{"id":201416,"date":"2009-05-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009"},"modified":"2015-12-09T11:25:00","modified_gmt":"2015-12-09T05:55:00","slug":"state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"State vs Jawahara Ram on 22 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur<\/div>\n
State vs Jawahara Ram on 22 May, 2009<\/div>\n
                                       1\n\n                                              S.B.Criminal Appeal No.61\/88\n                                                    (State of Jawahara Ram)\n\n\n IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR.\n\n                               JUDGMENT\n\n\nTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN.           V.       JAWAHARA RAM\n\n\n              S. B. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. NO.61\/88,\n              against the Judgment dated 3.4.87,\n              passed by Shri A.P.Solanki, RJS, Munsif\n              & Judicial Magistrate, First Class,\n              Bikaner, in Criminal Case No.81\/81.\n\n\n\nDATE OF JUDGMENT                                     MAY 22, 2009.\n\n\n                                PRESENT\n\n                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. M. TOTLA\n\n\nMr. Anish Bhurat, PP, for Appellant(s).\nMr. R.J.Poonia for Mr.LR Poonia, for Respondent.\n\n\nBY THE COURT:<\/pre>\n
      Preferring this appeal, prosecution requests that setting aside the<\/p>\n
judgment of the trial Court dated 3.4.87 acquitting respondent of the<\/p>\n
offence of Section 9, Opium Act, the respondent be convicted and<\/p>\n
appropriately punished for the offence.\n<\/p>\n
      Heard learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
respondent.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      According to prosecution, on 7.10.81, SHO PW 8 at Chowki of PS,<\/p>\n
informed by informer that a person wearing a white shirt (‘kameez’), white<\/p>\n
Dhoti, pink coloured baniyan and having old nylon chappals in feet,<\/p>\n
travelling in Phalodi to Bikaner Bus, is having opium in green bag of
\n                                      2<\/span><\/p>\n
                                               S.B.Criminal Appeal No.61\/88
\n                                                     (State of Jawahara Ram)<\/p>\n
canvas – the SHO making entry Ex.P3 in rojnamcha along with Head<\/p>\n
Constable PW 6 and constables quickly reached at bus stand, from where<\/p>\n
as bus had just left, so he following in a jeep near power house, the bus<\/p>\n
was stopped – on search found that on a seat of the bus a person<\/p>\n
resembling above, was sitting, with a bag on his thighs – on search in a<\/p>\n
polythene bag found about 3 quarter kilo opium – from which         the same<\/p>\n
was seized and separately sample of 30 gms sealed preparing memo Ex.P-<\/p>\n
1 also affixing impressions of the seal used – appellant enquired about<\/p>\n
his name       address etc. and conductor informed the person to have<\/p>\n
boarded the bus from Khetra purchasing ticket for Bikaner – the accused,<\/p>\n
who is      respondent arrested and on his search found bus ticket      and<\/p>\n
Rs.150\/- seized.    SHO making entry of entire incident in roznamcha of<\/p>\n
chowki and than reaching PS and on the basis of entry and           his own<\/p>\n
report, registered FIR No.55\/81 Ex.P-5 for the offence of Section 9, Opium<\/p>\n
Act.   Keeping the packets safe, the packet of sample was forwarded to<\/p>\n
Laboratory for examination. After investigation, charge-sheet submitted in<\/p>\n
Magisterial Court and Criminal Case No.81\/81 was registered.<\/p>\n
       Appellant charged for the offence of Section 9, Opium Act that in<\/p>\n
his possession and illegally on 7.10.81 at around 2.30 pm in a bus at town<\/p>\n
Kolayat, found 3 quarter kilo of opium – appellant claimed trial.<\/p>\n
       On behalf of the prosecution examined are SHO PW 8 who is also<\/p>\n
the seizure officer – Surja Ram PW 6 Head Constable, Constables Virendra<\/p>\n
Singh PW 5, Phoola Ram PW 3 who accompanied SHO, Panney Singh<\/p>\n
PW 1 Driver and Jagdish PW 2 conductor of the bus who are declared<\/p>\n
hostile –     Mallu Ram PW 7 Head Constable Malkhana Incharge and<\/p>\n
Constable Bahadur Singh PW 2         regarding keeping packets safe and
\n                                          3<\/span><\/p>\n
                                                     S.B.Criminal Appeal No.61\/88
\n                                                           (State of Jawahara Ram)<\/p>\n
delivering the sample packet at laboratory. Appellant in his explanation<\/p>\n
stated that witnesses are telling lie and he is innocent. Learned<\/p>\n
Magistrate,    arriving at conclusion,       that   independent witnesses either<\/p>\n
conductor or driver do not support prosecution – how the SHO and other<\/p>\n
personnels reached there, highly inconsistent and not is proved that the<\/p>\n
sample of packet remained in intact sealed position till delivering at<\/p>\n
Laboratory, acquitted appellant.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
         Learned Public Prosecutor argued that SHO deposited packets with<\/p>\n
Malkhana Incharge Head Constable PW 7 who in turn intactly delivered to<\/p>\n
Constable PW 4 who deposited the said packet at Laboratory, so the<\/p>\n
conclusions of the trial Magistrate are erroneous. Also argued that as per<\/p>\n
evidence produced SHO traveling in a jeep followed and stopped the bus<\/p>\n
and the said contradictions, if any, too minor and trifling as to be of any<\/p>\n
significance. Argued that of the ‘motbirs’ are signatures on the memo and<\/p>\n
proved that in possession of appellant was opium.<\/p>\n
         Learned counsel for the respondent argued that quite inconsistent<\/p>\n
and contrary to each other       are the statements of witnesses and the<\/p>\n
learned Magistrate elaborately dealing with the matter for convincing and<\/p>\n
strong reasons, has arrived at conclusion. Argued that since depositing<\/p>\n
sample in the same intact position, is not proved the appellant is rightly<\/p>\n
acquitted. Also submitted that the incident is said to be of 1981.<\/p>\n
         Considering arguments, perused record and judgment of the trial<\/p>\n
Court.\n<\/p>\n
         PW 1 driver and PW 2 conductor of the bus do not support<\/p>\n
prosecution – as per them policemen came in the bus, forced a person to<\/p>\n
alight and also took out a small bag through window of the bus- at police
\n                                       4<\/span><\/p>\n
                                                 S.B.Criminal Appeal No.61\/88
\n                                                       (State of Jawahara Ram)<\/p>\n
station, signatures of these witnesses procured on Exs. P-1 an P-2.<\/p>\n
Inference on testimony of these witnesses can be that the accused was<\/p>\n
traveling in the bus. Signatures of the witnesses on memos can             be<\/p>\n
corroborator of the what described in the memos if appear to have been<\/p>\n
proved by other evidence.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      Chhagan Lal PW 8 states that he being SHO was at Kolayat Chowki<\/p>\n
of police station where a informer informed him that a person wearing<\/p>\n
white shirt, dhoti, pink baniyan and old chappals of of nylon possessing<\/p>\n
opium in green bag is travelling in bus from Phalodi to Bikaner, now<\/p>\n
standing    at Kolayat bus stand, so he (the SHO) along with             head<\/p>\n
constable Surja Ram and constables Phula ram, Vidrendra Singh arrived at<\/p>\n
bus stand and as the bus has just departed, so followed in a private jeep<\/p>\n
and bus stopped by them near power house – on search in the bus on<\/p>\n
back seat   was a person of above description with bag         on his thighs<\/p>\n
which when     searched found    to       contained 750 gms of opium in a<\/p>\n
polythene bag from which sample etc. taken and sealed, inquiring about<\/p>\n
name etc. of person the accused, prepared memos. PW 8 states that<\/p>\n
arriving at police station, recording incident registered FIR Ex.P-5 and in<\/p>\n
course of investigation, recorded statements of witnesses – further says<\/p>\n
that appellant also gave a information which reduced in writing as Ex.P-6<\/p>\n
by him –    it seems that no recovery made or action followed on          this<\/p>\n
information. SHO PW 8 states that entry made while departing from<\/p>\n
Chowki is Ex.P-7 and of return is Ex.P-8 – in cross-examination says<\/p>\n
information was received at 2.15 and Ex.P-7 entry made at 2.30 – he<\/p>\n
followed bus travelling in a jeep of a contract and head constable on<\/p>\n
motor cycle was with him up to bus stand. As per PW 8, he did not deem
\n                                     5<\/span><\/p>\n
                                              S.B.Criminal Appeal No.61\/88
\n                                                    (State of Jawahara Ram)<\/p>\n
it necessary to obtain signatures of constables who were with him on<\/p>\n
memo of recovery Ex.P-1 and recovered substance not actually on the<\/p>\n
spot and only estimated. Surja Ram PW 6 the head constable states that<\/p>\n
on site plan memo Ex.P-2 are his signatures – but his signatures strangely<\/p>\n
are not on memo of recovery Ex.P-1. According to PW 6, he followed bus<\/p>\n
riding on a motor cycle and pillion rider was the SHO. Thus, the SHO<\/p>\n
accompanied on     motor cycle of this witness PW 6 and this is to be<\/p>\n
evaluated   with the fact that Ex.P-1 does not bear signature of this<\/p>\n
witness and as per PW 8, he was in a jeep. According to PW 6, Ex.P-2 was<\/p>\n
prepared right at the spot where bus was stalled. Constable Virendra<\/p>\n
Singh PW 5       who accompanied        SHO narrates that SHO searching<\/p>\n
respondent the passenger of the bus, found in his custody a green bag,<\/p>\n
which had opium in a polythene bag – in cross-examination says that he<\/p>\n
too signed on the memo but memo Ex.P-1 does not seem to have his<\/p>\n
signatures. Similar is for Constable Phoola Ram PW 3 who states of<\/p>\n
search and seizure as above, but admits of his signatures not being on<\/p>\n
memo Ex.P-1. This constable PW 3, in cross-examination, tells that no<\/p>\n
jeep was, and bus followed on motor cycle by the SHO – confronted with<\/p>\n
investigational statement Ex.D-1 that private vehicle      was used, the<\/p>\n
witness denied the same. PW 3 also says that bus was to its capacity. As<\/p>\n
above, the versions narrated are of major inconsistencies, so the<\/p>\n
conclusions of the learned Magistrate cannot be held to be erroneous and<\/p>\n
contrary to evidence.\n<\/p>\n
      From the evidence, it appears that SHO deposited the articles with<\/p>\n
Malkhana In-charge head constable Mallu Ram PW 7 on 7.10.81 itself.<\/p>\n
Mallu Ram PW 7 states so but does not state any thing            regarding<\/p>\n
delivering or giving of any part to any one. Constable Bahadur Singh PW 4
\n                                       6<\/span><\/p>\n
                                                 S.B.Criminal Appeal No.61\/88
\n                                                       (State of Jawahara Ram)<\/p>\n
deposed that he in November, 1981 was posted as constable and carrying<\/p>\n
sealed packet of FIR No.55\/81, deposited it at Jaipur, obtained receipt<\/p>\n
which handed over by him at police station – does not state anything<\/p>\n
about by whom and when the packet was given Mallu Ram PW 7 does not<\/p>\n
state if given to any one and when. Thus, the conclusions that when and<\/p>\n
by whom the packet given and for what period remained with the<\/p>\n
concerned person not established cannot be held to be erroneous or not<\/p>\n
based or contrary to evidence.\n<\/p>\n
      For the above reasons, the appeal being devoid of merit is to be<\/p>\n
rejected. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected.<\/p>\n
                                                        (C. M. TOTLA), J.\n<\/p>\n
scd\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur State vs Jawahara Ram on 22 May, 2009 1 S.B.Criminal Appeal No.61\/88 (State of Jawahara Ram) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN. V. JAWAHARA RAM S. B. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. NO.61\/88, against the Judgment dated 3.4.87, passed by Shri A.P.Solanki, RJS, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-201416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-rajasthan-high-court-jodhpur"],"yoast_head":"\nState vs Jawahara Ram on 22 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State vs Jawahara Ram on 22 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-09T05:55:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State vs Jawahara Ram on 22 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-09T05:55:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1482,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009\",\"name\":\"State vs Jawahara Ram on 22 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-09T05:55:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State vs Jawahara Ram on 22 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State vs Jawahara Ram on 22 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State vs Jawahara Ram on 22 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-09T05:55:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State vs Jawahara Ram on 22 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-09T05:55:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009"},"wordCount":1482,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009","name":"State vs Jawahara Ram on 22 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-09T05:55:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-jawahara-ram-on-22-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State vs Jawahara Ram on 22 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201416"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201416\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}