{"id":201068,"date":"2008-08-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008"},"modified":"2015-04-21T16:14:08","modified_gmt":"2015-04-21T10:44:08","slug":"the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Mangalore Tiles Ltd on 11 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Mangalore Tiles Ltd on 11 August, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.L.Manjunath &amp; A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n<pre>i\n\nxx TEE HIGH coax? or Kamnamnxa Am Haneaxa\ufb01sfg\".\n\ngamma wars wan 11\"'DA$ 09 AUGUST, \u00e9\ufb01cs  \"'\nPREsENw =\"*-- _ ' ;u u xx\nms now 51.2: mi. JUSTICE  \nTHE HON'BLE MR.' Ju's1*;;\u00a7::iER:A'2\u00a7_.;*%_V,L P\ufb01c\ufb01aagux\u00e9\ufb02\nBETWEEN: _ A,Hig\u00bb. V: 'V\n\n1.<\/pre>\n<p> The Cammiabi\u00e9n\u00e9r \u00e9f In\u00a2q$e\u00a2f\u00e9i;&#8221;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>C.R.Bu1;\u00a2ing{gA\u00a2tavfa,&#8217;5&#8217;=<br \/>\nM=a119=vIlo:\u00a3-av\u00bb     =<\/p>\n<p>2 . The {3\u00e915u&#8217;tyVif,Coazi\u00a7Li&#8217;::si:;;iex cf<br \/>\nIncdmeeTax'{Aa$tq};_&#8221;z *-\n<\/p>\n<p>Special&#8217; Range &#8216;, .&#8217;  , F. 1.33&#8243;-uAT.,1.&#8211;ding ,<br \/>\nAttav:a,,Mangal\u00a2re}g .. APPELLANTS<\/p>\n<p>(By\u00bbadvo&amp;a:\u00a2&#8221;Sri@M.V.Seshachala}<\/p>\n<p>V\u00b0ws Ma@gaia\u00e9e_i11es Ltd.,<\/p>\n<p>UdQiVBi$t~\u00a7?6 201. .. RESPO\ufb01DENT<\/p>\n<p>(By. Jidvocate Sri . S. P . Bhat)<\/p>\n<p>  I.T..A. is filed under Sac.260B. of The<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;E:;c;\u00a2ma Tax Act: to allow the appeal and set aside<\/p>\n<p>the&#8217; orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate<\/p>\n<p>yV&#8221;V&#8217;A\u00bb.\u00a3L&#8217;z.*:i.buz:al, Bangalore in XTA 160.335\/Bang\/&#8217;2000 dated<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>l9.12.2fJ\u00a333 ccnjfinning the order of the<br \/>\nCmtmissicmer and confimuad the order  _._the<\/p>\n<p>Joint; Comzniasionex of Incozrae Tax {Asaut:&#8217;;) <\/p>\n<p>Range , Mangalore .\n<\/p>\n<p>This Appeal is cc&gt;m1.Tng:.Jonb&#8221;&#8216;f::l: &#8216;.  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>this day, Mmnavnnsn J. delivered tha \u00a3n11qwinga_&#8221;c<\/p>\n<p>-3 U 1:&gt;._9,.;y\u00a7~;_\u00a7i\u00ab_%11w$  . A <\/p>\n<p>This appeal 1.3 tkfi,  cha.il;\u00e9nq1ng the<br \/>\nccncxuxxent fmnciings   of Im::.ome-<br \/>\nTax (Appeala;  tgge  by the Ine:c:sme&#8211;<br \/>\nTax App\u00e9ii@t\u00a7&#8221; ifri5@\ufb01a;;. Eanga1ore, in IIA<\/p>\n<p>go.aasi\u00e9\u00e9hgz\u00e9qao\ufb01gggggfzy.i\u00e9i\u00e9ooa.<\/p>\n<p>2. Em\u00e9 =:E\u00e9.c:t.s &#8216;\u00ab:.&#8217;af&#8221;&#8216; are as hereunder:<\/p>\n<p>;&#8217;1&#8217;i&#8217;.va asses\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9 1.3 a. znanufacturezr of tiles and<\/p>\n<p>a&#8217;r.1f.d;g:a5  the assessee is having few lorries.<\/p>\n<p>  depreciation at the rate cf 40% on<\/p>\n<p>th\u00e9.__   owned by it on the grounci that the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;,.fI.o1:3:ie&#8221;3 1:a.re eaxning incomne since the aasessee is<\/p>\n<p> than: can &#8216;hire ha.-5.1.5 far the purpcme of<\/p>\n<p> t\ufb01anspcrtation. The assessing officer having<\/p>\n<p>fv&#8217;<\/p>\n<p> zioticeci that than lorries in question are<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><br \/>\nComnissioner of Income-&#8216;fax (Appeals) as woii<br \/>\nIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal<br \/>\ndepreciation at the rate of:-I &#8220;a&#8217;m&#8211;3_ it<br \/>\nsubmits that whethex: there wot;<br \/>\nfrom transport business   Visit<br \/>\na question of fact fand  a.\ufb01&#8217;1tho;tiVtiiea have<br \/>\nooxzcurrently held V *  the assesses;<br \/>\ntharefoxe he ::u}&#8217;.vnexnit:.&#8217;\u00a7~  &#8216;intention<\/p>\n<p>of law     <\/p>\n<p>6. 8a:::ingf&#8217;hoai3\u00e9:ii:\u00a7\u00a3.V.th\u00a7aV&#8211;._oounse3f for the parties and<\/p>\n<p>on pei\ufb01sal&#8217;  it is noticed by us that<\/p>\n<p>\\\u00bb&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>before tihe\u00e9t  &#8216;officer assessoe did not<\/p>\n<p> prodxio\u00e9  ma&#8217;.te.x-.1&#8242;..a..3.s to show what was total.<\/p>\n<p>  .:eo\u00e9ived by the assessee from transport<\/p>\n<p>ibxxeiinoiiesa\ufb01 :&#8221;E1oxmL:.asioner of Income-EI.&#8217;a.x (Appeals)<\/p>\n<p>witizoutv&#8217;  the same, aoleiy relying upon the<\/p>\n<p> agmual-V__:r:aintena;:ce of lorries and the receipt<\/p>\n<p> 1fxi3?_\u00a7b&#8211;&#8216; Chaxgea has come to the conclusion that the<\/p>\n<p>  V a\u00e9seaaee is engaged in transportation business. We<\/p>\n<p>have coxwareci total receipts fzcom the transport<\/p>\n<p>I9\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;?\n<\/p>\n<p>business and the loxry maintenance charges in every<br \/>\nasseasnaent year. The maintanance charges woikld be<\/p>\n<p>nearly double than the receipt of hixgg <\/p>\n<p>from this it is not possible for any <\/p>\n<p>that whether: the lorries were&gt;~ma.;gn.1.T_j;   that<\/p>\n<p>businasss of assessee and 3.1:   I <\/p>\n<p>its business and that th_\u00e9&#8217;=.__a.s.sassee. \ufb02_g*at:t3Lng <\/p>\n<p>xexgpslar income by sending u&#8217;is::&gt;&#8217;r.*:.ji.es  bite basis.<br \/>\nIn the absence prv&#8221;_:&gt;pe;r.l. &#8220;~-zmtz\u00e9ztzial, man the<br \/>\nCoxxmzassionex cf   and the<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;15:-.=.\u00a5\u00a7.~,_  finding stating that the<br \/>\n.1.o:r:r:\u00a3.esx7wez.*eV  by the asseasee and that<\/p>\n<p>tha a_ssesa&#8217;ee&#8221;  \u00e9xztitled for deduction at 40%,<\/p>\n<p>  Elie .acce;Ste&#8211;:%&#8212;-\u00abby us and such a findang has to<\/p>\n<p> 115 as pexverse since the same is<\/p>\n<p>wifixc\ufb01iit V a:&#8221;iY&#8211; basis .\n<\/p>\n<p>    considering the order passed by the<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;&#8216;\u00a2c;:sx:_:&#8217;::$.&#8217;;f.@a;5:Lonc.-2..=: of Income&#8212;$&#8217;a.x (Appeals) and the<\/p>\n<p> t3f.%.bunaJ., we are of the opimmn that their findings<\/p>\n<p> axe arrazneoua and perverse and not based on proper<\/p>\n<p>material available on record. In the<br \/>\ncircumstances, we have to set aside the fin-tiings of<\/p>\n<p>the Cc:\u00abnm:i.s.s1:;.mer of Inccxme-iI&#8217;ax (Appeals}&#8230;..\u00a7aj:a.&#8217;:&#8221;w\u00a7\u00e9=;\u00a7;3,i ._a;a<\/p>\n<p>the tribunal and remand the matter to t\ufb01a atS#sain\u00a7t<\/p>\n<p>affine: for fa.-ash conaidexatamnm-s1n};:e _. .t_1A1&#8217;e-&#8216;._a,s;s-3ezs:iA.ngi&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>officex has mac not consici:\u00e9~.;\u00e9\u00a7i_T<br \/>\nto be considered by but O\u00a3C9%F  th\u00e9i<br \/>\ndepreciaticm allow.&#8217;-able.  attse\ufb01gegii at 40%.<br \/>\nSince there are my  given by the<br \/>\nasseessee before us, ..=m.\u00a7  that the<br \/>\nmatter has   assessing officer<br \/>\nto enablei. pt\ufb01pduce relevant recoxas<br \/>\nlmrry :&#8221;:L_g : for ibusiness and that there was<\/p>\n<p>sub.-stant;i.&#8217;a;3.V * j.11;:om_e&#8217;~~&#8211; from such transportaizxon<\/p>\n<p>._ busi\ufb01es\ufb01 an\ufb01 \u00e9\ufb01tltlad for \u00e9epreaiatlon at 40%.<\/p>\n<p> ,.f?:;  V&#8221;t~r:\u00e9=5ult, this appeal is allawed without<\/p>\n<p>azmyf\u00e9xing &#8216; &#8221; question of law fraxned 1:1; 6,1;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;x_;yrmnano1&#8217;iv.1ig the matter to the assessing officer for<\/p>\n<p>f}_&#8217;.&#8217;\ufb01.&#8221;zr.V&#8217;e:}s5&#8242;.i2. consideration as stated supra.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">9<\/span><\/p>\n<p>sal-\n<\/p>\n<p>Iudge<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>31130808 Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Mangalore Tiles Ltd on 11 August, 2008 Author: K.L.Manjunath &amp; A.S.Pachhapure i xx TEE HIGH coax? or Kamnamnxa Am Haneaxa\ufb01sfg&#8221;. gamma wars wan 11&#8243;&#8216;DA$ 09 AUGUST, \u00e9\ufb01cs &#8220;&#8216; PREsENw =&#8221;*&#8211; _ &#8216; ;u u xx ms now 51.2: mi. JUSTICE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR.&#8217; Ju&#8217;s1*;;\u00a7::iER:A&#8217;2\u00a7_.;*%_V,L P\ufb01c\ufb01aagux\u00e9\ufb02 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-201068","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Mangalore Tiles Ltd on 11 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Mangalore Tiles Ltd on 11 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-21T10:44:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\\\/S Mangalore Tiles Ltd on 11 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-21T10:44:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":812,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008\",\"name\":\"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\\\/S Mangalore Tiles Ltd on 11 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-21T10:44:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\\\/S Mangalore Tiles Ltd on 11 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Mangalore Tiles Ltd on 11 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Mangalore Tiles Ltd on 11 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-21T10:44:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Mangalore Tiles Ltd on 11 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-21T10:44:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008"},"wordCount":812,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008","name":"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Mangalore Tiles Ltd on 11 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-21T10:44:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-mangalore-tiles-ltd-on-11-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Mangalore Tiles Ltd on 11 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201068","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201068"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201068\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201068"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201068"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201068"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}