{"id":202164,"date":"2011-02-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011"},"modified":"2017-09-10T06:32:33","modified_gmt":"2017-09-10T01:02:33","slug":"union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011","title":{"rendered":"Union Of India Thr Chief Post vs Bijay Kumar on 18 February, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Union Of India Thr Chief Post vs Bijay Kumar on 18 February, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                                      W.P.(S)\u00a0No.\u00a0887\u00a0of\u00a02008\n                     Union\u00a0of\u00a0India                                      \u00a0...... Petitioner\n                                                 \u00adVersus\u00ad\n                     Bijay\u00a0Kumar                                         ...... Respondent\n                                               With\n                                      W.P.(S)\u00a0No.\u00a0978\u00a0of\u00a02008\n                     Union\u00a0of\u00a0India                                      \u00a0...... Petitioner\n                                                 \u00adVersus\u00ad\n                    Kundan\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Singh                                   ...... Respondent\n                                               With\n                                      W.P.(S)\u00a0No.\u00a0608\u00a0of\u00a02008\n                     Union\u00a0of\u00a0India                                      \u00a0...... Petitioner\n                                                 \u00adVersus\u00ad\n                    1.\u00a0\u00a0Md.\u00a0A.\u00a0Salim\n                    2.\u00a0\u00a0Amresh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Karu\n                    3.\u00a0\u00a0Budhai\u00a0Devi\n                    4.\u00a0\u00a0Jaikali\u00a0Pramanik\n                    5.\u00a0\u00a0Raghunath\u00a0Pandey\n                    6.\u00a0\u00a0Jageshwar\u00a0Paswan\n                    7.\u00a0\u00a0Phulchand\u00a0Yadav\n                    8.\u00a0\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Pankaj                                     ...... Respondents\n                                                  \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\n\n                                                           PRESENT\n                                                 HON'BLE\u00a0THE\u00a0CHIEF\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0\n                                                 HON'BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0D.N.PATEL\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0            \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\n                            For\u00a0the\u00a0Petitioner \u00a0     :\u00a0\u00a0Md.\u00a0M.Khan,\u00a0ASGI\u00a0(in\u00a0all\u00a0cases)\n                            For\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0     :\u00a0\u00a0M\/s.\u00a0M.M.Pal,\u00a0Sr.\u00a0Advocate\n                                                     \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mahua\u00a0Palit\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Leena\u00a0Mukherjee.\n                                                     \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\n\n      By\u00a0Court             Heard\u00a0counsel\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0parties.\n                     2.    The\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0as\u00a0delineated\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0\n                     Central\u00a0Administrative\u00a0Tribunal\u00a0dated\u00a021.11.2007\u00a0in\u00a0paragraph\u00a02\u00a0is\u00a0\n                     as\u00a0under\u00a0:\u00ad\n                                   \"2. The\u00a0 facts \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 case \u00a0 are \u00a0 that \u00a0 the\u00a0 applicant \u00a0 was \u00a0\n                                   initially \u00a0 appointed \u00a0 as \u00a0 Extra \u00a0 Departmental \u00a0 Mail \u00a0 Man \u00a0\n                                   (EDMM)\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0year\u00a01997.\u00a0Thereafter,\u00a0the\u00a0applicant\u00a0was \u00a0\n                                   granted\u00a0promotion\u00a0as\u00a0Mail\u00a0Man\u00a0(Group\u00adD\u00a0post)\u00a0on\u00a0the \u00a0\n                                   recommendation \u00a0 of \u00a0 DPC. \u00a0 He \u00a0 joined \u00a0 the \u00a0 post \u00a0 on \u00a0\n                                   13.02.2002<\/pre>\n<p>\u00a0in\u00a0temporary\u00a0capacity.\u00a0He\u00a0was\u00a0confirmed\u00a0on \u00a0<br \/>\n                                   the \u00a0 said \u00a0 post \u00a0 vide \u00a0 order \u00a0 dated \u00a0 22.03.2004 \u00a0 (Annexure\u00ad<br \/>\n                                   A\/3).\u00a0He\u00a0was\u00a0permitted\u00a0to\u00a0appear\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0departmental \u00a0<br \/>\n                                   examination \u00a0 for \u00a0 promotion \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 cadre \u00a0 of \u00a0 Postal \u00a0<br \/>\n                                   Assistant\/Sorting \u00a0 Assistant \u00a0 to \u00a0 be \u00a0 held \u00a0 on \u00a0 23.05.2004. \u00a0<br \/>\n                                   The\u00a0grievance\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0applicant\u00a0is\u00a0that\u00a0by\u00a0a\u00a0cryptic\u00a0and \u00a0<br \/>\n                                   non\u00a0speaking\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a030.07.2004\u00a0his\u00a0appointment\u00a0in \u00a0<br \/>\n               the\u00a0post\u00a0of\u00a0Mail\u00a0Man\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0cancelled\u00a0merely\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n              ground\u00a0that\u00a0his\u00a0appointment\u00a0was\u00a0irregular&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>3.     Learned\u00a0counsel\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner,\u00a0Union\u00a0of\u00a0India,\u00a0\u00a0drew\u00a0our\u00a0<br \/>\nattention \u00a0 towards \u00a0 departmental \u00a0 letter \u00a0 No. \u00a0 60\u00ad29\/98\u00adSPB\u00adI(Pt)\u00a0<br \/>\ndated\u00a014th\u00a0July,\u00a02001\u00a0which\u00a0reads\u00a0as\u00a0under\u00a0:\u00ad<br \/>\n                     &#8220;&#8230;&#8230;.\n<\/p>\n<p>                     2&#8230;&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>                     3&#8230;..\u00a0You\u00a0are\u00a0\u00a0therefore,\u00a0\u00a0requested\u00a0to\u00a0immediately \u00a0<br \/>\n              carry\u00a0out\u00a0a\u00a0review\u00a0in\u00a0your\u00a0Circle\u00a0and\u00a0submit\u00a0a\u00a0report\u00a0to \u00a0<br \/>\n              the\u00a0Directorate\u00a0covering\u00a0the\u00a0requirement\u00a0of\u00a0all\u00a0cadres\u00a0in \u00a0<br \/>\n              your\u00a0Circle\u00a0division\u00a0wise\u00a0so\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0reach\u00a0us\u00a0by\u00a031st\u00a0 July,\u00a0<br \/>\n              2001\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0enclosed\u00a0proforma.\u00a0As\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0information \u00a0<br \/>\n              has\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0submitted\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Screening\u00a0Committee,\u00a0which \u00a0<br \/>\n              will\u00a0be\u00a0chaired\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Secretary\u00a0(Posts),\u00a0you\u00a0must\u00a0certify \u00a0<br \/>\n              accuracy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0information,\u00a0while\u00a0submitting\u00a0the\u00a0same. \u00a0<br \/>\n              Needless \u00a0 to \u00a0 say, \u00a0 recruitment \u00a0 process \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 year \u00a0 2001 \u00a0<br \/>\n              should \u00a0 commence \u00a0 only \u00a0 after \u00a0 obtaining \u00a0 the \u00a0 approval \u00a0 of \u00a0<br \/>\n              Screening\u00a0Committee.\u00a0It\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0further\u00a0clarified\u00a0that\u00a0the \u00a0<br \/>\n              above\u00a0instructions\u00a0will\u00a0apply\u00a0only\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0vacancies\u00a0to\u00a0be \u00a0<br \/>\n              filled\u00a0up\u00a0by\u00a0direct\u00a0recruitment\u00a0and \u00a0it\u00a0will\u00a0not\u00a0apply\u00a0to \u00a0<br \/>\n              recruitment\u00a0by\u00a0promotion.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>4.     According \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 argument \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 learned \u00a0 counsel \u00a0 for \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nUnion\u00a0of\u00a0India,\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0appointment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0respondents\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0<br \/>\napproved \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Screening \u00a0 Committee, \u00a0 their \u00a0 services \u00a0 were\u00a0<br \/>\nterminated.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.     Learned \u00a0 counsel \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 respondents \u00a0 has \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 that\u00a0<br \/>\nappointment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0respondents\u00a0was\u00a0after\u00a0recommendation\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nD.P.C.\u00a0and\u00a0an\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0confirmation\u00a0has\u00a0come\u00a0in\u00a0place.\u00a0Once\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\norder\u00a0of\u00a0confirmation\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0post,\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0respondents\u00a0were,\u00a0<br \/>\ncomes,\u00a0then\u00a0subsequently\u00a0they\u00a0only\u00a0get\u00a0a\u00a0promotion\u00a0and\u00a0for\u00a0that\u00a0<br \/>\npromotion\u00a0the\u00a0aforesaid\u00a0letter\u00a0has\u00a0no\u00a0application,\u00a0as\u00a0stated\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\norder\u00a0itself.\u00a0Therefore,\u00a0on\u00a0account\u00a0of\u00a0non\u00adapproval\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Screening\u00a0<br \/>\nCommittee,\u00a0it\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0said\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0services\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0respondents\u00a0<br \/>\nwould\u00a0liable\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0discontinued\u00a0by\u00a0termination.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.     In\u00a0our\u00a0considered\u00a0opinion,\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0had\u00a0proceeded\u00a0on\u00a0<br \/>\nthe \u00a0 wrong \u00a0 premises \u00a0 because \u00a0 once \u00a0an \u00a0 employee \u00a0is \u00a0appointed \u00a0and\u00a0<br \/>\nconfirmed\u00a0on\u00a0a\u00a0post\u00a0then\u00a0he\u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0remain\u00a0a\u00a0temporary\u00a0employee\u00a0<br \/>\nand \u00a0 he \u00a0 acquires \u00a0 a \u00a0 substantive \u00a0 right \u00a0 and \u00a0 that \u00a0 substantive \u00a0 right\u00a0<br \/>\n                cannot\u00a0be\u00a0taken\u00a0away\u00a0only\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0ground\u00a0stated\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0letter\u00a0which\u00a0<br \/>\n               only \u00a0 applies \u00a0 in \u00a0 case \u00a0 of \u00a0 fresh \u00a0 appointment. \u00a0 In \u00a0 that \u00a0 view \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n               matter,\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Administrative\u00a0Tribunal\u00a0suffers\u00a0from\u00a0<br \/>\n               no\u00a0illegality.\u00a0These\u00a0petitions\u00a0are\u00a0meritless;\u00a0hence\u00a0dismissed.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                      \u00a0(Bhagwati\u00a0Prasad,C.J.)\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                                      \u00a0(D.N.Patel,\u00a0J.)<br \/>\nJharkhand\u00a0High\u00a0Court,\u00a0Ranchi<br \/>\nThe\u00a018th\u00a0February,\u00a02011<br \/>\nN\u00a0A\u00a0F\u00a0R<br \/>\nDey\/Birendra<br \/>\n                       IN\u00a0THE\u00a0HIGH\u00a0COURT\u00a0OF\u00a0JHARKHAND\u00a0AT\u00a0RANCHI<br \/>\n                                   L.P.A.\u00a0No.\u00a076\u00a0of\u00a02009<\/p>\n<p>                     Kamla\u00a0Shankar\u00a0Dubey                             \u00a0&#8230;&#8230; Appellant<br \/>\n                                                      \u00adVersus\u00ad<br \/>\n                            Bharat\u00a0Coking\u00a0Coal\u00a0Limited\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Others            &#8230;&#8230; Respondents<br \/>\n                                                       \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad<br \/>\n                            CORAM\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0THE\u00a0CHIEF\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0<br \/>\n                                      \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0D.N.PATEL<br \/>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0              \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad<br \/>\n                            For\u00a0the\u00a0Appellants \u00a0       :\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Jai\u00a0Prakash,\u00a0Sr.\u00a0Advocate<br \/>\n                            For\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0        :\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0A.K.Mehta,\u00a0Advocate<br \/>\n                                                       \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>      0817.02.2011         This\u00a0appeal\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0heard.\n<\/p>\n<p>                           As\u00a0the\u00a0respondents\u00a0have\u00a0appeared\u00a0through\u00a0their\u00a0counsel,\u00a0no\u00a0<br \/>\n                     notice\u00a0need\u00a0be\u00a0issued.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                        \u00a0(Bhagwati\u00a0Prasad,C.J.)\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                                        \u00a0(D.N.Patel,\u00a0J.)<br \/>\n      Dey\/Birendra<br \/>\n                           IN\u00a0THE\u00a0HIGH\u00a0COURT\u00a0OF\u00a0JHARKHAND\u00a0AT\u00a0RANCHI<br \/>\n                                    W.P.(PIL)\u00a0No.\u00a01530\u00a0of\u00a02009<\/p>\n<p>                            Yuva\u00a0Shakti\u00a0Manch,\u00a0Bokaro                       \u00a0&#8230;&#8230; Petitioner<br \/>\n                                                      \u00adVersus\u00ad<br \/>\n                            State\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Others                     &#8230;&#8230; Respondents<br \/>\n                                                       \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad<br \/>\n                            CORAM\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0THE\u00a0CHIEF\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0<br \/>\n                                      \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0D.N.PATEL<br \/>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0               \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad<br \/>\n                            For\u00a0the\u00a0Petitioner \u00a0       :\u00a0\u00a0J.C.\u00a0to\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Ajit\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0Advocate<br \/>\n                            For\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0        :\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0D.K.Dubey,\u00a0G.P.\u00adI<br \/>\n                            For\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0UOI :\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Faiz\u00adur\u00adRahman,\u00a0CGC<br \/>\n                            For\u00a0the\u00a0Accused\u00a0No.\u00a06 :\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Bhanu\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0Advocate<br \/>\n                                                       \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>       15\/17.02.2011         The \u00a0 Investigating \u00a0 Officer \u00a0 has \u00a0 so \u00a0 far \u00a0 not \u00a0 shown \u00a0 result\u00a0<br \/>\n                      notwithstanding \u00a0 the \u00a0 earlier \u00a0 orders. \u00a0 Learned \u00a0 Government \u00a0 Pleader\u00a0<br \/>\n                      seeks\u00a0two\u00a0week\u00a0more\u00a0time\u00a0to\u00a0impress\u00a0upon\u00a0the\u00a0Court\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0what\u00a0<br \/>\n                      steps\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0taken\u00a0on\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Investigating\u00a0Officer.<br \/>\n                      \u00a0      Learned \u00a0 counsel \u00a0 appearing \u00a0 for \u00a0 accused \u00a0 No. \u00a0 6,<br \/>\n                      Ratan \u00a0 Kumar \u00a0 Singh, \u00a0 urges \u00a0 that \u00a0 his \u00a0 bail \u00a0 application \u00a0 is \u00a0 not \u00a0 being\u00a0<br \/>\n                      disposed\u00a0of\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0learned\u00a0Special\u00a0Judge\u00a0.\n<\/p>\n<p>                             We \u00a0 think \u00a0 that \u00a0 learned \u00a0 Special \u00a0 Judge \u00a0 is \u00a0 doing \u00a0 things\u00a0<br \/>\n                      judiciously.\u00a0He\u00a0will\u00a0dispose\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0bail\u00a0application\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0next\u00a0date\u00a0<br \/>\n                      of\u00a0hearing.\n<\/p>\n<p>                             Put\u00a0up\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0after\u00a0two\u00a0weeks\u00a0on\u00a004.03.2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                            \u00a0(Bhagwati\u00a0Prasad,C.J.)\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                                            \u00a0(D.N.Patel,\u00a0J.)<br \/>\n       Dey\/Birendra<br \/>\n                        IN\u00a0THE\u00a0HIGH\u00a0COURT\u00a0OF\u00a0JHARKHAND\u00a0AT\u00a0RANCHI<br \/>\n                                    T.A.\u00a0No.\u00a010\u00a0of\u00a02010<br \/>\n                                            With<br \/>\n                                     T.A.\u00a0No.\u00a09\u00a0of\u00a02010<\/p>\n<p>                             Commissioner\u00a0of\u00a0Income\u00a0Tax,\u00a0Patna\u00a0&#8230;&#8230; Appellant\u00a0(in\u00a0both\u00a0cases)<br \/>\n                                                      \u00adVersus\u00ad<br \/>\n                             M\/s.\u00a0TISCO                                &#8230;&#8230; Respondent(in\u00a0both\u00a0cases)<br \/>\n                                                       \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad<br \/>\n                            CORAM\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0THE\u00a0CHIEF\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0<br \/>\n                                      \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0D.N.PATEL<br \/>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0                \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad<br \/>\n                            For\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant \u00a0        :\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0D.Roshan,\u00a0Advocate<br \/>\n                            For\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0        :\u00a0\u00a0\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad<br \/>\n                                                       \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>       05\/17.02.2011         Heard\u00a0learned\u00a0counsel\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0revenue.\n<\/p>\n<p>                             The \u00a0 questions \u00a0 sought \u00a0 to \u00a0 be \u00a0 raised \u00a0 are \u00a0 questions \u00a0 of \u00a0 facts.\u00a0<br \/>\n                      Whether\u00a0the\u00a0L.T.C.\u00a0which\u00a0were\u00a0claimed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0employees\u00a0were,\u00a0in\u00a0<br \/>\n                      fact,\u00a0\u00a0availed\u00a0or\u00a0not\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0question\u00a0sought\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0agitated,\u00a0which\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0<br \/>\n                      question\u00a0of\u00a0fact.\u00a0The\u00a0Tribunal\u00a0in\u00a0its\u00a0order\u00a0has\u00a0specifically\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0<br \/>\n                      the\u00a0employer\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0punished\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0alleged\u00a0delinquency.\u00a0If\u00a0at\u00a0<br \/>\n                      all \u00a0 the \u00a0 department \u00a0 has \u00a0 any \u00a0 grievance, \u00a0 \u00a0 then \u00a0 at \u00a0 time \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n                      assessment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0assessee,\u00a0all\u00a0these\u00a0questions\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0gone\u00a0into\u00a0and\u00a0<br \/>\n                      enquired\u00a0into.\n<\/p>\n<p>                             We\u00a0do\u00a0not\u00a0think\u00a0that\u00a0any\u00a0illegality\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0committed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n                      Tribunal.\u00a0No\u00a0question \u00a0of\u00a0law\u00a0emerges\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0case.\u00a0The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0<br \/>\n                      accordingly\u00a0dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                            \u00a0(Bhagwati\u00a0Prasad,C.J.)\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                                            \u00a0(D.N.Patel,\u00a0J.)<br \/>\n       Dey\/Birendra<br \/>\n                          IN\u00a0THE\u00a0HIGH\u00a0COURT\u00a0OF\u00a0JHARKHAND\u00a0AT\u00a0RANCHI<br \/>\n                                     L.P.A.\u00a0No.\u00a0376\u00a0of\u00a02010<\/p>\n<p>                               Employers\u00a0in\u00a0relation\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Management\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\n                               Hindustan\u00a0Copper\u00a0Limited                    \u00a0\u00a0     &#8230;&#8230;             Appellant<br \/>\n                                                            \u00adVersus\u00ad\n<\/p>\n<p>                               1. The\u00a0Union\u00a0of\u00a0India\n<\/p>\n<p>                               2. Moidul\u00a0Haque                                    &#8230;&#8230;           Respondents<br \/>\n                                                             \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad<br \/>\n                                 CORAM\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0THE\u00a0CHIEF\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0<br \/>\n                                         \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0D.N.PATEL<br \/>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0             \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad<br \/>\n                               For\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant \u00a0           :\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0A.K.Das,\u00a0Advocate<br \/>\n                               For\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0           :\u00a0\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Ananda\u00a0Sen,\u00a0Advocate<br \/>\n                                                             \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad<br \/>\n          07\/17.02.2011                  Heard\u00a0learned\u00a0counsel\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>                               The \u00a0 respondent \u00a0 no.2 \u00a0 was \u00a0 sanctioned \u00a0 leave \u00a0 from \u00a0 24.07.95 \u00a0 to\u00a0<br \/>\n                       29.07.95.\u00a0The\u00a0charge\u00a0against\u00a0him\u00a0\u00a0was\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0unauthorizedly\u00a0absented\u00a0<br \/>\n                       himself\u00a0\u00a0from\u00a0service\u00a0for\u00a0more\u00a0than\u00a0ten\u00a0days\u00a0continuously,\u00a0on\u00a0account\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\n                       which, \u00a0 he \u00a0 was \u00a0 prosecuted \u00a0 in \u00a0 a \u00a0 departmental \u00a0 proceeding. \u00a0 Ultimately,\u00a0<br \/>\n                       punishment \u00a0 of \u00a0 dismissal \u00a0 was \u00a0 awarded, \u00a0 \u00a0 which \u00a0 was \u00a0 set \u00a0 aside \u00a0 by \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n                       Labour\u00a0Tribunal\u00a0and\u00a0upheld\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0learned\u00a0Single\u00a0Judge.\u00a0Since\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0a\u00a0<br \/>\n                       case\u00a0of\u00a0absence\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0employee,\u00a0no\u00a0back\u00a0wages\u00a0were\u00a0awarded.\n<\/p>\n<p>                               We \u00a0 do \u00a0 not \u00a0 think \u00a0 that \u00a0 any \u00a0 illegality \u00a0 has \u00a0 been \u00a0 committed \u00a0 by \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n                       courts\u00a0below.\u00a0For\u00a0a\u00a0delinquency\u00a0of\u00a0mere\u00a0absence\u00a0of\u00a0more\u00a0than\u00a0ten\u00a0days,\u00a0<br \/>\n                       dismissal\u00a0could\u00a0not\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0awarded.\u00a0The\u00a0employee\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0kept\u00a0out\u00a0<br \/>\n                       of\u00a0employment\u00a0for\u00a0a\u00a0very\u00a0long\u00a0time\u00a0and\u00a0this,\u00a0by\u00a0itself,\u00a0is\u00a0 \u00a0a\u00a0sufficient\u00a0<br \/>\n                       punishment\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0absence,\u00a0 \u00a0for\u00a0which\u00a0he\u00a0was\u00a0out,\u00a0 \u00a0because\u00a0 \u00a0no\u00a0back\u00a0<br \/>\n                       wages\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0awarded.\n<\/p>\n<p>                               In\u00a0that\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0matter,\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0reinstatement\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0seen\u00a0<br \/>\n                       with \u00a0 any \u00a0 illegality \u00a0 in \u00a0 it \u00a0 \u00a0 because \u00a0 the \u00a0 employee \u00a0 has \u00a0 been \u00a0 deprived \u00a0 of\u00a0<br \/>\n                       emoluments\u00a0of\u00a0sufficiently\u00a0long\u00a0period.\u00a0The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0thus\u00a0dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                 \u00a0(Bhagwati\u00a0Prasad,C.J.)\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                                                 \u00a0(D.N.Patel,\u00a0J.)<br \/>\n       Dey\/Birendra\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court Union Of India Thr Chief Post vs Bijay Kumar on 18 February, 2011 W.P.(S)\u00a0No.\u00a0887\u00a0of\u00a02008 Union\u00a0of\u00a0India \u00a0&#8230;&#8230; Petitioner \u00adVersus\u00ad Bijay\u00a0Kumar &#8230;&#8230; Respondent With W.P.(S)\u00a0No.\u00a0978\u00a0of\u00a02008 Union\u00a0of\u00a0India \u00a0&#8230;&#8230; Petitioner \u00adVersus\u00ad Kundan\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Singh &#8230;&#8230; Respondent With W.P.(S)\u00a0No.\u00a0608\u00a0of\u00a02008 Union\u00a0of\u00a0India \u00a0&#8230;&#8230; Petitioner \u00adVersus\u00ad 1.\u00a0\u00a0Md.\u00a0A.\u00a0Salim 2.\u00a0\u00a0Amresh\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Karu 3.\u00a0\u00a0Budhai\u00a0Devi 4.\u00a0\u00a0Jaikali\u00a0Pramanik 5.\u00a0\u00a0Raghunath\u00a0Pandey 6.\u00a0\u00a0Jageshwar\u00a0Paswan 7.\u00a0\u00a0Phulchand\u00a0Yadav 8.\u00a0\u00a0Kumar\u00a0Pankaj &#8230;&#8230; Respondents \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad PRESENT HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0THE\u00a0CHIEF\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0 HON&#8217;BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0D.N.PATEL \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-202164","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Union Of India Thr Chief Post vs Bijay Kumar on 18 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Union Of India Thr Chief Post vs Bijay Kumar on 18 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-10T01:02:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Union Of India Thr Chief Post vs Bijay Kumar on 18 February, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-10T01:02:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1170,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011\",\"name\":\"Union Of India Thr Chief Post vs Bijay Kumar on 18 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-10T01:02:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Union Of India Thr Chief Post vs Bijay Kumar on 18 February, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Union Of India Thr Chief Post vs Bijay Kumar on 18 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Union Of India Thr Chief Post vs Bijay Kumar on 18 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-10T01:02:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Union Of India Thr Chief Post vs Bijay Kumar on 18 February, 2011","datePublished":"2011-02-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-10T01:02:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011"},"wordCount":1170,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011","name":"Union Of India Thr Chief Post vs Bijay Kumar on 18 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-10T01:02:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/union-of-india-thr-chief-post-vs-bijay-kumar-on-18-february-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Union Of India Thr Chief Post vs Bijay Kumar on 18 February, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202164"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202164\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202164"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}