{"id":201137,"date":"2010-07-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010"},"modified":"2015-09-02T16:23:25","modified_gmt":"2015-09-02T10:53:25","slug":"surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"Surendran vs Excise Inspector on 29 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Surendran vs Excise Inspector on 29 July, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 3059 of 2003()\n\n\n\n1. SURENDRAN\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. EXCISE INSPECTOR\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :29\/07\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n             M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J.\n            --------------------------\n              Crl.R.P.No.3059 of 2003\n            --------------------------\n\n                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
    Petitioner, the accused in C.C.No.488\/1996 on<\/p>\n
the  file  of  Judicial  First  Class  Magistrate’s<\/p>\n
Court-II, Attingal, was convicted and sentenced for<\/p>\n
the  offence  under  Section  58   of  Abkari  Act.<\/p>\n
Petitioner challenged the conviction and sentence<\/p>\n
before Sessions Court, Thiruvananthapuram in Crl.A.<\/p>\n
No.393\/1998.  Learned   Sessions   Judge,  on   re-<\/p>\n
appreciation of evidence, confirmed the conviction<\/p>\n
and  sentence  and  dismissed  the  appeal.  It  is<\/p>\n
challenged in the revision.\n<\/p>\n
    2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner<\/p>\n
and learned Public Prosecutor were heard.<\/p>\n
    3. Learned counsel submitted that as per the<\/p>\n
prosecution  case,  MO1  can,   containing  illicit<\/p>\n
arrack, was seized on 29.5.1996 and Exhibit P1<\/p>\n
mahazar, by which MO1 can was seized, does not<\/p>\n
disclose that any sample was taken and Exhibit P3<\/p>\n
CRRP 3059\/03             2<\/span><\/p>\n
certificate of chemical analysis shows that what<\/p>\n
was   received in   the  Laboratory  is  a   bottle<\/p>\n
containing 180 ml. of clear and colourless liquid<\/p>\n
and there is no evidence as to how a bottle of 180<\/p>\n
ml. was prepared. It was argued that though Exhibit<\/p>\n
P1 mahazar shows that the seized can was sealed,<\/p>\n
neither the mahazar nor the evidence of PW1 nor PW3<\/p>\n
show that any signature of the witness or the<\/p>\n
petitioner was obtained on the seal and in such<\/p>\n
circumstances, the delay in reaching the contraband<\/p>\n
article before the court is fatal. It was pointed<\/p>\n
out that there is no evidence as to when MO1 can<\/p>\n
reached the court and in such circumstances, based<\/p>\n
on   Exhibit  P3  report,   petitioner  cannot   be<\/p>\n
convicted and he is to be acquitted.\n<\/p>\n
     4. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that<\/p>\n
evidence of PWs 1, 3 and 4 with Exhibit P1 mahazar<\/p>\n
establish that MO1 can was in the possession of the<\/p>\n
petitioner and Exhibit P3 report establishes that<\/p>\n
it was illicit arrack and therefore, the conviction<\/p>\n
CRRP 3059\/03             3<\/span><\/p>\n
is legal.\n<\/p>\n
     5. Exhibit P1 with the evidence of PWs 1 and 3<\/p>\n
show that petitioner was arrested and was released<\/p>\n
on bail. MO1 can was seized on 29.5.1996. Exhibit<\/p>\n
P1 mahazar does not show that any sample was<\/p>\n
prepared before MO1 can was sealed. Evidence show<\/p>\n
that there was no case either for PW1 or PW3 or PW4<\/p>\n
that any sample was prepared from MO1 can at any<\/p>\n
point of time. Exhibit P3 report shows that what<\/p>\n
was received in the Laboratory was one sealed<\/p>\n
bottle containing 180 ml. of clear and colourless<\/p>\n
liquid, allegedly to be arrack involved in Crime<\/p>\n
No.60\/1996 of Kazhakkoottam Excise Range. It shows<\/p>\n
that the seal was intact and tally with the seal<\/p>\n
provided. It was not shown what was the seal<\/p>\n
forwarded to the Laboratory.\n<\/p>\n
     6. There is force in the submission of the<\/p>\n
learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that<\/p>\n
in    the    absence of  any   evidence   regarding<\/p>\n
preparation of the sample and forwarding the same<\/p>\n
CRRP 3059\/03             4<\/span><\/p>\n
to the Laboratory, based on Exhibit P3 report, it<\/p>\n
cannot be said that MO1 can contained illicit<\/p>\n
arrack. True, Exhibit P3 report shows that the<\/p>\n
sample examined at the Laboratory establishes that<\/p>\n
it contained 26.85% by volume of ethyl alcohol. But<\/p>\n
the question is whether that sample was prepared<\/p>\n
out of the liquid found in MO1 can after its<\/p>\n
seizure. Exhibit P1 mahazar shows that no sample<\/p>\n
was prepared and instead, the can as such was<\/p>\n
sealed. Evidence of PWs 1, 3 and 4 do not show who<\/p>\n
produced MO1 can before the court or when it was<\/p>\n
produced. On verification of the records, it is<\/p>\n
clear that MO1 can was produced before the court<\/p>\n
along with the charge sheet dated 18.6.1996. From<\/p>\n
the court seal, it can be presumed that the charge<\/p>\n
sheet, Exhibit P1 mahazar as well as MO1 can<\/p>\n
reached     the court on 18.6.1996.  There  is  no<\/p>\n
evidence as to who has been in custody of the<\/p>\n
seized MO1 can from 29.5.1996, the date of its<\/p>\n
seizure, till it reached the court on 18.6.1996.<\/p>\n
CRRP 3059\/03              5<\/span><\/p>\n
There is also no evidence to show whether it was<\/p>\n
kept under safe custody during that period. When<\/p>\n
the signature of the attesting witness or the<\/p>\n
petitioner was not obtained on the seal, even<\/p>\n
though when MO1 can reached the court there was<\/p>\n
seal, it cannot be said that it was the same bottle<\/p>\n
containing the same liquid, which was seized from<\/p>\n
the    petitioner  on   29.5.1996.  In   any   way,<\/p>\n
possibility   of  tampering cannot  be  ruled  out.<\/p>\n
Though, along with the final report a request made<\/p>\n
by PW4 to forward the sample for chemical analysis<\/p>\n
was also seen, it was not disclosed in evidence as<\/p>\n
to who prepared the sample and how it was prepared.<\/p>\n
In the absence of any evidence, petitioner is<\/p>\n
definitely entitled to contend that Exhibit P3<\/p>\n
report is not a report prepared on examination of<\/p>\n
the sample taken from MO1 can. If that be so, on<\/p>\n
that short ground, conviction is to be set aside.<\/p>\n
     Revision   is  allowed.   Conviction  of   the<\/p>\n
petitioner for the offence under Section 58 of<\/p>\n
CRRP 3059\/03             6<\/span><\/p>\n
Abkari Act in C.C.No.488\/1996, as confirmed in<\/p>\n
Crl.A.No.393\/1998,  is  set  aside.  Petitioner is<\/p>\n
found not guilty of the offence. He is acquitted.<\/p>\n
The bail bond executed by him stands cancelled.<\/p>\n
29th July, 2010       (M.Sasidharan Nambiar, Judge)
\ntkv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Surendran vs Excise Inspector on 29 July, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3059 of 2003() 1. SURENDRAN … Petitioner Vs 1. EXCISE INSPECTOR … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Hon’ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR Dated :29\/07\/2010 O R D E R M.Sasidharan Nambiar, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-201137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSurendran vs Excise Inspector on 29 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Surendran vs Excise Inspector on 29 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-02T10:53:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Surendran vs Excise Inspector on 29 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-02T10:53:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":840,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010\",\"name\":\"Surendran vs Excise Inspector on 29 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-02T10:53:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Surendran vs Excise Inspector on 29 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Surendran vs Excise Inspector on 29 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Surendran vs Excise Inspector on 29 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-02T10:53:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Surendran vs Excise Inspector on 29 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-02T10:53:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010"},"wordCount":840,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010","name":"Surendran vs Excise Inspector on 29 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-02T10:53:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/surendran-vs-excise-inspector-on-29-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Surendran vs Excise Inspector on 29 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201137","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201137"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201137\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}