{"id":203995,"date":"2008-08-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008"},"modified":"2017-10-31T07:10:52","modified_gmt":"2017-10-31T01:40:52","slug":"m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"M Basheer vs Ahamad Pasha on 1 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M Basheer vs Ahamad Pasha on 1 August, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n<pre>.i..\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 131' DAY OF AUGUST 2008 \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE SUBHASH B;\u00a7'\\D;-.V  \"V  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nM. Bashcer,\n\nS] 0. Abdul Khadar,\nMajor, R.B. Steal\nFactory W'u1*I-as,\nHalepcte,\nNarashnhaiajapma.\n\n(By Sri. H. V. Ragr.a'~\u00a71i\u00a7nd\u00a3\u00a71 Adi};'}V 'V V V\n\nAND:\n\nAhaxnad  _ AV\";-V fl: \n\nS\/o. Rasciol Stab,'      -- .\nMajor, K.G.N.V.Aui'o_ Wr.firks,__ V' V \nMai11Road,X__ V %    V V\nNa;msimharajap_m*a. - _\n\n   {By Srfi-'-\u00a7VGVi1fi':~hVK0\u20aci\u00e9i; \u00abAdv-E\n\ncggmng mvlszox PETI'l'\ufb01i'}\u00a7i-,!!j()..'3V9 ;A%ggg V  j   V\n\n \"      PETITIONER\n\n.. RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>    Revision Petition is \ufb01led under Section 397<br \/>\nR\/W.  V &#8216;C&#8221;1_:P.(3.V pxaying to set aside the conviction and<\/p>\n<p>V   sentence awmtig;-ud in C.C.No.355[O3 Dt.18.11.2003 on the \ufb01le of<\/p>\n<p>the JMFG, &#8216;i&#8217;\u20ac.R.Pu.ra and con\ufb01rmed by the 13.0., F&#8221;I&#8217;C&#8211;I,<\/p>\n<p>  ::mags.1;;.;s, in Cr1.A.No.172\/05, m.25.01.20o7.<\/p>\n<p>V , V&#8217;IVV&#8217;Vb_\u00abis. Revision Petition coming on for Admission this day.<\/p>\n<p> made the following:\n<\/p>\n<p>SLE_Q.\u00a7_B<br \/>\nThis Revision is against the judgment of eonvietio:e.._\u00bba_nd<\/p>\n<p>order of sentence in C.C.No.355\/2903 on the \ufb01ie of <\/p>\n<p>N.R.Pura con\ufb01rmed in Cximinal Appeal No.1&#8217;72\/200$&#8217;  5.1:&#8217;; <\/p>\n<p>of Fast Track Court-I. Chikxnagalur.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. Respondent is the coxnplainant,  It is;&#8211;&#8220;a11\u00a2&#8217;g\u00e9d  <\/p>\n<p>petitioner herein had borrowed a of Rs.4&#8217;6,(X3Gj1-  to<\/p>\n<p>repay the said amount    ?.4&#8243;%&gt; iiA3;terest per<br \/>\nannum. The complainant    amount. In<br \/>\nresponse to the s\u00a7mie;, &#8216;_&#8217;the  cheques dated<br \/>\n19.3.2003 for  5i\u00a2;.4.&#8217;2oo3 for 9315,0001-.<br \/>\nwhen the   were returned to the<br \/>\nIespondennwitig  .&#8221;:insu\ufb01eie11t fund&#8221;. In this<\/p>\n<p>regard, a lef\u00a7al_4_VVVnotViee 8.7 .2003 was issued by the<\/p>\n<p>jsespondentv.  On  ,of the same, the petitioner herein<\/p>\n<p>A1*e_;)1Aie(i.&#8211;.   allegation made in the notice.<\/p>\n<p> Resnon\ufb01ent in proof of his case, he got himself<\/p>\n<p>  &#8211;1 and also produced Exs.P1 to P7. Petitioner<\/p>\n<p>  examined as I)W&#8211;1 and examined two witnesses as<\/p>\n<p>K<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>4. The Mal court on appreciation of the evidence convicted<br \/>\nthe accused for an offence punishable under Section.,&#8221;1{38 of<\/p>\n<p>Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused \ufb01led an <\/p>\n<p>the lower appellate court. The appellate  &#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>consideration and re-appxreciatzion of ithel evidence;  the &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>judgment of the trial court.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Learned Counsel for thelvlvupetitionetll  that. the<\/p>\n<p>legal notice is dated  ts&#8221;&#8216;&#8211;no acknotvledgement<br \/>\nproduced for having served\ufb02   However, reply is<br \/>\ngiven to the   notice on  V The complaint is<br \/>\n\ufb01led on   is no date of receipt of<br \/>\nthe iegal     taking into consideration<br \/>\nthe date on  complaint is within 15 days<\/p>\n<p>from the date lofhzecelipt  legal notice. The complaint is not<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;    &#8216; v,.I.~.i..e\u00ab&#8217;contended that, as per the complaint.<\/p>\n<p>the  that. the petitioner herein had borrowed<\/p>\n<p> bepayahle after six months, though the cheques<\/p>\n<p> V are   and 10.4.2003, but both the cheques are<br \/>\n4onvVit.).3.20O3 only, i.e.. even before expixy of six months&#8217;<br \/>\n He also contended that. the cheques were collected<br \/>\n itowaxds the chit fund business and after payment of chit fund,<\/p>\n<p>3  the cheques are not returned. and it is clear from the evidence of<\/p>\n<p>DWs- 1 to 3. The respondent was in the habit of collecting blank<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>is received on 10.7.2003. The receipt for having issued the legal<br \/>\nnotice by registered post is also produced. which is dated<\/p>\n<p>8.7.2003. If the date of acknowledgement is taken as <\/p>\n<p>the complaint is \ufb01led after expiry of 15 days   .<\/p>\n<p>submitted that, in the order sheet of themtrial 0&#8242; &#8221; &#8216;V <\/p>\n<p>filed by the respondent is also recorded.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;7. As regards to the demandiotiiamount inonths, 0&#8242; 0<\/p>\n<p>he submitted that, though the cheqnes&#8221;Lsre&#8211;~datedA&#8217;  and<br \/>\n10.4.2003, they were itinfeentonths i.e., after<br \/>\nexpiry of six months._:&#8221;H__e   at no point of<br \/>\ntime, the  cheques are lying<br \/>\nwith the respondent;    thought, when the<br \/>\nlegal notice by way of reply such a contention<br \/>\nis raised. He\ufb01nther&#8217; ttiat. according to the reply. the<\/p>\n<p>chit \ufb01lndgebusixxess&#8217;-got&#8217; ovei?  February 2003 and the cheques<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;iv_efe&#8217; not  Butimthe evidence of the petitioner and two<\/p>\n<p>wietlesisesi :.?by him. they do not support the said<\/p>\n<p>iE*&#8221;&#8216;contentio:n  to them, the chit fund business is of<br \/>\n if the._c\u00a71it fund business got over in 2001, the petitioner<br \/>\n Vnotihave kept quiet \ufb01ll July 2003 and there is no evidence<br \/>\n  that. at any point of time. such a demand is made except<br \/>\n A\u00e9\u00e9sefti\ufb02g in the oral evidence. No material is produced by the<\/p>\n<p> petitioner. He also submitted that, to prove that there was a chit<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-6-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>fund business, no&#8211;evidence is produced except oral evidence of<br \/>\nDws-2 and 3. Legally chit fund business cannot be earned.<\/p>\n<p>without valid licence under the provisions of Chit <\/p>\n<p>submitted that, such a contention cannot be raised__iji1iee$- _<\/p>\n<p>is a speci\ufb01c material.\n<\/p>\n<p>8. Insofar as contention as Iegogd  <\/p>\n<p> 15 days. is concerned, no Vdoiobt, the daeknovtdedfgementvdied&#8221; e.<\/p>\n<p>not marked in the evidence, but  not  fithat, the<br \/>\nacknowledgement \ufb01nds   &#8211; ., It&#8217; is aigoddencn\ufb01o\ufb02ed<br \/>\nin the order sheet that. it   memo. The<br \/>\nacknowledgement.di\u00e9.e1o3ed=A._se:$rtee of 10.7.2003, if that<\/p>\n<p>date is taken i:1to .\u00a2\u00a2;isi\u00a2:e:a1i;;:\u00ab\u00a7;&#8217; tliedoomdplaint is \ufb01led after 15<\/p>\n<p>days. I do -jnotd  is any justi\ufb01eation in the<\/p>\n<p>contention Ieisedtby  Counsel for the petitioner. Even<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;that  .\u00e91ekaoW1ed.gement is not marked in the<\/p>\n<p>   for the purpose of marking the same. again<\/p>\n<p> &#8211;:back to the trial court does not sexve any<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;v&#8221;purpose__no;&#8217;v&#8217;it  the interest ofjustiee also.<\/p>\n<p>2  AA ;9:.,AsNx\\ega1*ds to the chit fund transaction. DW~1 in his<\/p>\n<p> eirideoeeddstates that, it is in 2001, wherein it is alleged that, the<br \/>\n&#8216;iea\u00e9pondent had carried on the chit fund business for an amount<\/p>\n<p> of Rs.&#8217;.23,{)O0\/ &#8211;, but looking at the reply given by the petitioner as<\/p>\n<p>K<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">-3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>that is so, haw many instalments of chit fund was paid, how<\/p>\n<p>many cheques were issued as security and why demand for the<br \/>\nreturn of cheques was not made and same is not explained either<\/p>\n<p>in the reply notice or in the evidence.\n<\/p>\n<p>1 1. Both the &#8216;courts have coneurren\ufb02y held   H<br \/>\npetitioner. This being the revision, even on re-appsveeia\ufb01eztii<br \/>\n1&#8217;e~co11sidemtion of the entire evidence.<br \/>\nto interfere with the judments of   i ii i V<\/p>\n<p>12. However. at this   the<br \/>\npetitioner submits that, the  theiebxieunt and<br \/>\nthe sentence of  by the<\/p>\n<p>tna&#8217; 1 court Vbeimisetii  the request. I \ufb01nd it<br \/>\nreasonable   &#8216;aside&#8230;&#8217; imprisonment of one year<br \/>\nimposed by   In respect of remaining pan.<\/p>\n<p>j1;idgme13.&#8217;t&#8217; 5&#8217;zfen_iait;s.\n<\/p>\n<p>    for the petitioner at this stage<\/p>\n<p> ipeii\ufb01oner has deposited Rs.25,000]- towards<\/p>\n<p>~ jVcompensa\ufb01Lx1i3~ and Rs.3,000\/ &#8212; \ufb01ne. The cheque amount is<\/p>\n<p> He submits that, the compensation amount be<\/p>\n<p>i.   Learned Counsel for the respondent agreed to \ufb01x the<\/p>\n<p>  .;_:eiJ1pensation amount at Rs.50.000\/ -. Considering the<\/p>\n<p> submissions of both sides, though the matter was disposed of on<\/p>\n<p>KNM\/&#8211; 5 ~<\/p>\n<p>merit, however, the sentence ordered by the trial court is<br \/>\nmodi\ufb01ed. In the light of the submissions made by both &#8216;(ha<\/p>\n<p>Counsel, the petitioner herein is sentenced with Rs.3,m}Q]\u00bb\u00bb_ ii1g.e<\/p>\n<p>and Rs.50.000l- compensation, out of which the   _<\/p>\n<p>ajimady deposited Rs.3.000\/- \ufb01ne and.  <\/p>\n<p>compensation. The remaining  uh:-rt:\n<\/p>\n<p>weeks, in default, the }3\u20ac&#8217;fLit.l0}f1\u00a3&#8217;)I&#8217; *1&#8243;{&#8216;)&#8217; 111*1&#8217;\u00a2:i::-._r&#8221;gc&gt;  zofkg  %\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>months&#8217; SJ. . _ &#8216; &#8216;<br \/>\nAccon:1i11g1y. the 1?e*ari:s3::ci:zsaL_PefiVi.:i_1&#8211;i  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court M Basheer vs Ahamad Pasha on 1 August, 2008 Author: Subhash B.Adi .i.. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 131&#8242; DAY OF AUGUST 2008 BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MRJUSTICE SUBHASH B;\u00a7&#8217;\\D;-.V &#8220;V BETWEEN: M. Bashcer, S] 0. Abdul Khadar, Major, R.B. Steal Factory W&#8217;u1*I-as, Halepcte, Narashnhaiajapma. (By Sri. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-203995","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M Basheer vs Ahamad Pasha on 1 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M Basheer vs Ahamad Pasha on 1 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-31T01:40:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M Basheer vs Ahamad Pasha on 1 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-31T01:40:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1123,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008\",\"name\":\"M Basheer vs Ahamad Pasha on 1 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-31T01:40:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M Basheer vs Ahamad Pasha on 1 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M Basheer vs Ahamad Pasha on 1 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M Basheer vs Ahamad Pasha on 1 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-31T01:40:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M Basheer vs Ahamad Pasha on 1 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-31T01:40:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008"},"wordCount":1123,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008","name":"M Basheer vs Ahamad Pasha on 1 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-31T01:40:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-basheer-vs-ahamad-pasha-on-1-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M Basheer vs Ahamad Pasha on 1 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203995","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203995"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203995\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203995"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203995"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203995"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}