{"id":200875,"date":"2008-10-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008"},"modified":"2015-04-12T16:19:05","modified_gmt":"2015-04-12T10:49:05","slug":"charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Charan Kaur vs Balbir Kaur & Others on 22 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Charan Kaur vs Balbir Kaur & Others on 22 October, 2008<\/div>\n
            IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT\n                           CHANDIGARH\n\n\n\n                                Civil Revision No. 1391 of 2007 (O&M)\n                                Date of Decision : 22.10.2008\n\n\nCharan Kaur\n                                                              ..........Petitioner\n\n                                Versus\n\nBalbir Kaur & others.\n\n                                                             ......Respondents\n\nCORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA\n\nPresent :     Mr. M.S. Lobana, Advocate\n              for the petitioner.\n\n              Mr. K.S. Cheema, Advocate\n              for respondent No.1.\n\n                    ****\n\nVINOD K. SHARMA, J.\n<\/pre>\n
              This order shall dispose of Civil Revision No. 1391 of 2007<\/p>\n
titled Charan Kaur Versus Balbir Kaur & others and Civil Revision No.<\/p>\n
1392 of 2007 titled Kuldeep Singh Versus Balbir Kaur & others, as they<\/p>\n
arise out of one and the same order passed by the learned Addl. Civil Judge<\/p>\n
(Sr. Divn.), Dasuya as affirmed by the learned Addl. District Judge,<\/p>\n
Hoshiarpur.\n<\/p>\n
              For brevity facts are being taken from Civil Revision No. 1391<\/p>\n
of 2007 titled Charan Kaur Versus Balbir Kaur & others<\/p>\n
              Smt. Balbir Kaur filed objections against auction of her land in<\/p>\n
pursuance to the decree passed against Parlad Singh son of Sh. Bhagat
\n Civil Revision No. 1391 of 2007 (O&M)
\n                                                                          -2-<\/span><\/p>\n
Singh. The objections were preferred under Order 21 Rules 97 to 103 read<\/p>\n
with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for setting aside auction<\/p>\n
proceedings and restoration of possession of plot No. 31. The objections<\/p>\n
were accepted and Kuldip Singh, the petitioner in Civil Revision No. 1392<\/p>\n
of 2007 was directed to hand over vacant possession to the objector Smt.<\/p>\n
Balbir Singh. Smt. Charan Kaur was directed to return the auction money to<\/p>\n
Sh. Kuldip Singh.\n<\/p>\n
              Objector Balbir Kaur claimed that she is the owner of plot No.<\/p>\n
31 situated at village Urmur (Fauji Colony ) tehsil Dasuya District<\/p>\n
Hoshiarpur.\n<\/p>\n
              Late Sh.Bhagat Singh was owner in possession of the aforesaid<\/p>\n
plot, which was sold to her vide sale deed dated 18.4.1995. It was claimed<\/p>\n
that Smt. Charan Kaur decree-holder had made an attempt to get the sale<\/p>\n
deed executed from late Sh. Bhagat Singh original owner of the plot in<\/p>\n
respect of plot in question on 22.8.1991 under the garb of decree dated<\/p>\n
25.10.1983. The said decree was not against late Sh. Bhagat Singh. It is the<\/p>\n
case of the objector that objections having been raised by Sh. Bhagat Singh<\/p>\n
the sale deed was not registered by Sub Registrar, Tanda.<\/p>\n
              The objector claimed that in the execution application the<\/p>\n
decree-holder by deceiving the Court got order of attachment dated<\/p>\n
25.7.1990 wrongly and illegally passed in respect of the plot in dispute. The<\/p>\n
said order of attachment was challenged by late Sh. Bhagat Singh by raising<\/p>\n
an objection that no decree against him was passed. In the revision petition,<\/p>\n
this Court vide order dated 1.2.1991 set aside the order of attachment. The
\n Civil Revision No. 1391 of 2007 (O&M)
\n                                                                            -3-<\/span><\/p>\n
decree-holder chose not to file any fresh list of property of Parlad Singh<\/p>\n
judgment debtor but she got the execution application moved by her<\/p>\n
dismissed on 2.12.1994.\n<\/p>\n
             After the property was detached, late Sh. Bhagat Singh sold the<\/p>\n
property in dispute to present objector Balbir Kaur vide sale deed dated<\/p>\n
18.4.1995 and put her in actual physical possession of the plot.<\/p>\n
             The decree-holder did not get the execution application<\/p>\n
restored but preferred the fresh execution application and again got attached<\/p>\n
plot No. 31 at the back of the objector. The decree-holder even got the same<\/p>\n
sold in auction and Kuldip Singh the auction purchaser got possession of<\/p>\n
the plot in dispute being auction purchaser.\n<\/p>\n
             The objector Balbir Kaur challenged the auction proceedings as<\/p>\n
well as auction on the plea that she was the owner of the plot in dispute and<\/p>\n
not Parlad Singh the judgment debtor.\n<\/p>\n
             The decree-holder questioned the objection petition by taking a<\/p>\n
preliminary objection that the objection petition was not maintainable as she<\/p>\n
did not have any locus standi to file the objection petition.<\/p>\n
             The plea of estoppel against her was also raised. It was claimed<\/p>\n
that the sale deed dated 18.4.1995 is a forged and fabricated document and<\/p>\n
did not pertain to the disputed plot. It was claimed that the sale deed was got<\/p>\n
executed by Parlad Singh the judgment debtor to create hindrance and to<\/p>\n
hamper the execution proceedings as the possession of the property had<\/p>\n
already been taken over.\n<\/p>\n
             On merits a plea was taken that the Court was not deceived. It
\n Civil Revision No. 1391 of 2007 (O&M)
\n                                                                             -4-<\/span><\/p>\n
was claimed that the proceedings were carried out legally.<\/p>\n
             The issues were framed and parties were allowed to lead<\/p>\n
evidence on the objections filed by the objector. The objector proved on<\/p>\n
record the sale deed dated 18.4.1995 as Ex. O-1. The extract of entries in the<\/p>\n
scribe register were also placed on record as Ex. O-2. The Deed Writer<\/p>\n
proved the writing of the sale deed produced on record and in support<\/p>\n
thereof he produced the extract from his register. The copy of the Sanad<\/p>\n
allotment in favour of late Sh. Bhagat Singh as well as certificate were also<\/p>\n
produced on record. The petitioner examined Jarnail Singh, Patwari.<\/p>\n
             The learned executing Court allowed the objections by holding<\/p>\n
that the sale in favour of the auction purchaser is liable to be set aside and<\/p>\n
possession is liable to be returned to the objector. It was also held that the<\/p>\n
decree-holder was liable to refund the amount to auction purchaser.<\/p>\n
Whereas objection with regard to the locus standi of the objector was also<\/p>\n
decided against the decree-holder. The decree-holder as well as the auction<\/p>\n
purchaser preferred two separate appeals, which were consolidated and<\/p>\n
disposed of by a common order.\n<\/p>\n
             The learned lower appellate Court had affirmed the findings<\/p>\n
recorded by the learned executing Court and, thus, dismissed both the<\/p>\n
appeals.\n<\/p>\n
             Mr. M.S. Lobana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the<\/p>\n
petitioner impugned the orders under challenge by alleging that the<\/p>\n
petitioner is victim of injustice as all efforts for recovery of compensation of<\/p>\n
Rs. 50,000\/- awarded to her by the Civil Court for murder of her son have
\n Civil Revision No. 1391 of 2007 (O&M)
\n                                                                               -5-<\/span><\/p>\n
failed and the judgment debtor Parlad Singh in connivance with his father<\/p>\n
Bhagat Singh and his brother Dukh Bhajan Singh has been successful in<\/p>\n
delaying the execution proceedings with one objection or the other.<\/p>\n
             It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that<\/p>\n
the plot was got attached but no objections were raised to the attachment by<\/p>\n
Bhagat Singh or any of his sons or spouse and thus the sale was affirmed. It<\/p>\n
was claimed that the objections by the objector Balbir Kaur were not<\/p>\n
competent as the sale deed executed in her favour was a fictitious document<\/p>\n
as no sale consideration was passed on and, in fact, the sale deed was<\/p>\n
executed to defeat the rights of the decree-holder. The learned counsel for<\/p>\n
the petitioner also challenged the findings of the learned Courts below<\/p>\n
holding therein that the ownership of the judgment debtor over the plot in<\/p>\n
question was not established.\n<\/p>\n
             The main plank of the contention of the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
petitioner was that Balbir Kaur is the wife of the brother of judgment debtor<\/p>\n
and the sale deed records the total consideration having been paid to Bhagat<\/p>\n
Singh prior to registration of the sale deed. It has thus to be presumed that it<\/p>\n
is a fictitious document prepared to defeat the rights of the decree-holder.<\/p>\n
             The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner,<\/p>\n
therefore, is that once it is held that the sale deed is null and void, the<\/p>\n
objector would have no locus standi to challenge the auction as she would<\/p>\n
have no concern with the plot.\n<\/p>\n
             On consideration of the matter, I find no force in the<\/p>\n
contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner.          Without
\n Civil Revision No. 1391 of 2007 (O&M)
\n                                                                            -6-<\/span><\/p>\n
referring to other reasons it may be noticed that the attachment of this very<\/p>\n
plot in execution of decree against Parlad Singh was ordered to be set aside.<\/p>\n
In spite of orders of this Court the decree-holder again chose to get the said<\/p>\n
very plot attached for the reasons best known to her, therefore, the<\/p>\n
allegations of the objector that the Court was misled are not without basis.<\/p>\n
               It may also be noticed that the only contention raised by the<\/p>\n
learned counsel for the petitioner to challenge the locus standi is that the<\/p>\n
sale deed is a fictitious document as no sale consideration has passed on<\/p>\n
before the Sub Registrar at the time of registration of sale deed.<\/p>\n
               This contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner cannot<\/p>\n
be accepted. The objector proved on record the ownership of late Bhagat<\/p>\n
Singh as well as transfer of plot in her favour by way of registered sale deed<\/p>\n
which stood duly proved. The transfer cannot be said to be fictitious transfer<\/p>\n
as late Bhagat Singh was not a judgment debtor and, therefore, it cannot be<\/p>\n
said that the plot has been transferred in order to defeat the rights of the<\/p>\n
decree-holder as is claimed by the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
               The non-payment of consideration is not a question which can<\/p>\n
be agitated by the petitioner once the vendor and the vendee accepted the<\/p>\n
transaction before the Sub Registrar at the time of registration of the sale<\/p>\n
deed. The said assertion could not be challenged by the petitioner unless<\/p>\n
some interest of party raising objections disclosed in the property so<\/p>\n
transferred.\n<\/p>\n
               Admittedly, the petitioner-decree-holder has not claimed any<\/p>\n
right in the said plot and the right of late Sh.Bhagat Singh to transfer the
\n Civil Revision No. 1391 of 2007 (O&M)
\n                                                                             -7-<\/span><\/p>\n
plot in his ownership either by way of sale deed or any other means cannot<\/p>\n
be subject matter of challenge, as he was absolute owner of the said plot.<\/p>\n
             The learned Courts below, therefore, rightly came to the<\/p>\n
conclusion that Balbir Kaur objector was the owner of the plot in dispute<\/p>\n
and there was no decree or judgment against her which could entitle the<\/p>\n
executing Court to attach and sell her property. The learned Courts,<\/p>\n
therefore, rightly allowed the objection petition. The orders passed by the<\/p>\n
learned Courts below, therefore, do not call for any interference.<\/p>\n
             No merit.\n<\/p>\n
             Dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
22.10.2008                                       ( VINOD K. SHARMA )\n  'sp'                                                JUDGE\n Civil Revision No. 1391 of 2007 (O&M)\n                                        -8-<\/span>\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Charan Kaur vs Balbir Kaur & Others on 22 October, 2008 IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No. 1391 of 2007 (O&M) Date of Decision : 22.10.2008 Charan Kaur ……….Petitioner Versus Balbir Kaur & others. ……Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA Present : Mr. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200875","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nCharan Kaur vs Balbir Kaur & Others on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Charan Kaur vs Balbir Kaur & Others on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-12T10:49:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Charan Kaur vs Balbir Kaur & Others on 22 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-12T10:49:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1630,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Charan Kaur vs Balbir Kaur & Others on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-12T10:49:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Charan Kaur vs Balbir Kaur & Others on 22 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Charan Kaur vs Balbir Kaur & Others on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Charan Kaur vs Balbir Kaur & Others on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-12T10:49:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Charan Kaur vs Balbir Kaur & Others on 22 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-12T10:49:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008"},"wordCount":1630,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008","name":"Charan Kaur vs Balbir Kaur & Others on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-12T10:49:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/charan-kaur-vs-balbir-kaur-others-on-22-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Charan Kaur vs Balbir Kaur & Others on 22 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200875","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200875"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200875\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200875"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200875"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200875"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}