{"id":202529,"date":"2009-08-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009"},"modified":"2016-05-16T00:56:41","modified_gmt":"2016-05-15T19:26:41","slug":"shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shankarlal Nathumal Chandak vs Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi on 20 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court<\/div>\n
Shankarlal Nathumal Chandak vs Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi on 20 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Bench: J. H. Bhatia<\/div>\n
                                       1\n\n          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\n                       CIVIL JURISDICTION\n                 SECOND APPEAL NO.213 OF 1986\n\n\n\n\n                                                                       \n     Shankarlal Nathumal Chandak,\n\n\n\n\n                                               \n     deceased by his heirs\n     (1) Rajibai Shankarlal Chandak\n     (2) Laxminarayan Shankarlal Chandak;\n     (2A) Kanchanbai Laxminarayan Chandak\n\n\n\n\n                                              \n     dismissed as against respondent no.2A\n     vide Additional Registrar's order\n     dated 26th February, 1988;\n     (2B) Rajibai Shankarlal Chandak\n     Dismissed as against appellant\n\n\n\n\n                                   \n     no.2-B vide Court's order dated 13.1.05\n     (2C) Shivnarayan Laxminarayan Chandak;\n                     \n     (2D) Puspa Laxminarayan Chandak ;\n     (2E) Chandrakala Laxminarayan Chandak;\n                    \n     (2F) Bindu Laxminarayan Chandak, minor\n     by guardian Kanchanbai Laxminarayan Chandak;\n     (2G) Sushama Laxminarayan Chandak;\n     minor through guardian Kanchanbai\n     Laxminarayan Chandak;\n      \n\n\n     (2H) Shrikant Laxminarayn Chandak;\n     minor through guardian Kanchanbai;\n   \n\n\n\n     Laxminarayan Chandak;\n     (3) Badrinarayan Shankarlal Chandak;\n     (4) Ramnarayan Shankarlal Chandak;\n\n\n\n\n\n     (5) Madanlal Shankarlal Chandak;\n                                             ...Appellants.\n                                                (Heirs of Org. Deft.No.22)\n     v.\n\n\n\n\n\n     (1) Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi;\n     (2) Bansilal Eknath Gujarathi, since deceased\n      by his heirs:\n     (2A) Indirabai Bansilal Gujarathi;\n     Name deleted vide Addl. Registrar's order\n     dated 29.1.1988\n     (2B) Ajit Bansilal Gujarathi\n\n\n\n\n                                               ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::\n                                        2\n\n     Dismissed vide order dated 7.3.2006\n     (2C) Dilip alias Ranu Bansilal Gujarathi;\n     (3) Damodar Trimbak Gujarathi;\n\n\n\n\n                                                                      \n     Since deceased through heirs\n     3A) Padmakar Damodhar Gujarathi\n\n\n\n\n                                              \n     Age-Adult\n     3B) Mrs. Vidhya Gujarathi\n     Age-Adult\n     Both residing a Kopargaon, Dist. Ahmednagar.\n\n\n\n\n                                             \n     (4) Prabhakar Trimbak Gujarathi;\n     Since deceased by his heirs\n     (4A) Baba alias Narendra Prabhakar Gujarathi;\n     (4B) Vilas Prabhakar Gujarathi;\n     (4C) Nalini Chandrakant Gujarathi;\n\n\n\n\n                                   \n     Dismissed as against R.Nos.4-A to 4-C vide\n     order dated 26.2.1988.\n                     \n     (4D) Pushpabai Prabhakar Gujarathi;\n      (dismissed as against Respondent\n                    \n     No.4D vide Additional Registrar's\n     order dated 26th February, 1988);\n         (5) Murlidhar Trimbak Gujarathi;\n     Dismissed as per order dated 18.9.1987\n     (6) Gopal Trimbak Gujarathi;\n      \n\n\n         (7) Bhalchandra Trimbak Gujarathi;\n     Dismissed vide order dated 26.2.88\n   \n\n\n\n     (8) Rangaldas Deochand;\n         (9) Virchand Balkrishna Patni (Since\n     deceased by his heirs):\n\n\n\n\n\n     (9A) Shantilal Virchand Patni\n     (9B) Pravinkumar Virchand Patni, Adult\n     (9C) Subhash Virchand Patni,\n     dismissed as against Respondent Nos.9A to 9C\n     vide Additional Registrar's order dated\n\n\n\n\n\n     29th January, 1988;\n         (10)Shantilal Virchand Patni;\n         (11)Pravinlal Virchand Patni;\n         (12)Subhash Virchand Patni;\n         (13) Sumatilal Bhagchand Patni\n          Since deceased by his heirs\n     (13A) Ashok Sumatilal Patni\n\n\n\n\n                                              ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::\n                                        3\n\n     (13B) Vinod Sumatilal Patni\n     dismissed as against Respondent Nos\n     13A and 13B vide Additional Registrar's\n\n\n\n\n                                                                      \n     order dated 7\/8\/1987.\n     (13C) Ashalata alias Babulal Manilal Rajurkar\n\n\n\n\n                                              \n     dismissed vide Addl. Registrar's order\n     dated 18.9.87\n        (14)Babulal Bhagchand Patni;\n        (15)Basantilal Bhagchand Patni;\n\n\n\n\n                                             \n           dismissed vide Addl. Registrar's order\n           dated 18.9.87\n         (16) Sukrilal Bhagchand Patni,\n           Dismissed vide order dated 18.9.87\n           (17) Ishwarlal Bhagchand Patni\n\n\n\n\n                                   \n           Dismissed vide Addl. Registrar's Order\n           dated 18.9.1987\n                     \n           (17A) Kantilal Virchand Patni;\n           (18) Shamchand Kavalchand, firm of Telegaon\n                    \n           since dissolved:\n           (19) Pannalal Harakchand Gujar, sinced deceased\n           by his heirs\n           (19A) Nishikant Pannalal Gujar;\n           (19B) Prashant Pannalal Gujar;\n      \n\n\n           (19C) Vijay Pannalal Gujar;\n           (19D) Rajesh Pannalal Gujar;\n   \n\n\n\n           (19E) Ranjana Pannalal Gujar;\n           (19F) Sarita Pannalal Gujar;\n           (19G) Sulabha Pannalal Gujar;\n\n\n\n\n\n           (19H) Kantabai Pannalal Gujar;\n           (19I) Suvarna Prakash Rai;\n        (20)Kantilal Balchand Gujar;\n           (21) Bhogilal Balchand Gujar\n           (22) Shantilal Balchand Gujar\n\n\n\n\n\n           Dismissed vide Addl. Registrar's order\n           dated 18.9.1987 against Respondent\n           nos.21 and 22.\n     (23)Arvind Govardhan Gujarathi;\n        (24)Narayan Damodhar Gujarathi;\n        (25)Vishwanath Sitaram Bhambare;\n           (26) Dhondiram Limbaji Sadawarte, since\n\n\n\n\n                                              ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::\n                                  4\n\n     deceased by his heirs:\n     (26A) Kamalabai Dhondiram Sadavarte;\n     (26A) Kamalabai Dhondiram Sadavarte;\n\n\n\n\n                                                                \n     (26C) Dynaneshwar Dhondiram Sadavarte;\n     (26D) Prabhakar Dhondiram Sadavarte;\n\n\n\n\n                                        \n     (26E) Nandu Dhondiram Sadavarte;\n     dismissed as against respondent no.26E\n     vide Addl. Registrar's order dated 18.9.1987.\n     (26F) Devanand Dhondiram Sadavarte\n\n\n\n\n                                       \n     (26G) Rajabhau Dhondiram Sadavarte\n     (26H) Subhadra Shantaram Lachake;\n      Dismissed as against respondent nos.26G\n      and 26H vide order dated 19.2.88.\n     (26I) Chameli Ishwarlal Avasarkar\n\n\n\n\n                            \n     (26J) Kalavati Ashokrao Jadhav\n      Dismissed as against Respondent Nos.26I and 26J\n               \n      vide order dated 27.11.87.\n     (27) Vasanta Nimbaji Sadavarte,\n              \n     dismissed vide Addl. Registrar' order\n     dated 18th September, 1987.\n     (28) Waman Ranganath Patodkar\n      Dismissed vide Addl. Registrar's order\n     dated 18th September, 1987.\n      \n\n\n     (28A) Balkrishna Waman Patodkar;\n     (28B) Ratnakar Waman Patodkar;\n   \n\n\n\n     (28C) Anil Waman Patodkar\n     (28D) Paravatabai Waman Patodkar;\n     Dismissed vide Addl. Registrar's order\n\n\n\n\n\n     dated 18.9.87\n     (28E) Prabhavati Sumanlal Gujarathi;\n     Dismissed vide Addl. Registrar's order\n     dated 28.9.1987\n     (28F) Malatibai Purushottam Gujarathi;\n\n\n\n\n\n     (28G) Joti Kantilal Shaha,\n     Dismissed vide Addl. Registrar's order\n     dated 19.2.88\n     (28H) Shashikala Bipinbhai Shaha,\n     Dismissed vide Addl. Registrar's Order\n     dated 19.2.88.\n     (28I) Babay Babubhai Kashinath Gujarathi;\n\n\n\n\n                                        ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::\n                                         5\n\n           (29) Kalika Devi Kasar Panchas Institute\n           of Yeola, Dist: Nashik;\n           (30) Malatibai Laxmanrao Shrimali,\n\n\n\n\n                                                                       \n           Dismissed vide Addl.Registrar's order\n           dated8.4.88                                            ...Respondents.\n\n\n\n\n                                               \n                         WITH\n              SECOND APPEAL NO.214 OF 1986\n\n\n\n\n                                              \n     1 Bhaulal Kanhyalal Halwai\n     2 Hiralal Kanhyalal Halwai\n     3 Maniklal Kanhyalal Halwai\n     4 Javaharlal Kanhyalal Halwai\n\n\n\n\n                                   \n     5 Ramnarayan Kanhyalal Halwai\n     6 Baburao Ganpatrao Khandare deceased by\n                     \n     his heirs Appellant Nos.7 and 8\n     7 Vasant Baburao Khandare\n                    \n     8 Madhavrao Baburao Khandare\n     9 Adbul Razak Abdulla Kachi\n     10 Mohmed Sidik Abdulla\n     11 Abdul Satar Abdulla\n     12 Abdul Gafar Abdulla Kachi\n      \n\n\n     13 Mohmed Iqubal Abdulla Kachi\n     14 Fandulal Manulal Halwai\n   \n\n\n\n     vs.\n     1 Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi\n     2 Bansilal Eknath Gujarathi deceased\n\n\n\n\n\n     by his heirs\n     A Indirabai Bansilal Gujarathi;\n     B Ajit Bansilal Gujarathi;\n     C Dilip @ Ranu Bansilal Gujarathi\n     Dismissed for non-prosecution against\n\n\n\n\n\n     R.No.2A vide Addl. R's order dated 7.8.87\n     3 Damodar Trimbak Gujarathi\n     Second Appeal stands dismissed as against\n     R.No.3 vide Court's order dated 17.11.06 in\n     C.A.No.5770\/93.\n     4 Prabhakar Trimbak Gujarathi\n        Deceased by his heirs\n\n\n\n\n                                               ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::\n                                         6\n\n     A Aba @ Narendra Prabhakar Gujarathi;\n     B Vilas Prabhakar Gujarathi;\n     C Sau. Nalini Chandrakant Gujarathi;\n\n\n\n\n                                                                        \n     D Sau. Pushpabai Prabhakar Gujarathi;\n      Dismissed for non-prosecution against\n\n\n\n\n                                                \n     R.No.4A vide Addl. Registrar's order\n     7.8.87.\n     Dismissed for non-prosecution against R\n     No.4D vide Addl. R's order dated 7.8.87.\n\n\n\n\n                                               \n     5 Murlidhar Trimbak Gujarathi\n     6 Gopal Trimbak Gujarathi\n     7 Bhalchandra Trimbak Gujarathi\n     8 Rangildas Devichand Firm of Yeola\n     9 Virchand Balchand Patni\n\n\n\n\n                                   \n     10 Shantilal Virchand Patni\n     11 Pravinlal Virchand Patni\n                      \n     12 Subhash Virchand Patni\n     13 Kantilal Virchand Patni\n                     \n     14 Sumatilal Bhagchand Patni\n     15 Babulal Bhagchand Patni\n     16 Basantilal Bhagchand Patni\n     17 Surkilal Bhagchand Patni\n     18 Ishwarlal Bhagchand Patni\n      \n\n\n     19 Shamchand Kevalchand\n     20 Pannalal Harakchand Gujar\n   \n\n\n\n     deceased by his heirs\n     A Nishikant Pannalal Gujar\n     B Prashant Pannalal Gujar\n\n\n\n\n\n     C Vijay Pannalal Gujar\n     D Rajesh Pannalal Gujar\n     E Ranjana Pannalal Gujar\n     F. Suvarna Prakash Ray\n     G Sarita Pannalal Gujar\n\n\n\n\n\n     H Sulabha Pannalal Gujar\n     I Shantabai Pannalal Gujar\n     21 Kantilal Balchand Gujar\n     22 Mangilal Balchand Gujar\n     deceased by his heirs\n     A Raykumar Bhogilal Gujar\n     B Santkumar Bhogilal Gujar\n\n\n\n\n                                                ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::\n                                      7\n\n     C Ramanlal Bhogilal Gujar\n     D Sevantilal Bhogilal Gujar\n     deceased by his heirs\n\n\n\n\n                                                                   \n     D1 Rekhabai Shevantilal Gujar\n     D2. Vivek Shevantilal Gujar\n\n\n\n\n                                           \n     D3 Parag Shevantilal Gujar\n     D4 Nayana Shevantilal Gujar\n     23 Shantilal Balchand Gujar\n     24 Bansilal Fandulal Halwai\n\n\n\n\n                                          \n     25 Ratanlal Fandulal Halwai\n     26 Babanlal Fandulal Halwai\n     27 Jagdish Dwarkanath Gujarathi\n     28 Jayshankar Bhikalal Upadhyay\n     deceased by his heirs\n\n\n\n\n                                 \n     A Anusuyabai Jayshankar Upadhyay\n     B Madhuben Harshadrai Pandya\n                    \n     29 Ambalal Mangaldas Upadhyay,\n     deceased by his heirs\n                   \n     A Tarabai Ambalal Updhyay\n     B Mahendrakumar Ambalal Upadhyay\n     C Chittaranjan Ambalal Upadhyay\n     30 Purshottam Lochardas Upadhye\n     31 Kankalben Ranchoddas Upadhye\n      \n\n\n     32 Shantabai Upadhye\n     33 Santoshben Upadhye\n   \n\n\n\n     34 Hiralal Prabhudas Company; Yeola\n     35 Waman Rangnath Patodkar\n     36 Madhav Lahanu Sonar; deceased\n\n\n\n\n\n     by his heirs\n     A Smt. Bhagirathibai Madhav Sonar\n     B Smt. Krishnabai Madhav Sonar\n     C Jagannath Madhav Sonar\n     D Dnyaneshwar Madhav Sonar\n\n\n\n\n\n     E Sau. Laxmibai Sudhakar Sonar\n     F Sou. Zumbarlal Gopinath Sonar\n     G Sou. Manda Krishnashet Sonar\n     H Sou. Pushpa Shivdasshet Sonar\n     I Nandu Madhavshet Sonar\n     37 Shankar Tulshiram Khairnar\n     38 Mahadu Sukhan Pardeshi\n\n\n\n\n                                           ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::\n                                        8\n\n     39 Ahmed Alli Abdulla Karim Kachi\n     40 Sou. Kamalbai @ Manoramabai Maniklal\n     Shah\n\n\n\n\n                                                                       \n     41 Sou. Malutai Laxmanrao Shrimali\n     42 Vimalkumar Damodar Patni\n\n\n\n\n                                              \n     43 Babulal Sakarchand Patni\n     44 Kisanlal Khandulal Halwai                       ...Respondents.\n\n\n\n\n                                             \n                               WITH\n                       SECOND APPEAL NO.220 OF 1986\n\n     Vishwanath Sitaram Bhambere                 ..Appellant.\n     vs.\n\n\n\n\n                                   \n     1 Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi\n                     \n     2 Indirabai Bansilal Gujarathi;\n     3 Ajit Bansilal Gujarathi;\n                    \n     4 Dilip @ Ram Bansilal Gujarathi\n     5 Damodar Trimbak Gujarathi\n     6 Prabhakar Trimbak Gujarathi\n     6A Sau. Nalini Chandrakant Gujarathi;\n     6B Vilas Prabhakar Gujarathi;\n      \n\n\n     6C Narendra Prabhakar Gujarathi;\n     6DSau. Pushpabai Prabhakar Gujarathi;\n   \n\n\n\n     6D(i) Baba Prabhakar Gujarathi;\n     6D(ii) Vilas Prabhakar Gujarathi;\n     6D(iii) Nalini Chandrakant Gujarathi;\n\n\n\n\n\n     7 Murlidhar Trimbak Gujarathi\n     8 Gopal Trimbak Gujarathi\n     9 Bhalchandra Trimbak Gujarathi\n     10 Malatibai Laxmanrao Shrimali;      } Names of R.Nos.10 to 12 are\n     11 Kamalabai Manoramabai Maniklal; } deleted as per Court's order\n\n\n\n\n\n     12 Rangildas Devchand Patni            } dated 16.7.87 passed in\n                                              C.A.No.3439\/87.\n     13 Virchand Balchand Patni            }\n     13A Shantilal Virchand Patni          }\n     13B Pravinlal Virchand Patni          }\n     13C Subhash Virchand Patni            }\n     14 Ashok Sumatilal Patni              }\n\n\n\n\n                                               ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::\n                                         9\n\n     15 Vinod Sumatilal Patni               }\n     16 Ashalata Babulal Manilal;           }\n\n\n\n\n                                                                        \n     17 Babulal Bhagchand Patni\n\n\n\n\n                                                \n     18 Bansilal Bhagchand Patni          }\n     19 Sukrilal Bhagchand Patni          }\n     20 Ishwarlal Bhagchand Patni         }\n     21 Kantilal Virchand Patni           }\n\n\n\n\n                                               \n     22 Shamchand Kevalchand              }\n     23 Pannalal Karamchand Gujar         }\n     23A Nishikant Pannalal Gujar         }\n     23B Prashant Pannalal Gujar           }\n     24 Kantilal Balchand Gujar             }\n\n\n\n\n                                   \n     25 Bhagchand Balchand Gujar            }\n     26 Shantilal Balchand Gujar\n                       ig                   }\n     27 Arvind Govardhan Gujarathi          }\n     28Narayan Damodar Gujarathi;           }\n                     \n     29 Dhondiram Limbaji Sadawarte         }\n     29A Kamalabai Dhondiram Sadavarte; }\n     29B Brahmadeo Dhondiram Sadavarte; }\n     29C Dynaneshwar Dhondiram Sadavarte;}\n     29D Prabhakar Dhondiram Sadavarte;       }\n      \n\n\n     29E Nandu Dhondiram Sadavarte;           }\n     29F Devanand Dhondiram Sadavarte         }\n   \n\n\n\n     29G Rajabhau Dhondiram Sadavarte         }\n     29H Subhadra Shantaram Lachake;          }\n     29I Chameli Ishwarlal Avaskar            }\n\n\n\n\n\n     29J Kalavati Ashokrao Jadhav             }\n     30 Vasant Limbaji Sadavarte,              }\n     31 Waman Ranganath Patodkar              }\n     31A Balkrishna Waman Patodkar;           }\n     31B Ratnakar Waman Patodkar;             }\n\n\n\n\n\n     31C Anil Waman Patodkar                  }\n     31D Parwatibai Waman Patodkar;           }\n     31E Prabhavati Sumanlal Gujarathi;       }\n     31F Malatibai Purushottam Gujarathi;      }\n     31G Jyoti Kantilal Shah,                  }\n     31H Shashikala Binbhai Shah,             }\n     31I Baby Babubhai Kashinath Gujarathi; }\n\n\n\n\n                                                ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::\n                                         10\n\n     32 Shankarlal Nathulal Chandak           }\n     33 Kalikadevi Kesar Panch                }\n     33A Rajubhai Shankarlal Chandak          }\n\n\n\n\n                                                                         \n     33B Badrinarayan Shankarlal Chandak;     }\n     33C Ramnarayan Shankarlal Chandak         }\n\n\n\n\n                                                 \n     33D Laxminarayan Shankarlal Chandak       }\n     33D(i) Kanchanbai Laxminarayan Chandak     }\n     33D(ii) Shivnarayan Laxminarayan Chandak }\n     33D(iii) Pushpa Laxminarayan Chandak       }\n\n\n\n\n                                                \n     33D(iv) Chandrakanta Laxminarayan Chandak }\n     33D(v) Shrikant Laxminarayan Chandak        }\n     33D(vi) Bindu Laxminarayan Chandak          }\n     33D(vii) Sushama Laxminarayan Chandak       }\n     33D(viii) Madanlal Shankarlal Chandak       } ...Respondents.\n\n\n\n\n                                    \n     Respondent Nos. 13A to 16 and 18 to 33\n                      \n     D( viii) are deleted vide Addl. R's order\n     dated 27.1.89 passed on office submission\n                     \n     Mr.P.D.Pise i\/by Ms.A.R.S.Baxi, advs. for the Appellant.\n     Shri Prasad Kulkarni i\/by P.S.Dani, advs. for the appellants in S.A.Nos.\n     213\/86 and 214\/86.\n     Mr.Prafulla B. Shah i\/by Shri S.D.Kulkarni, advs. For the Respondent\n      \n\n\n     Nos.1,3,4,5,8 and 9.\n   \n\n\n\n                              CORAM : J.H. BHATIA, J.\n<\/pre>\n
                              DATED : 20th August , 2009<\/p>\n
     ORAL JUDGMENT:\n<\/p>\n
     1           All these three appeals arise out of the common judgment in<\/p>\n
     the appeals filed by the defendants. Though original suits were different,<\/p>\n
     all the three appeals were admitted by one word order “Admit” and no<\/p>\n
     questions of law were formulated at the time of admission. After hearing<\/p>\n
                                                 ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::<\/span>
\n                                          11<\/span><\/p>\n
     the learned counsel for the parties and        perusal of the impugned<\/p>\n
     judgment, the following substantial questions of law arise in the present<\/p>\n
     appeals:\n<\/p>\n
                 “1 Whether the suits for redemption of mortgage
\n                 executed in 1880 were barred by limitation ?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                 2     Whether the Transfer of Property Act, 1882
\n                 has no application to the mortgage executed in
\n                 1880 and as a result, suit for redemption of
\n                 mortgage itself is not tenable in law ?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
     2           Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Perused the<\/p>\n
     impugned judgments and the relevant documents. Facts of each of the<\/p>\n
     appeals may be briefly stated.\n<\/p>\n
                        SECOND APPEAL NO.220 OF 1986<\/p>\n
     3           Property involved in this appeal is City Survey Nos.1147<\/p>\n
     and 1148 (Old No.3294) situated at Nashik. This property was originally<\/p>\n
     owned by one Bhausa Chimansa, who was owner of the big property. He<\/p>\n
     executed mortgage deed in respect of suit property in favour of the<\/p>\n
     Rangildas Devchand firm on 25.10.1880. As per the mortgage deed,<\/p>\n
     mortgagor could redeem the mortgage on expiry of four years. However,<\/p>\n
     right of redemption was not used by the original owners or his legal heirs<\/p>\n
     . On 13.3.1924 defendant no.1 Rangildas Devchand, i.e., the original<\/p>\n
     mortgagee executed     assignment deed in respect of suit property in<\/p>\n
                                                 ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::<\/span>
\n                                          12<\/span><\/p>\n
     favour of one Deubai Rangu Pansare and put her in possession of the suit<\/p>\n
     property. Property was open land. Deubai made construction of the house<\/p>\n
     on the said property. On 18.8.1945 Deubai executed a registered sale<\/p>\n
     deed cum assignment deed in favour of the defendant no.18 Vishwanath<\/p>\n
     Bhambere, who is appellant in this appeal and put him in possession of<\/p>\n
     the said suit property. Respondent nos.1 to 10 , who are the legal heirs of<\/p>\n
     the original owner and mortgagor, filed regular civil suit no.170 of 1968<\/p>\n
     before the Civil Judge Junior Division, Yeola for redemption of mortgage<\/p>\n
     and possession of the mortgage property against the present appellants<\/p>\n
     and other defendants. According to the appellant, suit is barred by the<\/p>\n
     limitation. Deubai had purchased open site and after construction ,<\/p>\n
     constructed premises were sold to the present appellants and, therefore,<\/p>\n
     no mortgage is subsisting. He also claimed that Transfer of Property Act,<\/p>\n
     1882 was not applicable and in case, redemption is granted, he is entitled<\/p>\n
     to refund of Rs.3,750\/- which was spent by him for repairs and<\/p>\n
     maintenance of the house. The trial Court rejected the contentions of the<\/p>\n
     defendant and passed the judgment and decree dated 31.10.1973. The<\/p>\n
     present appellant preferred regular civil appeal no.42 of 1974 before the<\/p>\n
     District Judge, Nashik. That appeal came to be dismissed on 31.10.1985.\n<\/p>\n
     Hence, the second appeal.\n<\/p>\n
                                                 ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::<\/span>
\n                                          13<\/span><\/p>\n
                        SECOND APPEAL NO.213 OF 1986<\/p>\n
     4           In this appeal suit property is house no.3291 (Old No.1146).\n<\/p>\n
     That suit house alongwith some other properties including nos.4151 and<\/p>\n
     3294 were mortgaged by Bhausa Chimansa in favour of the defendant<\/p>\n
     no.1 Rangildas Devchand firm under a mortgage deed dated 25.10.1980.\n<\/p>\n
     Defendant nos.2 to 10 and 10A are the partners or the owners of that<\/p>\n
     firm. The defendant no.1 transferred the mortgage rights of house no.\n<\/p>\n
     3291 in favour of the defendant no.11, of which defendant nos.12 to 15<\/p>\n
     are the partners or owners, under        assignment deed of 29.11.1927.\n<\/p>\n
     Defendant no.11 firm assigned their mortgage rights in favour of the<\/p>\n
     defendant no.21 in 1929. Defendant no.21 assigned his mortgage rights<\/p>\n
     to defendant nos.19 and 20 through a assignment deed Exhibit 88 dated<\/p>\n
     9.8.1947. Finally defendant nos.19 and 20 assigned their mortgage rights<\/p>\n
     to the defendant no.22, ie., the present appellant in respect of house no.\n<\/p>\n
     3291 under assignment deed dated 11.4.1959 Exhibit 89 and thus,<\/p>\n
     defendant no.22, who is the present appellant, is in possession of the said<\/p>\n
     house since 1959. Plaintiffs, who are the legal heirs of the original<\/p>\n
     owners by filing regular civil suit no.170 of 1968 claimed redemption of<\/p>\n
     three houses including     house no.3291. Suit was decreed and the<\/p>\n
                                                 ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::<\/span>
\n                                         14<\/span><\/p>\n
     appellant filed Civil Appeal No.53 of 1974. The appeal was dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
     Hence, this Second Appeal.\n<\/p>\n
                              SECOND APPEAL NO.214 OF 1986<\/p>\n
     5           In this appeal, four properties are involved , they are house<\/p>\n
     no.1062, house no.867, house no.937 and house no.933. These properties<\/p>\n
     and some other properties were mortgaged by Bhausa Chimansa in<\/p>\n
     favour of Rangildas Devchand a firm under three mortgage deeds dated<\/p>\n
     13th September, 1879. Bhausa Chimansa created further mortgage in<\/p>\n
     favour of Rangildas Devchand a firm in respect of these properties on<\/p>\n
     25th October, 1990 by securing further amount of Rs.1500\/-. Defendant<\/p>\n
     no.1 Rangildas Devchand a firm had assigned their mortgage rights in<\/p>\n
     favour of the defendant no.12 under the assignment deed dated 29th<\/p>\n
     November, 1927. Defendant no.12 firm assigned its rights in property no.\n<\/p>\n
     937 in favour of the defendant no.1 Abdul Alli Mohmed Kachi. The<\/p>\n
     appellant nos.9 to 13 in the present appeal, who were the defendant nos.\n<\/p>\n
     41 to 45 in Regular Civil Suit No.171 of 1968 are the legal heirs of said<\/p>\n
     Abdul. The mortgage rights in house no.867 were assigned in favour of<\/p>\n
     the original defendant no.40 who in turn assigned rights to one Namdeo<\/p>\n
     Bhima Mandwada. Said Namdev assigned his rights on 10th July, 1940 in<\/p>\n
     favour of the original defendant no.39 and the defendant no.39<\/p>\n
                                                ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::<\/span>
\n                                         15<\/span><\/p>\n
     transferred the said rights in favour of the defendant no.35 on 30th<\/p>\n
     August, 1946. The defendant nos.36 and 37 are sons of the defendant no.\n<\/p>\n
     35. Defendant nos.35 to 37 are the appellant nos.6,7 and 8 in the present<\/p>\n
     appeal. Rights of the house no.933 were assigned on 20th April, 1932 in<\/p>\n
     favour of the defendant no.38 by defendant no.12 and defendant no.38<\/p>\n
     transferred the said rights to defendant no.51 under assignment deed<\/p>\n
     dated 13th October, 1942. The appellant no.14 in the present appeal is<\/p>\n
     defendant no.51. Rights in the house no.1062 (Part) were assigned in<\/p>\n
     favour of Bandulal Bhagwandas on 17th August, 1931. Defendant nos.17<\/p>\n
     to 25 are the heirs of said Bandulal. The appellant nos.1 to 5 are the<\/p>\n
     original defendant nos.21 to 25.\n<\/p>\n
     6           About the above referred house no.867, 937, 933 and 1062<\/p>\n
     alongwith some other properties, the legal heirs of the original owners<\/p>\n
     Bhausa Chimansa filed regular civil suit no.171 of 1968 for redemption<\/p>\n
     of mortgage. Decree passed in their favour was challenged in civil appeal<\/p>\n
     no.57 of 1984 by the present appellants. That appeal was also dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
     7           On hearing the learned counsel for the parties and perusal of<\/p>\n
     the record, there appears no dispute about the original ownership and the<\/p>\n
     different transactions beginning with 1880 onwards. Firstly, we have to<\/p>\n
     see what is the effect of enactment of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. In<\/p>\n
                                                ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::<\/span>
\n                                          16<\/span><\/p>\n
     fact settled principle of law is that once a mortgage always a mortgage<\/p>\n
     and mortgagor could redeem the property anytime. No written law was<\/p>\n
     there in respect of mortgage of the property prior to 1882 . It was only<\/p>\n
     codified in chapter IV of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. No basic<\/p>\n
     change has been made in the law but only some terms, rights and<\/p>\n
     liabilities of the mortgagor and mortgagee or the assignees have been<\/p>\n
     specifically provided. Even though this Act would not have been enacted<\/p>\n
     or would not have been made applicable to the previous transactions,<\/p>\n
     mortgagor would always be entitled to redeem the mortgage by making<\/p>\n
     the payment of mortgage money.\n<\/p>\n
     8           As far as House Nos.3294, i.e., City Survey Nos.1147 and<\/p>\n
     1148, suit property in the second appeal no.220 of 1986 is concerned,<\/p>\n
     this was mortgaged alongwith two other properties by the original owner<\/p>\n
     Bhausa Chimansa in favour of defendant no.1 Rangildas Devchand firm<\/p>\n
     under the registered mortgage deed dated 25.10.1880 Exhibit 84. The<\/p>\n
     terms of the mortgage are specified therein. Mortgage money was to<\/p>\n
     carry interest at the rate of 8% p.a. Mortgagee was entitled to recover the<\/p>\n
     rent and profits of the property. Amount of the rent or other properties<\/p>\n
     was to be adjusted against the interest to be deposited by the mortgagor<\/p>\n
     from time to time. As per the agreement, mortgage could be redeemed on<\/p>\n
                                                 ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::<\/span>
\n                                          17<\/span><\/p>\n
     expiry of four years from the date of mortgage deed. As far as Appeal<\/p>\n
     No.213 of 1986 is concerned, it is pertaining to house no.3291, which<\/p>\n
     was also part of same mortgage deed. It appears that in 1924 defendant<\/p>\n
     no.1, Rangildas Devchand assigned the rights in respect of house no.\n<\/p>\n
     3294 in favour of Deubai under the registered deed dated 13.3.1924 and<\/p>\n
     then Deubai executed the registered sale deed cum assignment deed<\/p>\n
     dated 18.8.1945 vide Exhibit 87 in favour of the defendant no.18, i.e., the<\/p>\n
     appellant Vishwanath in Second Appeal No.220 of 1986. That mortgage<\/p>\n
     deed clearly shows that the rights as a mortgagee on the land were<\/p>\n
     assigned by Deubai in favour of the appellant while structure thereon<\/p>\n
     was sold by her to the appellant. Thus, the appellant got the property as<\/p>\n
     a mortgagee of the land and as a owner of the structure thereon. He never<\/p>\n
     purchased the land under the deed dated 18.8.1945 Exhibit 87. In respect<\/p>\n
     of appeal no.213 of 1986 also, it appears that under every document of<\/p>\n
     assignment, the rights of the mortgagee were transferred from one person<\/p>\n
     to another and the some right is now held by the appellant, who was<\/p>\n
     original defendant no.22.\n<\/p>\n
     9           The learned trial Court rightly pointed out that under the<\/p>\n
     Limitation Act, 1908, period of limitation for the purpose of redemption<\/p>\n
     of mortgage was 60 years, however, that period has been reduced to 30<\/p>\n
                                                 ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::<\/span>
\n                                          18<\/span><\/p>\n
     years now under the Article 61 of the Limitation Act, 1963. As the<\/p>\n
     original date of mortgage was four years, date of limitation for the<\/p>\n
     purpose of redemption would begin to run from 25.10.1884 and this<\/p>\n
     period would expire on 25.10.1944. However, as per the assignment deed<\/p>\n
     dated 13.10.1924 in one appeal and dated 29.11.1927 in another appeal,<\/p>\n
     by executing assignment deeds, the then mortgagees and their assignees<\/p>\n
     acknowledged     the existence of mortgage in favour of the original<\/p>\n
     owners and they admitted that they were still mortgagees. Thus, before<\/p>\n
     the expiry of period of limitation, they made acknowledgment of the<\/p>\n
     right of the mortgagors and, therefore, period of limitation would begin<\/p>\n
     to run in 1924 or 1927. As under the Limitation Act 1908, period of<\/p>\n
     limitation was 60 years, this period was to come to an end on 1984. Suits<\/p>\n
     were filed on 14th August, 1968. Under Section 30 of the Limitation Act,<\/p>\n
     1963, it is provided that any suit, for which the period of limitation is<\/p>\n
     shorter than the period prescribed by the Limitation Act, 1908, may be<\/p>\n
     instituted within a period of 7 years next after the commencement of the<\/p>\n
     Act of 1963 or within the period prescribed for such suits by the<\/p>\n
     Limitation Act, 1908, whichever period expires earlier. It may be noted<\/p>\n
     that initially period was five years. Suit to be filed within five years but<\/p>\n
     by the amendment of 1969, this period was enhanced by seven years.\n<\/p>\n
                                                  ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::<\/span>
\n                                          19<\/span><\/p>\n
     Anyhow, as per the provisions of Section 30,       at the time of filing the<\/p>\n
     suit in 1968, suit could be filed within five years from the date of<\/p>\n
     implementation of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Act came into force on<\/p>\n
     1.1.1964. Therefore, suit for redemption of mortgage could be filed on<\/p>\n
     or before 1.1.1969. Present suit was filed during the year 1968, therefore,<\/p>\n
     it was within limitation.\n<\/p>\n
     10           In view of the facts in appeal no.214\/1986 it is clear that<\/p>\n
     initially Bhausa Chimansa had mortgaged his rights on the properties in<\/p>\n
     favour of Rangildas Devchand a firm on 13th September, 1879 and he<\/p>\n
     created further mortgage in respect of the properties on 25th October,<\/p>\n
     1900. Thereafter these rights were assigned firstly, in 1927 then in 1931,<\/p>\n
     1932 and 1942. Undisputedly in every assignment deed only the rights of<\/p>\n
     the mortgage deed were assigned by one person to another and thereby<\/p>\n
     there was acknowledgment of existence of title of the original mortgagor<\/p>\n
     in all these properties.\n<\/p>\n
     11           It is material to note that under Section 18 of the Limitation<\/p>\n
     Act, 1963 where before the expiry of prescribed period for a suit or<\/p>\n
     application in respect of any property or rights, a acknowledgment in<\/p>\n
     respect of    any such property or right has been made in writing signed<\/p>\n
     by the party against whom such property or right is claimed or by any<\/p>\n
                                                 ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::<\/span>
\n                                         20<\/span><\/p>\n
     person through whom he derives his title or liability, a fresh period of<\/p>\n
     limitation shall be computed from the time when the acknowledgment is<\/p>\n
     so signed. Similar provision was made under Section 19 of the<\/p>\n
     Limitation Act, 1908. Therefore, period of limitation would begin to run<\/p>\n
     as and when there was fresh assignment acknowledging existence of the<\/p>\n
     mortgage. In the present case, first such document dated 13.10.1924 in<\/p>\n
     the form of assignment deed executed by the defendant no.1 Rangildas<\/p>\n
     Devchand firm in favour of the Deubai and then in 1927 therefore, fresh<\/p>\n
     period of limitation would begin in 1924 or 1927.\n<\/p>\n
     12          Taking into consideration the legal position and the facts, I<\/p>\n
     find no mistake in the decree passed by the trial Court and confirmed by<\/p>\n
     the Appellate Court.\n<\/p>\n
     13          The learned counsel for the appellant in Appeal No.220 of<\/p>\n
     1986 contends that the Courts below have refused to refund the amount<\/p>\n
     to him for the repairs and also they have not stated anything about his<\/p>\n
     right over the structure. As far as refund of amount is considered , there<\/p>\n
     is no fault because open land was mortgaged on which structure was<\/p>\n
     raised by Deubai and from time to time present appellant was required to<\/p>\n
     spend some money for repair and maintenance of that structure. There is<\/p>\n
     no dispute that structure is owned by the present appellant while the land<\/p>\n
                                                 ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::<\/span>
\n                                             21<\/span><\/p>\n
     belongs to the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs will naturally get the decree for<\/p>\n
     redemption of mortgage in respect of land beneath that structure. At the<\/p>\n
     time of execution of the decree, the present appellant being owner of the<\/p>\n
     structure may, if he so desires, remove and take away material of the<\/p>\n
     structure. In fact, this clarification is not at all required because that is the<\/p>\n
     settled position of law. Thus, on this count also the learned counsel could<\/p>\n
     not point out any fault in the decision of the Courts below.\n<\/p>\n
     14           For the aforesaid reasons, appeals stand dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
     15<\/span><\/p>\n
                  As the Appeals are disposed off, Civil Application Nos.\n<\/p>\n
     1106 of 1986, and Civil Application No.555 of 1989 do not survive and<\/p>\n
     stand disposed off accordingly.\n<\/p>\n
                                                       (J.H. BHATIA,J.)<\/p>\n
                                                     ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:55:08 :::<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court Shankarlal Nathumal Chandak vs Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi on 20 August, 2009 Bench: J. H. Bhatia 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.213 OF 1986 Shankarlal Nathumal Chandak, deceased by his heirs (1) Rajibai Shankarlal Chandak (2) Laxminarayan Shankarlal Chandak; (2A) Kanchanbai Laxminarayan Chandak dismissed as […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-202529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShankarlal Nathumal Chandak vs Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shankarlal Nathumal Chandak vs Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-15T19:26:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shankarlal Nathumal Chandak vs Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi on 20 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-15T19:26:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":2350,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Shankarlal Nathumal Chandak vs Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-15T19:26:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shankarlal Nathumal Chandak vs Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi on 20 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shankarlal Nathumal Chandak vs Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shankarlal Nathumal Chandak vs Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-15T19:26:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shankarlal Nathumal Chandak vs Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi on 20 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-15T19:26:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009"},"wordCount":2350,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009","name":"Shankarlal Nathumal Chandak vs Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-15T19:26:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shankarlal-nathumal-chandak-vs-balkrishna-jagannath-gujarathi-on-20-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shankarlal Nathumal Chandak vs Balkrishna Jagannath Gujarathi on 20 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202529"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202529\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}