:s.?\u00a7_\u00bbr:;_ ____ __a.:3S11:"\ufb016\u20acE by {ha I'\u20aciS\u00a7}\u20ac}I"}.d\u20acI1'E, me<\/p>\n
:\u00a7.\u00a7z\u00a7'ii\u00a7{i\u20ac\u00a7\u00a53,;\u20ac:E":?~.i  hTa\ufb01 "\u00a3:;\u00a7 other aiterzaative but :0 apprcach ibis<\/p>\n
 V ::':w1~s::2-;r \u00a7?3{\u00e9'.";3af::\u00a7\u00a7'1:\u00a7 time in W? \u00a7'$aa54{}?j{}?2, $3; an arder<\/p>\n
 {i'at.e::i  {\u00a7sI1Ii\u20ac3XL\u00a3E'f:~}3), tizis Cami. a\u00e9iewed the '%%E'I'i'ii<\/p>\n
 :p\u00e9iii.\u00a7(\u00a7;5fz–.:\u00a7;\u00a71e:'e\u00a7f2 21: psira~\u00ab9, {ha Cotiriz \u00abzzsbgerveii as fa\ufb01ewsz<\/p>\n
"E 313': Sf {.216 9;3i3'1i01": ftha"\u20ac. {he
\ngmtitre &0e$ ROE indir::ate as {:3 in what
\n:\u00a733.::,a:::3\u00a71\u20acz* 15\u00a2 aariier lav}: is sha\ufb01wiaviad
\nE101' {mes it Ixienfiam about the<\/p>\n
\ufb01atigfaatiarz sf \u00a7.\u00a7 nde:'3t am this<\/p>\n
aspect. Efraibztunateiy, the order at
\nAm1exu1'e~Q is no iII1pI'E)Vs'f3I11\u20acI1{. It
\nsuffers from a geat\u00e9r fe\ufb02y of not
\nindicathig any reason far the order. _If\u00e9"" 9
\n0111}; recites about the developmenigt\u00e9 V
\nand rejecteti the 1'(:p1'esc=:11t\u00a3:3.ti<}z1,,–\u00bb .. , " '
\n{ices 110$. wan indicate ;:ee:3’*-\n<\/p>\n
consizier\ufb01d anti. as to forv\ufb01\ufb01rhat rtiaS<3I1'*\u00bb. 2 VV '
\nit haS been rejeCted;TVA.__c1aSS\u00a7\u00a2_: VCxan:fj'1\u00e9?g <\/p>\n
0f 3. neryspeaking era-$f;'–? '   <\/p>\n
4. ‘1’I1ez’$fo;re, it;quaS}”.1_ed E116 \u20ac\u00a7\u00e9i;1\u00e9’n;_d I1oti\u00a3i’e’:s”issi;ed and
\nsent it. back ta the rcspoiider\ufb01: ff3 i’ {‘i)I]..S_ifCft;\u00b0.;}'{?11i_\u00a7_QH and to act 3211<\/p>\n
3<:<:m*dar1c:e xvith;~'ia<.\u00a7 %;n iiifm; g:*\u20ac)u'n;\u00a7' –:?;?a\u20ac:\ufb01.1__i;}1e demand Izoticas<\/p>\n
iasua\ufb01  Contrarfi E0 the provisions Gf<\/p>\n
Sec\ufb01\u00e9 af \u00a3%1\u20ac–_A\u20ac:t a\u00a7r3.<i""3'j1:";:";\u00a7"'**E.:;<5:1i\u00a7\u00a2c~s _  wars quashezi by this Court. ‘}’hus, the<\/p>\n
Hlaitsf-\u00a201i}d”_”_h\u20ac\u00a7;iii again 91113: with ‘\u00a3113 issue of fmsh $.I:::aw*<\/p>\n
Esause xfmtiiigzf, ‘$%}1i.ch were in compliance with 8:3-:<:.56(2) mi' the<\/p>\n
  \u00a7%3::';. i7:;'T1'-\u00bb:::nga:4d to the pario\ufb01 Wi'\u00a3hi\u00a31 Wmch such notices maid be<\/p>\n
V  " 3' Tim ground of attack sf' th\u00e9 $hma:T~ca.use mastic\/.\u00bb: is \u00a3213:<\/p>\n
 it is iiiegai ar\u00a7:2\u00a3t3'az'y and issued in \u00a7::Zaf,a:3i Vi{}}&\u00a71i{3I'\u00a3 af<\/p>\n
\\w\/<\/p>\n
pmvisions 01' {ha Act and oppamd to the pri11<:ip1\u20acS ofgi\u00a723_tL1ra}<\/p>\n
jugiica.\n<\/p>\n
6. ‘”\u00a3’he I\u20acai”}1(:'{i Szn\u00e9huzzsel, M.1*.A.N.Jaya_.Rma_q:’ ‘\u00e9ifgpeair\ufb01zg <\/p>\n
on bahaii’ of \u00a7)\u20aci\u20aci'[i{}II\u20ac3I’S has p1aCe\u20ac3.:;:’:1’e1:i;\u00a7;1 1\u00a7\u00a7;<\u00a7'L\ufb01\u00e9gjfsg  "
\nR1 $39.34\/12\/$9\/'rGA~6 date:i..__':.:2;'1.\u00a7\u00a7'8':2
\neariier writ petition. _F'urther K  ivfalzi\u00e9anae upcm
\nAI1jIT16XU;jT'\u20ac'–A No.34\/' 12\/ 1 .__5.  W}:'1\u20ac:I'<i=:i11 at<\/p>\n
SE.N0.4'7 rega1'd\u00a7I1g_ "tizaemmfuatratgad " '\ufb01an\u00e9 gaods net<\/p>\n
otherwise'iiS*\u00a3.\u20ac:;.?f_;is"3iiic:iti\u00a7}:1ed_\ufb013f 1:116 purpose of ievjzixig
\nwharf?-gage \u00e9\u00a77:aI*-gas-91*:  9:' <:ubic meter and kilo iitr-6:.<\/p>\n
'i_'%1::': gajgi _vt:1T2'{.3"j\u00a7' gs. mt \u00e92.;:3j\u00a7\u00a7iicab\u00a3e ti} \u00a31116 goeds; in qiuegtisri.<\/p>\n
 "i'I;:s:ref@f\u00e9,i-.::\\{*':e*\u00a7:::1p11g:*i\u00e9\u20aciA ai\ufb01znazzd :10ti<:\u00a7: is bad in and is Iiabie<\/p>\n
{<5 33% g{:as\u00a7;;;%,:i".   . V <\/p>\n
 ffhs .i<\u00a7arn::\u00ab:i saunas} fer \u00a7:seti'\u00a3:i<mer fur\u00a5:h\u20acr C\u00a3}I"}'\u00a3\u20acf1{i\u20acC\u00a5<\/p>\n
  %tj'f\u00a7;\u00ab::::A ci\u00e9:t\u20acrn.1iI:a.{,i%.’\u00a7:::9i:>r;i Esemzeezz May 19%} and March 1993 by $116 resperuiant<\/p>\n
is :’1e.:::: 31%: pr<2peI':i{:tem1i11atior1 of Charges 'E,ip{}1"} U516 pet:iii01':r:r<\/p>\n
\\\\\\wu\/<\/p>\n
as the deman\ufb01 zzetice has nut been considered by t,a_}{;13g into<\/p>\n
\u20ac~1CCDE.II1?Z {he objecttions iaken by the petitiozier i\u00a7fi\u00a3i:. f\u00e9fsr\u00e9zgce<\/p>\n
to the provisions of UTEEE MP1' Act; and the"\n<\/p>\n
a1110un’t.wit1’1 refbrezace to the gaedsixa Qil\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02 ‘i;s \u00a7:Ic:;i.V15\u00a33SVsible <\/p>\n
to be measured in terms sf either cu}3ic}:a1eter o’:ijiki} iiiir\u00e9\u00e9afzd<\/p>\n
it dues. not 12311 wit11i_11 the tiefirii\ufb01\u00e9n of “\u00e9;;1″\u20ac:’S’.-V-T}’i\u00e9:;”ef0r\u20ac, the
\nqL:9.nta’I’1ca1;ion of the arn\u00e9tznt by r%:3jn;afid\u00a7\u00e9nt is “:1.\u00a7:\u00a7t: iegal and
\nvalid and hence requested fQr._qLifg–iShir\u00a3g  S’:-“~;:1::1<:.<\/p>\n
8. *i’i”r:;e – _i\u00a7\u00e9j;\u00bb31n’\u00e9f’::}”– \u00e9:tit:_e'<iQr:i:a:1diz}g that. the qzzaniificzratiaza<\/p>\n
xi;'}f–.\u00a3.\u00a71\u20ac' :\u00a7E1?1;}3._11':%iAi-S i1 V:'<::;)r:Vi'a1':11it\u00a7,=7 with S\u20ac=IZ7.56 of the MP? Act<\/p>\n
  ;f~\u00a7;"EI?_\u00a7f:1*%fi'ii1:g :,0pp0rtu:1it\u00a7;* t0 the \ufb01"I'S$ p\u20act,i':i$neI" fer filirig<\/p>\n
" = 0b}ecti\u00a7:{r1s  has been atansidraraii axis} the _E3<}a1'd has<\/p>\n
~ : -'::m1<:* is \u00a31032. factuaiijy and laga\ufb02js C(}I'Z"'\u20acC'f \u20ac'i?E:I1 aSs:..1:\ufb01ij:ig;_ that<\/p>\n
gowads in ciumsiion fall '\u00a3Vii"hi}1 1me1'1u11'1{:ra\u00a3ed g'<3o\u00ab\u00a71:A$"\u00a75\u00ab2M%\u00a7.'<\/p>\n
of the 1mt.ificat:i0I1 far {ha sake 0\u00a7'g\u00ab;rgu;I1\u20ac1\u00e9ts—-  saiii _ <\/p>\n
511:1}?  appiicabie 23:12 E115: geads H1 <f; ::;\u00a23\u00a7}'i.<;}5L
\nview, this %5<)ar(i is required i;o':;:f;4:-I310
\nad} the fa.<:t:L:a\u00a3 aspect\ufb01  ..;;\u00a7{;~3'1.i.i:c3:1i;i,<.:;;1'2VsD\u00a7 urged in
\nstatemezit. 0;? abjezctkigns  3'\u00a7\u20ac:Vif.%5t;\u00a7Li\u00a7ri;Vt$1\u00e9\u00ab.B9ai\\:\u00a3_’ 1:0 femc\u00e9xamiiia the Whcie 0133111 if
\nthe: \ufb01rst: pe\u00a3:i\u00a3j\u00a3:I1V&34 “.\u00a7’:>$:s,r””‘~:;*\u00a7?:;z:1′ s’;r;’;.d:%:;;;’\u00b0i11g 1:116 :’e3:\u00ab:vara_t: \u00a7)E'{}V.’ES\u00a7\u20ac}E”IS azxzi<\/p>\n
reievaij\ufb01 “e:::11::rjg\u00ab* “\u00a7’:r”\u00a75I:: {E18 zzai\u00e9iicatimx and CQ3″}S\u00a7;Ci\u20ac1″ the<\/p>\n
V. Ist,ai@\u00a7\u00a7_,1 e\ufb01$k:%I’ Q}\u00a7\u00a7.\u00a73{3?.i$E”}S and ciispass Cif ‘{l”}.\u20ac Santa Wiiiiiiri isighi<\/p>\n
 \u00e97\u00a7;.’\u00a7{‘\/161%<\/p>\n
:s:\u00a2\u00e9ik8\u00e9'[‘if1f0:\u00a7’; $15: z\u00e9\u00e9aife 01′ rsceipt af\u00a5;E1\u00a7s arder.
\nELLE. “‘\u00b0E’fZ”‘A:\u00a7$. Writ i3\u20ac\u00a3i\u00a7]\u00a7.O1’1 is iiispegeai 0f in abov\ufb01 terzztxs.<\/p>\n
Sd\/-5
\nJUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Worldwide Shipping Inc vs New Mangalore Prot Trust on 18 June, 2009 Author: V.Gopalagowda IE’? ‘THE Hi\ufb01r\ufb01 CGEIRT 3? K%I’ZA.’I’AKA AT DATED THIS Tim 13% DAY 01%’ JI3i\u00a2E \u00a7’j2\u00a3t{}i\u00a7 ~ _ _: ” BEFGRE THE I~:ozsr*3LE 3m..ms’1fIcE V, ” WRIT PETITION’ No–.. $’i=3-,1’7’\/V2\u00ae’\u00a7’\u00a3\u20ac\u00a7MV;}E\u00a7\ufb01Si’ BETWEEE: V’ ‘ V 1, Wc;1″ldv\u00a3i{i\u00a3: Shippii1Vg I:*1\u00a7:’;’,’E’\u00bb . […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200869","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nWorldwide Shipping Inc vs New Mangalore Prot Trust on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Worldwide Shipping Inc vs New Mangalore Prot Trust on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-01T17:48:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Worldwide Shipping Inc vs New Mangalore Prot Trust on 18 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-01T17:48:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1777,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Worldwide Shipping Inc vs New Mangalore Prot Trust on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-01T17:48:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Worldwide Shipping Inc vs New Mangalore Prot Trust on 18 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Worldwide Shipping Inc vs New Mangalore Prot Trust on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Worldwide Shipping Inc vs New Mangalore Prot Trust on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-01T17:48:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Worldwide Shipping Inc vs New Mangalore Prot Trust on 18 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-01T17:48:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009"},"wordCount":1777,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009","name":"Worldwide Shipping Inc vs New Mangalore Prot Trust on 18 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-01T17:48:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/worldwide-shipping-inc-vs-new-mangalore-prot-trust-on-18-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Worldwide Shipping Inc vs New Mangalore Prot Trust on 18 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200869"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200869\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200869"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}