{"id":202010,"date":"2011-03-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-03-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011"},"modified":"2015-11-05T09:04:22","modified_gmt":"2015-11-05T03:34:22","slug":"mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.M Koti Nagaiah vs Insurance Division on 28 March, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.M Koti Nagaiah vs Insurance Division on 28 March, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                                  1\n\n\n              Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\nRoom\u00a0No.296,\u00a0II\u00a0Floor,\u00a0B\u00a0Wing,\u00a0August\u00a0Kranti\u00a0Bhawan,\u00a0Bhikaji\u00a0Cama\u00a0\n                     Place,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00ad110066\n     Telefax:011\u00ad26180532\u00a0&amp;\u00a0011\u00ad26107254\u00a0website\u00adcic.gov.in\n\n           \u00a0Appeal\u00a0:\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/DS\/A\/2010\/001657\u00a0\n\n\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\/Complainant       :       \u00a0Sh.\u00a0M.\u00a0Koti\u00a0Nagaiah,\u00a0\nVijayawada\u00a0\nPublic\u00a0Authority              :       \u00a0The\u00a0New\u00a0India\u00a0Assurance\u00a0\nCo.\u00a0Ltd.,Mumbai\n                              \/Visakhapatnam\u00a0\n(\u00a0Smt.Rajeshwari,CPIO\n                              &amp;\u00a0Sh.Vinay\u00a0Batra,AA\u00a0-\u00a0through\u00a0\nvideo\n                              Conferencing)\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0              :       \u00a028\u00a0March\u00a02011\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision              :       \u00a028\u00a0March\u00a02011\nFacts<\/pre>\n<p>:\u00ad\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>1.    applicant \u00a0 preferred \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 application \u00a0 dated \u00a0 8\u00a0<br \/>\nFebruary \u00a0 2010 \u00a0 before \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO, \u00a0 The \u00a0 New \u00a0 India\u00a0<br \/>\nAssurance \u00a0 Company \u00a0 Limited, \u00a0 Visakhapatnam \u00a0 seeking\u00a0<br \/>\ninformation \u00a0 pertaining \u00a0 to \u00a0 rules \u00a0 governing \u00a0 employees\u00a0<br \/>\nof \u00a0 the \u00a0 Company \u00a0 for \u00a0 obtaining \u00a0 prior \u00a0 sanction \u00a0 from\u00a0<br \/>\ncompetent \u00a0 authority \u00a0 while \u00a0 acquiring \u00a0 in \u00a0 movable\u00a0<br \/>\nproperties \u00a0 in \u00a0 his \u00a0 own \u00a0 name \u00a0 \/family \u00a0 members, \u00a0 movable\u00a0<br \/>\nproperties \u00a0 costing \u00a0 more \u00a0 than \u00a0 Rs. \u00a0 25,000 \u00a0 and \u00a0 while\u00a0<br \/>\nlending\/depositing \u00a0 money \u00a0 to \u00a0 any \u00a0 person\/Banks \u00a0 and\u00a0<br \/>\nregarding\u00a0adherence\u00a0of\u00a0these\u00a0rules\u00a0by\u00a0other\u00a0employees\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0the\u00a0Company\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0enclosed\u00a0herewith\u00a0as\u00a0Annexure\u00a0A.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.   The \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 vide \u00a0 his \u00a0 order \u00a0 dated \u00a0 15 \u00a0 March \u00a0 2010\u00a0<br \/>\nprovided \u00a0 part \u00a0 information \u00a0 that \u00a0 did \u00a0 not \u00a0 satisfy \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nappellant \u00a0 who \u00a0 preferred \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 dated \u00a0 4 \u00a0 May \u00a0 2010\u00a0<br \/>\nbefore\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0appellate\u00a0authority.\u00a0The\u00a0matter\u00a0was\u00a0<br \/>\ndisposed \u00a0 of \u00a0 vide \u00a0 FAA \u00a0 order \u00a0 dated \u00a0 17 \u00a0 May \u00a0 2010 \u00a0 by\u00a0<br \/>\nupholding\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO&#8217;s\u00a0order.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.    Being \u00a0 aggrieved \u00a0 and \u00a0 not \u00a0 being \u00a0 satisfied \u00a0 by \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nabove \u00a0 orders, \u00a0 the \u00a0 appellant \u00a0 preferred \u00a0 second \u00a0 appeal\u00a0<br \/>\nbefore \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission. \u00a0 The \u00a0 matter \u00a0 was \u00a0 heard \u00a0 today\u00a0<br \/>\nthrough \u00a0 videoconferencing. \u00a0 Both \u00a0 parties \u00a0 were \u00a0 present\u00a0<br \/>\nas\u00a0above\u00a0and\u00a0presented\u00a0arguments.\u00a0Appellant\u00a0clarified\u00a0<br \/>\nto \u00a0 the \u00a0 respondent \u00a0 that \u00a0 information \u00a0 sought \u00a0 by \u00a0 him\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                           Appeal\u00a0:\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/DS\/A\/2010\/001657<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>pertained \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Regional \u00a0 Office \u00a0 Visakhapatnam \u00a0 and\u00a0<br \/>\nthat\u00a0\u00a0he\u00a0would\u00a0be\u00a0satisfied\u00a0if\u00a0information\u00a0pertaining\u00a0<br \/>\nto\u00a0compliance\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0rules\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0<br \/>\nin \u00a0 respect \u00a0 of \u00a0 any \u00a0 two \u00a0 officers \u00a0 from \u00a0 each \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 12\u00a0<br \/>\nDivisional \u00a0 Offices \u00a0and\u00a0 the\u00a0Administrative \u00a0Officer \u00a0in\u00a0<br \/>\ncharge\u00a0of\u00a0Personnel\u00a0Department\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0period\u00a01994\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0<br \/>\n2004.\n<\/p>\n<p>                         Decision\u00a0notice<\/p>\n<p>4.   After \u00a0hearing \u00a0both\u00a0 sides\u00a0 the\u00a0Commission \u00a0directs\u00a0<br \/>\nrespondent\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0above\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0without\u00a0<br \/>\nproviding \u00a0 the \u00a0 names \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 third \u00a0 parties \u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nappellant\u00a0within\u00a0eight\u00a0weeks\u00a0of\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order.\u00a0<br \/>\nRespondent \u00a0 is \u00a0 not \u00a0 required \u00a0 to \u00a0 provide \u00a0 copies \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nproperty \u00a0 returns \u00a0 etc \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 employees \u00a0 to\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0respondent.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                         (Smt.\u00a0Deepak\u00a0Sandhu)<br \/>\n                                Information\u00a0Commissioner\u00a0(DS)<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy:\n<\/p>\n<p>(T.\u00a0K.\u00a0Mohapatra)<br \/>\nUnder\u00a0Secretary\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Dy.\u00a0Registrar<br \/>\nTel\u00a0No.\u00a0011\u00ad26105027<\/p>\n<p>Copy\u00a0to:\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>1.    \u00a0Shri\u00a0M.Koti\u00a0Nagaiah<br \/>\n      Advocate,\u00a0Door\u00a0No.\u00a041\u00ad7\u00ad27A<br \/>\n      Varma\u00a0Gari\u00a0Street,\u00a0Near\u00a0Andhra\u00a0Bank<br \/>\n      Krishna\u00a0Lanka,\u00a0Vijaywada\u00ad13.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.    The\u00a0CPIO<br \/>\n      The\u00a0New\u00a0India\u00a0Assurance\u00a0Co.\u00a0Ltd.,<br \/>\n      Visakhapatnam\u00a0RO(620000),<br \/>\n      3rd\u00a0&amp;\u00a04th\u00a0Floor,\u00a0Pavan\u00a0Paradise<br \/>\n      47\u00ad10\u00ad12,\u00a0Second\u00a0Lane,\u00a0Dwarka\u00a0Nagar<br \/>\n      Visakhapatnam=530016<\/p>\n<p>3.    The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n      The\u00a0New\u00a0India\u00a0Assurance\u00a0Co.\u00a0Ltd.,<\/p>\n<p>                                             Appeal\u00a0:\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/DS\/A\/2010\/001657<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                          3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>    Regd.&amp;\u00a0HO,\u00a0The\u00a0New\u00a0India\u00a0Assurance\u00a0Bldg.,<br \/>\n    87,\u00a0M.G.\u00a0Road,\u00a0Fort,\u00a0Mumbai\u00ad400001\u00a0<br \/>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                  Appeal\u00a0:\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/DS\/A\/2010\/001657\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.M Koti Nagaiah vs Insurance Division on 28 March, 2011 1 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission Room\u00a0No.296,\u00a0II\u00a0Floor,\u00a0B\u00a0Wing,\u00a0August\u00a0Kranti\u00a0Bhawan,\u00a0Bhikaji\u00a0Cama\u00a0 Place,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi\u00ad110066 Telefax:011\u00ad26180532\u00a0&amp;\u00a0011\u00ad26107254\u00a0website\u00adcic.gov.in \u00a0Appeal\u00a0:\u00a0No.\u00a0CIC\/DS\/A\/2010\/001657\u00a0 \u00a0Appellant\u00a0\/Complainant : \u00a0Sh.\u00a0M.\u00a0Koti\u00a0Nagaiah,\u00a0 Vijayawada\u00a0 Public\u00a0Authority : \u00a0The\u00a0New\u00a0India\u00a0Assurance\u00a0 Co.\u00a0Ltd.,Mumbai \/Visakhapatnam\u00a0 (\u00a0Smt.Rajeshwari,CPIO &amp;\u00a0Sh.Vinay\u00a0Batra,AA\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0through\u00a0 video Conferencing) Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing\u00a0 : \u00a028\u00a0March\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision : \u00a028\u00a0March\u00a02011 Facts :\u00ad\u00a0 1. applicant \u00a0 preferred \u00a0 RTI \u00a0 application \u00a0 dated \u00a0 8\u00a0 February \u00a0 2010 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-202010","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.M Koti Nagaiah vs Insurance Division on 28 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.M Koti Nagaiah vs Insurance Division on 28 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-03-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-05T03:34:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.M Koti Nagaiah vs Insurance Division on 28 March, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-05T03:34:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011\"},\"wordCount\":384,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.M Koti Nagaiah vs Insurance Division on 28 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-03-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-05T03:34:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.M Koti Nagaiah vs Insurance Division on 28 March, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.M Koti Nagaiah vs Insurance Division on 28 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.M Koti Nagaiah vs Insurance Division on 28 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-03-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-05T03:34:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.M Koti Nagaiah vs Insurance Division on 28 March, 2011","datePublished":"2011-03-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-05T03:34:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011"},"wordCount":384,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011","name":"Mr.M Koti Nagaiah vs Insurance Division on 28 March, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-03-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-05T03:34:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-m-koti-nagaiah-vs-insurance-division-on-28-march-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.M Koti Nagaiah vs Insurance Division on 28 March, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202010","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202010"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202010\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202010"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202010"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202010"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}