{"id":202598,"date":"2007-09-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-09-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007"},"modified":"2017-09-24T22:08:16","modified_gmt":"2017-09-24T16:38:16","slug":"g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007","title":{"rendered":"G.Dinesh vs State Of Kerala on 19 September, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
G.Dinesh vs State Of Kerala on 19 September, 2007<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C) No. 17608 of 2003(U)\n\n\n1. G.DINESH, AGE4D 35 YERARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX OFFICER,\n\n3. APPELLATE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,\n\n4. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, (REVENUE RECOVERY)\n\n5. PHILIP S\/O. POTHEN, KUTTARAPALLIKUNNEL\n\n6. JOSE MATHEW S\/O. MATHEW,\n\n7. KATTAPPANA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.K.SAJEEV\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR (RETD.JUDGE)\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BHASKARAN (RETD.JUDGE)\n\n Dated :19\/09\/2007\n\n O R D E R\nJUSTICE M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR (RETD. JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA)\n                                           &\n    JUSTICE R.BHASKARAN (RETD. JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA)\n\n                         W.P.(C) No. 17608 of 2003\n                               ---------------------------\n                  Dated this the 19th day of September, 2007\n\n\n                                     AWARD\n\n\n      Petitioner is represented by counsel. Second respondent present in\n\nperson. Respondents 1 to 4 are represented by Govt. Pleader.\n\n      The grievance of the petitioner is that though he had purchased only\n\n3 acres of land, he has been made liable for the tax arrears in respect of a\n\nlarge extent of 15 acres. During discussions today it was brought to our\n\nnotice that subsequent to the issuance to the revenue recovery notice the\n\ndemand itself was withdrawn. The second respondent agrees that the\n\nrespondents liability is only in respect of the area purchased by him. In the\n\ncircumstances, we closed this O.P. with a direction that the second\n\nrespondent will be     at liberty to issue fresh certificate demanding the\n\nproportionate amount due from the petitioner and that revenue recovery\n\nproceedings can be initiated against the petitioner only in case he fails to\n\npay the balance amount if any due from him after appropriate notice under\n\nthe Revenue Recovery Act.\n\n      The O.P. is disposed of as above.\n\n\n                                                    M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR\n                                   (RETD. JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA)\n\n\n                                                          R.BHASKARAN\n                                    (RETD. JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA)\njp\n\n\n? IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\n+WP(C) No. 3404 of 2004(E)\n\n\n#1. DR.K.A.SYED ALAVI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n$1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES,\n\n3. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER,\n\n4. THE SUPERINTENDENT,\n\n!                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.RAMAKRISHNAN\n\n^                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\n*Coram\n The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN\n\n% Dated :13\/08\/2007\n\n: O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
            THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.\n<\/p>\n
                  ——————————————-
\n                     W.P(C).No.3404 OF 2004\n<\/p>\n
                  ——————————————-
\n             Dated this the 13th day of August, 2007<\/p>\n
                              JUDGMENT<\/p>\n
      The petitioner, then an Assistant Surgeon, was placed<\/p>\n
under suspension pending enquiry into alleged misconduct.<\/p>\n
Ext.P6 was issued to him requiring him to show cause against<\/p>\n
disciplinary action on the allegations contained therein.            The<\/p>\n
charge was that the application submitted by him for leave from<\/p>\n
11.9.1995 to 30.11.1995 on medical certificate was returned on<\/p>\n
13.12.1995 with direction to obtain and forward revised leave<\/p>\n
application, however, that the petitioner did not submit revised<\/p>\n
leave application, but enjoyed 81 days’ eligible leave and re-<\/p>\n
joined on 1.12.1995 and still further, that he entered on Earned<\/p>\n
Leave for 83 days with effect from 4.2.1996 and that a<\/p>\n
confidential check up in the matter was conducted through the<\/p>\n
Superintendent of Police (Vigilance) and it was found that the<\/p>\n
petitioner entered on Earned Leave, which was not sanctioned,<\/p>\n
and he was unauthorisedly absent                    from service and was<\/p>\n
engaged in private practice in Hajath Hospital, Ponnani.<\/p>\n
WPC.3404\/04<\/p>\n
                            Page numbers<\/p>\n
2.    In Ext.P7, the petitioner replied to the charges. He stated<\/p>\n
that the allegation that he is doing private practice in Hajath<\/p>\n
Hospital, Ponnani is not true.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3.    By Ext.P9 dated 20.3.1996 the Inspector General of Police<\/p>\n
(Vigilance) informed the Government through the Commissioner<\/p>\n
and Secretary in the Vigilance Department, in answer to the<\/p>\n
Government letter dated 19.3.1996, that the confidential check<\/p>\n
up conducted in the matter through Sri.K.Balakrishnan Nair,<\/p>\n
Superintendent of Police, Vigilance, Kozhikode had disclosed,<\/p>\n
among other things, that the petitioner is doing private practice<\/p>\n
in  Hajath Hospital, Ponnani as informed by Sri.Balakrishnan<\/p>\n
Nair over phone.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4.    The suspension of the petitioner was revoked and<\/p>\n
thereafter, disciplinary proceedings were ordered to be<\/p>\n
conducted. On the basis of the direction of the Government<\/p>\n
contained in the letter dated 30.7.2001, the Director of Health<\/p>\n
WPC.3404\/04<\/p>\n
                             Page numbers<\/p>\n
Services proceeded with the disciplinary action by issuance of<\/p>\n
Ext.P11 show cause notice.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
5.   I may at once notice that as rightly contended by the<\/p>\n
learned counsel for the petitioner, though Ext.P11 show cause<\/p>\n
notice is issued calling upon the delinquent to show cause why<\/p>\n
the proposed decision to award him the punishment of barring of<\/p>\n
next two increments with cumulative effect should not be<\/p>\n
implemented, it does not contain that it was concluded in the<\/p>\n
enquiry that the petitioner was guilty of the charges. Equally,<\/p>\n
the DHS also did not deal with the stand of the petitioner that he<\/p>\n
is innocent while Ext.P13 was issued, confirming the provisional<\/p>\n
decision regarding punishment. In fact, even in Ext.P13, there is<\/p>\n
no definite finding as to the guilt.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6.   While there is no malice or malafides is attributed to<\/p>\n
Sri.K.Balakrishnan Nair, the Superintendent of Police, Vigilance,<\/p>\n
Kozhikode or to the Inspector General of Police to hold that the<\/p>\n
opinion gathered by them in the confidential check up is wrong<\/p>\n
WPC.3404\/04<\/p>\n
                            Page numbers<\/p>\n
or unreliable, punishment was imposed by the disciplinary<\/p>\n
authority without entering a finding as to the guilt.<\/p>\n
7.    Imposing the punishment of barring of two increments with<\/p>\n
cumulative effect has to be treated only as a minor punishment<\/p>\n
as at that point of time and Ext.P14 appeal of the petitioner was<\/p>\n
considered by the Government. In considering that appeal, the<\/p>\n
Government granted the petitioner an opportunity of personal<\/p>\n
hearing. The entire records were examined and the contentions<\/p>\n
raised by the petitioner, including on the issue as to how the<\/p>\n
period of suspension has to be treated, as also the question of<\/p>\n
subsistence allowance, were dealt with quite elaborately by the<\/p>\n
Government in the appeal. Advertence to paragraphs 6 and 7 of<\/p>\n
Ext.P15 order would show that all the contentions of the<\/p>\n
petitioner, on the merits, in opposition to the allegations against<\/p>\n
him, have been duly adverted to and considered, including by<\/p>\n
putting pointed queries to him during the course of personal<\/p>\n
hearing. It has been found by the Government that the charges<\/p>\n
are substantiated.    The Government also took the view that<\/p>\n
barring of increments with cumulative effect was re-categorised<\/p>\n
WPC.3404\/04<\/p>\n
                            Page numbers<\/p>\n
as major penalty only after the relevant time and that therefore,<\/p>\n
the petitioner’s contention regarding absence of enquiry in terms<\/p>\n
of Rule 15 of the Kerala Civil Services (Classification, Control<\/p>\n
and Appeal) Rules, 1960 is not sustainable.<\/p>\n
8.     Having regard to the nature of consideration of the<\/p>\n
materials and contentions by the Government as the appellate<\/p>\n
authority, as is reflected in the appellate order, Ext.P15,<\/p>\n
particularly paragraphs 6 and 7 thereof, the impugned action<\/p>\n
cannot be termed as violative of law, in any manner, and the<\/p>\n
impugned order Ext.P15, in which, all the earlier proceedings<\/p>\n
have merged, is not bad on counts of any jurisdictional error or<\/p>\n
legal infirmity.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
     In the result, the writ petition fails and is accordingly<\/p>\n
dismissed. No costs.\n<\/p>\n
                                                Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
                          THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,
\n                                              Judge
\nkkb.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court G.Dinesh vs State Of Kerala on 19 September, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C) No. 17608 of 2003(U) 1. G.DINESH, AGE4D 35 YERARS, … Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY … Respondent 2. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX OFFICER, 3. APPELLATE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, 4. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, (REVENUE RECOVERY) […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-202598","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nG.Dinesh vs State Of Kerala on 19 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"G.Dinesh vs State Of Kerala on 19 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-09-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-24T16:38:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"G.Dinesh vs State Of Kerala on 19 September, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-09-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-24T16:38:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007\"},\"wordCount\":813,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007\",\"name\":\"G.Dinesh vs State Of Kerala on 19 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-09-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-24T16:38:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"G.Dinesh vs State Of Kerala on 19 September, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"G.Dinesh vs State Of Kerala on 19 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"G.Dinesh vs State Of Kerala on 19 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-09-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-24T16:38:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"G.Dinesh vs State Of Kerala on 19 September, 2007","datePublished":"2007-09-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-24T16:38:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007"},"wordCount":813,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007","name":"G.Dinesh vs State Of Kerala on 19 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-09-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-24T16:38:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/g-dinesh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-19-september-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"G.Dinesh vs State Of Kerala on 19 September, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202598","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202598"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202598\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}