{"id":202087,"date":"2011-08-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011"},"modified":"2017-01-10T07:01:52","modified_gmt":"2017-01-10T01:31:52","slug":"mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Ayodhya Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Ayodhya Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                     In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                    at\n                                             New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                            File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001162\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a04,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a04,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties: (heard\u00a0through\u00a0videoconference)\n\n\n\n        Appellant\n\n\n        Shri\u00a0Ayodhya\u00a0Prasad\n        H.No.\u00a0104\/B,\u00a0Tipsy\u00a0Topsy\u00a0CHS,\n        Sambhaji\u00a0Chowk,\u00a0Ulahasnagar,\n        Thane\u00ad\u00a0421004\n\n        The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present.\u00a0\n\n        Respondents\n\n\n        Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0\n        Office\u00a0of\u00a0General\u00a0Manager\n        Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Cell\u00a0(HQ)\n        CST\n        Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0001\n\n\n\n        Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Dr.\u00a0M.\u00a0Lakre,\u00a0Medical\u00a0Director,\u00a0and\u00a0Dr.\u00a0S.K.\u00a0Tiwari\u00a0Chief\u00a0Health\u00a0Director\n\n                   Information\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                             at\n                                                     New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                          File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001162\n\n\n\n                                                          ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.     The\u00a0 Applicant\u00a0 filed\u00a0 his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a018.01.2010\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Chief\u00a0Medical\u00a0Director,\u00a0Central\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Railway,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0CST,\u00a0seeking\u00a0certain\u00a0&#8220;clarification&#8221;\u00a0inter\u00adalia\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0emergency\u00a0clause\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Railway\u00a0Board&#8217;s\u00a0guidelines\u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0papers\u00a0he\u00a0enclosed\u00a0with\u00a0his\u00a0application.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       obtain \u00a0 certain \u00a0 specific \u00a0 details \u00a0 in \u00a0 a \u00a0 particular \u00a0 format, \u00a0 which \u00a0 he \u00a0 himself \u00a0 designed, \u00a0 in \u00a0 respect \u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       occupation\u00a0of\u00a0officer&#8217;s\u00a0ward\u00a0on\u00a009\/10\/2007.\u00a0The\u00a0PIO,\u00a0on\u00a008.02.2010,\u00a0while\u00a0advising\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the \u00a0 information \u00a0 sought \u00a0 at \u00a0 item \u00a0 3 \u00a0 (i.e \u00a0 occupation \u00a0 of \u00a0 officer&#8217;s \u00a0 ward) \u00a0 may \u00a0 be \u00a0 obtained \u00a0 from \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       MD\/Byculla\u00a0as\u00a0it\u00a0did\u00a0pertain\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0office,\u00a0also\u00a0gave\u00a0required\u00a0clarification\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0with\u00a0respect\u00a0to\u00a0other\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       items\u00a0of\u00a0queries.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0on\u00a018.06.2010,\u00a0in\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant&#8217;s\u00a01st\u00adappeal\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       him,\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0item\u00a0no.\u00a03\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0application\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       supplied\u00a0by\u00a0MD\/Byculla\u00a0through\u00a0the\u00a0Dy.\u00a0CMD\u00a0(T&amp;A).\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0thereafter\u00a0filed\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0appeal\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       (dated\u00a029.03.2011)\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0pointing\u00a0out\u00a0the\u00a0deficiency\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0supplied\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       him.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nDecision<\/p>\n<p>2.     During\u00a0 the\u00a0 hearing,\u00a0 the\u00a0 Appellant\u00a0 stated\u00a0 that\u00a0 the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0 have\u00a0 not\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0 him\u00a0 details\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       regarding\u00a0the\u00a0reimbursement\u00a0made\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0people\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a06\u00a0months\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0year\u00a02009\u00ad2010\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       they\u00a0have\u00a0furnished\u00a0contradictory\u00a0information\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0item\u00a03\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0application\u00a0that\u00a0too\u00a0after\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       delay.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.     Since\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0received\u00a0the\u00a0reimbursement\u00a0related\u00a0information\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0identified\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       period,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0within\u00a02\u00a0weeks\u00a0of\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order,\u00a0shall\u00a0furnish\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0available\u00a0with\u00a0him.\u00a0As\u00a0regards\u00a0Appellant&#8217;s\u00a0allegation\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0has\u00a0<br \/>\n          been\u00a0given\u00a0&#8216;contradictory&#8217;\u00a0information\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0item\u00a03\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0application,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0should\u00a0give\u00a0a\u00a0personal\u00a0hearing\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0and\u00a0verify\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0vis\u00ad\u00e0\u00advis\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         the\u00a0Appellant&#8217;s\u00a0allegations\u00a0and\u00a0then\u00a0pass\u00a0a\u00a0speaking\u00a0order\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0mater\u00a0within\u00a04\u00a0weeks\u00a0of\u00a0receipt\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         of\u00a0this\u00a0order.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>4.       The\u00a0PIO\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0show\u00a0cause\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0penalty\u00a0should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0imposed\u00a0upon\u00a0him\u00a0for\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         failure\u00a0to\u00a0take\u00a0action\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a05(4)\u00a0or\u00a06(3)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct\u00a0while\u00a0dealing\u00a0with\u00a0 \u00a0Appellant&#8217;s\u00a0RTI\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>         query\u00a0at\u00a0item\u00a0no.\u00a03\u00a0of\u00a0 \u00a0his\u00a0application,\u00a0thereby\u00a0obstructing\u00a0the\u00a0supply\u00a0of\u00a0information. \u00a0Returnable\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         within\u00a02\u00a0weeks\u00a0of\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>5.       Appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                             \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                     Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0Ayodhya\u00a0Prasad<br \/>\n         H.No.\u00a0104\/B,\u00a0Tipsy\u00a0Topsy\u00a0CHS,<br \/>\n         Sambhaji\u00a0Chowk,\u00a0Ulahasnagar,<br \/>\n         Thane\u00ad\u00a0421004<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<br \/>\n         Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0<br \/>\n         Office\u00a0of\u00a0General\u00a0Manager<br \/>\n         Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Cell\u00a0(HQ)<br \/>\n         CST<br \/>\n         Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0001<\/p>\n<p>3.       Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n         Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0<br \/>\n         Office\u00a0of\u00a0General\u00a0Manager<br \/>\n         Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Cell\u00a0(HQ)<br \/>\n         CST<br \/>\n           Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0001<\/p>\n<p>4.        Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC<\/p>\n<p>Note: \u00a0 In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission&#8217;s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0<br \/>\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0reply,\u00a0(3)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0(4)\u00a0copy\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(5)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0considers\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0complaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/\u00a0Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Ayodhya Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001162 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a04,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a04,\u00a02011 Parties: (heard\u00a0through\u00a0videoconference) Appellant Shri\u00a0Ayodhya\u00a0Prasad H.No.\u00a0104\/B,\u00a0Tipsy\u00a0Topsy\u00a0CHS, Sambhaji\u00a0Chowk,\u00a0Ulahasnagar, Thane\u00ad\u00a0421004 The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present.\u00a0 Respondents Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0 Office\u00a0of\u00a0General\u00a0Manager Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Cell\u00a0(HQ) CST Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0001 Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Dr.\u00a0M.\u00a0Lakre,\u00a0Medical\u00a0Director,\u00a0and\u00a0Dr.\u00a0S.K.\u00a0Tiwari\u00a0Chief\u00a0Health\u00a0Director Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001162 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0 Applicant\u00a0 filed\u00a0 his\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a018.01.2010\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Chief\u00a0Medical\u00a0Director,\u00a0Central\u00a0 Railway,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0CST,\u00a0seeking\u00a0certain\u00a0&#8220;clarification&#8221;\u00a0inter\u00adalia\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0emergency\u00a0clause\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0 Railway\u00a0Board&#8217;s\u00a0guidelines\u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0papers\u00a0he\u00a0enclosed\u00a0with\u00a0his\u00a0application.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0 obtain \u00a0 certain [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-202087","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Ayodhya Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Ayodhya Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-10T01:31:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Ayodhya Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-10T01:31:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":559,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Ayodhya Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-10T01:31:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Ayodhya Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Ayodhya Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Ayodhya Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-10T01:31:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Ayodhya Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-10T01:31:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011"},"wordCount":559,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011","name":"Mr.Ayodhya Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-10T01:31:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ayodhya-prasad-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-4-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Ayodhya Prasad vs Ministry Of Railways on 4 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202087","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202087"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202087\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202087"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202087"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202087"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}