{"id":203861,"date":"2009-01-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009"},"modified":"2018-12-27T22:23:30","modified_gmt":"2018-12-27T16:53:30","slug":"videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Videsh Kumar Sharma vs Kanha Ram And Others on 20 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Videsh Kumar Sharma vs Kanha Ram And Others on 20 January, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>               IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                           CHANDIGARH\n\n                                         Criminal Misc. No.693-MA of 2008\n                                              Date of Decision: 20.01.2009\nVidesh Kumar Sharma\n\n                                                                     Appellant\n                                    Versus\nKanha Ram and others\n                                                                  Respondents\n\nCORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH\n        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH\n\n\nPresent:     Mr.J.S.Thind, Advocate for the applicant\n                         .....\n\n\nJasbir Singh, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>             Applicant- Videsh Kumar Sharma filed a criminal complaint<\/p>\n<p>against the respondents for commission of offences punishable under<\/p>\n<p>Sections 302\/34\/120-B IPC. His complaint was dismissed vide judgment<\/p>\n<p>dated 1.10.2008. Hence, this application with a prayer to grant him leave to<\/p>\n<p>file an appeal against that judgment.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Facts of the case, as noticed by the trial Court, in paragraph No.2<\/p>\n<p>of its judgment, reads thus:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                          &#8220;In brief, the case of the complainant is that he is<\/p>\n<p>             resident of Ellenabad and he is doing job in private sector. He<\/p>\n<p>             was having two sons out of which Surinder @ Gattu who used to<\/p>\n<p>             work in Ellenabad Grain Market as Accountant at Booth No.7;<\/p>\n<p>             and was having age of 20 years. He further stated that about<\/p>\n<p>             one month prior to the present occurrence i.e. on 7.5.2001 at<\/p>\n<p>             about 10.00 p.m. his son Surender alias Gattu came from the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Misc. No.693-MA of 2008                             2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>          shop and Kanha Ram accused no.1 also met him in the street<\/p>\n<p>          and then accused started abusing him. On hearing the same, he<\/p>\n<p>          along with his family members came out from the house and in<\/p>\n<p>          their presence, the said accused was saying to him that his<\/p>\n<p>          money should be paid. He has acquaintance with the police<\/p>\n<p>          because he runs Satta Ki Khaiwala in Ellanabad. He also<\/p>\n<p>          threatened that he will implicate in such a case that he will<\/p>\n<p>          remember. On the next day accused again came to his house<\/p>\n<p>          and also threatened to him as well as his son Surinder @ Gattu<\/p>\n<p>          by saying that he would cause injuries to his son and he has<\/p>\n<p>          some bad elements with him and they will eliminate Surinder @<\/p>\n<p>          Gattu and his dead body will be thrown in the canal. Since, he<\/p>\n<p>          has good relation with the police, therefore, police would not<\/p>\n<p>          take any action against him. Not only this he also gave a crutch<\/p>\n<p>          blow hitting on the hand of his son and the complainant along<\/p>\n<p>          with his wife and brother -in-law of his son, rescued him from<\/p>\n<p>          his clutches. When he was leaving the spot he also threatened<\/p>\n<p>          that some day they would found the dead body of deceased and<\/p>\n<p>          they would not be in a position to recognize the same.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>          3.          It is further case of the complainant that accused<\/p>\n<p>          no.2 Babli @ Vinod accused no.2 alongwith bad elements found<\/p>\n<p>          roaming near his house for 3-4 times. They also threatened the<\/p>\n<p>          complainant that he should not indulge with Kanha accused<\/p>\n<p>          no.1 otherwise they would collect a heap of dead bodies and at<\/p>\n<p>          that time Babli accused no.2 was armed with a knife. Accused<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Misc. No.693-MA of 2008                                  3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>             No.1 runs a Satta Ki Khaiwali in the Chaubara of accused no.2.<\/p>\n<p>             It is his further case that accused no.1 and 2 with the help of<\/p>\n<p>             bad elements go disappeared Surinder @ Gattu son of<\/p>\n<p>             complainant and on 9.06.2004 his dead body was found in the<\/p>\n<p>             Grain Market. The aforesaid accused have murdered his son<\/p>\n<p>             and after doing the same his dead body was thrown in the Grain<\/p>\n<p>             Market with intention that murder may be converted into<\/p>\n<p>             suicide.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>             The complainant has further stated that rope, which was used for<\/p>\n<p>hanging the dead body of his son, was so weak, that it could not have borne<\/p>\n<p>weight of the dead body. By stating that the blood was oozing out from the<\/p>\n<p>nose, there were many injuries on the eyes, nose and back of the deceased,<\/p>\n<p>complainant submitted that it was a case of murder. Complainant has further<\/p>\n<p>stated that matter was informed to the police. Dead body was got removed.<\/p>\n<p>Inquest report was also prepared, the complainant was assured that action<\/p>\n<p>shall be taken against the culprits, however, nothing was done. It was further<\/p>\n<p>stated that doctor gave wrong report at the time of post-mortem examination<\/p>\n<p>of the dead body. In preliminary evidence, complainant produced seven<\/p>\n<p>witnesses and also brought on record documentary evidence to prove his<\/p>\n<p>case. Vide order dated 3.11.2007, the trial Court on appraisal of preliminary<\/p>\n<p>evidence, led by the applicant-complainant, summoned respondents No.1 and<\/p>\n<p>2, to face the trial. Thereafter, the trial Court, after hearing counsel for both<\/p>\n<p>the parties, acquitted both the persons mentioned above, vide impugned<\/p>\n<p>judgment. Hence, this application.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Learned counsel for the applicant heard.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Misc. No.693-MA of 2008                                  4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>             He has taken us through the contents of judgment, under<\/p>\n<p>challenge and after looking at the same, we are convinced that view taken by<\/p>\n<p>the trial Court was possible. The trial Court has noticed that after death of<\/p>\n<p>his son, applicant-complainant gave a different version when matter was<\/p>\n<p>reported to the police on 9.6.2004. At that time, it was stated before the<\/p>\n<p>police that his son had committed suicide. The complainant made above said<\/p>\n<p>statement, in the presence of his son Kamal Kant. The trial Court has also<\/p>\n<p>looked into report made by the doctor, who has conducted autopsy on the<\/p>\n<p>dead body, wherein it was mentioned that death was result of asphyxia.<\/p>\n<p>Ligature mark was present on the neck and blood was oozing out from the<\/p>\n<p>nose. The Court has also noticed that main accused Kanha Ram is a lame<\/p>\n<p>person, his leg had been amputated and he could walk only with the help of<\/p>\n<p>crutches as such, it was not possible for him to commit murder of the<\/p>\n<p>deceased. So far as other accused are concerned, against them there was<\/p>\n<p>charge of conspiracy alone. We feel that the view taken by the trial Court is<\/p>\n<p>perfectly justified and need no interference. Counsel for the applicant has<\/p>\n<p>failed to indicate any misreading of evidence on the part of the trial Court.<\/p>\n<p>             Even in cases where two views are possible, the view taken by<\/p>\n<p>the trial Court in favour of the accused is to be accepted.<\/p>\n<p>                   Their Lordships of the Supreme Court in <a href=\"\/doc\/1265608\/\">Allarakha<\/p>\n<p>K.Mansuri v. State of Gujarat,<\/a> 2002(1) RCR (Criminal) 748, held that where,<\/p>\n<p>in a case, two views are possible, the one which favours the accused, has to<\/p>\n<p>be adopted by the Court.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Misc. No.693-MA of 2008                                 5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>             A Division Bench of this Court in <a href=\"\/doc\/921451\/\">State of Punjab v. Hansa<\/p>\n<p>Singh,<\/a> 2001(1) RCR (Criminal) 775, while dealing with an appeal against<\/p>\n<p>acquittal, has opined as under:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>             &#8220;We are of the opinion that the matter would have to be<\/p>\n<p>             examined in the light of the observations of the Hon&#8217;ble<\/p>\n<p>             Supreme Court in Ashok Kumar v. State of Rajasthan, 1991(1)<\/p>\n<p>             SCC 166, which are that interference in an appeal against<\/p>\n<p>             acquittal would be called for only if the judgment under appeal<\/p>\n<p>             were perverse or based on a mis-reading of the evidence and<\/p>\n<p>             merely because the appellate Court was inclined to take a<\/p>\n<p>             different view, could not be a reason calling for interference.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>             No case is made out to interfere at the instance of the applicant.<\/p>\n<p>             Dismissed.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<pre>\n\n\n\n                                             (Jasbir Singh)\n                                                Judge\n\n\n20.01.2009                                    (Jora Singh)\ngk                                               Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Videsh Kumar Sharma vs Kanha Ram And Others on 20 January, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.693-MA of 2008 Date of Decision: 20.01.2009 Videsh Kumar Sharma Appellant Versus Kanha Ram and others Respondents CORAM:- HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-203861","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Videsh Kumar Sharma vs Kanha Ram And Others on 20 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Videsh Kumar Sharma vs Kanha Ram And Others on 20 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-27T16:53:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Videsh Kumar Sharma vs Kanha Ram And Others on 20 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-27T16:53:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1137,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Videsh Kumar Sharma vs Kanha Ram And Others on 20 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-27T16:53:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Videsh Kumar Sharma vs Kanha Ram And Others on 20 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Videsh Kumar Sharma vs Kanha Ram And Others on 20 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Videsh Kumar Sharma vs Kanha Ram And Others on 20 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-27T16:53:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Videsh Kumar Sharma vs Kanha Ram And Others on 20 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-27T16:53:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009"},"wordCount":1137,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009","name":"Videsh Kumar Sharma vs Kanha Ram And Others on 20 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-27T16:53:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/videsh-kumar-sharma-vs-kanha-ram-and-others-on-20-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Videsh Kumar Sharma vs Kanha Ram And Others on 20 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203861","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203861"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203861\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203861"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}