{"id":201675,"date":"2008-05-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008"},"modified":"2017-11-08T02:16:51","modified_gmt":"2017-11-07T20:46:51","slug":"state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008","title":{"rendered":"State By Excise Sub Inspector vs Rangappa Vithal Kolkar on 29 May, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
State By Excise Sub Inspector vs Rangappa Vithal Kolkar on 29 May, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n
pm...\n\n:54 THE man cam? 99 KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nmama ms 7:45 29?\" mv o2= MAY zoos\nat-?.r=<3RE M    4'\nTHE HG\u00a7~\u00a7'Bi.,E M:-musrzcs suamsa gf-:;f\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7:'   ~ }'\n   :  Qgi    " A\n\n \n\nBE'T'\ufb01\u00a3EEi'\\\u00a7:\n\nSme by Excise Subinspector   V   \nBiaiihengai. 'L'  b  'PET E_Ti0'NEF\u00a7\n\n(By 8rE.C.H.Jadhaxr, SP?)    \nAND: \n\n1. Rangappa V\u00e9\u00a3ha4\u00a7'\u00a7~\u00a7t:2_%karJ""'  .  - \nAge: Major, Q3c;Ba:1arfa_ Busivrzesis A '  2 \nRIO Bailho\u00a77\u00a7a\u00a7v_"_  ' '   \n\n2. A:'\\;\u00a3n:3 SEixia\u00a7A\u00a7.:;\u00a79:a;\u00a7\u00a7;a4%'  .\nAge: h{Ia\u00a7Q: ,' Goazv Bar;a:;a"8usiness\nRio Bai3hon_ga:.-- V   '  --~ .. RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
(By s::,v:swa\u00a7a:h S.ShVet{a-as A-3%.)<\/p>\n
  _ ‘_fhi\u00a7 ‘G?\u00a7mina1 R\u00a7\u00a7%’\u00e9Eon Petition is filed under Section 39? read
\n‘-iw\u00e9iwh”\u20ac3.ect\u00a7Qn~\u00e9Q.1’*G_r.P.C, praying to set aside the order dt.18.4.2QQ5
\npasae\u00e9 ‘ i:.y’\u00bb_thaf~Pr\u00a5,Civii Judge (Jr’.E}n.) 8. Jfv’iFC., Bailhongai in<\/p>\n
C.L’-.2,N’n\u00a7762L?\u00a3}94}:=<\/p>\n
‘.44’?hi\u00e9.\u00e9R\u00e9\\%.i$ion Petition earning on fez Hearing this \u00e9ay, the Csuyt<\/p>\n
T ~ .~ 2. _  made th\u00e9 \ufb01\ufb01icwing:\n<\/p>\n
  % @2313
\nYhis Revisicn Peiition Es \ufb02ed by the State against the 9:33;’ of<\/p>\n
V V  ‘   .disc\u00a31a:*ge gassed under Section 239 Cr,P.C.<\/p>\n
Vtn.aVt e;\u00e9a<\/p>\n
r
\nE’-J
\nx<\/p>\n
2″ The resgoadents wem prosecuted far the offense punishabie
\nunder Sections 1?, 32 S: 14 read sazith Sections 326$) arz\u00e9  the<\/p>\n
Kasnataica Excise Act,<\/p>\n
3. The ailegat\u00e9on is that. the Exc\u00e9aej\ufb01suthorit\u00e9eg a_\u00a7ia’Ed\u00bb <\/p>\n
or: 233 200:: at about 3 am in the hsu\u00e9g eiiti\ufb01fezfja\u00e9sge\u00e9ecj—a’n\u00a7’tzgggmgthe ”<\/p>\n
stack of Eiquor withcut S\u00e9cencek E2; th\u00a7s’\\r_e\u00a7’ard, \u00a7:%:\u00e9;a;\u00a2’;:i:seZ:!  =we_:*t;\u00bb:.<\/p>\n
presecuted. The ac\u00e9useei {\ufb02ed an’uaS\u00a7\u00a7i\u00a7ca_tier2V’ss:ee{\u00a7{\u00a7r;1g\u00e9 d\u00e9zgcharge fmm
\nthe offence on $12 gmur:{“:%\u00a7at f:\u00a7A'[E%’_\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01iff5.gh\u00a7’\u00a5?EiteF\u00a7a\u00e9Vg\ufb01\ufb02\u00e9\ufb01t\u00e9\ufb01 by the
\npmsecut\u00e9er: does not make 9&1: E;.:nde:’ the preszis\u00e9ens
\nof sections 4;, \u00a2.2i;;V;%m ri..— :\u00a7\u00e9dg%:\u00e9\u00a7%h-$\u00e9;\u00e9:\u00a7o.n\u00a7_V:\u00a73iv{1) and 33$: 9? the
\nKagna\u00e9aka        <\/p>\n
-4.  V\u00a7\u00abe1\u00a7ai:*2\u00a7&\u00a7:7\u00e9- _Szm\u00a7:e Pubiisz Prosecutaz sufsrmitke\u00e9 that<\/p>\n
the Eea\u00a7ned’\u00a5v%a}ig\u00a7s\u20acr:aia \u00a7’\u00a7\u00a7”–a:;;jpV m\u00a2\u00e9dense”t9__\u00a3;eme ta ‘me concisgsion that fine ev\u00e9\u00e9erace is nai sas\ufb01icient to<\/p>\n
5: The erder imgagned ahsws that the ra\u00e9d was made an<\/p>\n
  [V233 QQM, Awarding is tine panchanama, the t\u00e9m\u00e9ags is mentianrsed as<\/p>\n
145 am. an the said data, wzereas, in $.C,!\\%e,’?G\u00a9!2\u00a7Q4E Ehe<\/p>\n
\u00e9\ufb01i<\/p>\n
-3-<\/span><\/p>\n
::erra\u00a7\u00a7a%:”:aat reee\u00e9ved the information at aboazt M5 am’ on the said Q33:
\nam the inveatiga\u00e9\u00e9on Grfficer a\ufb02esied iize acstsse\u00e9 at 1,3G_4.a,\u00a7::.,’_ T*\u00a7\u00a51cugh<\/p>\n
the effence is me. twin charge-sheets are fi\u00e9ed \u00a7r2steac\u00a7__:\u00a7f”5o’ri::i.%;,:- it<\/p>\n
is aiieged that am accused are tenants ef t?2e_.p.:e’%\u00a7f:%.s.;\u00e9sT..::: 4Hs*\u00a7;%7e~ge:f4,”‘~.._<\/p>\n
except the ewrzer, no other gerstm is eixamirg\u00e9ci; h\u00e9pa\ufb01ch’v.g\u00a73\u00a7\u00a7nAes55a$’–._<\/p>\n
signatures are mt taken on evegy  page ef the parg’::\u00a7xa\u00a5r\u00a7Vai%’1aV’\u00e9g\ufb01tbce\ufb01at
\nthe ens? of the same and their addr\u00e9agege, %*esi:\u00a7eT{:c\u00e91,  a\u00e9se \ufb01at
\nfcrthcsmiag. The \u00e9earned *!\u00a5~’\u00a5\u00a7 gisif\u00e9i\u00e9 ‘$\u00a7\u00a7g\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7e\u00a7ia\u00a7 \u00a7E\u00a7’\u00e9e “\u00a3:3a\u00a7 er\u00a7a\u00a7 eo\ufb01ecte\u00e9
\nby \ufb02ue prosecuticn foamd t\u00a7sait:_L-vn*;’\u00a3a\u00a7e:i_%\u00a7L’V\u00a7–$\u00e9_’.:::v\u00e9\u00a7t_~__suf\ufb01c\u00a7en: ta gyoseed
\nagairsai the accgse\u00a7 gnd  make eat an e\ufb01erace<\/p>\n
pursishab\u00e9e u::”:’7<':\u00e9'r'_a_$%;%\u00a7:;\u00a7:\u20acs\u00ab.}; r:__Q'    read wit\u00e9z Sectiang 32(1) am<\/p>\n
am; er%:::ekT\u00a7<g;m&ata:iea Exci\u00e9efscii \u00ab %  .\n<\/p>\n
6:””‘_\u00a5;’h’%9.’_Ee’2z-s*’:’;V\u00a7e%.\u00a5.” \u00e9ghe had the benefit as the maier\u00e9ai<\/p>\n
ceiiected b3\u00a7VV’t\u00a7:\u00abn,\u00a7% p:rt>$’e{;:;ii::\u00a7:;\u00ab ?\u00e9Cas cansideied the entire mateyiai am has<\/p>\n
 V. \u00ab_ \u00a7our\u00a7:\u00a7~;;ha\u00a7A’ihieV en\u00e9irte .ma_tes\u00a7a\u00e9 acres not prima facie make saw: a case is<\/p>\n
 ;:>\u00a7f:;\u20ac5\u20ac*\u20ac?:V\u00a3\u00a7d..;aAug1’a,E\u00a7’:\u00a5.\u00a7*:gi”‘*i?3__19 accused. The Magistrate has ju\ufb01iciausiy exercised<\/p>\n
h\u00a7s ‘g’.–x=ow\u00e9?   faasnd that the materiaf is \u00a7nsu\u00a7\ufb01c\u00a5en\u20ac ta proceed<\/p>\n
V _ aga\u00a7\u00e9’\u00e9~;=:st t%n.\u00e9 .a’a::c7’used. I find my reason is interfere with the same,<\/p>\n
” * , ” = _He%’:\u00a2e, the F\u00e9evisicn Pezszsoa fa\u00e9is and :5 dismissed.<\/p>\n
1′ KNM11 _ Sd\/3<\/p>\n
Judy?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court State By Excise Sub Inspector vs Rangappa Vithal Kolkar on 29 May, 2008 Author: Subhash B.Adi pm… :54 THE man cam? 99 KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE mama ms 7:45 29?” mv o2= MAY zoos at-?.r=<3RE M 4' THE HG\u00a7~\u00a7'Bi.,E M:-musrzcs suamsa gf-:;f\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7:' ~ }' : Qgi " A BE'T'\ufb01\u00a3EEi'\\\u00a7: Sme by Excise Subinspector […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-201675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState By Excise Sub Inspector vs Rangappa Vithal Kolkar on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State By Excise Sub Inspector vs Rangappa Vithal Kolkar on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-07T20:46:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State By Excise Sub Inspector vs Rangappa Vithal Kolkar on 29 May, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-07T20:46:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008\"},\"wordCount\":632,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008\",\"name\":\"State By Excise Sub Inspector vs Rangappa Vithal Kolkar on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-07T20:46:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State By Excise Sub Inspector vs Rangappa Vithal Kolkar on 29 May, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State By Excise Sub Inspector vs Rangappa Vithal Kolkar on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State By Excise Sub Inspector vs Rangappa Vithal Kolkar on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-07T20:46:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State By Excise Sub Inspector vs Rangappa Vithal Kolkar on 29 May, 2008","datePublished":"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-07T20:46:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008"},"wordCount":632,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008","name":"State By Excise Sub Inspector vs Rangappa Vithal Kolkar on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-07T20:46:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-excise-sub-inspector-vs-rangappa-vithal-kolkar-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State By Excise Sub Inspector vs Rangappa Vithal Kolkar on 29 May, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201675","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=201675"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/201675\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=201675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=201675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}