{"id":202128,"date":"2008-09-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008"},"modified":"2014-09-04T00:57:16","modified_gmt":"2014-09-03T19:27:16","slug":"veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Veeresh S\/O Hanumanthappa … vs P S Chapparadahallimath on 24 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Veeresh S\/O Hanumanthappa … vs P S Chapparadahallimath on 24 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: K.Ramanna<\/div>\n
IN MFA No.4-943 14_d23bo(\u00a7f  \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATA}<A.  \n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT Daaawazj " \n\nDATED '\u00a3'H\u00a7S THE 24TH DAY OF:"SVE13'TE'M1\u00a7ER; \n\nBEI?(\u00a7=?=i13\u00bb.,V_\n\nTHE H(}N'BLE MR.JUs%r{{;E ;;i12ADAHALL1Iv:ATH\nS\/0..S}i.ASHIDHARAYYA AGE MAJOR\n\n AA R\/AT'IS'1' CROSS VAGEESHNAGAR'\n2 RAREBENNUR DIST HAVERE\n\n - V THE DIVISEONAL MANAGER\nF NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY um,\n\" SHAMANUR BUILDING CHAMARAJPETH\n\nDAVANAGERE\n{INSURER OF' 'THE BAJAJ\n\n\n\nAUTO BEARING REG NO\n1<A-27\/4443 COVER NOTE\nNC1583826\n\nVALED FROM  " V .\n17-2-2000 TO 16~2--20013  REsPQ:\u00a7DVENT.(s)._\n\n(By Sri\/Srnt ; S.SHRiSHAILA, ADV. )\n\niirirti\ufb01tiz\n\nTHIS WA 18 FILED U\/S 17s.;ji;~~._%QF  z=..<:':"'v_:z=;'&::;i;'I'I~ss'14 THE'\n\nJUDGMENT Am AWARD DATED 4\/1\/_Q'5.VFia\u00a7$SED.1i'--\u00a3 _MVC NO.15'?\/O1\non THE FILE OF' THE c:iv:L JE).'D_C}E:4._(SiR~iDN) 3;" \u00a3591.. JMFC,\nADDL.MAC'i', RANEBENNUR, PARTLY' A,i;posv}%ie.fzf1ezE CLAIM PETITION\nFOR COMPENSATEON AI5;BV--..".jsE';.a1;1\u00bbz\u00a7Jc;\u00a7":_ j\u00abji~\u00e9:.sa'ANcEMENT OF\nCOMPENSATION. ' " 3  "  \n\nIN MFA No.1\u00a7939g "2\u00e9{3\u00a7.\u00ab.V__'3'\u00ab.% * '\nBETWEEK: A ' L'\n\n1 HAisHWI.MANTHAPPA,v'*\n S\/,r;_2.A.NAGAPPA,.' V\n' ' _ AaE;3:_:\u00bbyRsA, occ.A'r3RIL,\n\nV R\/0.KUMBALOOR WLLAGE,\n\n :I~iAP?{HAR'{'A},UK,\n \u00a32131'. :3gwA1~1AAm_Q\"4._.( 1,105; PF;S~S'\u00bbEE}jVIPa' MVC 3510.156\/O1\nON THE FILE OF THE civ1LJU\u00a73c3E {s3R>.::\u00ab1~:;._& FRL. JMFC, ADDLMACT,\n\nRANEE3 ENNUR,\n\nCOMPENSATEON MD SE\u00a7;'E'E\ufb01PJ(3 E:~a\u00a7iA:s;c:s;Mk:NT OF COMPENSATEON.\n\nIN MFA xo.494g'.:g%%oe5V_\"'  V.  \n\n_s.\u00a7::_;w_m'; 'I\n\nBH};~DR2\u00a7r\u00bb1MA,   ..... V' \u00bb\n\n' \u00abW\/o.RM\u00bb:Ac1\u00a2:ANDRAPpA\n ' ;E1vIMI\u20ac3Ai'JUf'R, ' \n\n M2.-E.':*:-:53 Y'.RS,OCC.AGRIL,\n'*}2\/'OLRANEBEEINUR,\n\nHAVERI~ D_ISffi  APPELLANT\n\n '\u20ac33'-\u00bbS\ufb01\/ Sm\": ; SHIVAPRABHU PHREMATH, ADV. 3\n ';> s\"cHAPPARADAHALL:MATH\n\n__;S\/O SHASHIDHARAYYA AGE MAJOR\nPEIAT IS? CROSS VAGEESHNAGAR'\n\nRANEBENNUR DIST HAVERI\n\n  \/,,,\/y,\n\n4-f_,.:;~\/1\n\nRAR\".s1,3>'- A\u00a3,LQ'J\u00bb\"~Ii*$IG'~ 'I\"E\u00a3E~...Q1\u00a7AiM PETITION FOR.\n\n\n\n2 THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER'\n\nNEW INDIA INSURANCE CGMPANY LTD,\nSI-IAMANUR BUILDING CHAMARAJPETH\nDAVANAGERE\n\n[HVISURER 01:' THE BAJAJ\n\nAUTO BEARING REC} NO\n\nKA-27\/4443 COVER NOTE\n\nI~Io.5s3826   ~\nVALID FROM '\n\n17-22900 TO 16-2-200 13 I .  E;JsP\u20ac;~I\\;\\:Q ,, , .   f \n\n(By Sri\/Smt ; SSHRISHAILA, ADV. \nnHnt* '\nTHIS MFA IS FILED  1?_3(1\u00a7;.,i>'r+f__I\u00a7IV'.IAc:T ACIAINST THE\nJUDGMENT AND AWARD DATE\u00a3)-T.4:\/ Ijo'3:'VPA,$sI\u00e9:II. 1IgI MVC Ncmss\/01\nON THE FILE OF' THE4C:\"\u00a3V_\u00a3LJUDGE {$R.'13.1\u00a7II__& I=rI2:,\u00a7 ';mFc, AEBDLMACT,\n\nRANEBENNE.,FR,__ f5\u00e9IvWI.,f,A'L1;C\u00a7A{INC} THE CLAIM PE'1'ITiON FOR\nCGMPENSATIQN AND SEE}{ING__E'NHANCEMENT OF' COMPENSATION.\n\nHi MFA r4_r_:,-I_.4,938'g 6:. \n\n   A.  ---------- \n\n1  \u00bb'VM0\u00a5}NvESE~i;\u00bb _ ' .\n . S.;10I.eHA.NNAI'a:a$APPA MAYACHRI,\n\n'AGE30 Ys\u00e9js, z;9cc.cAI2PEN'FER,\n\nRIQ. KEFZU  VILLAGE,\n\nRANEBENNUR TALUK,\n\nDIsT'.IIA1~vERI.  APPELLANT\n\n .(3;}\"1sri:,I v. \n\n_    \n\nTHIS MFA --VIs\"'-I1'-Imzgz; I}';:s3\"\"'1?3\u00a7::V; ($1? MV ACT AGAINST THE\nJUDGMENT ';\u00a7I\u00a5\u00e9i::\";g:;;;a\u00a7I2Ij1:'\u00a7\u00a7saTE:*zI'_' 4\/ 1x05 PASSED IN MVC NO. I58\/01\non THE E5I~LE*OF 'I'1;I'El_ \u20ac'I15\u00a77iL LI_i}i3GE (swan; 85 PRL. JMFC,\nADDL.MACT, I\u00e9AI.;\u00a7EI3ENNU'I2.;' I\u00e9>}\u00a7\u00a7I::fI4L*I:* ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION\nFOR GC'1'?P2NsAT1'0N.,\".'- AI.JI:)\"\"\"' SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF'\n\nI1\\i'.I\u00a71F'\u00abf;E._0_.i\u00a7\u00a740g:v ma\n\nBsrmggg' \n\nI _ JA*?API\":\u00e9,. \n\n. 8\/ O.NAGAPPA KO'I'iHAL,\n  AGE.32'wYRS, OCOAGRIL,\n\u00bb Ri\u00ae'1.'CHATNAHALLI VILLAGE,\n' _ FEEREKERUR TALUK,\nDIST. HAVERI.  APPELLANT\n\n _ VI {Qy Sri\/Smt : SHIVAPRABHU HIREMATH, ADV. I\n\nR I\n\\.g \/,,,.. \n\nc:;'..C  ~'\n\n\n\n1 P S CHAPPARADAHALLIMATH   ._\nS] O SHASHIDHARAYYA AGE MAJOR\nR\/ATISFCROSSV%GEESHNAGAR\"E\nRANEBENNURINSFHAVERIV\n\n-2 THE Dlvzszotw, MANAGER   V\nNEW mam INSURANCE COMFAN'i?.IJ?D.,\nSHAMANUR BUILDING gHAMAAR--m.PL?rH..L_\nDAVANAGERE   '  1. . \n(INSURER OF THE BAJAJ ~\nAUTO BEARING REG NO V V\nKA\u00bb2'?\/4443 COVER NOTE\u00bb . \nNQ583826    _,    I\nVALID FR0Mi_ _ _  _  ' \n17-2-2000.-'I'e     RESPONDENT(S)\n\n{By Sm;smti':'\u00e9ISH\u00e9\u00a7s;HAf\u00a7LA,  3 V\n'V &j\u00a5\u00a7\u00a7\u00a5it\n\n VVMFA IS P'i-LE__Q___iJfS 173(1) OF' mi AC1'? AGAINSI' THE\n\n.\u00a7f\u00a3J_D',\u20ac}i\\:'{\u00ab\u00a7?1}'1:'l'I'\ufb01i\u00a7JL}--.;\u00a7L'\\5e?VARD DATED 4\/2\/05 PASSED 1N Mvc. M0159\/01\n\nONA1'\u00a7H_E\u00a5;\u00a7:1LE--{\u00a7'::tfi'}\u00a7\u00a3;vCIVIMUDGE (SRDN) 85 PR1... JMFC, AD1Z)L.MAC'I',\n\n \"\"RAN$BEI%{NUE',' .; lPAR'P1:r ALLOWING ms CLAIM PETITION FOR\n\n~ :,\u00bb-Gr:\u00a7MPENsA\ufb01';g\u00a7N AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OP' COMPENSATION.\n\n APPEALS COMING 01\u00bb: FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,\n\n ijouR'.i' DELIVERED THE: FOLLOWING\n\n\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
All these \ufb01ve appeals are \ufb01led by the <\/p>\n
not being satis\ufb01ed with the compen_sati6\ufb02._ewa1″de:i V1’\u00a73yVit;l3e-V” ;<\/p>\n
learned Civil Judge (Sr.{)n.) and’  in
\nMVC.Nos.l57, 256, 155, 153 and 3L”5:H\u00a7lVfVAiiil.{}i.’ivvti~ated \/E2005.<\/p>\n
2. Since the appe\ufb02ante  bft\u00a31e road tmilic
\naccident as well as  the same and a
\ncommon order  appeals, the appeals
\nare heard  ii\u00a7i i’t;eg\ufb02ef}fier”V\u00a7fbr final disposal in order
\nto avoid   <\/p>\n
3. Heaxizftlge  ihe learned counsel appearing 0:1
\n‘myth sidesi ‘ end perzisecl:  jeecords.\n<\/p>\n
ll   ‘rhVE’\u00a21%;i”.;=~.=:;V\u00a7,5f’;;c=11an<;\/veereszci in MFA.-=1-943\/2006 has been<\/p>\n
exain\u00a7Iied_ axs."Iv':'s'V:._f2 "jarove the nature of the injuries sustaine\u00e9 by<\/p>\n
 byA,'p1I)d1;t:ia\u00a7"'tAlie Wound certificate Ex.P.7. Apart from that,<\/p>\n
""3–:Ei1".Um\u00a7matli,'v.xirho has examined the injured anal issued the<\/p>\n
 eer\ufb01\ufb01cate has opined that the injuze\u00e9 su\ufb01izrs 45% of the<\/p>\n
 disability vide Ex.P.13. But the Tribunal Without<\/p>\n
' E?\n<\/p>\n
Q:\n<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
cons\ufb01ering all these and without giving any acceptable reasons,<\/p>\n
has stated that he does not want to give much _pra1<\/p>\n
evidence of P.W.6 as well as ignored the contents of Exs; <\/p>\n
14 which is incorrect. The appellant is aged    <\/p>\n
stated to be an agxicnltnrist and  ,net<\/p>\n
followed the precedent law in awajding ltcompel\u00e9ea\ufb01cn  ei” \\’<\/p>\n
various heads namely” ‘General  Speciai  The
\napmllant is required to he .awa1’ded”cc’rnpensat:\u00a3on  the head<\/p>\n
‘pain and suffering’, ‘medical   nourishment’,<\/p>\n
‘loss of future  Acmzding to the Tribunal, the
\nappellant sutfegs’ \u00a2}S’}’c3._ct disability. Therefore, it is a tit<\/p>\n
case to enhance  ceznpensa\ufb01on. Accordingly, the appellant is<\/p>\n
tn 3–.”en1’i”I\ufb02,IlCedlWceillp\ufb01nsation of Rs.1\u20ac},D00\/ ‘ towaztis<\/p>\n
‘med__ical. ‘V ‘ex:;\u00a7e;;s\u00e9s.<,_f_jns.3,ooe\/\u00ab toards 'conveyance, food and<\/p>\n
V"'–..V'nonIis}:n_nent'V,  into consideration that he was doing<\/p>\n
  that such injuries will heal writhin one mon\ufb01l, he is<\/p>\n
  Rs.2,0(}()\/~ towards 'loss of earnm' g during the laid up<\/p>\n
V.   The evidence of P.W.6 shows that the appellant su\ufb01ers<\/p>\n
 _l'('}\u00b0,\/6 of earning capacity and that he earns R's.1,200}'- pan. and<\/p>\n
fl<\/p>\n
\u20ac\u00ab arm"\n<\/p>\n
5′ \u00a7<\/p>\n
adopting mliitiplier at ‘:7’: he is entitled to Rs.24,430,sf\u00bb<\/p>\n
‘future loss of earnings’. Therefore, the appellant\ufb01;  <\/p>\n
enhance\u00e9 compensation of Rs.44,480\/H;-o..wh:eh_\u00ab’is'”:wei3;\ufb01fIed’_’A.oi’– <\/p>\n
33.44.5001\u00bb with interst at 6% p.a’;-._A  7a~\u00a7m:” ar
\nRs.5,500\/-already awaxded by :11e’f1*z:ijsun ae2..'” V’ ‘V .  ‘V ‘V<\/p>\n
5. Whexeas, the  sin
\nMFA.4939I2G06 has beets-…_.sws;\u00a51er\u00a7;VA  eozxopensation of
\nRs.}Q,O00\/~. He was  certi\ufb01cate
\nhas been   Pie” of ieft radius.\n<\/p>\n
According   heWsu\ufb01’ers 30% of permanent
\ndisability   h,as’ ” certi\ufb01cate and marked.<\/p>\n
Conside\ufb01ng the eiride\ufb01ee  on record, a reasonable amount of<\/p>\n
I-‘f;\u00a7$;”1A0,,Q”0<\u00a7}=mis._ beezxv\ufb02\ufb02e\ufb01sraxtied under the head 'pain and<\/p>\n
 V  eompvensation is awarcied under the head<\/p>\n
""'~V""medica\u00a5.." expetises', 'conveyance, food and nourishment'.<\/p>\n
~ iv\u00bb-T}1'lVCX'\u20acfO1"t?,  appellant is en\ufb01tied to a sum of Rs.5,000\/ ~ under<\/p>\n
 the V:'1u\u20ac?@\u00a3'i' :_".1OSS of eanxings' during the laid up period, Rs.'2,50()\/~<\/p>\n
.  -to\u00e9r\u00e9axtis 'medias; expenses', 'conveyance, food and nourishment'.<\/p>\n
.  View of the fact that the appellant was aged about 35 years and<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
he suffers 10% of loss ofeazmng capacity, by taking Rs.\u00a32,4i).{}\/ – as<\/p>\n
income per month, he is entitied to ‘future loss of ,at<\/p>\n
Rs.43,200]- (i.e., Rs.2,4()() x 12 x 15 x 10% = Rs.43;f.:\u00e90o\/T-1);’e3″‘I’uL’g;a,”e\u00e9<\/p>\n
he is entitled a enhanced compensatiotn; of  —<\/p>\n
interest at 6% pa. apart fmm the amotint ifhte<\/p>\n
Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n
6. Whereas, the ggzpellantj  in
\nmm.no.49421zoo6 has “”s:i1st3j:1e\u00a7i;  The wound<\/p>\n
certi\ufb01cate Ex.P.9 discleses that-\ufb02:e14e was’  in the left Wrist<\/p>\n
and tendeivftzese, 13t”ih111′::ee1’v..1_1a:s.’ awaxdeci only Rs.5,000\/~ _as
\nglobal compee,_s\u00e91tioi1;=.  the nature of injuries, the<\/p>\n
appellant;  _ entiutiedt  etshenced compensation of Rs.8,()G0\/-<\/p>\n
tov\u00a2fa’1do Vs’t”pa1;*n”t” suffering’. Since no amount has been awarded<\/p>\n
uniieft the  “‘;11jer1i.eaZ expenses’ and ‘loss of earnings, it is just<\/p>\n
E”~*just  award a sum of Rs.S,(}00\/- under the head<\/p>\n
~ jV”‘meciica1 er\u00e9petises, conveyance, food and nourishment’, a sum of<\/p>\n
  towards loss k0fC83″I1iI}gS during laid up }3BI’iO{}.. In View<\/p>\n
.  o.’f:ti1e’e?facat that the appellant was aged about 55 years at the time<\/p>\n
V  ..,ot:’aeci;dent by taking Rs.2,40(},\/ – as her income yer month and she<\/p>\n
1}.\n<\/p>\n
suffezrs 10\u00b0\/o loss of earning capacity she is entititii  <\/p>\n
eaxmugs at Rs.31,68(‘)\/- 11.5., 2,400 x 1.i2*’x\u00bb..11 x; 1i)\u00a72o}   <\/p>\n
she is entitled to enhanced comwnszaL’iio1i_A_AO’E;V <\/p>\n
interest at 6% pa. apart from th\u00e9 ajf;9untAa1zfeady Ely the  L’<\/p>\n
Tribunal. A<\/p>\n
7. Whereas, the   — Mounesh in
\nM1’\u00ab’A.4938l2006  M\\;G.~–1 5ja\/ ‘gn\u00e9ve the injuries
\nsustained by    Accozding
\nto P.W.6\/   5% of the permanent
\ndisability.   awaxded only a sum of<\/p>\n
Rs.5,000\/ – b\u00ab3,rnv\u00a7z’a3r (\u00a7t”g};(\u00a7i:.s%;’a},.4(‘i\u20ac3-\u00a3:}V’i\u00a3}:)V\u00a7?.:nsan’on. f-lance, thc appellaat is<\/p>\n
gan\ufb01tiecl “a,su1:1:V1 cf1G,’000\/- towards enhanced compensation<\/p>\n
  “aqtzd s\ufb01i\ufb01ex-1mg’, Rs.5,000]— towards ‘\ufb02ood and<\/p>\n
._(\u00a7<31\u00a7;s#t*::3*'a11<:e', Rs.3,0{)0\/– 'towards 'loss of earnings'<\/p>\n
   period. Since he is aged about 55 years he is<\/p>\n
W " ' A"<=.=.i:j.L*'\u00a3'itA3ejr;i  vlg\ufb01\u00e9zs of future: earnings on account of 35% of permanent<\/p>\n
 i.e., 13\u00b0\/9 ofwhole body tiisability. As per the calculation,<\/p>\n
  tmtitieci to Rs.4T1,184\/- [i.e., 2,400 x 12 X 11 X13943] mwanis<\/p>\n
   \u00a7~' fI1t11re loss of ttanlings". In all, the appellant is entitled to a sum<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
of Rs.59,184I- with interst at 6% pa. apart  the::* <\/p>\n
already awarded by the Tribunal.   ~<\/p>\n
8. Whereas, the appe\ufb01ant\/Zbciaih\ufb01xa\ufb01t  <\/p>\n
mm.494o12oo6 in Mve.No.159t!.,’2QG1 1ias  :\u00bb\u00a2\u00a2t:;t1Ae\u00a7gar.2i:t\u00e9d by-L’<\/p>\n
P.W.6\/ Dznumanath to prove the   nature of
\nthe injuries sustained by  {   wd to have taken
\ntreatment in Ranebennar. Ex; ie   ‘eerti\ufb01cate, which
\ndiscloses that    injury. The eiajms
\n‘\u00a5’ribuna1 baa   of 10,600\/~ as global
\ncompensatiet:t’V_v  #5: produced any document
\nabout the  that he su\ufb01ers. However,<\/p>\n
considering. the \ufb02\ufb01ataret  the\u00abvi.:1\u00a7u1is sustained by the appellant,<\/p>\n
of- awarded is to be treated. as<\/p>\n
 ‘pain and su\ufb01eziag’. But the Tribune} has<\/p>\n
‘ V’ ‘w…vz;1<ot aveatfeited ti-\u00a7u_t1ount under the head 'medicai expenses, food<\/p>\n
_"}].O1lIiS}f;lv.\u00e9IA:i.3I1\u00a7:, loss of eanlmgs during the laid up peried.<\/p>\n
  is entitled to compensation of Rs.3,0{)O\/~ towards<\/p>\n
 \u00bb'1_:_x'1e'{iiea1 expenses', Rs.2,()()0\/- towar\u00e9s 'conveyanbe, food and<\/p>\n
'V V  Ati\u00e9angishment' and Rs.3,(}{}O\/~ towar\u00e9s 'loss ofearnings during the<\/p>\n
183d 1113 \ufb02eriod'. Hence, he is entitled to  <\/p>\n
compensation of R.s.8,000\/- with inte1e'e't"et 5% \u00a7g;;:v'ap\u00e9:1'.V\ufb01\u00a7m':'<\/p>\n
the amount already awarded by the  it it<\/p>\n
9. It is seen that there is  oi”‘c}\u00a3)__5 ‘d.;;{V’$  these<\/p>\n
appeals. The order sheet dated  the deiay
\nwas condoned. However, tile” be entitled for any
\ninterest for the coxjrespon\ufb01i\ufb01gh.  Therefore, the
\nappellants in all.  iiiiiterest from the date
\nof \ufb01ling of  t)f deposit, excluding the
\ndeiay of 305; ziayisi  gin  these appeals.\n<\/p>\n
10.   all these appeals are allowed.\n<\/p>\n
The judgment aifidv..V;;1w’:;i1d.ii’;3aiesed by the learned Civil Jucige<\/p>\n
=($i~;’ez:;.)” ~31} P.fi.JM.l\u00a7’C, A\u00a21}ii;MACr, Ranebeermur is modified. The<\/p>\n
   is directed to deposit the enhanced<\/p>\n
i ‘compeIi\u00a7\u00a7efio13,.   6 weeks from the date of receipt of a<\/p>\n
–.  eopgze of 135138″ Qti\u00e9ler.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/~
\nJudge<\/p>\n
” Afii\u00e9vs<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Veeresh S\/O Hanumanthappa … vs P S Chapparadahallimath on 24 September, 2008 Author: K.Ramanna IN MFA No.4-943 14_d23bo(\u00a7f IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATA}<A. CIRCUIT BENCH AT Daaawazj " DATED '\u00a3'H\u00a7S THE 24TH DAY OF:"SVE13'TE'M1\u00a7ER; BEI?(\u00a7=?=i13\u00bb.,V_ THE H(}N'BLE MR.JUs%r{{;E ;;i12ADAHALL1Iv:ATH S\/0..S}i.ASHIDHARAYYA AGE MAJOR AA R\/AT’IS’1′ CROSS VAGEESHNAGAR’ 2 RAREBENNUR DIST HAVERE – […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-202128","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nVeeresh S\/O Hanumanthappa ... vs P S Chapparadahallimath on 24 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Veeresh S\/O Hanumanthappa ... vs P S Chapparadahallimath on 24 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-09-03T19:27:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Veeresh S\\\/O Hanumanthappa … vs P S Chapparadahallimath on 24 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-03T19:27:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1315,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Veeresh S\\\/O Hanumanthappa ... vs P S Chapparadahallimath on 24 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-03T19:27:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Veeresh S\\\/O Hanumanthappa … vs P S Chapparadahallimath on 24 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Veeresh S\/O Hanumanthappa ... vs P S Chapparadahallimath on 24 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Veeresh S\/O Hanumanthappa ... vs P S Chapparadahallimath on 24 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-09-03T19:27:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Veeresh S\/O Hanumanthappa … vs P S Chapparadahallimath on 24 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-03T19:27:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008"},"wordCount":1315,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008","name":"Veeresh S\/O Hanumanthappa ... vs P S Chapparadahallimath on 24 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-03T19:27:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veeresh-so-hanumanthappa-vs-p-s-chapparadahallimath-on-24-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Veeresh S\/O Hanumanthappa … vs P S Chapparadahallimath on 24 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202128","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202128"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202128\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202128"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202128"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202128"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}