{"id":203181,"date":"2008-11-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008"},"modified":"2016-03-26T11:25:12","modified_gmt":"2016-03-26T05:55:12","slug":"sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri B N Mahesha vs The Divisional Controller The … on 21 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri B N Mahesha vs The Divisional Controller The … on 21 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH coum\" 01? KARNATAKA AT   \u00ab \"\n\nDATED THIS THE 218'? DAY OF;P\u00e9QVI5M_\u00a3\u00a7V\u00e9}i\u00a7\"    \n\nBEFORE A   %  \nTHE HONBLE MR. JUS'1'\u00a7.QE As  \n\nWRIT' PETITION_ NO.   5\n\nBETWEEN :\n\nS2213NMAHEs}\u00a7A'f;;.L,}\"   \nAGED ABOUT.4'5'Y__EA_R.i_\u00a7 \"      A\n\ns\/<3 N:r~;<3EG:s_'r2::;c:'r  =  %\n\n V' %  PETITIONER\n\n \" \u00abgay  H-TC sHwA:\u00e9A5a'u;'ADv.}\n\nA\ufb01m.   '\n\n THE 1\u00a7:v:s\u00a7QNAL CONTROLLER\n  'I-'HE MANAGEMEN? or\n\n\" :{.s.s:.T.C..\"MYs0RE amazon\n\n  '\u00a3,3AhzN:\u00a7e;aNrAP ROAD\n__ -m%s<':)RE 5'20 915\n\n RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
{By MISS SPHLPA K.S. ADV. FOR SR1 N K RAMESH)<\/p>\n
TH!S WRIT PE’E’I’I’ION [S FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 85
\n227 OF THE CONSTITLWION OF’ INDIA. WITH A PRAYER’*TO;
\nQUASH THE IMPUGNED AWARD DATED 23.12.2004 PASSED BY<\/p>\n
THE msouse mum’ AT mvsores IN 11:) No.122\/99 vzrnsabsx’-‘-.<\/p>\n
D AND ALSO QUASH VEDE ANX~A; 21112201′ THE RESPO\u00a5;iD_ENT_
\nTO REINS’I’A’1’E THE PETITIONER BACK mro saw-1cEA’mr:m”——.T ~
\nc0N’r1:~:u’m op’ sag-vxcs xncwxamc;  \u00ae,C_>’.”l-KER  u
\nCONSEQUENTIAL BENEWTS. INCLUDHIG,f\ufb01JLL–‘BAt”3\u00a7{“WACiES, ‘
\nmom THE DATE 09* REMvA1,”1*1LL\u00ab ‘_THE-;’ DATE. “op
\nRE\u00a7.NS’I’A’I’EMENT, UNDER ms mcms Ar;:*o%.c:RcuMs’rA2\u00a7c:Es:g<\/p>\n
OF THE CASE.\n<\/p>\n
This Writ Pe\ufb01iian oomingjona rorVhca’n;;g,  \ufb02ay, <\/p>\n
Court made the foilowing :\n<\/p>\n
f <\/p>\n
The  in qucs\ufb01on the award tiataed<\/p>\n
   .i1;___I\u00ab.&I.D.No.122\/99. By the said awavsti,<\/p>\n
%”%._Vth\u00a2”z.abaur.%  has dismissed the petition \ufb01led by the<\/p>\n
p\u00a2aam:  10(4-A) ofthe i.D.Act.\n<\/p>\n
V’ n   the lcazrned counsel for the parties and<\/p>\n
  the writ papers.\n<\/p>\n
J?\n<\/p>\n
r
\nr<\/p>\n
3. The pe\ufb01tioner was worrkzing as a    b <\/p>\n
homing token No..125 in the   <\/p>\n
mspondcnt is said to have  abs\u00e9\ufb01i <\/p>\n
and as such the petitioner was  ‘the
\nC-orporatiolta vidc order “‘ti\u00a7_;\u00a7;cd  to be
\naggrieved by the same, ‘A  the Labour
\nCourt. The   the claim put
\nforth by    ,Court on oonside\ufb01ng
\nthe rival,   the application. The
\npe\ufb01\ufb010n\u00a2’;:r,_ is = Court assailing the said<\/p>\n
award.\n<\/p>\n
.A     of that awazd would indicate that the<\/p>\n
sesgj\u00e9naeiaiimargag\u00e9meaat had urged before the Labour Court<\/p>\n
V . that ‘he “—fn\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01cncr had rammed umautborisedly absent<\/p>\n
 u    onwaztia It. was fuzther contended that even<\/p>\n
 instances fmm 37.7.1993’ to 8.9.1997 had<\/p>\n
T  “r-z\u00e9mained absent and thereafter also on two other occasions,<\/p>\n
” Vh\ufb01 was unauthorismily absent for a pc\ufb01od cf 82 days and 54<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
(v.\n<\/p>\n
days respectively. The Labour Court on noticigfg  ‘<\/p>\n
contentions and the said dates had.   ‘A a<\/p>\n
respondent had remained unauthiz\ufb01s\u00e9dlj zibs\u00e9\ufb01ii <\/p>\n
present instance: and aiso on etiriiaag’ occasions.  A<\/p>\n
5. As against the: send’ dbniention “pu\u00abf T\u00a3’rti1′:\u00a7 by the
\nmanagement and the \ufb01nciiiags  the  Court,
\nthe petitioner oantcnds tl3at’\ufb02A;e I\ufb01fas at that time<\/p>\n
suffeting \ufb01mn  stpmacki ac1ie ” az1_\u00a2i_f’as such he was<\/p>\n
undcI”gc.:-E_zA1g \u00a311: year 199? and as such<\/p>\n
during th\u00e9    though he was irregular<\/p>\n
 he  made 1:ti$~,?:1; c:#t efforts to \u00abdischarge his duties. It is<\/p>\n
  \ufb01u\ufb01ezj  the fact that the petitioner had joined the<\/p>\n
  1992 and til: the year 1997 then: was 110<\/p>\n
V V’ _ (:om153ain.$s’e3f’\u00ab:’i1:c1autI3o;i2ncd absence or any other nature is to<\/p>\n
   while bolting to this aspect of the matter<\/p>\n
 ,  the limited period when he was tmauthcrrisedly<\/p>\n
VA   ab\u00e9rcnt and that was due to serious i.1l–hea}th .<\/p>\n
J2<\/p>\n
6. In this regaxti, the Labour Couxt has noticed.-.___\ufb021e<\/p>\n
action  by the respo11dent\u00abmanage:t11e;ut \u00a3i3_V:ic\u00a5w_’<\/p>\n
nature of the evidence tendexed through MW}   ‘<\/p>\n
end” ence tendered \ufb02zmugll WW1. Since’   ‘ <\/p>\n
has been noticed, to that extent    <\/p>\n
cmxtmations, it cannot be  the  5&3
\ncued in the matter. However, zeqgims.    is
\nthat the Labour Cotnrf ire;-3 _ ._cenaide1ed the<\/p>\n
oontcntioirsa   (xi “”t}”:.-i\ufb01zion on the aspect as to
\nwhethcri\ufb02ze’  was commensurate to<\/p>\n
the natu1*eV of_VMtine   ”  Therefore, to the sald’<\/p>\n
 ,    have to consider this aspect of the<\/p>\n
   out as to whether the punishment of<\/p>\n
  or as no whether the Ieiief requires to<\/p>\n
-vbe    other manner.\n<\/p>\n
 A, j 7..  nothing this aspect of the matter, the fact<\/p>\n
VA   petitioner was in sersrioe from the years’ 1992 is not<\/p>\n
 :,’i;;__\u00e9Eispute. Even as per the allegation of the respondents,<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
‘:1<\/p>\n
the petitioner thcugh was unautboriscdly absc\ufb01i’ Qfi V’<\/p>\n
earlier occasion, the same had started  ‘ <\/p>\n
anwaxds. In this regard, the <\/p>\n
contention with regard to his
\nduning the said period.  a\u00e9g  had
\nnot got the have    the Medical
\nCerti\ufb01cate, whens. vIi0i’.i(::\u00a3-”  V  ”  by the
\nmanagement.     before the
\nres,po13dc13t:3…TT’1′;3\u00bb.1;e3;\u00bb\u00ab:ii=:;   older dated 4.6.1999
\nwhich ‘Via,   to the petition.\n<\/p>\n
Considering  s\ufb01bwquen\ufb02y, he has produced the<\/p>\n
 _  that had mmailized absent due to<\/p>\n
 ‘:_Vilh\u00a7e;=_=5V, a%\u00a7;\u00a5c%aai; ‘i{>___thc extent of providing an opporturzity to<\/p>\n
  and reform himseif, the same should<\/p>\n
— V havc”.4B3\u00a2I}:\u00a7.>OIi%ide1’e:d.<\/p>\n
  In this rcgmd, I am of the new’ that even if the<\/p>\n
VT drticr of dismissal is interfered and if an cipportuility is<\/p>\n
3 gmnted to the: petitioner to mftsazm hixnscif, this. Court: should<\/p>\n
\u00e9<\/p>\n
a
\n‘VI<\/p>\n
also mice into consideration the izatcrast of  “,<\/p>\n
respondent-Corporatricm 5:) that they should not   ”<\/p>\n
Wh1Ie’ this Court is exweising its disxzxwezt\u00e9ail   V<\/p>\n
I 1-A of the I.D.AcL Therefore,  <\/p>\n
by the Labour (301111: in   ‘bf
\nthe View that the saint, ‘calls 3 the<\/p>\n
proportionality of the   cfzinsidezved.<\/p>\n
9.  23.12.2004 to the
\nsand’  VV’G;Jhseqnen\ufb02y, the carrier dated<\/p>\n
4.6.1999  ?.)yVV1l1_<\u00a7'zfc's;'1:;\u00e9;ndent-management also stands<\/p>\n
  Th\u20ac 'I'\u00a3#$pQ'\ufb02dE}1t[CDrp0I'ati0\ufb01 are thcrcfozc<\/p>\n
  the petitioner into service to the pest<\/p>\n
  at the three of his dismissal on<\/p>\n
V  .I*"id;uvcvcr, it is made char that the P\ufb01\ufb01tiancr<\/p>\n
'_nc: f  cntitked to any backwages or oonscqttcn\ufb01al<\/p>\n
 Further the period fmm 6.2.1999 i.e., the date on<\/p>\n
'T %  'whi\u00e9h he had remained unauthsmisedly absent ran the date<\/p>\n
 u "on which this petition was presented before this Court<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
i.c., 9.1.2006 shall not be Iwkonw liar  <\/p>\n
cantinuity of sczvzoe" since the \u00a2xc'Vi"uM:\u00a7i611*  <\/p>\n
substituted punishment.\n<\/p>\n
With the ahovtgr …Vmoei..i’hca””  dmuon\u00e9 and
\nclari\ufb01cation” 5;, the petition’.  V _’ no order<\/p>\n
as to costs.\n<\/p>\n
301\/’9:\n<\/p>\n
Iudgi<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri B N Mahesha vs The Divisional Controller The … on 21 November, 2008 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH coum” 01? KARNATAKA AT \u00ab ” DATED THIS THE 218′? DAY OF;P\u00e9QVI5M_\u00a3\u00a7V\u00e9}i\u00a7” BEFORE A % THE HONBLE MR. JUS’1’\u00a7.QE As WRIT’ PETITION_ NO. 5 BETWEEN : S2213NMAHEs}\u00a7A’f;;.L,}” AGED ABOUT.4’5’Y__EA_R.i_\u00a7 ” A s\/<3 N:r~;<3EG:s_’r2::;c:’r […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-203181","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri B N Mahesha vs The Divisional Controller The ... on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri B N Mahesha vs The Divisional Controller The ... on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-26T05:55:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri B N Mahesha vs The Divisional Controller The … on 21 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-26T05:55:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":975,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri B N Mahesha vs The Divisional Controller The ... on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-26T05:55:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri B N Mahesha vs The Divisional Controller The … on 21 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri B N Mahesha vs The Divisional Controller The ... on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri B N Mahesha vs The Divisional Controller The ... on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-26T05:55:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri B N Mahesha vs The Divisional Controller The … on 21 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-26T05:55:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008"},"wordCount":975,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008","name":"Sri B N Mahesha vs The Divisional Controller The ... on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-26T05:55:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-n-mahesha-vs-the-divisional-controller-the-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri B N Mahesha vs The Divisional Controller The … on 21 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203181"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203181\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}