{"id":204022,"date":"2009-05-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009"},"modified":"2018-09-27T06:25:15","modified_gmt":"2018-09-27T00:55:15","slug":"sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri C Bahrat Kumar S\/O Late Sri. &#8230; vs Dr Ramakrishna Gowda on 28 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri C Bahrat Kumar S\/O Late Sri. &#8230; vs Dr Ramakrishna Gowda on 28 May, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H N Das<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH oou RT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE 5  % \n\nDATED THIS THE 23*\" mew cw MAY, 2\u00a7\u00b08  1  A  V} %%\n\nBEFORE\n\n\"me HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE rm. NAc\u00a7Aa4\u00a7&gt;HA\u00a72 = % \n\nW.P.10034 :2gg8gafg%--cPc$)\"     A\nBETWEEN:     t\n\nSri C.Bharath Kumar ; \"   \nS4\/o late Sri Charrdmuil S.K._..   V\nMajor. aged about\ufb01\ufb01vyearss ' . _  ' \nPia No.13,-9'     \"   \nShankarpuram;   'V   \"   _\u00bb\nBangalore-56!)   '     V' ~\n\nV ....   ' \"&lt;;;.. &#039;\u00ab..,_wLPETITIONER\n\n(By Sri Pam %&#039;Jaa\u00a71,A;\u00a2m  [ *  %\n\nAND: 5 - ..\n\n &quot;  s3r.;:;:{\u00a3nax:sshna  &#039;\n\nS\/or Eats Sri.H-.D6d\u00a2a1hamme Gowda\n\n  V _ &quot;52, &quot;&#039;:-yam &quot;  &#039;\n_ Y\n\nV pk Q aanga1or.;\u00a256o&#039;o4o.\n\nNo.3 ?96fB, 29.&#039;?  9&quot;&#039; Grass,\n6&quot;&#039; Main, RFC -Layout, Vijaynagar\n\n..RESF&#039;ONDENT\n\n  &#039;* (BiyV[3ri.Nandish Gowcia for\n\n &quot;Sr? R.B.Sadashivapa, Adv. )\n\nThis wrii peti\ufb01on \ufb01led under Artictes 226 &amp; 227 of the\n\nVA A V Constitution of India praying to quash the order cmo.7.2ooa\n\npassed on I.A.No.5, in OS No.16736l2006 pending in the\ncourt of City Civii Judge, Bangalore (CCH-20).\n\nW\n\n\n\nThis petition coming on for preiiminaty hear\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9  \n\nday, the court made the foifuwing: _. ~ ~-- . ._\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>In \ufb01wis petition, the petitionephas &#8216;pr\u00e9iyed for?&#8217; in   &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>{he nature of certiorari to quash  dated .V1O;?.&#8221;.V2od\u00ab&#8217;\u00a7 iri&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>0.S.No.16?36f2006  by&#8217;%%Ltrje%3%%%\u00a2%iiy.%_civie'&#8221;Judge,<br \/>\nBangaiore City dismissing I.A.:~4g:.s%ai:\u00e97eci um}praer 12 Rule<br \/>\n6 opc.   &#8216; &#8221;  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>2.__   wrespondent is the<br \/>\ndefendant _t:\u00a7t\u00a2:e Tfiae  in this order for<br \/>\nconveniehc\u00e9the  \u00a7Ee. :i6i&#8217;%\u00e9ned to their status before<\/p>\n<p>the &#8220;ma! Qouf\u00e9.\n<\/p>\n<p>   \ufb01led 0.S.No.16738J2006 against the<\/p>\n<p>H {\u20ac\u00a2&lt;;\\rery of a sum of Rs.85.87,000l~ together<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;V witr&#8217;\u00a7 inzte&#8217;*#:e;Vst&#8217;\u00e9i;rzd costs. The defendant entered apmarance<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;A  mfose  Trial Court and \ufb02ied written statement interaiia<\/p>\n<p>g\u00e9nying the claim of piaena\ufb02. Thereafter me plain\ufb01ff med an<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8221;\u00a7pp{ica\u00a7m LA.r4o.5 under Order :2 me e cpc for a<\/p>\n<p>iudgmenz on admission to an extent of Rs.70,75.000l~. The<\/p>\n<p>defendant \ufb02ied their obiections denying the averments made<\/p>\n<p>,.__,x_,<br \/>\nK<\/p>\n<p>in the af\ufb01davit in support of LA.No.5. The Trial Court <\/p>\n<p>hearing both the par\ufb01es and on appreciation of the  V:-\u00ab : E  <\/p>\n<p>and docurnems on record, passed the impugne\ufb01ii <\/p>\n<p>rejecting i.A.No.5 on me ground that i{1ere;.:i4$A -Taci\u00e9mis\u00e9icn<\/p>\n<p>by the defendants. Hence, this.yv1&#8217;Et    <\/p>\n<p>peti\ufb01on.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Heard argumen\u00e9i\u00e9\ufb01n   peru\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01f the<\/p>\n<p>entire writ papers. V<\/p>\n<p>4; &#8216;&lt;&quot;J&quot;&#039;rc;&#039;eT.\u00a7.&#039;A:&#039;?;;&#039;2 -6  under:<br \/>\nJudgz! Ient:d\u00a3\u00e9:&#039;32im\u00a7ifs%\u00a7t%\u00a7 &#039;<br \/>\n(1)  fact have been made eft\ufb01er<br \/>\n&#039; &#039;V in  olhervvise, whefher orally or in<br \/>\n wtiiing.  may at any stagegof the suit,<br \/>\nV 1 ..  the application of any party or of its own<br \/>\n waiting forthedetermna\ufb01on of<br \/>\n.. &#039;anfb\ufb02zer question between the parties, make<br \/>\n&quot; _ Ewch Order orgive suahjudgmem&#039; as it may think<br \/>\n&#039;at, having wanna such <\/p>\n<p>(2) Whenever ajuvxtnent is pronounced under sub-<br \/>\n;z:Ie{1) a decree shall he dnawn up in eooomlance<br \/>\nwitirthejudgmentandthedmreeshalibearthe<br \/>\ndate on which thajuwment was pronounced.<\/p>\n<p>____\/&#039;\\&#8230;.r<\/p>\n<p>&#039;&#039;*e.,.\/<\/p>\n<p>pleading or come within the scope of the Ruie<br \/>\nstateinents are not made in the course of the<br \/>\notherwise. when a statement is ma\u00abaeeAtb:)_a  _<br \/>\nstateinent is brought be-ioie {be c:ouiii  eqn:ie.een oi &#039; T T<br \/>\nliability by an appioaiion iiied under oeeexii, rg\u00bbae% 6\u00bb.endf &quot;&#8211;~ <\/p>\n<p>_ the other side has su\ufb01icient  fa  <\/p>\n<p>admission and if such explanatioiiie   by} the<br \/>\nCourt, we do not think  infei ceait  in  to<br \/>\npass a decree. We have &#039; _.; &#039; _   of the ciaim<br \/>\nand the mamer in whi&#039;cfi~\u20ac.&#039;:e.  with the<br \/>\nsame. When r\u00a7\u00bb1e&#039;fi1fe}&quot;   made<br \/>\nin the pmcem &quot;ii\u00e9ge eee  qfbireefnis meeting and the<br \/>\nieiier gig   read together,<\/p>\n<p>extent ie which the  is in dispute. And the<\/p>\n<p>court had \u00e9 :,iiiii;{toV  same and grant a miee. We<br \/>\nthink; t?1i.s.appm&amp;.*;fiVi$&#039;unexcep6onab\ufb01e.<\/p>\n<p>   ~.&quot;4.&quot;~&amp;ef\u00a7i*e_ the trial Judge, there was me pieading<br \/>\n  ie&#039;ssI&quot;_\u00a7ai_i  as in the circumstaiices in which<\/p>\n<p> was made ea as in take it out of the<\/p>\n<p>   caiegery eiedmieezms which cieeied liability. On me other<br \/>\n ., fxaiiag what is stated in \ufb01re course of me pieadiizgs, in<br \/>\n   &#039;enswer ie the anolicetibn filed under&#039; cine: XI! Rziie 5, sec,<\/p>\n<p> stand is clearly in the con\ufb01azy. Statements had been<\/p>\n<p> Wmede in the course of the Minmes ofthe Board oioiieciore<br \/>\nhe-Idori 30&quot;&#039; May, 1990 In which wehave ereadyedveneciio<\/p>\n<p>in demil. in me pleadings raised before the Court, mete is a<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>clear statement made by {he raspondent as<br \/>\nundisputed part of she claim made by them. In regard~\u00ab\u00a3ri.&#8217;:?2i.\u00a7_   ,f &#8221; ,<br \/>\naspect of communicating the resolution de\ufb01ed  \u00a3113};-&#8220;&#8216;<br \/>\n1990 inu2e1e:terdatad4&#8243;&#8221;June, 199Q,wh\u00a7tis<br \/>\namdavst in opp\u00e9zsiaon in application ta:ader,OElef._)Gi,_.&#8217;Rh}*e.. 3 &#8216;  T<br \/>\nCPO is save, whaf are madam&#8217; on  \u00e9nd  wha&#8221;t\u00bb &#8216;&#8211;~<br \/>\nwould appaar hum we  30&#8243;&#8216; kgv:ay,T&#8217;V.A19g;\u00a2.A,.5;;-&#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>allegations in the contrary am  This<br \/>\naverment would clearly.      not<br \/>\ndeny a word of what    &#8216;arid what is<br \/>\ndenied is the    denial is<br \/>\nevasive and   .i.udg&#8217;;e&#8221;i;\u00a7 jzisii\ufb01ed in holding<br \/>\nthat there is*anc\u00a3:r:e cements of the<\/p>\n<p>docuz\ufb01\u00e9rrts amc   extent of the admission but<br \/>\nthe mcnme in me-;:ab:\u00a7iy is<\/p>\n<p>   refemhg to the expnession<\/p>\n<p>_   1;)&#8221; &#8216;Rule 6 of Omar XII, CFC, we can dtaw an<br \/>\n  ihfererce. V&#8217;  case on me basis of the p%&#8217;ngs<\/p>\n<p> In the&#8221;i\u00a2a%se m the shape of the appncaaons under that<br \/>\nRui\u00e9  meanssuenng affidavit wf\ufb01ch ciearfy renew&#8221; tes the<\/p>\n<p>..  Qjdmls\u00e9iag\ufb01; If that is so, Interpretation of ihe expmssron<br \/>\n&#8216; ..f_\u00bb  unnecessary.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The obgect of Order 12 Ruie 6 CPO is to enabie<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217; the piazntiff to a speedy gudgment to Ehe extent of the relief<\/p>\n<p>admitted by the defendant. it the admission is in respect of<\/p>\n<p> l<\/p>\n<p>the entire relief ctaimed in the plaint then the court rnsty    <\/p>\n<p>a judgment to the entire claim. If the  <\/p>\n<p>respect of a portion of the relief tt1en:&#8217;\u00bb11&#8217;1e:;t:tt:-tztt if<\/p>\n<p>par\ufb01ai judgment. This admission may beint pt=eedijng_Vor <\/p>\n<p>otherwise. The word &#8216;otiwerwiseti  Jfand<br \/>\ninclude me admission ebewtjorei&#8217; pleetztings.<br \/>\nAny such admission must  claimed<br \/>\nin the ptaint. Sg1eti&#8217;jA;va\u00e9\u20acimiesto:i;.oiear, speci\ufb01c<br \/>\nand the  or quati\ufb01ed<br \/>\nor    pass judgment on<br \/>\nadmission. :   in pteadings and mat the<\/p>\n<p>same fatts nndet&#8221;\ufb01:eV &#8216;wont &#8216;oinerwise&#8217; under \ufb02ute 8, then an<\/p>\n<p> &#8211;  _opp.\u00bb\u00a7ttunity shat! o\u00e9&#8217;prov\u00abided to the defendant to explain the<\/p>\n<p> said  end if such explanation is aooeptabte m the<\/p>\n<p>cfc::.r.rt&#8221;i%t1en&#8217;t\u00a3.4;e__re?&#8217;oVa&#8217;a:nnot be a judgment on admission under<\/p>\n<p> Order?  6 C90. Keeping \ufb01wese prtnoiples in mtnd it is<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V &#8221;  to examine the fact situation in the present case.<\/p>\n<p>7. tn support of me apptieation i.A.No.5. tiw plaintiff<\/p>\n<p> med an affidavit. In this ef\ufb01davit the plairtti\ufb01 reiied on an<\/p>\n<p>encioreement made by the defendant on 2.6.2006 admitting<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;1\/<\/p>\n<p>dispose the same within a time frame of six months frorr_:_&#8217;&#8211;&#8220;t\u00a7r:zAMe&#8221; 4_    <\/p>\n<p>\u00e9ate of receipt of copy of this order.<\/p>\n<p>DKBI<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri C Bahrat Kumar S\/O Late Sri. &#8230; vs Dr Ramakrishna Gowda on 28 May, 2009 Author: H N Das IN THE HIGH oou RT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE 5 % DATED THIS THE 23*&#8221; mew cw MAY, 2\u00a7\u00b08 1 A V} %% BEFORE &#8220;me HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE rm. NAc\u00a7Aa4\u00a7&gt;HA\u00a72 = % [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-204022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri C Bahrat Kumar S\/O Late Sri. ... vs Dr Ramakrishna Gowda on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri C Bahrat Kumar S\/O Late Sri. ... vs Dr Ramakrishna Gowda on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-27T00:55:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri C Bahrat Kumar S\\\/O Late Sri. &#8230; vs Dr Ramakrishna Gowda on 28 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-27T00:55:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1019,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri C Bahrat Kumar S\\\/O Late Sri. ... vs Dr Ramakrishna Gowda on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-27T00:55:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri C Bahrat Kumar S\\\/O Late Sri. &#8230; vs Dr Ramakrishna Gowda on 28 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri C Bahrat Kumar S\/O Late Sri. ... vs Dr Ramakrishna Gowda on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri C Bahrat Kumar S\/O Late Sri. ... vs Dr Ramakrishna Gowda on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-27T00:55:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri C Bahrat Kumar S\/O Late Sri. &#8230; vs Dr Ramakrishna Gowda on 28 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-27T00:55:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009"},"wordCount":1019,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009","name":"Sri C Bahrat Kumar S\/O Late Sri. ... vs Dr Ramakrishna Gowda on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-27T00:55:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-bahrat-kumar-so-late-sri-vs-dr-ramakrishna-gowda-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri C Bahrat Kumar S\/O Late Sri. &#8230; vs Dr Ramakrishna Gowda on 28 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204022\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}