{"id":204025,"date":"2009-05-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009"},"modified":"2015-05-04T01:36:33","modified_gmt":"2015-05-03T20:06:33","slug":"kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"Kisanrao Khobragade Education … vs Bhojraj on 2 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court<\/div>\n
Kisanrao Khobragade Education … vs Bhojraj on 2 May, 2009<\/div>\n
Bench: F.M. Reis<\/div>\n
    wp2593.00.odt                                                                                         1\/5\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                                      \n                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\n                             NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR.\n\n\n\n\n                                                                            \n                               WRIT PETITION NO. 2593 OF 2000\n\n\n\n\n                                                                           \n    1. Kisanrao Khobragade Education Society,\n       Armori, Through its President Shri Bhagyawan\n       s\/o Kisanrao Khobragade, Adult,\n       r\/o Armori, Distt. Gadchiroli.\n\n\n\n\n                                                           \n    2. Principal,\n       Yeshwantrao Chavan College,      \n       Lakhandur, Distt. Bhandara.  ::                     PETITIONERS\n\n            -: Versus :-\n                                       \n    1. Bhojraj s\/o Kevalram Motghare,\n       aged about 38 yrs., r\/o Talodhi (Kh.),\n       Post Gangalwadi, Tq. Bramhapuri,\n       Distt. Chandrapur.\n        \n\n\n    2. University & College Tribunal,\n     \n\n\n\n       Nagpur University, Nagpur.\n\n    3. Nagpur University,\n       through its Registrar, \n       Tagore Marg, Civil Lines,\n\n\n\n\n\n       Nagpur.                                   ::        RESPONDENTS                              \n\n    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n                          Shri S. A. Radke, Advocate for the petitioners.\n                         Shri A. S. Kilor, Advocate for respondent No. 1.\n\n\n\n\n\n                                   None for respondents No. 2 & 3.\n    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n                                                                        CORAM:  F. M. REIS, J.\n<\/pre>\n
                                                                        DATE   :  2nd May, 2009<\/p>\n
                                            ORAL JUDGMENT<\/p>\n
                                                                            ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:34:21 :::<\/span>
\n     wp2593.00.odt                                                                                 2\/5<\/p>\n
    1.       Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and respondent No. 1.\n<\/p>\n
         The petition has been filed to challenge order dated 4\/5\/2000 passed by <\/p>\n
         respondent No. 2 whereby Misc. Civil Application No. 16 of 2000 filed by <\/p>\n
         respondent No. 1 for condonation of delay was allowed.  It is the case of <\/p>\n
         the petitioners that on or about 3\/3\/2000 respondent No. 1 filed appeal <\/p>\n
         under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 challenging <\/p>\n
         his  termination   w.e.f.   July,   1998   and   prayed   for   relief   of   reinstatement <\/p>\n
         with all back wages.  As the appeal was not filed within the period of 30 <\/p>\n
         days, respondent No. 1 moved an application for condonation of delay <\/p>\n
         for preferring the said appeal.  In the said application the grounds which <\/p>\n
         were sought to be invoked by respondent No. 1 as a justification to file <\/p>\n
         appeal beyond the period of limitation was that, he was pursuing another <\/p>\n
         remedy in as much as he had filed representation before respondent No.3 <\/p>\n
         to   get   his   grievances   decided.     According   to   respondent   No.1,   he   was <\/p>\n
         bona-fidely pursuing his remedy before respondent No. 3.   Respondent <\/p>\n
         No. 1 further stated in the application that despite of direction on the part <\/p>\n
         of respondent No. 3 to get him reinstated, the petitioners failed to comply <\/p>\n
         with   such   direction   which   forced   him   to   file   the   said   appeal   before <\/p>\n
         respondent No. 2.\n<\/p>\n
    2.       Despite   all   objections   on   the   part   of   the   petitioners   to   the   said <\/p>\n
         application for condonation of delay, respondent No. 2 vide impugned <\/p>\n
         oder dated 4\/5\/2000 condoned the delay to prefer the appeal filed by the <\/p>\n
         respondent No. 1.  Being aggrieved by the said order dated 4\/5\/2000, the <\/p>\n
                                                                      ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:34:21 :::<\/span>
\n     wp2593.00.odt                                                                             3\/5<\/p>\n
       present petition has been filed by the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
    3.     During the course of hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioners <\/p>\n
       sought to impugn the said order passed by respondent No. 2 contending <\/p>\n
       that there was no justification shown by respondent No. 1 which could <\/p>\n
       condone the delay to prefer the appeal.  Respondent No. 1 had not shown <\/p>\n
       any   cause   to   condone   the   delay   and   consequently   there   was   no <\/p>\n
       justification according to the petitioners in respondent No. 2 passing the <\/p>\n
       impugned order.  On the other hand, the learned Counsel appearing for <\/p>\n
       respondent No. 1 urged before me that there was ample justification on <\/p>\n
       the part of respondent No. 1 in preferring the appeal beyond the period <\/p>\n
       of   limitation   as   he   was   pursuing   the   remedy   bona-fidely   before <\/p>\n
       respondent   No.   3   and   had   reasonable   expectation   that   he   would   get <\/p>\n
       required results before respondent No. 3.  Having not been able to get the <\/p>\n
       relief as sought for, in view of the attitude by the petitioners in failing to <\/p>\n
       accept the directions by respondent No. 3 to reinstate respondent No. 1, <\/p>\n
       the appeal had to be preferred by respondent No. 1 before respondent <\/p>\n
       No.   2.    The   learned   Counsel   relied   upon   the   judgment   of   this   Court <\/p>\n
       reported in  2008 (2) Mh. L. J. -494  –  Sandeep Hiralal Netke vs. State of  <\/p>\n
       Maharashtra & others<\/a>.  The learned Counsel further submits that there is <\/p>\n
       no   dispute   that   respondent   No.   1   was   bona-fidely   pursuing   remedy <\/p>\n
       before respondent No. 3.  However, considering the attitude on the part <\/p>\n
       of the petitioner in failure to accept direction of respondent No.3, the <\/p>\n
       appeal had to be filed by respondent No. 1.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                  ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:34:21 :::<\/span><\/p>\n
     wp2593.00.odt                                                                              4\/5<\/p>\n
    4.     In the judgment of this Court, cited supra, at para 11, this Court has <\/p>\n
       held as under:\n<\/p>\n
                “It   is   significant   to   note   that   the   petitioner   had   made <\/p>\n
                representation   to   the   Deputy   Director   of   Education   and  <\/p>\n
                Vocational training, who had issued directions from time to <\/p>\n
                time and had even threatened the Management of stoppage of  <\/p>\n
                salary grants  and had also directed the Management  not  to <\/p>\n
                admit the students unless the directions were complied with.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                In   the   aid   circumstances,   the   petitioner   can   be   said   to   be  <\/p>\n
                entitled to a legitimate expectation that he would ultimately <\/p>\n
                get relief from the said Authority.  It is not as if the petitioner  <\/p>\n
                was   making   only   representations   after   representations.    The  <\/p>\n
                representations were met with the order being passed by the  <\/p>\n
                Deputy Director of Education and Vocational training.  In the  <\/p>\n
                said   circumstances,   the   delay   between   the   year   2000   and  <\/p>\n
                31-3-2003, when the Writ Petition filed by the petitioner was  <\/p>\n
                rejected, can  be justified.  In my view, the petitioner has shown <\/p>\n
                sufficient cause for condoning the said delay as it is well settled  <\/p>\n
                that it is to the extent of the delay but the cause shown.  In the <\/p>\n
                instant case, it cannot be said that the petitioner was negligent  <\/p>\n
                or that he was mala-fidely pursuing some other remedy….”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                 The facts in the present case and the facts before this Court in the <\/p>\n
       said judgment appears to be  identical.  There is no reason   shown   by <\/p>\n
                                                                   ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:34:21 :::<\/span>
\n     wp2593.00.odt                                                                               5\/5<\/p>\n
       the petitioner which could disclose that respondent No. 1 was mala-fidely <\/p>\n
       pursuing some other remedy or then there was any negligence on his <\/p>\n
       part in pursuing such remedy.   On the contrary, the facts disclosed, as <\/p>\n
       rightly held by respondent No. 2 that respondent No. 1 was pursuing the <\/p>\n
       remedy before the Authority in a bonafide and diligent manner.\n<\/p>\n
    5.     In such circumstances, it cannot be said that there was any infirmity <\/p>\n
       in respondent No. 2 condoning the delay in filing appeal by respondent <\/p>\n
       No.1.   However, the said application for condonation of delay ought to <\/p>\n
       have been disposed of by awarding some costs to the petitioner, which <\/p>\n
       was not done by respondent No. 2 whilst passing the impugned order.\n<\/p>\n
       Consequently,  there  is no  illegality  so  as  to  interfere  in  the   impugned <\/p>\n
       order   dated   04\/5\/2000   in   M.   C.   A.   No.   16   of   2000.     But,   however, <\/p>\n
       respondent   No.   1   is   directed   to   pay   costs   of   Rs.   1,000\/-   (rupees   one <\/p>\n
       thousand only), within two weeks, to the petitioner for getting the delay <\/p>\n
       condoned.\n<\/p>\n
    6.     In   the   circumstances,   the   writ   petition   is   disposed   of   accordingly.\n<\/p>\n
       Rule discharged.\n<\/p>\n
                                                     JUDGE<\/p>\n
    WWL<\/p>\n
                                                                    ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 14:34:21 :::<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court Kisanrao Khobragade Education … vs Bhojraj on 2 May, 2009 Bench: F.M. Reis wp2593.00.odt 1\/5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2593 OF 2000 1. Kisanrao Khobragade Education Society, Armori, Through its President Shri Bhagyawan s\/o Kisanrao Khobragade, Adult, r\/o Armori, Distt. Gadchiroli. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-204025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKisanrao Khobragade Education ... vs Bhojraj on 2 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kisanrao Khobragade Education ... vs Bhojraj on 2 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-03T20:06:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kisanrao Khobragade Education … vs Bhojraj on 2 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-03T20:06:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":954,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009\",\"name\":\"Kisanrao Khobragade Education ... vs Bhojraj on 2 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-03T20:06:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kisanrao Khobragade Education … vs Bhojraj on 2 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kisanrao Khobragade Education ... vs Bhojraj on 2 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kisanrao Khobragade Education ... vs Bhojraj on 2 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-03T20:06:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kisanrao Khobragade Education … vs Bhojraj on 2 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-03T20:06:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009"},"wordCount":954,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009","name":"Kisanrao Khobragade Education ... vs Bhojraj on 2 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-03T20:06:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kisanrao-khobragade-education-vs-bhojraj-on-2-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kisanrao Khobragade Education … vs Bhojraj on 2 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204025","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204025"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204025\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}