{"id":202163,"date":"2008-11-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008"},"modified":"2018-10-09T01:25:06","modified_gmt":"2018-10-08T19:55:06","slug":"mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mr. Prem Matiyani vs Ministry Of Information And … on 7 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr. Prem Matiyani vs Ministry Of Information And … on 7 November, 2008<\/div>\n
           Central Information Commission\n\n                                               CIC\/OK\/A\/2008\/01146\/AD\n\n                                                  Dated November 7, 2008\n\nName of the Appellant           :      Mr. Prem Matiyani,\n                                       C-II\/63, Shajahan Road,\n                                       New Delhi-110011\n\n\nName of Public Authority        :      Under Secretary (Vig) & CPIO\n                                       Government of India\n                                       Ministry  of   Information   and\n                                       Boradcasting,\n                                       A Wing, Shastri Bhawan, New\n                                       Delhi\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n
1.   The RTI application was filed on 25.04.08.      The Appellant requested
\n     for inspection of files relating to the extension of his period of
\n     suspension and supply of certified copies of relevant information from
\n     the files.   The CPIO replied on 16.05.08 stating that the request for
\n     inspection of files cannot be acceded to under Section 8(1)(h) of the
\n     RTI Act since it contains references to the P.E. report conducted by Mr.
\n     Pyare Lal, Sr. Secretary.      He stated further that the P.E. report is
\n     under examination in the Ministry and that if he so desires, the
\n     Appellant can have copies of the minutes of the 4th suspension review
\n     meeting and the decisions of the disciplinary authority.      The CPIO
\n     followed this up by sending the minutes and the decision of the
\n     Disciplinary Authority to the Appellant vide his letter dated 26.05.08.
\n     The Appellant then filed his first appeal before the concerned Appellate
\n     Authority in the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting on 30.05.08
\n     stating that the copies of the documents sent to him by the CPIO
\n     already contain references to the PE report, the very report because of
\n     which inspection of files was denied to him. The Appellant reiterated
\n     his request for inspection of related files and supply of copies of
\n     relevant documents.     The Appellate Authority (Director (Vig.) replied
\n      on 26.06.08 stating that he had studied the whole matter and
\n     observed that the Appellant may inspect the file except the P.E.
\n     Report\/Background note for the review committee. He denied access
\n     to the report under Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. Not satisfied with
\n     the reply, the Appellant preferred his second appeal before the CIC on
\n     10.08.08 reiterating his request for supply of information sought in the
\n     RTI application.\n<\/p>\n
2.   The Bench of Mrs. Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner,
\n     scheduled the hearing for November 7, 2008.\n<\/p>\n
3.   Shri A.D. Roy CPIO & Under Secretary, Shri. Vijay Sharma Director I.P.\n<\/p>\n
     (vig.), Shri. Thomas Mathani and Shri. A.K. Bhola S.O. (vig) M\/o I&B
\n     represented the Public Authority.\n<\/p>\n
4.   The Appellant, Mr. Prem Matiyani was present in person.\n<\/p>\n
Decision<\/p>\n
5.   The Appellant submitted that he has been under suspension for over
\n     two years and he pleaded that he be given a chance to prepare for his
\n     defence in the Court where a Case against him is pending.\n<\/p>\n
6.   The Respondents submitted that the P.E. report was denied to the
\n     Appellant since there is a likelihood of disciplinary action being taken
\n     against the Appellant based on the report. They, however, admitted
\n     that although the inquiry conducted by Mr. Pyare Lal, Jt. Secretary in
\n     the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, was completed several
\n     months ago, no charge-sheet has been filed in the court against the
\n     Appellant.\n<\/p>\n
7.   The Appellant argued that because of the fact that no charge-sheet
\n     has been filed in the Court against him in this matter within the time
\n     limit of three months (prescribed by Cabinet Sectt. (Dept. of
\n       Personnel) Memo No. 39\/39\/40-Ests(A) dated 4th February 1971 on
\n      the subject of quick disposal of cases of departmental proceedings) he
\n      is entitled to inspect the file along with the inquiry report.   He also
\n      stated that more that 7 months have passed since the report has been
\n      filed and that no action has been taken by the Public Authority on the
\n      document.\n<\/p>\n
8.    The Commission heard both the sides and also studied the said report.\n<\/p>\n
      The Commission also noted the contents of the Cabinet Sectt. (Dept.
\n      of Personnel) Memo No. 39\/39\/70-Ests (A) dated 4th February 1971
\n      and the Deptt. of Personnel & A.R. O.M. no 35014\/1\/81-Ests (A) dated
\n      9th November 1982,       both of which insist on quick disposal of cases
\n      and filing of charge-sheet within 3 months of the date of suspension of
\n      a Government official.\n<\/p>\n
9.    Based on the above observations, the Commission holds that since the
\n      Appellant has been under suspension for more than 7 months and
\n      since this particular report has been completed and no action taken
\n      against the Appellant during all these months including filing of charge
\n      sheet, the Appellant is entitled to inspect the concerned file as
\n      requested by him, along with the part of the P.E. report of Mr. Pyare
\n      Lal, not exempted by disclosure under Section 8 (1) of the RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n
10.   The Commission directs the CPIO to allow the Appellant to inspect the
\n      files along with the P.E. report after severing from the P.E. report all
\n      references to cases against other Officers and to provide certified
\n      copies of required documents to the Appellant.\n<\/p>\n
11.   All information to be provided to the Appellant within 15 days of
\n      receipt of this Order.\n<\/p>\n
 12.   The appeal is disposed off.\n<\/p>\n
                                                        (Annapurna Dixit)
\n                                                Information Commissioner
\nAuthenticated true copy:\n<\/p>\n
(K.G.Nair)
\nDesignated Officer<\/p>\n
1.    Mr. Prem Matiyani, C-II\/63, Shajahan Road, New Delhi.\n<\/p>\n
2.    Mr. A.D. Roy, Under Secretary (Vig) & CPIO, Government of India,
\n      Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, A Wing Shastri Bhavan, New
\n      Delhi.\n<\/p>\n
3.    The Appellate Authority – RTI Ministry of          Information   and
\n      Broadcasting, A Wing Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi.\n<\/p>\n
4.    Officer incharge, NIC<\/p>\n
5.    Press E Group, CIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr. Prem Matiyani vs Ministry Of Information And … on 7 November, 2008 Central Information Commission CIC\/OK\/A\/2008\/01146\/AD Dated November 7, 2008 Name of the Appellant : Mr. Prem Matiyani, C-II\/63, Shajahan Road, New Delhi-110011 Name of Public Authority : Under Secretary (Vig) & CPIO Government of India Ministry of Information and Boradcasting, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-202163","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr. Prem Matiyani vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. Prem Matiyani vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-08T19:55:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. Prem Matiyani vs Ministry Of Information And … on 7 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-08T19:55:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":843,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Mr. Prem Matiyani vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-08T19:55:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. Prem Matiyani vs Ministry Of Information And … on 7 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. Prem Matiyani vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. Prem Matiyani vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-08T19:55:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. Prem Matiyani vs Ministry Of Information And … on 7 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-08T19:55:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008"},"wordCount":843,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008","name":"Mr. Prem Matiyani vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-08T19:55:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-prem-matiyani-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. Prem Matiyani vs Ministry Of Information And … on 7 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202163","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202163"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202163\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202163"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202163"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202163"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}