{"id":201237,"date":"2008-10-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008"},"modified":"2017-09-23T23:45:44","modified_gmt":"2017-09-23T18:15:44","slug":"national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"National Insurance Company &#8230; vs K Andhunni on 14 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">National Insurance Company &#8230; vs K Andhunni on 14 October, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT 01:' KARNATAKA AT BANGAL\u00a7Ri4*i:.'\u00ab V.\n\nDATED THIS THE 14TH DAY 0? ocrosr\u00e9iz 2&amp;8 {  Q \n\nBEFORE \n\nTHE Ho:~rBL1:: MR. Jus'r:&lt; :;E 1\u00a7e--..;$1\u00a7AN:;_.\u00a7%&#039;~ . 2 &quot;  T\n\n   \n\nM.F.A.N0.3655     \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1 NATIONAL \u00a3NSURANCE;_COM.FA.NY LIMITED\nMANGALORE DO, &#039;i&#039;HRQU(3i~i_ ms REG1&#039;e:1gmL\nomen AT i\u00a7{3,144,;&#039; SUBSEARAM QOMPLEX\nM.G.ROA\u00a3), BAIJGAE-,O1F~?I\u00a7-01  _   \nREPRES\u00bbVE&#039;N3&#039;E.D.&#039;BY&quot;  A$ST;A.\u00a3&#039;rM.C)FFICER _.\nDKARATH-ERA &#039; &#039;--   \n\n1 _ H % %  _ ...APPELLAN&#039;{&#039;\n(By Sri : E g: &#039;s$ET\u00a7iA:\u00a7p.w;..\u00a7aG; ADVOCATE 3\n\nms :_ _\n\n  1 Cg\ufb01akaun\ufb01r  %%%%% \n\n_  s\/*0 ABBAS HAJI\n\n* .. &#039;Again &#039;34 YEARS --\n\n Rl\ufb01? NoV&quot;J~1V\/3:9, KUMBALAGODI HOUSE\n PERUVAI &#039;VILLAGE, VITAL\n\n I3A:+r3*m.LA--1*.a.1,uK\n\n 21:-574243\n\n   2 _ 1\u00a7u;~iH1 HALEEMA\n\n* V &quot;--._W\/{} HAJI M A SHAFT\n&#039; -- ..=RfAT NO 2\/79, KUMBALAGODI HOUSE\n\nPERUVAI VILLAGE, VITAL\n\nBANPWALA TALUK\n\nDK.-574243 .\n\n RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>(1337 Sri K MOHITH KUMAR FOR R2: R-I SERVED}<br \/>\nMFA FILED U\/S 30 (1) OF WORKMEZWS COMPENSATEON<\/p>\n<p>_AC&#8217;T&#8217; AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER I}A&#8217;I&#8217;ED:4.8.2005<\/p>\n<p>% Court, delivered the following; _V<\/p>\n<p>PASSED m WCA:SR-392003 (NF) ON THE FILE OF&#8217;<br \/>\nLJ-&#8216;sBOUR omega we commssxoxsxme pop we~m&lt;5.~sew:G. V<\/p>\n<p>COM?ENS&amp;TiON, SUB-DIVISIONJZ, MANGALORE,_.&#039;F\u00a7WARi&#039;)}NG&#039;7&#8211;~. ~<\/p>\n<p>COMPENSATEON OF RS.1,&#039;?1,234\/~ WITH I\u00a3~i&#039;1&#039;E\u00a52ES;&#039;.i&#039; ..*~;f1&#039;=. 12%:<\/p>\n<p>AND DIRECTING THE APPELLANT HEREIN<br \/>\nSAME.  &quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>This appeal, coming on for <\/p>\n<p>in this appeal by  ietirxlipany, the<\/p>\n<p>following    been raised<br \/>\nfor :31}, 3 .\n<\/p>\n<p> acted perversely in<\/p>\n<p>holding   respondent was a workman<\/p>\n<p>    respondent by :gno&#8217; ring their<\/p>\n<p>  and sister?\n<\/p>\n<p>   the Commissioner was justyiea in<\/p>\n<p>  contents of the admitted document. Exh P:2,<\/p>\n<p>K V&#8217;   produced by the first %pondent showing<\/p>\n<p>   position as a user of private car belonging to his<br \/>\nkk brother-\u00ab\ufb01r:-\u00a3cu.v?\n<\/p>\n<p>(iii) Whether the Commissioner was justi\ufb01ed in not<br \/>\nacfmgjudiciausiy to analize the material placed on<\/p>\n<p>T0 &#8220;m&#8217;e&#8211;p;&lt;:_;s1*n &#039;rma,;  &quot; &#039;V &#039;V<\/p>\n<p>M  tiaie da.v.&quot; ?}1?=.  &quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>?\n<\/p>\n<p>ix)&#8217;  K16&#8242;? _&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>L-&#8216; &#8216;.\n<\/p>\n<p>A  __i=ee:1 gorooed. Both the parties have relied<\/p>\n<p>At the parties, the teamed Tribunal cannot be<\/p>\n<p>stated that he had lodged \ufb01rst iI1forn:1atic1V1: \ufb02&#8217;0.I1<br \/>\nmisconception of facts.  &#8216;4 &#8216;V  <\/p>\n<p>6. In a decision reported in 2007?_{\u00bb3}E_f3&#8217;t.A\u00a7A\u00a7:\u00a2_i1<br \/>\nvs. menmmm  op<br \/>\nCourthasheldas:-   V.    <\/p>\n<pre>\n\n'13. However,   \n\ncou\u00e9d also be    First\n\n be noted that\n\n the document is\n  the party bringing the\n<\/pre>\n<p>Saf7i\u00a3\u00a7.&#8217; 0n   be permitted to turn<\/p>\n<p>_ round&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;o;\u00a7dV  that the other contents<br \/>\n  rest part thereof had not<\/p>\n<p>  It was marked as an Exfubit as<br \/>\nA  both  intended to rely upon them.<br \/>\ni*{i.&#8217;:. Once a part of it is relied upon by both<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;  to have committed my illegality in<br \/>\nrelying upon the other part, irrespective of the<br \/>\ncontents of the document been proved or not.<br \/>\n13&#8242; the contents have been proved, the question<br \/>\nof reliance thereupon only upon apart thereof<br \/>\nand not upon the rest, on the technical ground<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02y: &#8221;  L19-,_,,_ , <\/p>\n<p> &#8216;   is esiiijsequent development. From the<\/p>\n<p>    claim petition, WC \ufb01nd that claimant<\/p>\n<p> dfisz\ufb01ilg licence held by claimant his permanent<br \/>\n   is shown as resident of the house ef 15*<br \/>\n  _1_&#8217;\u00a7\u00a7spondent. The fist respondent has not given evidence<\/p>\n<p> to prove that she had employed claimant (her own<\/p>\n<p>that the same had not been proved <\/p>\n<p>aeeordcmoe with law, would notarise.&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>7. in the case on hand, claimant had<br \/>\ninformation and he had producedwsztrpy   K V&#8217;<br \/>\nhis evidence. The claimant<br \/>\nturndown to contend that  of<br \/>\nare false. As per;  &#8216;  was<\/p>\n<p>R..-\n<\/p>\n<p>taldng his Wife and sietets   .loelong&#8217;ng to W<\/p>\n<p>respondent. _ this&#8221;&#8216;felt1er_V&#8217;sistei&#8217;)&#8221;&#8216;to the house of PW&#8211;1<br \/>\nanotl1e1&#8217;*gsiete:-..  5510 reference to the alleged<\/p>\n<p>employment~\u00bb  .  i11foIIn.etion. The alleged<\/p>\n<p>  the house of 18* respondent Even in<\/p>\n<p>brother) as her car driver. g [j}\n<\/p>\n<p>-~\\, M\u00bb &#8220;L. \\.  I .4&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>8. The Commissioner for Work:1nen&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>Compensation without considering .<\/p>\n<p>between parties, ignoring the contentsf\ufb01&#8217;  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>information and contents of driviI15g&#8217; iicence,.:coii{h.ict.1of<\/p>\n<p>parties has 1mnecessa:ri|y:  V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>insurance company by stating&#8230;:th.at<br \/>\nhas failed to discharge ,bursen* tor \ufb01ropf east; upon it.<br \/>\nThe View taken by the Workmen&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>Compensation _;I&#8217;mu*easonsbie:&#8221;&#8216;ei1dopposed to law.<\/p>\n<p>The 15? respo\ufb01zient .. claimant are sister and<\/p>\n<p>brother.  rsew   &#8216; relationship it was for the<\/p>\n<p> _ &#8221;  to Vlestiebiish the a\ufb02eged employment by<\/p>\n<p> a:a.V(\u00e9ic&#8217;:11cin:.g&#8217;*.. cogent evidence. The first information<\/p>\n<p>  would disprove his contention that<\/p>\n<p> he eras emfwioyed by 1% respondent. The driving licence<\/p>\n<p>it it of &#8216;T  and cause title of the petition would<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  disciose that at the time of accident claimant was<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;4 residitlg in the house of 15* respondent. Therefore,<\/p>\n<p>considering facts and circumstances of the case and<\/p>\n<p>conduct of pa11:ies. the case of claimaht that he was<\/p>\n<p>M &#8230;&#8230;..L<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;x&#8217;-3.11.1\u00bb.\/L &#8216;  V.\n<\/p>\n<p>emplayed by 18* raspondent and had<br \/>\nin the course of, and arising out of<br \/>\ninsurance company is liable<br \/>\ncannot be accepted. V A&#8217;   A. .&#8217; V&#8217; V&#8217;  V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>9. In the result, I pass   \u00abV<\/p>\n<p> 0RDE?T+,7\u00b0<br \/>\nThe appea1  is  order is<\/p>\n<p>set aside.  &#8216;ins\ufb01rance company<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/&#8211;v<br \/>\nIudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court National Insurance Company &#8230; vs K Andhunni on 14 October, 2008 Author: N.Ananda IN THE HIGH COURT 01:&#8217; KARNATAKA AT BANGAL\u00a7Ri4*i:.&#8217;\u00ab V. DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY 0? ocrosr\u00e9iz 2&amp;8 { Q BEFORE THE Ho:~rBL1:: MR. Jus&#8217;r:&lt; :;E 1\u00a7e&#8211;..;$1\u00a7AN:;_.\u00a7%&#039;~ . 2 &quot; T M.F.A.N0.3655 BETWEEN: 1 NATIONAL \u00a3NSURANCE;_COM.FA.NY LIMITED MANGALORE DO, &#039;i&#039;HRQU(3i~i_ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-201237","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>National Insurance Company ... vs K Andhunni on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"National Insurance Company ... vs K Andhunni on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-23T18:15:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"National Insurance Company &#8230; vs K Andhunni on 14 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-23T18:15:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":688,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008\",\"name\":\"National Insurance Company ... vs K Andhunni on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-23T18:15:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"National Insurance Company &#8230; vs K Andhunni on 14 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"National Insurance Company ... vs K Andhunni on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"National Insurance Company ... vs K Andhunni on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-23T18:15:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"National Insurance Company &#8230; vs K Andhunni on 14 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-23T18:15:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008"},"wordCount":688,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008","name":"National Insurance Company ... vs K Andhunni on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-23T18:15:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-company-vs-k-andhunni-on-14-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"National Insurance Company &#8230; vs K Andhunni on 14 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201237"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201237\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201237"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201237"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}