{"id":203999,"date":"2011-09-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011"},"modified":"2018-10-26T21:08:47","modified_gmt":"2018-10-26T15:38:47","slug":"mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Anuj Kumar vs Vijaya Bank on 20 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Anuj Kumar vs Vijaya Bank on 20 September, 2011<\/div>\n
                       CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                           Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                         Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                                Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                                         Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002167\/14706\n                                                                 Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002167\nRelevant facts emerging from the Appeal:\n\nAppellant                            :      Mr. Anuj Kumar,\n                                            Flat No. 172, Sector -22,\n                                            Pocket -I, DDA SFS Flats,\n                                            Dwarka, New Delhi.\n\nRespondent                           :      Public Information Officer,\n                                            Vijaya Bank\n                                            Regional Office:-\n                                            Vijaya Building, 3rd Floor,\n                                            17, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi -110001.\n\nRTI application filed on             :      08-03-2011\nPIO replied on                       :      09-04-2011\nFirst Appeal filed on                :      22-04-2011\nFirst Appellate Authority order of   :      04-07-2011\nSecond Appeal received on            :      05-08-2011\n\nInformation sought: the appellant asked regarding saving A\/c No. 119118 opened in the name of\nAnuj Kumar on 21-08-2004, the information following as under:-\n1.    Attested copies of account opening documents and bank transactions with supporting papers.\n2.    Name, designation and address of the official officer, who has opened this account in your\n      bank.\n3.    Name, designation and address of the official, who has attested the signature of relevant person\n      for operating this account.\n4.    Name and address of the Manager Chief Manager of Vijaya Bank, Branch Samaipur, Delhi on\n      21.08.2004.\n5.    Whether a Saving A\/c can be opened with your bank without personal presence of concerned\n      person in bank.\n6.    Whether bank transactions can be made without personal presence in the bank.\n7.    Whether PAN No. is required for opening the account and heavy cash transaction in your bank.\n8.    Whether any action has been taken on my complaint dated 10\/02\/2011, handed over to your\n      goodself personally, if so kindly provide the copy of that action taken documents.\n\nThe PIO Reply.\nI have examined your application and furnish the required particulars as follows:\nOur Samaypur, Delhi branch opened Saving A\/c 119118 in the name of Anuj Kumar, S\/o. Om Pal\nSingh on 21.08.2004. while opening the account, the applicant submitted the Identity card issued by\nthe Election commission of India. The photograph affixed on the Account opening form and as on the\nIdentity card are the same. However, We observe that the photograph in the PAN card AFIPK926SD\nsubmitted by you along with the RTI application dated 09.03.2011 is of a different person.\nFurther, the address mentioned in the SB A\/c 119118 is U-24 C, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi - 110 088 and\nwhereas the address mentioned in your application is Flat No.172, Sector-22, Pocket-1, DDA SFS\nFlats, Dwarka, New Delhi. Thus the information\/document sought by you pertains to a third party,\nwhich is exempted from disclosure under section 8(e) & (j) of Right to Information Act 2005.\n\n\n                                                                                          Page 1 of 3\n Grounds for the First Appeal:\nThe appellant is not satisfied with the PIO reply.\n\nOrder of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):\n        \"I have carefully examined your appeal dated 07.06.2011 and the reply given by the PIO vide\nletter No. ROD\/PER\/RTI\/1482\/2011 dated 09.04.2011 against your RTI application dated 09.03.2011.\nOn examination of the information and documents placed before me, I am of the view that PlO has\nrightly replied to you the photograph affixed on the account opening form and the photograph\nembossed on voter identity card issued by the Election Commission of India is of the same person.\nHowever, the said photograph does not match with the photograph embossed on your PAN card.\nUnder the circumstances, I am of the considered opinion that the information sought by you is of third\nparty information which is exempted from disclosure under Section 8 (e) & (j) of the RTI Act.\n\nGround of the Second Appeal:\nThe appellant is not satisfied with the PIO reply & FAA order.\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n
 emerging during Hearing:\n<\/p>\n
The following were present
\nAppellant: Mr. Anuj Kumar;\n<\/p>\n
Respondent: Absent;\n<\/p>\n
        The Appellant states that some one has opened a fake bank account in his name at the address
\nU&V-24C, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi – 110 088. It appears that his Election ID has been used for this
\npurpose. Subsequently the Appellant has changed his address and in January 2011 the Police made
\ninquiries from him regarding this account. Since he had never opened this account he file a complaint
\nwith the Bank on 10\/02\/2011 in which he had informed the Bank that an account appear to have been
\nfraudulently opened in his name by using his photographs and copy of Voter ID. Since he got no
\nresponse to this he file RTI application on 08\/03\/2011 asking for details of this account and how it was
\nopened as well as seeking information on the progress of this complaint dated 10\/02\/2011. The PIO
\nhas not provided any information about the progress of this complaint and refused to provide the
\ninformation about the other queries on the ground that it is third party information. Since the Voter ID
\nand the address provided in the said account was of the Appellant where he was residing earlier this
\ncannot be claimed to be third party information. The claim for exemption of information does not
\nappear to be valid by the PIO. The Commission also directs the PIO to provide the information about
\nthe progress of the complaint in the following format:\n<\/p>\n
     Date on which      Name and designation of Action taken Date on which forwarded to
\n     Complaint received The officer receiving it.            Next officer\/office.<\/p>\n
         *there will be as many rows as the number of officers who handled the complaint.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
   Attested photocopies of all letters and notings will be provided.\n<\/p>\n
Decision:\n<\/p>\n
The Appeal is allowed.\n<\/p>\n
       The PIO is directed to provide the information on the first seven queries of the
\nRTI application as per available records. As regards query-8 the PIO is directed to
\nprovide the information on the progress of the complaint as directed above. The PIO is
\ndirected to provide the complete information to the Appellant before 15 October 2011.\n<\/p>\n
The issue before the Commission is of not supplying the complete, required information by the
\nPIO within 30 days as required by the law.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                            Page 2 of 3<\/span><\/p>\n
 From the facts before the Commission it appears that the PIO is guilty of not furnishing information
\nwithin the time specified under sub-section (1) of Section 7 by not replying within 30 days, as per the
\nrequirement of the RTI Act. He has further refused to obey the orders of his superior officer, which
\nraises a reasonable doubt that the denial of information may also be malafide. The First Appellate
\nAuthority has clearly ordered the information to be given.\n<\/p>\n
It appears that the PIO’s actions attract the penal provisions of Section 20 (1). A showcause notice is
\nbeing issued to him, and he is directed give his reasons to the Commission to show cause why penalty
\nshould not be levied on him.\n<\/p>\n
He will present himself before the Commission at the above address on 21 October 2011 at 12.30pm
\nalongwith his written submissions showing cause why penalty should not be imposed on him as
\nmandated under Section 20 (1). He will also submit proof of having given the information to the
\nappellant.\n<\/p>\n
If there are other persons responsible for the delay in providing the information to the Appellant the
\nPIO is directed to inform such persons of the show cause hearing and direct them to appear before
\nthe Commission with him. If no other responsible persons are brought by the persons asked to
\nshowcause hearing, it will be presumed that they are the responsible persons.\n<\/p>\n
This decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
\nAny information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                                    Shailesh Gandhi
\n                                                                                          Information Commissioner
\n                                                                                                 20 September 2011
\n(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)(NS)<\/p>\n
                                                                                                              Page 3 of 3<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Anuj Kumar vs Vijaya Bank on 20 September, 2011 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi – 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002167\/14706 Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002167 Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Anuj Kumar, Flat No. 172, Sector -22, Pocket -I, DDA SFS […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-203999","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Anuj Kumar vs Vijaya Bank on 20 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Anuj Kumar vs Vijaya Bank on 20 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-26T15:38:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Anuj Kumar vs Vijaya Bank on 20 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-26T15:38:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":681,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Anuj Kumar vs Vijaya Bank on 20 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-26T15:38:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Anuj Kumar vs Vijaya Bank on 20 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Anuj Kumar vs Vijaya Bank on 20 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Anuj Kumar vs Vijaya Bank on 20 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-26T15:38:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Anuj Kumar vs Vijaya Bank on 20 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-26T15:38:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011"},"wordCount":681,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011","name":"Mr.Anuj Kumar vs Vijaya Bank on 20 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-26T15:38:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anuj-kumar-vs-vijaya-bank-on-20-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Anuj Kumar vs Vijaya Bank on 20 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203999","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=203999"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/203999\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=203999"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=203999"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=203999"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}