{"id":203854,"date":"2009-12-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009"},"modified":"2015-07-14T02:32:38","modified_gmt":"2015-07-13T21:02:38","slug":"mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mr. S. Mukherjee vs Dsiidc on 29 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr. S. Mukherjee vs Dsiidc on 29 December, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>                    CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                     Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market,\n                       Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067.\n                               Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                                     Decision No.CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002730\/6123\n                                                           Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002730\n\nAppellant                                    :      Mr. S. Mukherjee\n                                                    28-B, Masjid Moth,\n                                                    Phase -I, DDA Flats,\n                                                    New Delhi-110048\n\nRespondent                                   :      Public Information Officer\n                                                    CM (Liquor), DSIIDC\n                                                    A-3\/4, State Emporia Building,\n                                                    IInd floor, Baba Kharak Singh\n                                                    Marg, New Delhi-110001\n\nRTI application filed on                     :      03\/08\/2009\nPIO replied                                  :      04\/09\/2009\nFirst Appeal filed on                        :      20\/09\/2009\nFirst Appellate Authority order              :      09\/10\/2009\nSecond Appeal Received on                    :      26\/10\/2009\n\nInformation sought:\nThe Appellant had sought detailed information primarily in regard to two contexts: 1) in the year\n2004-2005 a selection committee of senior officers of Delhi Govt. set up by DSIIDC for\nselecting\/approving a consultancy firm for the purpose of computerizing all the Liquor shops\nunder IMFL Division ; 2) detailed information about the then selected consultancy firm. The\nfollowing information was sought:\n\nFirst 8 Queries of the RTI application basically seeks information about the selection committee\nminutes of the meeting, a copy of the offer letter given to the selected consultancy firm &amp; of the\ndocuments that were submitted by the consultancy firm including the booklet providing the\nnames of technically qualified person(s); names of those involved in the firm before and after the\nagreement; Name of the firm, wether private\/partnership or limited firm; names of the\ndirectors\/partners of the firm &amp; of those signing the agreement along with their designation; &amp; a\ncopy of the signed agreement .\n\nQuery No.9 &amp; 10 dealt with information on wether the firm adhered to the provisions of the\nagreement in respect to two things:\n\u25aa providing one P.C. set along with a printer&amp; stationary to each shop of IMFL. Further if there\nwere any shops complaining of insufficiency f0r the same. ;\n\u25aa transferring all sales data from each shop on day to day basis to the Head quarter of the IMFL\nDivision. In case of violation of agreement in this regard what action was proposed by the\ndivision. Further, if computing weekly orders by the E.D.P for IMFL shops were based on inputs\nprovided by the the firm, if not, then on what basis were the weekly orders calculated.\n Query No. 11 sought information in regard to the payment terms with consultancy firm that if it\nwas against submission of bill\/s or if any other system for payment was followed as per the\nagreement provisions.\n\nQuery No.12 If there was\/is any liability of the firm towards DSIIDC, as per agreement.\n\nQuery No.13 Were any changes recommended for the constitution of the firm post agreement, if\nyes, provide correspondences in this context. Secondly, if any legal consultation was sought in\nthis regard, if yes, what was the outcome?\nFurther, why were the contractual workers engaged by the IMFL Division who were appointed\non contract basis through M\/s Sahyog IT for transferring datas of each IMFL division to HQ for\ncomputing of weekly orders .If cost of these computer operators observed by the consultancy\nfirm. Further, if as per agreement was it the liability of the firm to provide the weekly sales data\nto IMFL HQ.\n\nQuery No.14 In accordance with query no.9 were any violation of agreement made not off, if so,\nto provide the nature of violation as recorded on file and correspondences made thereof.\n\nQuery No.15 dealt with information about the review meeting that was held in regard to the\nviolations caused by the firm, in addition to the earnings made in terms of the names of officers\npresent in the meeting; feedback on the violations committed, details of the account of earning(s)\nmade by the consultancy firm by way of advertisement in the IMFL Vends given by the Area\nManager\/Division Manager during the meeting &amp; a copy of the minutes of the meeting.\n\nQuery No.16 &amp; 17 Any subsequent action that was taken to put the agreement on hold for\nindefinite period or if any restrictions were put in place for the firm. If neither of such action\nwas taken, on what grounds the firm was allowed to continue its activity.\n\nQuery No.18 &amp; 19 To provide observation of the Division recorded by the then OSD\/Consultant\nfor terminating the agreement of the consultancy firm for violation of the agreement and the\nrecommendation of the legal counsel thereof. What decision was eventually taken by the\ncompetent authority for terminating the agreement.\n\nQuery No.20 If the agreement is still in force, how is the firm compensated for the expenditure\nincurred by them.\n\nPIO's Reply:\nCopy of the M.O.U with consultancy firm M\/s Utopia confirming their selection was made\navailable. However, the remaining information was denied under Section 8 (1) (d) [wrongly\nmentioned in the PIO's reply dated 04\/09\/2009 as Section 8 (d)] of the RTI Act.\n\nGrounds for First Appeal:\nInformation was provided only in regard to Query No.8 and denial of rest of the information\nunder Section 8 (1) (d) appears unreasonable to the Appellant. In addition to this, the delay in\nresponding as against the mandated time is cited as another potential ground.\n\nOrder of the First Appellate Authority:\nIt was observed that certain information which was not strictly of third party nature could be\nprovided. Further, as per Appellant's desire, an inspection of documents and to take photocopies\nthereof was allowed within 15 days from the order.\n Grounds for Second Appeal:\nPrimarily, denial of information by the PIO. Secondly, Appellant has grievances against the PIO\nfor allegedly using abusive language during the hearing held before the First Appellate\nAuthority, of which the FAA was also ascertained vide Appellant's detailed letter of allegations\nto the FAA dated 12\/10\/2009.\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n<p> emerging during Hearing:\n<\/p>\n<p>The following were present:\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant: Absent;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent: Absent;\n<\/p>\n<p>        The appellant vide letter dated 15\/12\/2009 informed the Commission that he had received<br \/>\nthe information satisfactorily and wishes to withdraw the appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p>The Appeal is withdrawn.\n<\/p>\n<p>Appellant has received complete satisfactory information.\n<\/p>\n<p>This decision is announced in open chamber.<br \/>\nNotice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.<br \/>\nAny information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                           Shailesh Gandhi<br \/>\n                                                                                 Information Commissioner<br \/>\n                                                                                         29 December 2009<br \/>\n(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)Rnj\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr. S. Mukherjee vs Dsiidc on 29 December, 2009 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067. Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No.CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002730\/6123 Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2009\/002730 Appellant : Mr. S. Mukherjee 28-B, Masjid Moth, Phase -I, DDA Flats, New Delhi-110048 Respondent : Public Information Officer CM [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-203854","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr. S. Mukherjee vs Dsiidc on 29 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. S. Mukherjee vs Dsiidc on 29 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-13T21:02:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. S. Mukherjee vs Dsiidc on 29 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-13T21:02:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":115,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009\",\"name\":\"Mr. S. Mukherjee vs Dsiidc on 29 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-13T21:02:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. S. Mukherjee vs Dsiidc on 29 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. S. Mukherjee vs Dsiidc on 29 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. S. Mukherjee vs Dsiidc on 29 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-13T21:02:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. S. Mukherjee vs Dsiidc on 29 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-13T21:02:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009"},"wordCount":115,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009","name":"Mr. S. Mukherjee vs Dsiidc on 29 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-13T21:02:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-mukherjee-vs-dsiidc-on-29-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. S. Mukherjee vs Dsiidc on 29 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203854","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203854"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203854\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203854"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203854"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203854"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}