{"id":204285,"date":"2008-09-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008"},"modified":"2017-01-04T18:54:23","modified_gmt":"2017-01-04T13:24:23","slug":"sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri S D Nagaraj vs State Of Karnataka on 19 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri S D Nagaraj vs State Of Karnataka on 19 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: L.Narayana Swamy<\/div>\n
I\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 1931 DAY OF SEPFEMBER, 2003---..,\u00bb\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE _MR.JUS'I'ICE' L NARAYANAH s\u00a7;a{;aM*\u00a3 V' \n\nWRH' PETITION N0. 16176\/i\u00a3:{}5V'?:(GM\":.MMS)_.:\n\nB\u00e9:t:w-\"3311:\n\nSR! 8 1:: NAGARAJ\nS\/O RAMAKRISHNE GOWDA\n\nAGED 43 YEARS\n\nRm SQWMYA NILAYA\n\nBOW COLONY  \nNAGASHETTIHALLI BAN.GAL0I%?\u00a3..... _  '\n\nREP BYG;DA:,_:{0i,:5rs:\u00a7:\u00e9_.,  V   _ -\nSRiH SR\u00a7NIVAf\u00a7A'--R}:I;DD\" '-~._ %  _ '  PETITIONER\n\ngay SR1'? SESHAC\u00a7VI \u00a3?Z_i'4i\u20ac'g\u00a7,iZ?;\u20ac'ADVOCATE)\n\n1 \":=;fm:1%_Ei' \u00e9\"}?*..\u00a7{;1R%\u00a7\u00a3\u00a3\u00a7'AKA\nR\u00a3:PBfr' I'1'\"3'_i\u20ac31;E INDi_}S'\u00a5'RIE-S 1:.:E?AR':'MENT\n. vmH;:aNA--. saumm, BANG-1%LQRE~ 1\n\nTHA\u00a7:.T1;3\u00a3RE'\u00e9T0R 0;? M;1xfE:$ Aim GEOLOGY\n\n \"\u00a3{_\u00a3\u00a7.;\u00a2gNI?I;%, BHAVAN\n=_R?;.CE 'COWQSF, RQAE\n\n .._ 8A1?%GALQRE',\n\n \u00ab3, _ \"=';':-{E J\u20acZ}i'\u00a7'%\"I' DERECTOR\n\n\" 0;: MINES ANS GEOLGGY\n;:\u00a7I*$?,\u00bb3Y THE; RESPGMJENT No.3 IN\nREVISION NO. 2255199.;rd'e;,:z~i\u00a3\u00a7mf_\".;aNNExURE-G 3:5 FURTHER ISSUE\nN;?;cesSAR\u00a5;u';R.E<:':;1ez:;_"*1'#:2 THE RESPGNDENTS NOSE T0 4 TC)\nREF~\u00a5\ufb01i.3i--.'1f}~1'\u00a7:3i.'L}3;2*s\u00abSE3 ..QUARY"'i%'$R A FURTHER PERIOD OF 5 YEARS\ngm I;')Vi!j'=.R$If_\u00a7V.\ufb01%l\ufb02',E:'.V'$'\u00a7"V%R'IE RENEWAL APPLiCA'{'I{)N om: FELED BY\n\nmg P\ufb01fi-:*1*I'Q,N$i\u00e9F_QLii:\u00a7'i5 A'? ANNEX--P.\n\n ' This writ 'pietiticn coming on for pmrxaunaement of crders\n\n b6'{%{\u00a734f'\u00aeV "'i:1jze_ 601311: today after having heard and reservad for\n e:;*1{_*d\u00a7_rs, ' mads ms: foilmvingi\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
  ”  T1115 petitioner in this writ petitiejn has chailmtxg\ufb01d the order<\/p>\n
ga\u00e9sttd by the Re3p<311de\u00e9nt $30.3, the Joint E\ufb01irector of M11133 and<\/p>\n
"\\<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
Gttelogv”, Bangaiors: and \ufb01wther sought diI’\u20acCiiGI1 to the respondents 2
\n&, 3 Director and Jami, Bireetar of Miil\ufb01g anti G\u00e9cxiogy to:  the
\n$6336 01″ q’l;1a3Z”\u00a3’_\\F far further \ufb01ve years p’ur$11smt to
\napplicatisnn as per A;1I1ci:xum~\u00bbP. \u00ab u ”\n<\/p>\n
2. Tha fam 01′ the cage are 15113: t}”:\u00a2….5_{3::titi0,\u00a71\u00e9f”i1%:{{3 ‘fijaii\ufb01  <\/p>\n
app\ufb01cation fcxr quarry’ 16.2133 in S3:.N.  \u00absf   \u00a3:–i1;\u00e9\u00a2g_\u00a2,<\/p>\n
Bevanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Di:.~:1;ric*f: _c>’;r3.__1*’;2\u00a5\/xii:-,f3:391. f2itl..1.t1:4s:_;\u00a7e_.;cva%m<<\/p>\n
penit 0:?' time, Karnataka M:i\u00a71or Miae1;%3\u00a2\u00a5.,:_C<;;1Ces\u00a7s\u00a793jg Ri\ufb02es, 1969,<\/p>\n
herainafter 1*ef\u00a32;ri:c\u00a7..iff\u20ac:;he"– :9\u00e99\ufb02 1?'u1e~.i;' was prsvaltztxt. On 1315
\nbasis of the    was issued an 3Z4\/1992 in
\nfavuzrcur \u00absf the: petiii\u00a3\u00a7\u00a71e1*. '7{i;i<%:1g};{_"\\.'L11;:)ti\ufb01ca\u00a7i0n was issued, leas\ufb01 was
\nm::t_ .<ir_%c:11t\u00a7%:i\u00a7g-;11:;V_ his fa{?ciu\u00a5:H\u00a7\u00a71Hi'\u00ab%35\/2\/ 1999 Bafara \ufb01xecuiing the sai\u00e9<\/p>\n
Eeasiz-:._._ a f'n=:st1 n9"Li:iI1 W33 issued. The lease executed in favour :31″<\/p>\n
‘;.f\u00a3h.e patitjcii\ufb02ar i&\u00e9*3;\u00a7\u00a7”_v.<:h\u00e9\u00a71i\u00a7%;nged by the esarlisr iessse in 1'fiS}3\u20ac:Ct 0f the<\/p>\n
 ;~3am%: :\u00a7rziau"i:1 E%e:v'i:~;iio11 \u00a30.48\/92. The sa\u00e9d mvisien caina fr} he<\/p>\n
 pr: 21.9?\u00bb\/1992, against which he ;3r<~:fz:rr\u20acd Wxiit Petiticn<\/p>\n
  which 3150 came in ha dismis\ufb01ed. Eiawever, the<\/p>\n
  .  \u00a7:s\u00e9'ij\u00a7_i<;;:?;e;\u00a7 in fh\ufb01 saiti W'I'i'{ gctitien was permitted. to make an<\/p>\n
 \u00e9xp;\u00a7I;\u00a3\u00e9a.tiQn in 3;c\u20ac:<m:2a_13.11sr was<\/p>\n
4<\/span>
\nchallcng\u00e9zd fay 031$ S M Visixwanath in Ravision Petition N0223\/1999
\n{:31 {ha {“116 of the Diractor of Mmesr. and Gsoiogr, Bangaloztz wheji\ufb01in he<\/p>\n
challenged the said nofificatiozl on several greungis.\n<\/p>\n
noti\ufb01cation datcd 171′ 19~2~1\u00a7}\u00a7\u00a5Q was back in Eaves fer tixe\ufb01iiielssfofiz    <\/p>\n
coxxfxavsnes R1116 8-211 0:” that Kamxataka E\u00a7f1iii0:’~ .Mi;;1&r:g2:} {;’l\u00a33z::;:\u20ac:’*.3$i::s3;:<\/p>\n
R’l3.1fi3, 192%, h.ereina\ufb01x:::- r&sf\u20ac:rre;\u00a2:i to as ‘@116 ‘i3.jy*\u00a3};:c: ii\ufb01ievbj\u00e9f<\/p>\n
corisideraiion mzw Rules czanzzi into fi3I”\u20acT’jjE\u00a7\u00a7’:._ Tli\u00e9 j{}e1f;\u00a7.\ufb010i::,ei’*–;s’ii\u00a3’\u00a7;i;ittec}. V’<\/p>\n
that ih\u00e9 zmsra in qu<3s~.;tim1 was 1".i.f_\u00a71d \u00a3\u00ab1f\ufb01\u00abf;:1"\u00a73}T'Vhi:'jI'iV"F_3a V S\u00e9m:2.<sh\u00e9kar and<\/p>\n
affair his lease was lapsed, the ar\u20acawa3_f0 vbe"rz\u00a7t::\u20aci\ufb01a:i u.1:f?:\u00a3)Ii\u00a5i\u00a2’3’lIi}”3}g$\u00bbt\u20acE; tjgxai {Em area belsugg
\nto Stats (73~0Ve11:\u00a31:_1e:’:f\u00a3,  \ufb01o\ufb01\ufb01eti in the gazetttt for this
\n}31}i’}i30${“3 sgf gra:1ti11\u00a7E\u00a7a3Ve.VV    the kisses in reaped of the area
\nin ysriggaaz\ufb01  \ufb01ha ‘::re;,;:tv1ff_J’;\u00a7e\u00aba’;’\u00a3ia:>3:; was i$S{1\ufb01C\u00a7 on 17f 19–2- 19%?<\/p>\n
;1z14:1:e;s:ure}J–.:\u00a7z;1;<;v' :::;; ifij$\ufb01:=:c\u00a7 by tile. eariiszr lessee Sr: B "V Somash\ufb01kar in<\/p>\n
1323: \u00a71a1n%:~_r:\u00a7ii7._;;t1%\u00e9r '_:a.;1d:;'3ftar lease: was gmntad it was transfeszred ti)<\/p>\n
f_i1e ?'art3::e:".?\u00a7i3i;3 The pa;r"tx1\u20acrs of the Compazzy art: norm<\/p>\n
A  ;h_is v\u00e9ife and son. 80 accaztling is 31:: Q\ufb01tiii\ufb02ll\ufb01i', the said.<\/p>\n
 01" B ':3 \ufb01omashekar ami \u20ac31: \ufb02lfi $\u20acCQ}Z1d T\ufb01\ufb01p\ufb02\ufb02d\ufb01ilii<\/p>\n
  fi\u00e9liiil\ufb01\ufb01 magi \u00a3',%eoI\u00a3eg: is iii\ufb01gal anti visaiatioii ef provisiens of<\/p>\n
 gm;  v<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
3. it is furthcer submitted by the pa:-titioner that tbs: appljaticsn
\nma\ufb01a by 81′}. B V Somasshtzkar on \u00a3916\/1991 was cie\u20acz3.24e:c1V.1*t__”\u00a7r3:~:::tes:i<\/p>\n
wi\ufb01ain the ‘i;}Z1I’\u20acC’E Hmnths fmm the date 01″ such appiica\ufb01or\u00e9j iii.’ of<\/p>\n
the fact that umiier Rules of 1%9 Rzlkas, if apgklj\u00e9at-\u00a7\\r;\u00a7 :j,’:.L:’i:\u00a7 <\/p>\n
processed within three months, \u00a3116: ];”.iI’\u20aci$3;1}C}}.}L}1Li\u00a3>{i! isV f;\u00a73V:a:  3’a;idu ‘ . ”<\/p>\n
agzpiication is mjectcrd. Revisien Pctiti0:1:”:231a’\u00e9i_ \u00e9*’i:)y<\/p>\n
came. to be a\ufb02owed and the :t1c;ti:fir::3;t;i\u00a7)I} issued. ii: \u00a393611: 59f tbs.’<\/p>\n
pcttitionar was sat aSida’i’:. The sai{iV__\u00a7\u00a7Vif:i\u00a2r’v.\u00a7_\u00a7v*as..Ch\ufb01ilezig\u00e9d by the
\npetitionex’ in W P Nc\u00ab.2851?f   13$ disposed 0f on<\/p>\n
Z\u00a3\/3\/ 2005 jg5\u20actifi%%\ufb01%;f ;.:ci”‘ur–g?.; all the gmunds available
\nin the   The or\ufb01\u00e9tr in the gajd revi.si3.”c1er   the  respencirsni: has sat aaaide the<\/p>\n
VVV.j’;{J’~VEf3’\u00a7VLi}~31C\u00a3\u00a7\u00a3fZi01;;’\u00a5:” d\u00e9\u00a7;1\u00a7u.S1″‘ 1:9[2\/19\u00a7\u00a53 passed in {avatar of the petitizm\ufb02erx<\/p>\n
 _p6\ufb01\ufb02\u00e9n.\n<\/p>\n
 V’ ‘\u00a7_11%if’7& haartl the iaarnad ccunsei for the part;ir-:3 and pserfasad<\/p>\n
i\ufb01ti’~.{f(\ufb01COI”,l\u00a7\/3.3.\n<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
5. The Beast: granted in favom” of the pe\ufb01ticner by i\u00a33i.i)ti\ufb01C3.'{;iOI1
\n{iaiffd 3\/4\/1992 and S\u20acC{}l”1{I noti\ufb01catian dated 19\/2\/199\u20ac3″‘—-.~;;1;der<\/p>\n
19699 Rui\ufb01s was \ufb01rm subject matter in Ravi:-‘\u00a3011 petitimi <\/p>\n
by one B ‘J %n1ashf:kar. T116 contention of {mi r&visi011″\u00ab’3;_>2<3t&ti:):1xie$:*  <\/p>\n
that the had area becams: frea by vir?:"u.\u20ac: c;:?'i}1:<\u00e9"e.x1;3ira2t3\u00a7a3t\u00a7{?<;$\u00a5r" t}1e:';\u20ac.\u00e9\u00a7.::e<\/p>\n
gmnted in favour Csf the p\u20ac:titi<mr:r and "the15\u00e9aff.:=~._rA. \ufb021.si\u00e9\u00e9';t\u00a71 of \u00abis"svgii;t1ig?":;;VV<\/p>\n
nati\ufb01cation undetr R1113 841. of the }L9\u00a7\u00a5%i"'~i\u00a71}1\ufb01\u00e9, si\u00e9contl'<\/p>\n
r\ufb01sp\ufb02fid\ufb01\ufb01t have cmzlnzittad 611"}; \u20acfi"I'\u20ac)}"  t\ufb01e' Iat:iI’1cati0:1 dated<\/p>\n
3\/4\/1992 a11(3;v-‘sz:;:s:\u00a7f;:::.’Ii\u00e9s\u00e9gifacaiigyn’ i’?’,:v1v932~1<399 'uxlder Rule .1969
\nRul\ufb01s and byisgiziiuc 's:=\u00a7;;ti%V.}1E}.\u00a33iifi"\u00e9\u00a7 that once 133.8 appiicaticm \ufb01leti
\numier Sectiofs 6 919 \ufb01s:r:_ }\u00a3\u00a5{“”\u00a7%f%  is not consiciamd, ‘then it will be 21
\nziagziiagi 1~s::_%]f:\ufb01:i::3;r=t;i-:.E>1_i5{. By  v$i:;.n1.:=:, the second Imti\ufb01cation was i\ufb01\ufb01lii\ufb01d,<\/p>\n
I1t3\\2;\u00a5g’.\ufb01;;1l\u20acii$’\u00abc;\u00a73}f11\u00a2:’iIT\u00a71sE::ii3I’\u00a71\u20ac. Un\u00e9ar R1116: 8—A of 1994 Rulaeg, in case the<\/p>\n
 iand l\ufb01ia.3;i=v1::,;g,s: Tt.a3=. ‘\u00a3\u00ab’\u00a3i:1e5’ Gcv\u00e9mment, {rash netj\ufb01cation. \ufb01h\ufb02i\ufb02d have been<\/p>\n
‘v.i\u00a3\u00a7S\u00a5:f~:{\u00a3 in $11: gamti\u00e9; A in the mstani (raga, the said pmvigion has net<\/p>\n
–\u00a55%3\u20ac,?,\u20ac:!1_\u00a7:’}iesx;1=:x:i” the-. maponsiiszlts 1 tax 3. Thai: granting of lease in<\/p>\n
 fa7v:3f:;1\u00b0 0f  peiitiuner by 117.8 \ufb01rs: and $\u20aciC011{1 I.’\u20acSp{}1}d\u20ac\ufb02tS was<\/p>\n
 %111a$l:;\u20ac:kar 3’11 Ecvisian No.48] 199:2 ami ‘\u00a31616 same was<\/p>\n
 V  911$} erideci in the 033362’ passegi by the High Couzi in ‘\u00a34′ \u00a33′<\/p>\n
 :    \u00bb’ H Iudge<\/p>\n
7<\/span><\/p>\n
530.3401\/\u00a7}\u00a7. when such being the ease, the G\u00bb:::v\u20acr11me1:1.t ghouid have<\/p>\n
issueti zxetj\ufb01catjon under R1116 8A of the 19% Rulm.\n<\/p>\n
6. in View 01′ the abovci: p::)$;it:in of iaw in 31%:\n<\/p>\n
provisimis of 1.\u00a7i\/39 Rakes and 1.994 Rulc\u00e9s, case 0f the  <\/p>\n
been prtaperly’ cransider\u00e9d 33? {ha authorities. Eictn\u00e9t\ufb01i gave’-T.\u00a7fea:s0:i”‘  <\/p>\n
to mt\ufb01zfer\u00e9 in th\ufb01 Orfi\u00e9x” pasged by the Jzaiit\ufb01 Di_\u00a7”\ufb01\u00a2.’t5\u00a7   <\/p>\n
Geelagf in Revisinn \u00a7’~\u00a7<::.22Sf9\u00a7 czatgd _414\/8';A2':}s?.   \u00e9'fu:7':\ufb01:a:~ *~ <\/p>\n
sbs\u00e9rveci that in the imgugued crder AIii::;\u00a7::1:t-O "\u00a3;h\u00e9'\u00a2\u00a7(5i11i';:i3\u00a5\u00a71*eCtor<\/p>\n
has ciirectesrl the ::E:\u00a7"-;":1x-3.'{.{:\u20ac,:"5,";}\ufb01*i1:'.'}\u00ab.\u20ac':E3' "'\u00a3'::V~\u00ab:r\u00a3::nssic1e:r {.316 appiications
\nmceivsd in {J'ursv\u20ac;\u00a7znc'\u00a5: A.{\u00a7oi\u00a7i?iC::\u20ac%tji\u00a7\u00a7;n.&ated 4\/9] 2000 is rtzq11i:'\u20acci
\nto be madi\ufb01ed.  VVV\u00a3'c%$f'\ufb01;'};j.(i.'<\u00a7i"1ts. am {'h;("\u20acC"E,\u20ac:\u20acI. ti} 31331.16 fresh
\n:wti\ufb01;\u00a3:a\u00a7\u00a7on    iagggi. e:<;:1*:g1i0\u00a72M 311;:
\naccio\ufb01dag\ufb01\u00e9r\u00e9   ‘ \u00ab  “‘<\/p>\n
wi&;.::u’s \u00a2i3s\u00e9’:wsaa;’\u00a2i;, pmtion is rejecm.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri S D Nagaraj vs State Of Karnataka on 19 September, 2008 Author: L.Narayana Swamy I IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 1931 DAY OF SEPFEMBER, 2003—..,\u00bb BEFORE THE HON’BLE _MR.JUS’I’ICE’ L NARAYANAH s\u00a7;a{;aM*\u00a3 V’ WRH’ PETITION N0. 16176\/i\u00a3:{}5V’?:(GM”:.MMS)_.: B\u00e9:t:w-“3311: SR! 8 1:: NAGARAJ S\/O RAMAKRISHNE GOWDA […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-204285","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri S D Nagaraj vs State Of Karnataka on 19 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri S D Nagaraj vs State Of Karnataka on 19 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-04T13:24:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri S D Nagaraj vs State Of Karnataka on 19 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-04T13:24:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1288,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri S D Nagaraj vs State Of Karnataka on 19 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-04T13:24:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri S D Nagaraj vs State Of Karnataka on 19 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri S D Nagaraj vs State Of Karnataka on 19 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri S D Nagaraj vs State Of Karnataka on 19 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-04T13:24:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri S D Nagaraj vs State Of Karnataka on 19 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-04T13:24:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008"},"wordCount":1288,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008","name":"Sri S D Nagaraj vs State Of Karnataka on 19 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-04T13:24:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-d-nagaraj-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-19-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri S D Nagaraj vs State Of Karnataka on 19 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204285","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=204285"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/204285\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=204285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=204285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=204285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}