{"id":201234,"date":"2008-03-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008"},"modified":"2016-07-01T12:01:28","modified_gmt":"2016-07-01T06:31:28","slug":"ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Energy Pack Pvt Ltd vs Karnataka Industrial Areas … on 19 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Energy Pack Pvt Ltd vs Karnataka Industrial Areas … on 19 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH coum' OF KARNATAKA, BAPi':(3'rAII\\:C):I\u00a7 E'~\u00ab  \nDATED THIS THE 19TH DAY 01%.'. Mag\u00e9\ufb01 \"29\u00a5;I:)\u00e9\"'   k\nBEFORE';  I  L 2  \n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JIISTICE \"A  BQIII'Il\u00a7':D\u00a7'A\u00bb\u00bb  \n\n1\n\nwan' PETITION ;1\\iO,21'Z99:}1Ii_;I'3OO5.fG}*.d;I;{I__AfE1)B)\n\nIvI,m T \"Rear PA\u00a3'..I={P'v\"P,l{{--'\ufb02 -\n\nNO.62--B, I3oMwI--.\u00a2,sANI)23A I,NIj;IIIsTRI\u00a7A.L PIRIIIA\nAIIEKALTALIIK  = I '   \n\nBANLIALOIIE \" .  \n BY i'vE}JRi_':LiDH}%RA\"'A.'jv'I.\n\nDIREC.'I.'0.R_  '    I \"    PETITICJNER\n(BY SMT  ADV FOR PRANHLA ASSOCIATES)\n\nAND :\n\n II?\u00a7II*3ufT_I_'\u00a7II'xI. AREAS 'DE'v'E\" OPIviE'\u20acT BGARB\nA \u00ab1\u00bb'+----,I3, :?.\"Ii>ID'\"E'LOOR, R.P. BUILDING\n. VI4.Ru?ATHuII\u20ac3,A ROAD\nA \"a._aI'I~aI\\.GVI'=-.v\u00abI4:>:--*IIs:.\u00a2 I3;\n._B'E_}?I'S'CI%I_EE?:;EXECUTIVE OFFICER  REsI><::\ufb01I::E'T\n(BY sI?_I'I':s -RFSIIINIVASA GOWDA, ADV)\n* _ T " IVTLHIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLLES 226 AND\n~.. 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH TI-IE\n 'ORDER DT. 25.3.05 BY THE RESPONDENT VIDE ANN-J AND<\/pre>\n
 ETC.\n<\/p>\n
” THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY,
\nTHE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:\n<\/p>\n
41..\n<\/p>\n
f<\/p>\n
The pctitioncl’ is before thisiz\ufb02puft
\nwrit of c:ert1’orari to quash ,\u00a73It1\u00a5=;r’v.t.;iiatcd. ‘ ”\n<\/p>\n
No.0ADB\/1351\/7468\/Q5-05    at\n1LI111\u20ac_}\u00a3l,11'E_3 'J' to they    said oxder, the\n\n<\/pre>\n
133’1~’-\ufb02lrclent 21-J-=.\u00bb_ “””‘*_’:-2′-1:1.  ha 159% I<\/p>\n
mtrs. cf 1$u;d’::. pl\ufb01t  of;’\u00a7Eirmmasand1’a indtlstliai
\nA1133,   T8111}: which was allotted in<\/p>\n
favour A(:)f__tht;  \\ ,.,_ ” ‘”\n<\/p>\n
Q; I”V’1&1ave  Ms.Gectha Manon, learned coulmel<\/p>\n
  ~  “idle lnetitioner and Sri B.R.Sn’31ivasa Gowda,<\/p>\n
lL2,1’1-I:\u20ac}_. .r:.r’_1-L’r_I_.1r1._t:1 agypca\ufb02ng for the Iespolldellt. Having heard<\/p>\n
”   .1’\u00a7:\u00a7{j;g:::’s.\n<\/p>\n
1<\/span>
\n‘-a.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3. The facts Whicli are not in dispute  V   <\/p>\n
bearing No.62–B of Bommasandzra “I’11dusttfial  iAtij}Je1\u00a7; V<\/p>\n
Hobli, Anekal Taluk, measiuillg <\/p>\n
L. _\u00a3J.fDLl..’ _f K.T.J.T11omag, w]:_:o*~.was H19 P1ii;_3iiip!ror” of’Joey”<\/p>\n
Riibbor ‘\ufb02ozks 3.11.. ‘gossessio-12! C\ufb01i*\u00a7i\ufb01%$E 0′ was HI”.\u00a7S’.l\u20acd on
\n27.07.1″79. A iease otiiiisaifj \u00e9agf.1″oij:i”::fit’\u00bbeTi’f’d 2′}’.08.19′}’9<\/p>\n
was also eiggmlf\ufb01q  _    said allottee.
\nSubaequeotlgi,  ‘.:v_gaiol.:  0  was converted
\ninto   s.E11ergy Pack (Private)
\nLiinit\u00e9gii’ -of –the rcspolidcnt and as such, a
\n\ufb01eali  \u00bb Cl’.li1’J.’V iii”:-3..\u00a7i’tV.=.Jc1nent dated 19.01.1985 was<\/p>\n
cxogstitacl in’ t;11\u00a2:_V  of the \ufb01nn. However, the disputt-, at<\/p>\n
   is that the vespoiident contclids that the<\/p>\n
aiioftefi’ in iris favour alld  a ]_JC)i”l o 1 rue so”-“”1g ~ru-4<\/p>\n
 xn1t;rs. ‘wins not used for any of the activities of the petitioner,<\/p>\n
 ‘*;.11er.~o1tle:1* dated 25.08.2005 has been passed oazioellilig the<\/p>\n
H\u00e9leasc agiocment to the said extent indioatilig that possession<\/p>\n
of that portion would be taken on 19.09.2005. Th\ufb02<\/p>\n
1<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
13.<\/p>\n
Iespondcnt oontt:11ds that such action has beoif  <\/p>\n
issue ofnotioo to the petitioner.   ._<\/p>\n
4. On this aspect of tl1e, 1_i1aj:te1′, ii:  no t”\u00e9oii!.f_ti:<–!.111\u00e9 thatw  L'<\/p>\n
the mspolldent has isstlcd _;'-_1__ "allow oai1se_ _ notiiot: dated<\/p>\n
":3A1ow\u00a53aL:_$o :1: \u00e9wao issued by the<\/p>\n
agrccmelzt     pofi*'on\u00abj= \u00bb~'cm:u. d
\nce1'tai11"t\u00a7:I:1I1sf  therefore they had
\npropoocd_   ti1jo '"o%cmo'nt made in favour of the
\npctitio1A16:Ir_." _  the sahow cause no\ufb01oe, the<\/p>\n
pet:it:io11_e1'  V1'1xr\u00ab,1Vsf.'~i1:13.I\u00e9t:dv by its oomlnunioa\ufb01oll dated<\/p>\n
 – 1\u00a72005a  In  Iepiy, the pet.itio11e1* has indicated<\/p>\n
    which only a portion of the plot had hex-11<\/p>\n
my s’La_m-g that E116: <.:o.n.rstn1ot1'o11<\/p>\n
 vf=\u00a7.ll';f}.1ET the peti\ufb01onel' has a Pmjcot to expand the busiitlcss in<\/p>\n
K   big Way by oelltcriug into oollabomtiolx with foreign<\/p>\n
.1" %—.-r<\/p>\n
Compallies. Despite the said reply being ieeued  *<\/p>\n
petitiollel', the order dated 25.08.2005 has he.-.%i1' 'p}(s\u00a7\u00e9ca,'_'   <\/p>\n
5. A pcl’l.1SHl of the ‘CT-_1jc’ie;’ weulel i1_1di\u00a7:\u00a7ete’v\u00ab–vt11at3 t1ie–. <\/p>\n
1espo11c1e11t. has nefe1Te__d to th_e :  of the
\n‘ease agreemexzt. and in’:-‘_’:rj::,’:.a.’r  issued by the
\npe’ti’ri”1″1′ the re”*'”I1:den\u00a7:s:=}1a?ee._ ”  ….e.t _he
\nreasons a.’95e,ig\u00a77;:;1et:~:\u00a7:Ee’e\u00e9%*;!1_fe    ‘ti1e:r’fCni”” 4?: p”*r.i*i1
\nof the    after cmlceiiing the
\nlease  ex;ent.. In this backgmund,
\nWhat Ieqglires  ‘is that the very lease agreement<\/p>\n
e11tereri_ illfe ,1\u00a7Ae’twee1.i- die parties would indicate that the<\/p>\n
 ‘ \u00ab\u00a3i1’IC:\\\u00ablV:.teE-t’:”L ‘is VVVe>I,1&tit1ec\u00ab1VV”1’:’6 \u00abput up collstructiorl only to the extent<\/p>\n
   size 0f the plot and that too after leaving<\/p>\n
eui\ufb01cient  1232.. 9.1.4:. as i11d.i..J.=;t_.c1 i_- he agleement. The<\/p>\n
 fact. ‘iIt1″‘i. the pei”1’i”i”i1ei’ h'”e ‘put up same eG11s..’uc!;5e11 in .he<\/p>\n
 .p1di_\u00ab is not in dispute, but what is (tent<\/p>\n
‘\ufb01xespondent is that the entim plot. has not been utiiiseci. This<\/p>\n
aspect of the matter also requires to be looked into fmna the<\/p>\n
I
\n5<\/span><\/p>\n
angle ofthe Jlature of the business czanied on  ‘
\nsince the Iesponclent would have to \u00bba1’1’ij(e
\nto what is the lnattlre of b11s1;i3.cs9Q    <\/p>\n
petitioner, whethel’ the  is 1  ‘L<\/p>\n
by buildings to be CD11B\ufb02’l1CtB(1___B\u00a7’,’\ufb02i\ufb01v pc\ufb01’tie-1’1t_:r  whether<\/p>\n
portioll   i\ufb01i\u00e9 -‘mt\ufb02ding. “w’i’ri1out
\nCOI1:’iiC1l\u00a71\u00e9I2l:g*v..g?.i.1:.}–.’V’i’\u00a7!}\u00a73:Ei\u20act  tv1’f\u00a7eV mattcr, the: rcsponclcllt
\nca11.11c\u00e9t c:)1 1i\u00e9:’v te   _tli\u00a51t the allottcc \/pct1’t1’oncr in
\nthis c2:1AS1:’1ias  :_4f’i:% ‘i’;.5i.’1}1s of the ag1’ee1nent, since the<\/p>\n
entire. plot iia\ufb01 A110t”be.\u00e911 \ufb01\ufb01lised by put.ti11g up collstructioll.<\/p>\n
 illtllidilf\ufb01cd to ‘the xi}’sDB Act
\n  for 311011) viclc Section 34(3), wlxewill the provisiml
\nfountains that the 11:spo11c1e11t should provide an opport.unity<\/p>\n
to the allottee to reuledy the breaches if any, even if the<\/p>\n
1<\/span>
\nE<\/p>\n
reependent 11ot:ic:es such blea-ell. Though it is”p1eLF1et1i1’eete.’T V’<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
new at dais sage as .9 whe-h.e: tjjere is’ ‘a ebi7ea\u00a2,::h. \ufb01r. _no’f;,V ‘the:<\/p>\n
object of “ie p'””‘i'”‘”i”i itself weu1d’,_im’3ica.e \ufb02y:-.’t1 –_3.e ‘sage ~_<\/p>\n
has been illtrodueecl so \ufb011af.’\u00ab.\ufb02 ‘1’e, IEBPC-“‘1ii?.i”1_”i._: urn”;-Vtilw\ufb01’ “3’i3ig<\/p>\n
about a situation w11e1’e~t11e a\ufb01dttee’ve6:11\ufb01 lltiiise \ufb01ie pint for<\/p>\n
the vely same purpose :V.:fai;11L($’t.$ed. T ]16lB.fOI’\u20ac, if<\/p>\n
such a 11ot1’c_:.e  ise1f;ecl,    1ie”;if1cL1mbent 011 the
\nallottee to;’ieii;et\u00a7l’y’   ‘jevep if such ‘meaehea we
\nthere mxdv \ufb01metixeti,  waullci be eusuled that the plot<\/p>\n
is uiilieeci for which it was allotted.<\/p>\n
-1
\n5!-\n<\/p>\n
E
\n(1
\nIII
\n:1
\n==r~
\n:;\n<\/p>\n
\u00a31:\n<\/p>\n
,:\n<\/p>\n
I
\nF?’
\n:5<\/p>\n
H
\nE:\n<\/p>\n
21<\/span><\/p>\n
\n“a
\nE:\n<\/p>\n
”+
\n:3
\nE3<\/p>\n
5%
\nE
\n5<\/span>
\nhi
\nI<\/p>\n
4<\/span>
\n8<\/span>
\ng..\n<\/p>\n
Q
\n1’5
\nId
\n1″?\n<\/p>\n
:Qi’.i:1 1v()__1t:iJ1g Ciiause-4 of the lease agieeme\ufb01t ecvht ta
\nleave Vveilch a notice, more particularly when the
\n the plesent case had indicated specific reaeolls
\n feeald to the no11~11ti1isatio11 of a partial) till such time<\/p>\n
 the method in whicth it would be u\ufb01lised in futtue.<\/p>\n
8. T11t’31’Cf(}1’f3, collsidcriug all these as-;_];):c’act.’e3A?  ”<\/p>\n
matter, I am of the View that the  i31 <\/p>\n
its ])l’CS\u20acI1f. form is not s11staji:ab\ufb02_iT”\u00e9x11c?i’~. fh\ufb01 sa\ufb01ic: ii\u00e9.<\/p>\n
accordingly quashed. ifs 11di&’:v\u00a3r_  thc’~ . L’<\/p>\n
1,.:31__11d_t::11t to issue a po\ufb01cc as \u00a7S:m11ta=:1np1ated. _1_111c1\u00e9r Section
\n34(3) *1″ the Act.  #113″ 9.135111 it
\nIn tctmus of\ufb02xc al}ov?e-_Va11(.l with tvii\u00e9 above oi)se1va\ufb01o11s,<\/p>\n
this ]_)|53t”l.tEi01′}’~,\u00a7}’:t’c’3.fil,_!:.:’l’S c}”.tb.s.'[3c’1:-A-.’.\u00b0’.’VvL:A-.ci  N urder as to costs.<\/p>\n
Sd!-\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Energy Pack Pvt Ltd vs Karnataka Industrial Areas … on 19 March, 2008 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH coum’ OF KARNATAKA, BAPi’:(3’rAII\\:C):I\u00a7 E’~\u00ab DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY 01%.’. Mag\u00e9\ufb01 “29\u00a5;I:)\u00e9”‘ k BEFORE’; I L 2 THE HON’BLE MR. JIISTICE “A BQIII’Il\u00a7’:D\u00a7’A\u00bb\u00bb 1 wan’ PETITION ;1\\iO,21’Z99:}1Ii_;I’3OO5.fG}*.d;I;{I__AfE1)B) IvI,m T “Rear PA\u00a3’..I={P’v”P,l{{–‘\ufb02 – […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-201234","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Energy Pack Pvt Ltd vs Karnataka Industrial Areas ... on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Energy Pack Pvt Ltd vs Karnataka Industrial Areas ... on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-01T06:31:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Energy Pack Pvt Ltd vs Karnataka Industrial Areas … on 19 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-01T06:31:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1167,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Energy Pack Pvt Ltd vs Karnataka Industrial Areas ... on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-01T06:31:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Energy Pack Pvt Ltd vs Karnataka Industrial Areas … on 19 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Energy Pack Pvt Ltd vs Karnataka Industrial Areas ... on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Energy Pack Pvt Ltd vs Karnataka Industrial Areas ... on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-01T06:31:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Energy Pack Pvt Ltd vs Karnataka Industrial Areas … on 19 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-01T06:31:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008"},"wordCount":1167,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008","name":"M\/S Energy Pack Pvt Ltd vs Karnataka Industrial Areas ... on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-01T06:31:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-energy-pack-pvt-ltd-vs-karnataka-industrial-areas-on-19-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Energy Pack Pvt Ltd vs Karnataka Industrial Areas … on 19 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201234","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201234"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201234\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201234"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201234"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201234"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}